Yep I'm down for that, would look pretty nice if we can I think. Bit like
what VS Code, pycharm etc do for different file types.
Would be still handy to see if it's line, point, etc so just need to
consider that.
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017, 6:26 PM McDonaldR wrote:
> Hi List,
>
y 2017 at 09:10, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> > A common workflow that leads to this situation is when working on
> shapefiles
> > and then using them in a processing algorithm that involves an external
> > process. The processing situation co
>
A common workflow that leads to this situation is when working on
shapefiles and then using them in a processing algorithm that involves an
external process. The processing situation could be avoided (detect if
potentially dangerous operations like a delete have been performed since
the last
I thought I turned that on a while ago?
IMO +1 on this because it makes things nicer to read.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Nyall Dawson
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Been thinking about this lately, with all the excellent work which is
> being done on sipify and improving
Hey,
I think most of us are pretty busy just with the ramp up to 3.0. The idea
is fine however the proposal requires hosting map tiles, which may come at
a large cost if hit hard. I think your best bet is to follow leads on that
front first, if you can get someone to step up to host the tiles
You won't be able to get the doc strings like that in 2.x as we never
included them in the sip files meaning they are never exposed to Python.
The automatic sip generation which also includes docs string is only for
3.x.
Nathan
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, 7:31 AM Kevin Stadler
Hey Andreas,
They are really two different things. $geometry is really a function that
takes no arguments. This has been deprecated in favour calling with ()
e.g geometry().
@ is only for variables.
So you can explain it that $ used to be a shorthand way of calling a
function that took no
I would say it's a case of bad docs as it's just a QVariant::Type and other
providers use it already.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Mark Johnson
wrote:
> >> What makes you think that?
> Based on the implementation of the QgsSpatiaLiteProvider (which only
> supports
Should be real 3D from talks with Martin.
Nathan
On Wed, 24 May 2017, 12:41 AM Syd Visser wrote:
> I have a question on the 3D that was proposed in the grant for the use
> with QT 3D. Am i wrong to think this is really oriented towards what some
> people call 2.5D
Ok that's all fine. Was just tabling the idea. Doesn't really affect me was
just an idea mainly.
Nathan
On Mon, 22 May 2017, 11:34 PM Neumann, Andreas wrote:
> I agree with most other responses. I would like to see QGIS server remain
> in the main repo. One of the reasons
Hey all,
I'm starting to wonder if we need to split up the code base into different
repos for the different sub projects?
At the moment I think it would be best for QGIS Server to live in it's own
repo mainly because it means the development process and cycle can be
different to desktop if that
ps Nathan: any news on your profile work?
Yeah getting there, just doing clean up etc. Busy at work at the moment but
hopefully this weekend.
We also need something to deal with these key changes to help people
migrate from 2 to 3. We need a transform settings function.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at
Hey,
Yes if you are needing speed you should avoid going via the edit buffer in
the layer. You should get the data provider off the layer once and then
just call the delete, update, add feature methods on there. It will avoid
the edit buffer and commit overhead that you get and no doubt are
Hey,
Postgres, SQL Server, etc are all 1 based. Hence the alignment with that
logic.
- Nathan
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Trying to create a rule based style I encountered/used the 'substr'
> function to find the first
Hey all,
Maybe this has been raised before, but do we really need all the copyright
header stuff in the source files? If they needed to make a source release
they could be added using a script.
I find it just fluff that clutters the files when I can't really see much
need. We already have the
Hey Andreas,
Parent means the parent expression itself. So in a function, you can know
what the whole expression is e.g it points to the instance of.
You can't really know what the layer because expressions are not always
layer bound and QgsFeatures don't hold a reference to the layer they are
Hey,
Yes, that is fine. You can use Apache libraries in a GPL applications (I
think QGIS already does) just not the other way around e.g you can't make
an Apache application that includes GPL code.
- Nathan
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Enrico Ferreguti
wrote:
> Hi
Hey Eduardo,
Thanks for the intro. Great to hear about the promotion you will and have
been doing. Thanks for kind words about the project.
Regards,
Nathan
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Yeah don't change anything like this in a LTR. It's not a good idea for
trust.
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, 5:24 PM Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > Please don't. Embedded code copies are a PITA. QGIS has too many of
> those already (although they're generally not required).
>
> I agree in
We use Jinja2 for QGIS stuff so I would use that.
