Re: [QGIS-Developer] WARNING No QgsCoordinateTransformContext context set for transform

Andreas, I've dealt with two sources of such warnings today, one which caused one warning on every canvas redraw (the north arrow decoration), the other caused many warnings upon (re-)drawing the content of the overview panel. One of the few remaining sources of warnings is with the WMS/XYZ

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Concerns re UX of new "duplicate features" actions in 2.99

I share those concerns too. The integration with parts of QGIS is sub-optimal. For e.g., the added (and always visible) menu bar in the attribute form. I'm not sure is should be there at all, and if so, certainly not when the layer's edit mode is OFF. IMHO, I'd disable/remove less-than-optimal

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

+1 to set a release date for the last week of January. That'll give us 2 weeks of freeze period (assuming the vote turns out not to extend the soft freeze) which can be used to focus on fixes only. The soft freeze period saw a nice set of fixes too, which was nice. On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:48

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

I'm -1 to label 3.0 a "beta" product. I'd argue that in many respects, 3.0 is a more stable and reliable product than 2.18. On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote: > Am 02.01.2018, 23:39 Uhr, schrieb Nyall Dawson : > > > >>> I

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Disable scratch layer warning on closing project

That is, have your plugin set that setting to false upon loading. I wasn't suggesting to switch the overall default to false. On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 16:08 Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > Chris, > > There is: > > QgsSettings().value( QStringLiteral( "askToSaveMemoryLayers" ),

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Disable scratch layer warning on closing project

Chris, There is: QgsSettings().value( QStringLiteral( "askToSaveMemoryLayers" ), true, QgsSettings::App ) Switch that to false, that'll disable the warning. I was wondering how long it'd take for the memory layer saver plugin to switch that off ;) On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 13:15 Chris Crook

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Early 3.4 point release?

Nyall, thanks for having raised this (and fixed that horrific regression). Jürgen, thanks for that extra flexibility, much appreciated. On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 8:08 PM Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 01. Nov 2018 at 21:47:06 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > > I meant 2018-11-02.

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Early 3.4 point release?

That's rather unfortunate, but most probably needed. The issue raised, 20262, affects WMS(T), XYZ, WFS, etc. layers. On top of - and very much due to - the gravity of the bug itself, 3.4 is flagged as LTR, and it'd be most appropriate to insure that people jumping onto this new LTR aren't left

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suitability of backporting browser layer preview feature to 3.4?

Absolutely. It was the right move to not add that as part of backported browser panel fixes for emergency 3.4.1, but it should ultimately be in the LTR to fix a feature gone missing regression. On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, 6:54 AM Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm looking for thoughts on whether

Re: [QGIS-Developer] What to do about WFS test failures?

Can these failures be reproduced locally if one repeatedly tests those cases? On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 07:02 Nyall Dawson wrote: > On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 20:37, Richard Duivenvoorde > wrote: > > > And myself I also have the feeling that WFS is less stable > > This is my experience too, which is why

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] QGIS 2.18 EOL approaching?

Jumping in the discussion to offer thoughts on the bigger picture here: while we have a few dozen regressions filed against 3.4 LTR, it's also true that 3.4 LTR has _countless_ fixes and refinements - not referring to new features here - when compared to 2.18 which adds a big amount of positive in

Re: [QGIS-Developer] GSoC 2019 for QGIS 3D Improvement Proposal

Regarding on-screen navigation, it'd be good to think of an implementation that would work for both 2D as well as 3D map canvases when conceptualizing the way ahead (I'm not suggesting you implement this as part of this GSoC plan, just seeding the idea as it might shape way you move forward). It'd

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Request for Change of UserAgent

I would really like to understand (i.e. get an explanation) from the OSM admins as to why a user agent that explicitly identifies itself as QGIS like we have now is not enough for them before moving forward. Being a web admin/developer myself, I can hardly find a reason why that's not enough.

Re: [QGIS-Developer] installing 3.6 missing dll

Unless the standalone install executable file has been re-uploaded with the missing EXIV2.DLL dependency, I can confirm this is an issue here on windows 10 using the 64-bit standalone installer. Math On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:41 PM Lene Fischer wrote: > Made a re-re installation again this

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Branch protection enabled for 3.4

Thanks for the reminder Nyall, I'd totally forgotten about this. On Sat, Feb 23, 2019, 8:24 AM Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a heads up: now that 3.4 is officially the LTR, I've enabled > github branch protection on the branch. This means all commits to the > branch must now: > 1. Go

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Get rid of 'Manage Layers Toolbar', or not?

