In a message dated 15/10/03 17:29:57 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 15/10/03 07:11:12 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2 - the sources have everything needed but an Assembler to be readily compiled. You never know. Even that might change. (An
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:15:49 +, Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 at 21:46:27, Timothy Swenson wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I've sort of been following the discussion of the SMSQ/E license (yet
again).
So have I, but a great deal of the discussion seems to expand
Under UK tax laws.
Non profit organisations are taxed on any profit they make unless they are a
registered charity. Quanta is a first class example.
Quanta is a Friendly Society and can only trade internally ie. with it's
members. Any profit it makes from investments like bank interest is taxed
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor
On 16 Oct 2003 at 9:57, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Above statement is formally credited as Copyright (C) Roy Wood
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 at 11:01:05,
=?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN9Pzq7/IpIg==?=
wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:15:49 +, Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 at 21:46:27, Timothy Swenson wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 16 Oct 2003 at 9:57, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Above statement is formally credited as Copyright (C) Roy Wood
sometime in the last 3 years :o|
Do you think Roy would ... licence it?
Wolfgang
No, it is open source !
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:38:59 +0100, Roy wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 16 Oct 2003 at 9:57, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Above statement is formally credited as Copyright (C) Roy Wood
sometime in the last 3 years :o|
Do you think Roy would ...
Just got the new QL Today - very nice. Now for the problem, work on
QDT or read and play? How to make such a decision!
OK, so I should work on QDT for now and then read and play instead of
sleeping later tonight.
Did want to say though the the layout looks very nice, lots of
interesting
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:01:28 -0700, James Hunkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just got the new QL Today - very nice. Now for the problem, work on QDT
or read and play? How to make such a decision!
OK, so I should work on QDT for now and then read and play instead of
sleeping later tonight.
Hello,
I was there in Eindhoven when there was a small meeting about what to do
now that Tony Tebby was ready to show the source code of SMSQ/E.
I was the first to speak and I said that IMO 15 years of work of TT
should be legally protected so that he could benefit from the
development of a
Arnould Nazarian makes some magical things to make me read
} Hello,
}
} I was there in Eindhoven when there was a small meeting about what to do
} now that Tony Tebby was ready to show the source code of SMSQ/E.
}
} I was the first to speak and I said that IMO 15 years of work of TT
} should
On 16 Oct 2003 at 3:31, Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντό wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:46:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You fail to see the argument. Linux (or anything else) if its license is
already a Free Software License by definition it cannot be turned into
something that is NOT
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:17:30 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Oct 2003 at 3:31, Phoebus R. Dokos ( . wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:46:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You fail to see the argument. Linux (or anything else) if its license is
already a Free Software License by definition it
Do I hear the sound of rattles being thrown out of prams once more,
children?
Hey, I got told off when I said that !
--
Roy Wood
I remember it being said first time round, couldn't remember who said
it. Thought it might be worth throwing into the melting pot once more.
Above statement is
Thank you.
$C8 is described in my book as number of watched WHEN variables
It doesn't matter that it doesn't work on QDOS, it is only for my own
debugging use on QPC2.
--
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
: Re: [ql-users] error lines
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:22:32 +0100, Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone know how to get the statement number within a line when an
error occurs?
Obviously, ROMs which support ERLIN return the line number. It
would
be helpful to get the statement
Not Darren's fault...
It's not indeed an Irishman ;-)
The fault is all Rich's :-) I was asking him if he knew of any
proper (ie
not speaking American English) Tweenies DVDs for the daughter (She's
a big
fan :-) and he told me that there's one with Dilwyn...
Needless to say that I made a
Hi Dilwyn,
I like 10 pint jokes, that is you need 10 pints of beer to appreciate them.
Derek
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] DJC 16
The reg number DJC seems to have
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
$C8 is described in my book as number of watched WHEN variables
Those area of the BV are pretty OS specific. keys_sbasic is the file
you're looking for (although I'm usually nice enough to look them up
;) EVERY programmer should have the keys directory of the SMSQ/E
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Well, it wasn't the error tables I wanted. It was which statement in a
line of basic caused the error. Launchpad's accessory programs are
written in compiled BASIC and there are some multi-statement lines
causing me problems.
The variables I mentioned probably don't work
Just a thought
Would it be possible to adapt the QL Operating
system so it could run on an Apple Mac machine?
If so could this solve our hardware
problems?