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Hey Simran,
Nice work on making some custom expressions. I'm happy to take a pull
request for my expressions plus plugin to allow other people to use them.
Send me a PR with the changes and I can merge them for you.
Regards,
Nathan
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Khare Simran
Where's the fun in software if we aren't breaking stuff last minute ;)
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, 7:38 PM Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Nyall,
>
> On Sat, 01. Apr 2017 at 12:27:37 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there's any chance of an immediate follow up to the
> >
Hey Larry,
I have some slides from my talk just recently in New Zealand if you want to
use some of it. The slide deck uses the new logo and style guide which
looks pretty good.
You can find the slides here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/85jxstidntb8e8t/QGIS%20NZ%20-%202017.pptx?dl=0
Regards,
The wiki information got outdated very fast, and was also not translatable
easily.
A decision was made a while ago for official documentation should be done
int the same workflow
as the website in order to streamline that process and make sure everyone
is using the same tools.
- Nathan
On Sat,
Sure thing. I have so much time because who needs to work when MS sends me
money for being a shill :)
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> wrote:
> On 03/07/2017 12:32 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> > As a Mircosoft shill, I'm a super -1 on this.
I'm not sure we need the headers in the sip files to make a python docs API
do we. That is the first thing to work out.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 6:23 pm Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we still lack a up-to-date comprehensive documentation targeted to
> Python QGIS
Yeah I'm not really ok with a empty table as the default. I understand the
point but users are going freak at that.
One option might be to ask users what they want when a table is first
opened for the first time. E.g what default mode would you like with some
notes on each. This is only asked
at 6:35 PM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 7 March 2017 at 09:32, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> As a Mircosoft shill, I'm a super -1 on this. How will I make my money
> from
> >> Microsoft for making QGIS on Windo
As a Mircosoft shill, I'm a super -1 on this. How will I make my money
from Microsoft for making QGIS on Windows better?
:)
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:07 AM, wrote:
> Isn't it possible that g++ will also run on Windows with c++17 support or
> that MSVC will have the
Hmm cool idea. Is there benefit to including it as core vs outside plugin?
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 7:46 pm Alexander Bruy wrote:
> Sorry for raising this again.
>
> I've added plugin package to the QEP (will work with QGIS 2.14.x/2.18.x).
> Two sample (and very basic)
Yes. Less magic the better
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 2:30 pm Martin Dobias wrote:
> Hi Nyall
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Nyall Dawson
> wrote:
> > Just want to raise a discussion about this. What does everyone think
> > about these and whether we
Hey all,
Just note that we can ship a older icon "theme" and use the theme switcher
feature which would allow people to change back if required.
Default to the new one but ship a lagacy theme. Have a look at Night
Mapping to see how it's done.
- Nathan
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Paolo
Yeah I'm a -1 on this at the moment. There have been times that I have
used it even after the new rendering stuff.
- Nathan
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Denis Rouzaud
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a big -1 on this.
>
> We often use this for digitizing operations such as
Do you have the commit where it was removed? That would normally have the
message on why.
Nathan
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 5:06 pm Andrea Peri wrote:
> Hi,
> we at Tuscany Region in 2013 fundedthe adding of the support of scale
> legend in the wms provider.
> That (if I
Hey,
I was thinking about handling that case in my work as per QEP 82 (
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/82).
Regards,
Nathan
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:42 PM, DelazJ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've enabled QGIS 3 on a Windows machine where 2.18 and 2.14 are
It's the same code, just in dock form. I find the browser dock to be super
helpful but have never used the standalone version.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 19-02-17 23:33, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wanted to raise the
I'm not sure we need to break the project here though right? The xml can
stay the same just the API and UI is different.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
> Il 07/02/2017 10:59, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>
> > Well, ideally not. Currently we only
Great work Jurgen.
Thanks for all your work on this.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:20 PM, DelazJ wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My daily update of osgeo4w installed today qgis-dev (2.99), meaning that
> qgis 3 dev can now be easily installed (and tested?) on Windows.
> Wonderful!
>
> Big
Which ones?
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 6:17 pm Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Il 27/01/2017 09:13, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
>
> > Can I ask for all devs to use the WIP (Work in Progress) label in
> > https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api issues?
>
> looking at this, I see
Hey,
What times and dates do we have on those?