For the record, this toolbar is already hidden by default. Some people like the one-button unified dialog, some prefer the individual provider buttons. I don't see why we'd want / what we'd gain to remove this hidden-by-default toolbar. On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 7:14 PM Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Improvement to the plugin manager's upgradeable plugins details

Could we take it a step at a time and proceed with adding the changelog bit to the plugin.xml file first? The fixed UX will probably provide additional motivation for authors. On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, 6:56 PM Paolo Cavallini wrote: > this would also be nice for users. > thanks. > > On 11/03/19

[QGIS-Developer] Improvement to the plugin manager's upgradeable plugins details

Greetings, While applying a couple of commits to QGIS' plugin manager, I would like to fix a long-standing UX issue with it, namely that plugins that show a newer version available do _not_ show the latest changelog but rather the changelog of the currently installed plugin version. It'd much

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Improvement to the plugin manager's upgradeable plugins details

; > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:38 AM Mathieu Pellerin > wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> While applying a couple of commits to QGIS' plugin manager, I would like >> to fix a long-standing UX issue with it, namely that plugins that show a >> new

Re: [QGIS-Developer] GSoC QGIS 3D Improvement: Week 2 Report

Nice progress. I feel it'd be really important to figure out a way to creating some floating controls here, the current approach eats so much space it'll likely be unusable with docked 3d maps. On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 18:40 Tim Sutton wrote: > Hi Ismail > > > Looking great! I was wondering:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] SSL Performance Overhead

For the record, sending unencrypted data over a local network isn't safe as soon as WIFI is part of said local network. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 17:02 Martin Dobias wrote: > Hi Matthias > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > > > The documentation currently promises "massive

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Expressions with aggregate in PyQGIS

This is such an instructive reply it should be added to stackexchange straight away! :) On Mon, May 20, 2019, 07:37 Nyall Dawson wrote: > On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 01:21, Anita Graser wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to add an example of an aggregate expression to my recent > PyQGIS 101

[QGIS-Developer] cdash down? travis submission to cdash failing

FYI, for the last ~24 hours, travis builds fail to submit test results to our cdash instance (https://dash.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php?project=QGIS). The website itself appears to be down most of the time too. Known issue? ___ QGIS-Developer mailing

Re: [QGIS-Developer] GSoC QGIS 3D Improvement: Week 7 Report

Nice screencast. Are billboards able to handle alpha/opacity channel for a given raster? On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 20:10 Ismail Sunni wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Hehe, yeah, I am the one who missed it. I put it in my billboard > repository now: >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Some thought on LTR

Matthias, you're raising a good point on the 2.0 vs 3.4 (I'd argue 2.18 vs 3.4 too). Sometimes we tend to get so "passionate" about specific bugs that impact our own workflows that we end up not seeing the forest for the trees. 3.4 LTS is overall a much, much more solid product than 2.18 was and

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Crashes on exit

Calvin, A fair amount of crashers and stability issues have been resolved in 3.8.1, which'll be out in a few days. Give that a try. If you still find it unstable, actionable information describing crashes and issues are needed (since you're a plugin dev, I'm sure that's familiar to you ;) ). If

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Crashes on exit

While discussing this further with Nathan, disabling the crash reporter might not be the right solution as it'd most likely bring the OS crash dialog anyways. We'd need for the crash reporter to detect specific traces and silently fail when it detects a useless / harmless trace. There's also the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Crashes on exit

Jurgen, would we be able to include the debug symbols for the build on the > normal installers for once release cycle while this is still an issue? That > would be super handy to catch this and other issues that come up. > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:44 PM Mathieu Pellerin > wr

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Updating osgeo4w to qt 5.12.4/5.13.1

Just checked, 5.12.5 was released a few days ago, nice! https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-5.12.5-released On Thu, Sep 26, 2019, 07:39 Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > FYI, 5.12.4 (and 5.13.1 I believe) has an issue that breaks CSS-based > themes (night mapping, blend of gray). > > A fix has be

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Updating osgeo4w to qt 5.12.4/5.13.1

FYI, 5.12.4 (and 5.13.1 I believe) has an issue that breaks CSS-based themes (night mapping, blend of gray). A fix has been committed and will be available in 5.12.5. On Thu, Sep 26, 2019, 06:31 Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Is there any plans on the horizon for updating the Qt build in

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Popular plugins

Question regarding download count: if I merely upgrade a plugin, does the download to upgrade the plugin counts as an overall download? We could have a refined popularity count if we'd find a way to come up with an active users count (which shouldn't be that difficult to implement, info could be

Re: [QGIS-Developer] LTR management [was Re: Delaying 3.10.1?]