Yes of
course there are (and for the Atari, too). I'm not saying that all
versions for all machines should be entirelyequal. What I do want,
is that all machine should be able to recompile allversions, so that
you can use any one of the machines to compile all versions.Why
insist in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
=?utf-8?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKM6mzr/Or86yzr/PgiDOoS4gzp3PhM+Mzro=?=
=?utf-8?B?zr/Pgiki?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Exactly right but the quest for code uniformity imposed by both the
structure of the license and choices make it impossible for SMSQ/E to
be that
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:49:52 +0100, John Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a thought
Would it be possible to adapt the QL Operating system so it could run on
an Apple Mac machine?
If so could this solve our hardware problems?
Hi John,
what kind of an Apple machine? An older Mac (68K)?
John Sadler wrote:
I do not get the impression that the new versions of Marcel Kilgus
programs will run on older machines.
Of course they do. Wolfgang put together a new PE that provides
compatibility with the new facilities.
Marcel
Q1: If SMSQ/E was distributed under this GPL licence and someone would
take it to develop a successfull product, TT would have no rights on it.
True or false?
What do you mean by rights? He would have as much copyright as he has now.
As the code would be under GPL licence, there could not be
There could be even an almost direct adaptation by using MicroAPL's tools
(PortAsm) url:http://www.microapl.co.uk/ on the QDOS Sources to convert
them to PowerPC assembly and then fill in the bits and pieces.
I don't think that is true. Much of the power of SMSQ/E comes from some
subtile
On 16 Oct 2003 at 9:57, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Above statement is formally credited as Copyright (C) Roy Wood
sometime in the last 3 years :o|
Do you think Roy would ... licence it?
Wolfgang
On 16 Oct 2003 at 15:52, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Well, it wasn't the error tables I wanted. It was which statement in a
line of basic caused the error. Launchpad's accessory programs are
written in compiled BASIC and there are some multi-statement lines
causing me
On 14 Oct 2003 at 22:13, Peter Graf wrote:
.
I also think Marcel and Wolfgang work hard. Wolfgang does it without
financial reward, a fact that has my full respect and appreciation. I hope
that those Q40/Q60 developers who, unlike me, see enough reason to follow
Marcel's SMSQ/E route,
On 14 Oct 2003 at 18:44, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Do I hear the sound of rattles being thrown out of prams once more,
children?
rattle, rattle
For goodness's sake, bury the hatchets now (and I don't mean in each
other's heads).
grin
This is rapidly turning into another all too public
On 14 Oct 2003 at 14:52, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Oh, excuse-me, but I'm only using (and developping it too) on Q40.
I won't call that a waste!
No, it isn't, of course not.
Wolfgang
On 14 Oct 2003 at 12:06, Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
Again,
It should be clear that I am not an expert on this matter , i do not have any
special expertise .
Perhaps - but at least you TRY (and succeed) to do something with the sources.
Just one think , I have as my hobby to play with QL and
On 14 Oct 2003 at 20:28, Tarquin Mills wrote:
(...)
I like the QL because it (the QL community) is in general polite and
friendly.
Yes, that's true - and it makes the occasional storm only stand out that much
stronger.
But, always the optimist, I hope that this might clear the air for a
On 14 Oct 2003 at 13:55, Bill Cable wrote:
(...)
I knew the QL was very special the first time I switch it on and am pleased to
see it receive credit as a key motivator for the Open Source Movement.
:-)
Just to put a further cat amongt the pigeons (I'm in a provocative mood today), let me
On 14 Oct 2003 at 19:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
Forget this idea. I never sold nor trusted Q60 SMSQ/E versions after Tony Tebby.
I can understand that you didn't sell any.
But not trust any newer version?
Do you mean there are, what, timebombs in the code?
Somebody, on purpose,
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:11:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Oct 2003 at 22:13, Peter Graf wrote:
.
snip
To some extent, QPC and Qx0 might be seen as competing with each other,
(I've heard
this being said) even though, for me, they are definitely not.
I do not think that the Qx0 and QPC
Hello,
I will provide a lot of details just to request a small information!
This is mainly for hardware people...
The provided Eprom with the Q40 are two 27C1024, making it for 256KB.
Looking at my latest SMSQ/E (which must be 3.01), the current size of
the file might be only a few KB short to
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:11:17 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Oct 2003 at 13:55, Bill Cable wrote:
(...)