Regards,
Nathan
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
> Hi all,
> AFAICT, we mostly agree on:
> * freezing just after Essen HF, with possibility of delaying it in case
> the need will arise there
> *
Hey Jürgen,
Thanks very much. I have a build working but nothing something that I would
share as has a few hacks to make it work.
Regards,
Nathan
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer <j...@norbit.de> wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> On Fri, 13. Jan 2017 at 21:57:40 +1000,
What about a cross out though the icon, to show not enabled?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Alexandre Neto
wrote:
> Mathieu Pellerin escreveu no dia segunda,
> 16/01/2017 às 00:04:
>
>> +1 on updating the icon, -1 to introducing color icon in the
+1 for me. Icons should have the same meaning over all the application.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Alexandre Neto
wrote:
> Proposal: for consistency, change the current mIconProjectionEnable and
> mIconProjectionDisable Icons. These are the Icons next to the EPSG
Hey,
Do we have an update when we might have nightly builds for Windows for QGIS
3.0 for users to test?
Giving the large number of changes in 3 we need lots of ramp up time for
users to test with.
Regards,
Nathan
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
com
>> >> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
>> >> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/u
>> sers/19667/luigi-pirelli
>> >> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
>> >> * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition:
>> >> *
>> >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-bu
*
> >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-
> intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition
> >>
> >>
> **
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11 January
As the QML has now turned into more then just style I think a full rename
is in order for what it is, which is really all the layer properties.
We can then have a new file type for just style information.
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 4:25 pm Alexander Bruy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
ot; to "File"
> either.
> Going into detail: shouldn't "Project Properties..." go into the
> "Project" menu then (and be renamed to "Properties")?
> "Snapping Options..." are currently placed in settings, but are a
> project's setting.
Ignore the project properties in there was just a mistake in UI file.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 6:09 pm Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 January 2017 at 13:11, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I wou
Hey all,
I would like to propose a new QGIS menu item that in the menu before the
Project item. This menu item will contain all the stuff in the Settings
Menu, Exit QGIS, and some of the stuff from the Help menu like About
Motivation: A lot of application have a "Application" menu with
How long does the build vs test run itself take?
- Nathan
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> On 4 January 2017 at 07:59, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > Hi René-Luc, hi all,
> >
> > This is something I have been afraid of for a couple
Hey,
Which major broken stuff has been left for years?
- Nathan
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:43 pm Giovanni Manghi
wrote:
> Hi Nyall, Tim,
>
>
> > I'd prefer to prioritise a High priority bug which affects 90% of
> > users over a regression which affects 0.05% of users.
Hey Mark,
A QEP should be opened in order for review to take place on any design
changes that might need descussion.
Also please note that 2.x is not receiving any new features as we are now
working on 3.0. 2.x will only be bug fixes.
Regards,
Nathan
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 7:29 pm Mark Johnson
I think we have to put a level of trust in here. If the source is
available (ship it with the plugin please) and the user is trustworthy I
don't see a lot of harm here.
It's not ideal to have binary downloads however there are some use cases
for that so I would hate to not allow it when the rest
IMO anything core is no longer a plugin, processing included. We don't
have these options for stuff like Python console etc so it doesn't make
sense to have it for the rest.
- Nathan
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Régis Haubourg
wrote:
> Hi all,
> just a reminder
To be clear this isn't removing the ability to have C++ plugins, just
having core plugins and making them optional.
- Nathan
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Neumann, Andreas
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before we remove the ability to have C++ plugins, or the ability to
>
gt; On 12 December 2016 at 21:14, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Yes please. if it's core (plugin or not) it shouldn't be optional and
> should
> > be enabled always.
> > It's just confusing for people and honestly doesn't feel right h
+1
Yes please. if it's core (plugin or not) it shouldn't be optional and
should be enabled always.
It's just confusing for people and honestly doesn't feel right having core
parts disabled/enabled, imagine if
the style dock or atlas stuff, etc was optional. Messy and confusing.
The other
Klaus,
You can see this post on how to replace them if you want.
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220138/removing-santa-hat-from-qgis-icon/220222#220222
Regards,
Nathan
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Mithöfer wrote:
> Dear group,
> not everybody was happy
Thanks. I will review tomorrow.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:17 pm DelazJ wrote:
> Below a list of QEP that I think could be closed in order to have a
> cleaner repository:
>
> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/75: Add
> concept of "true north" to composer
Hi all,
I have made a QEP for merging all qgis2 and settings into a folder:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/82
I'm keen to work on this for 3.0 so just looking for any feedback on it,
mainly any negatives that people can see.