Add to what was said (which I don't disagree with per say). I think it's important to note that this GDAL3/PROJ6 transition was always going to be rocky (whether we applied it to 3.4 LTR or delayed it of 4 months when 3.10 LTR will replace 3.4. One reason being most core developers are on linux

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Delaying 3.10.1?

The consorted efforts this past week across three open source projects (!) to fix serious regressions following one of the first "mainstream" exposure of next gen gdal3/proj6 codebase through QGIS has been heartening to witness. Congrats to all involved! Do we have a new release date set for

Re: [QGIS-Developer] LTR management [was Re: Delaying 3.10.1?]

n this would be a good opportunity to do an > ad-hoc investment into Jürgen (given that he has some of his precious time > left to actually work on this and that he does not completely disagree with > me). > > Best regards > > Matthias > On 11/28/19 1:47 AM, Nathan Woodrow wr

Re: [QGIS-Developer] LTR management [was Re: Delaying 3.10.1?]

+1 to end 3.4 cycle a few months early too. On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 05:57 Nathan Woodrow wrote: > +1 on dropping support early as the risk is large on breaking the users > experience with a LTR > > On Thu., 28 Nov. 2019, 8:55 am Even Rouault, > wrote: > >> > I think the issues are deeper then

Re: [QGIS-Developer] LTR management [was Re: Delaying 3.10.1?]

Ouch! ;) yes, 2020. On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 16:57 Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > On Thu, 28. Nov 2019 at 15:36:39 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > > For the record, according to schedule, 3.4 reaches its end of life on > > February 21st, 2010. > > 2020? &

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 3.10.0 in hard freeze, should we branch master as unfreeze for 3.12?

I'm also -0 to branch off early, as I think it's a missed opportunity to get core devs to stick to soon-to-be-released 3.10 for as long as possible (and therefore oh-so slightly increase the chance of core devs stumbling on a bug he/she can fix prior to release :) ) . On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:02

Re: [QGIS-Developer] What to do about GDAL and PROJ for 3.10.2?

Having helped out chasing down some of these CRS and transformation issues under GDAL3/PROJ6, I too feel *very* uncomfortable shipping the next QGIS point release with anything lesser than GDAL3 and PROJ6 master as of yesterday. To be clear, QGIS had plenty to fix itself, and that’s been taken

Re: [QGIS-Developer] What to do about GDAL and PROJ for 3.10.2?

Great news, best way to open 2020 :) On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 14:14 Kristian Evers wrote: > > > On 19 Dec 2019, at 03:37, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > > Having helped out chasing down some of these CRS and transformation issues > under GDAL3/PROJ6, I too feel *very* uncomfortable

[QGIS-Developer] osgeo4w's qgis-dev package broken, proj_7_0.dll missing

FYI, the qgis-dev package is currently broken, reporting it can't start because proj_7_0.dll is missing. I think some dll referencing needs updating (proj recently renamed its forthcoming branch to 6.3, and I can see a proj_6_3.dll floating around). ___

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

Fantastic, thank you. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 15:48 Anita Graser wrote: > I can do it. > > Regards, > Anita > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:15 AM Mathieu Pellerin > wrote: > >> Jürgen, thanks for the successful re-release of 3.10.2. >> >> Paolo, Anita, w

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

gt;> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Thanks Mathieu. Should it be 3.10.2 or 3.10.3? Asking because those who >>> have already downloaded the broken 3.10.2 may not think to update. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Harrissou >>> >>> Le me

[QGIS-Developer] Good news: next Ubuntu version shipping with gdal3/proj6

Here's a nice Sunday news: Ubuntu 20.04 (ETA end of April) will ship with gdal 3 (at the moment 3.0.3, hopefully will be 3.0.4 by release day to fix a nasty bug) and proj 6.3. This can likely increase the number of QGIS core devs using this next gen pair of libraries, which would undeniably help

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Good news: next Ubuntu version shipping with gdal3/proj6

Bas, Thanks for the update, and big thanks for the efforts you've put into this over the years. I've updated my system too, no big regression, nice to live in the future :) On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 19:17 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 2/2/20 9:52 AM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > > Here

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Are the Projection Problems Fixed in 3.10?