Regards,
Nathan
Hey Even,
Personally I think this is a good change and handy for the use case you
mentioned.
To solve the UX of knowing if the layer is visible in a heavy nested list I
think we could grey out, or some kind of icon, for all layers not currently
on.
Nathan
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 8:32 pm Even
Hey,
Yeah, this was mainly just a side comment from watching Tom's talk and how
integrated some plugins should be as part of the UI and if that makes the
general UX better or worse.
It's not always relevant in every context but I have started to become a
fan of reusing what is provided in core
Does Qt5 give us anything 3d related that we can just do all this inline
without worrying another dependency?
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:12 pm Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> On 09/11/16 12:51, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
> > On 2016-11-09 11:26, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> >> For more details,
+1 to move that to dev section.
However on that note: how hard is it to connect other providers for
authentication? Google, Facebook, etc I know people like the OSGeoID thing,
but having other options isn't bad.
- Nathan
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
Hey,
I made a tool called qgis2img that can report the renderer time of a
shapefile. Its a standalone Python script if you do a search there is notes
on the web for it.
- nathan
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:30 am Manikanta Kondeti
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As the subject says I
Hi,
I agree with Nyall. As this is a major release this requires more time,
have a look at how long it took Python 3 to finally become used for an idea
on how people treat major breaks in API.
As we already have 2.14, 1.6 and 2.18 out the door as a really good base I
don't see a need to rush
Are you sure you can't open it in older versions? I mix project versions a
far bit and never seem to have any issues. Some styling options etc might
not load right but it should still open at least.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:10 pm Paulo van Breugel
wrote:
> On 25-10-16
Hey,
They look like they are there now.
[image: Inline image 1]
Regards,
Nathan
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The QGIS website displays the new release of QGIS 2.18 as available for
> download, but both the Windows x86 and the x64
>> "Would that become a LTR?" remains however.
2.14 is still LTR and 3.20 will be the next one.
- Nathan
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 2:52 AM, DelazJ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given the introduction of the 2.18 release changelog [1] being written, it
> seems that one of the questions
+1 to remove it. We should try and reduce the number of places you can do
the same thing in QGIS 3.0
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
> Il 22/10/2016 09:01, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wondering - can we remove the dxf2shp
+1 for always opt-in, and also a good way to back to opt-out if you opt-in
by mistake.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 17-10-16 09:53, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> >> * a list of current crowd funding projects and their funding progress
> >> > *
No pony for you Matthias ;)
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 10/17/2016 12:20 PM, Geo DrinX wrote:
> > Ok, I will try to be more clear (compatibly with my bad English).
> >
> > Look at this: https://goo.gl/WR8LVF
> >
> > In this project,
And Qt.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes I have read it, however we don't run on PyPy, we use CPython.
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:06 PM, <geodr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Inviato da iPhone
&
Yes I have read it, however we don't run on PyPy, we use CPython.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:06 PM, <geodr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Inviato da iPhone
>
> Il giorno 17 ott 2016, alle ore 11:19, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
>
> For context
Sandro,
Have a read of the links that Even posted. They don't really side in
favour with the idea of sandboxing Python, and that was just plain
python not including PyQt4, etc,
https://lwn.net/Articles/574215/
- Nathan
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
.
The security of pysandbox is the security of its weakest part. A single bug
is enough to escape the whole sandbox."
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Honestly, this is getting tiresome.
>
> If you don't like the approval proces
given the complex
nature of that and you would still have to
be able to support what we can in core, etc.
- Nathan
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Geo DrinX <geodr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2016-10-17 10:19 GMT+02:00 Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Qg
Qgis uses CPython. You also have to sandbox Qt, so I suspect you are
running into a lot of dead ends.
As we have said before, this is a ton of effort and you will not gain what
you want from it.
Microsoft had to write a whole new .net framework just to handle this.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 6:13 pm
oua...@spatialys.com>
wrote:
> Le samedi 15 octobre 2016 15:32:42, Geo DrinX a écrit :
> > 2016-10-14 8:42 GMT+02:00 Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com>:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > Have you raised this as a issue with us. Can't really fix anything if
> > > it
Hey,
Have you raised this as a issue with us. Can't really fix anything if it's
not raised.
What you suggest we do to make it better?
Regards,
Nathan
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Geo DrinX wrote:
> Good morning :)
>
>
> I am here to inform you that I just removed
Where is it used?
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 3:10 pm Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Just wanted to raise this discussion again now that we've dropped qt4
> compatibility.
>
> Should we remove all references to qwt polar from the source and
> remove the associated cmake flag? AFAIK it
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Nyall Dawson
wrote:
> Maybe this could even be integrated with Nathan's experiments with
> selection presets...
>
Is that a gentle nudge I feel there Nyall ;)
- Nathan
___
Qgis-developer
Hi,
QGIS master now uses Qt5 and no longer Qt4.
- Nathan
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Idan Miara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile QGIS for the first time on Ubuntu Xenial, I've
> followed the instructions to compile the Qt4 version:
>
Qt5 is now a requirement maybe that needs a new version of QCA
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:31 am Sandro Santilli wrote:
> I'm trying to build the master branch on Ubuntu 14.04.5
> but the build configuration fails with:
>
> CMake Error at cmake/FindQCA.cmake:60 (message):
> Could
Hey,
When would you normally need an escape char for LIKE?
- Nathan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:33 PM, René-Luc Dhont wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I'd like to know if an escape character is defined for the LIKE operator
> in QGIS Expression.
>
> If I take a look at the code
Hi all,
Are we doing a 2.18 release. Seems we are in freeze but I wasn't sure we
were doing the release to start with.
- Nathan
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Yes please open a QEP. Martin, Nyall and myself all have feedback for it.
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 4:49 pm Vincent Mora wrote:
> Hi Alvaro,
>
> I'd also like to see that in QGis 3.
>
> I'm developing a plugin that needs this functionality to visualize/edit
> features in the
A broken application is also wrong...
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
> Il 06/09/2016 08:32, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>
> > Honestly, the Windows approach of packaging-all-our-dependancies
> > ourselves is looking more and more attractive to me! ;)
QWebKit was removed from the Python bindings upstream as far as I know.
- Nathan
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Robin Paulson
wrote:
> On 2016-09-04 22:19, Tom Chadwin wrote:
>
>> Did the latest point release fix this issue?
>>
>
> not here, qgis 2.16.2
I'm a big +1 on that. I will add my notes on a QEP if one is opened
(Hopefully I can be a bit more active in the project after a bit of a break)
- Nathan
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Neumann, Andreas
wrote:
> Hi all, Hi Nyall, Matthias and Denis,
>
> After some
If you haven't saved the layer after you did the delete the provider still
thinks there is 4 features. The layer itself and the edit buffer sit above
the data provider.
Generally you should trust the layer as it knows the state of the edit
buffer.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Casper
Qt can be a bit picky at times. Nothing has changed between 2.14 and 2.16
to effect that.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Geo DrinX <geodr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> 2016-08-30 12:24 GMT+02:00 Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Works fine for
Hmm I thought the whole point of using github etc was so we don't have to
run our own setup and can just deal with making the software?
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 5:33 pm Vincent Picavet (ml)
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a note to say that SAC is currently testing an OSGeo GitLab
I think we need to rename the .qgis2 folder to .qgis-dev or .qgs3 so we
don't break old plugins.
I will do this tonight.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This commit
>
>
Not sure we can? 2.14 is bug fix only. Given it's Python though you could
just patch their copy.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:25 PM, René-Luc Dhont wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I just made a Pull-Request to add a feature to DB manager.
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/3322
> Add
Hey,
True, maybe it's just a bunch of unrelated package issues that look like
path issues
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 7:04 pm Jürgen E. <j...@norbit.de> wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> On Fri, 15. Jul 2016 at 16:02:55 +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> > Are we planning on keeping the unicod
Hi all,
Seems the name of the release is causing a few issues on Windows installs:
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/20/qgis-2-16-n%C3%B8debo-libintl-8-dll-missing
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/201657/problem-installing-new-version-of-qgis-under-windoss-10-64-bits/202200#202200
.qgis-dev?
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> wrote:
> Sounds like a good plan. Or .qgis-master.
>
> On 07/09/2016 01:50 PM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> > On that note, do you think we should now make a .qgis3 folder in home
> > driver to
On that note, do you think we should now make a .qgis3 folder in home
driver to not mess with 2.x installs?
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Hi Nyall,
>
> I think you are looking for that:
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commits/master_2
>
> Matthias
101 - 200 of 1080 matches
Mail list logo