It's wise of you not to have your department jump on a .0 release. All known (ie reported through filing) protection issues have been resolved. That said, you should also take on the task of stress testing the latest version against your department's workflows and datasets. Unreported issues are

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

Jürgen, thanks for the successful re-release of 3.10.2. Paolo, Anita, who is in a position to publish the drafted post on the blog? On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 10:59 Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > +1 to that plan. We're 33% done already since the blocking PR has been > merged. > > On Wed,

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Good news: next Ubuntu version shipping with gdal3/proj6

Nice, Ubuntu 20.04 (LTR) shipping with gdal 3.0.4 and proj 6.3.1 is really sweet. Any plan to update QGIS to 3.10? 3.4 reaches it's end of life in the coming few days. Math On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:57 PM Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2020-02-18 10:45, Denis Rouzaud wrote: > > Is this correct

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Good news: next Ubuntu version shipping with gdal3/proj6

Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2020-02-18 11:00, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > > Any plan to update QGIS to 3.10? 3.4 reaches it's end of life in the > > coming > > few days. > > Yes, but this will probably be too late for focal, as recently discussed > on th

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

are very happy that QGIS 3.10 is now in shape to replace 3.4 > as LTR in a month time. > > Bests > Matthias > > > On 1/22/20 10:58 AM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > > Paolo, here's the draft blog post: > > *Public Service Announcement: Update to the latest point rele

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

. Happy mapping! [1] https://north-road.com/2019/09/03/qgis-3-10-loves-geopdf/ [2] https://gdalbarn.com/ On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Fully agreed. Mathieu, would you like to write it? > Thanks. > > On 21 January 2020 06:39:08 GMT+04:00, Mathieu Pellerin

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

d the broken 3.10.2 may not think to update. > > Regards, > Harrissou > > Le mer. 22 janv. 2020 à 11:05, Mathieu Pellerin a > écrit : > >> Matthias, >> >> Good idea. >> >> Math >> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:02 PM Matthias

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

Sure, I can draft something by the end of the day. On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Fully agreed. Mathieu, would you like to write it? > Thanks. > > On 21 January 2020 06:39:08 GMT+04:00, Mathieu Pellerin < > nirvn.a...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

+100 on all that's been said here. Also, once 3.10.2 is updated to include the updated packages & above-referred fix, I'd suggest writing a QGIS.org blog post to inform users of the worthiness of updating to 3.10.2(.2) *ASAP*, and expand a bit on why 3.10.0/.1 were such rough releases. We can

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Raster pipeline issues

+1 If in doing so we could unlock resampling for reprojected rasters, woupidou. On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 04:46 Martin Dobias wrote: > Hi all > > With the recent addition of contour renderer of rasters I have > realized there are artifacts coming to the renderer from the earlier > stages (the

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Travis failing in QGIS-Documentation

Denis, Thanks for all the work improving and fixing this. Math On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 3:12 PM Denis Rouzaud wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, I am somehow responsible for the failure of the recent Docker > images on master (release branches were apparently not affected). > > The images were apparently

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Qt LTS no longer Open Source

What a sad milestone. On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, 21:57 Tim Sutton wrote: > Hi All > > In case you missed it, it seem the hammer has dropped on the Qt closing > off their LTS versions now: > > https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2021-January/040798.html > > > > Regards > > Tim > > -- >

[QGIS-Developer] Nominatim integration in QGIS

a formal request seeking permission from OSMF to go ahead and merge these features. Would it be possible for you, as chair of the QGIS.org association, to send an email to the OSMF/Nominatim folks on this? Best, Mathieu Pellerin [1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/40669

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS master and 3.16 dev version crashing when opening Options dialogue

Andreas, it should be fixed as of this commit ( https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/c4306e18e85145c43331fc871bfb2691dcd55505) merged earlier today. On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:09 PM Andreas Neumann wrote: > This is self-compiled, on Ubuntu-Linux 18.04 (Kubuntu). > > Thanks, > > Andreas > > On

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS master and 3.16 dev version crashing when opening Options dialogue

The fix was committed hours ago :) On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:23 PM Andreas Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you Jürgen and Mathieu for your replies! > > Hm - but my build is from "yesterday". and the issues you mention had been > committed about 2 weeks ago? > > Anyway - I am currently

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Google summer of code: On-the-fly raster calculator

Woupidou! Super excited about this. On Tue, May 18, 2021, 4:50 PM Martin Dobias wrote: > Good news everyone, > > this year we will have Francesco Bursi working on his summer of code > project to introduce on-the-fly raster calculator to QGIS! Please join me > in welcoming him to our amazing

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Unscheduled 3.18.1 release?

Add the following to the list of serious issue: - raster URIs using /vsi{zip,curl,etc.}/ won't load anymore: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/41888 (fix PR open) +1 to have an early .1 release. On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 2:15 PM Nyall Dawson wrote: > So. 3.18.0 is unfortunately proving to

Re: [QGIS-Developer] R: GSoC 2021 QGIS On-the-fly Raster Calculator proposal draft review and feedback

Big interest on my side too (and I'm sure countless more). I always thought ESA's SNAP had a winning formula with their virtual raster bands, glad we can make any move in that direction. Math On Tue, Apr 13, 2021, 20:57 Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi Francesco, > > This is a great initiative,

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Urgent: news feed certificate has expired again

-1 on non secure feed, opens the door wide open for injection attacks. It would be nice to have some form of automated reminder so we avoid these unfortunate lapses as much as possible though :) On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:25 PM Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > Can someone renew the certificate

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS LTR releases -- is it time to pull the plug?

If packaging a brand new release is "faster" and "simpler" than updating our website, there's something to improve there ;-P We should have a clear procedure to allow for designated person(s) to be able to swiftly revert a release on the website (manual edits if need be). On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] QGIS LTR releases -- is it time to pull the plug?

Big supportive +1 on looking back at what happened during this last month with the LTR, draw some lessons and take remedial actions. Most urgently: we _absolutely_ need to stop advertising 3.16.13 LTR on the website and fallback to 3.16.11 for now; can someone with access to the website do that

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS LTR releases -- is it time to pull the plug?

Right, we still need to kill the MSI installer, which is the one people will hit first. On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:30 PM Andrea Giudiceandrea wrote: > Il 16/11/2021 08:27, Mathieu Pellerin ha scritto: > > If packaging a brand new release is "faster" and "simpler"

Re: [QGIS-Developer] URGENT AS CAN BE: QGIS 3.16.12 and sip 6?

Whether we release a new point release or not, we should definitely release a public service announcement on our social media accounts. On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 07:25 Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi Nyall, > > On Fri, 05. Nov 2021 at 08:28:33 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > > We also then need to push

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Override System Locale user interface with American English by Default?

caring about the > context of the string, which ends up in very strange and nonsense. > > Thanks for your opinions > > Alex > > Mathieu Pellerin escreveu no dia quinta, > 24/03/2022 à(s) 11:39: > >> Could we not have some means to attach a quality value to each language &g

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Override System Locale user interface with American English by Default?

lled > into code base. The issue here is that pt_PT has issues with the quality of > the translated strings. > > Regards, > Harrissou > > Le jeu. 24 mars 2022 à 12:39, Mathieu Pellerin via QGIS-Developer < > qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> a écrit : > >> Could we no

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Override System Locale user interface with American English by Default?

Could we not have some means to attach a quality value to each language (eg at the very least % translated), and only force English on poorly translated languages? I feel forcing English by default would be a disservice to the part of the community that spends hours to translate QGIS. On Thu, Mar

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Current state of QGIS and Qt 6 (good news!)

Oh, by the way, we'll need to adapt Find{Qca,QWT,etc}.cmake to behave nicely on systems where both qt5 and qt6 libraries are installed. Atm it'll randomly pick one or the other. We can make use of BUILD_WITH_QT6 there. On Sat, Aug 20, 2022, 15:22 Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > Richard, >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Current state of QGIS and Qt 6 (good news!)

Richard, FYI, I've been able to compile QGIS against Qt6 (6.2.4) on Ubuntu 22.04. Few notes: - We're lucky, Ubuntu 22.04 has a Qt6 keychain package, you should use this one, that reduces the nb of libs to compile to 3 - As Matthias suggested, I'd install the libraries - The QCA_INCLUDE_DIR has to

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Finishing Visual Changelog for export to site

Same here, I'd appreciate a day On Sun, Feb 25, 2024, 03:24 Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer < qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, 12:41 am Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer, < > qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> As release 3.36

<    1   2   3