I knew the QL was very special the first time I switch it on and am
pleased to
see it receive credit as a key motivator for the Open Source Movement.
:-)
Just to put a further cat
I am interested too, I would like to add also why not useflash eprom.
Hoping in an answer .
FabrizioJerome Grimbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,I will provide a lot of details just to request a small information!This is mainly for hardware people...The provided Eprom with the Q40 are two
Forwarded answer from Peter to my last mail, posted with his
agreement. I leave it at that.
---
Marcel wrote:
But if I asked for the Qx0 schematics (the equivalent of my software
in the hardware world), would you give them to me?
Yes of course, as soon as my turnover breaks even with my
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
The two programs running in the background are DirectCD and AVG
anti-virus.
Anti-virus programs are always a source of trouble and sometimes big
slow-downs.
Marcel
-
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: QL Users List [EMAIL
PROTECTED
On 15 Oct 2003 at 3:05, Phoebus R. Dokos (è á. ç) wrote:
I do not think that the Qx0 and QPC are directly competing with each but
they do indirectly.
To explain: Basing an OS around an emulator, tempts users to totally
abandon hardware for software only.
Oh boy, do I disagree with
On 15 Oct 2003 at 10:29, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
That implies the rattle is still in your hand and not yet been thrown,
right?
No, it's the echo.
(...)
This IS a subject that affects many (perhaps even all) of us.
As long as something constructive comes out of it (e.g. agreement on
updated
On 15 Oct 2003 at 3:59, Phoebus R. Dokos (è á. ç) wrote:
(...)
The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
SMSQE - OK
The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs
(freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
SMSQE OK
On 15 Oct 2003 at 3:05, Phoebus R. Dokos (è á. ç) wrote:
(all cut)
Just a very quick reply to one point.; I'll probably rply to more of this
later.
There is NOTHING
- in the licence
- in what I have ever said
that stops you from developping code specific to a machine.
You want to
Anyone know how to get the statement number within a line when an
error occurs?
Obviously, ROMs which support ERLIN return the line number. It would
be helpful to get the statement number as well for debugging
purposes - what I'd like is for my debugging routine to return
something like:
REPORT
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:37:50 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. As far as I know, I never said a word.
Actually, I'd forgotten about it to be honest!!
Cheers,
Not Darren's fault...
It's not indeed an Irishman ;-)
The fault is all Rich's :-) I was asking him if he knew of any proper (ie
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:58:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Oct 2003 at 3:05, Phoebus R. Dokos ( . ) wrote:
(all cut)
snip more
I have repeatedly stated on this list that OF COURSE I would include
code that beneftis only one machine - provided, it is not done in such a
way to
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:22:32 +0100, Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone know how to get the statement number within a line when an
error occurs?
Obviously, ROMs which support ERLIN return the line number. It would
be helpful to get the statement number as well for debugging
purposes -
On 15 Oct 2003, at 10:56, Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντό wrote:
(...)
Well that's restriction 1... As seen below you have to be able to
distribute legitimate copies both in binary and in source form so... it's
not OK
That's the restriction, alright.
(...)
To your (*) that alone breaks
throw a
really Free SMSQ/E on say Savannah or SourceForge you will get at least 10
or 20 people to have a look-see. If you win half (sic!) of them you gained
a potential whole new tree of QL users (and developers).
Point 5. A publicly available CVS server gives any project the air of
maintenance
Hi,
I was going up the M6 in England, last week just North of Stoke to see my
girlfriend, when a red Porsche flew pasted me with the registration number
DJC 16
I wondered where Dilwyn was going in such a rush.
Derek
Roy wood wrote:
There were one or two teething problems when the code changed to
incorporate the faster memory but there were in the original code
and just shown up by the new code. (That is right isn't it Marcel?).
If you're referring to the RECHP problem you're right, I suspect the
problem
For some time now, the JOBS facility under QPAC2 has indicated
corrupt memory for all jobs. Naturally this has made me a bit
suspicious of some of my programming but I have now tackled the
problem and find that the problem persists even when booting
with the following:
LRESPR
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:05:16 +0100, Derek Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was going up the M6 in England, last week just North of Stoke to see my
girlfriend, when a red Porsche flew pasted me with the registration
number
DJC 16
I wondered where Dilwyn was going in such a rush.
Derek
Christopher Cave wrote:
This is under QPC2 v3.03, SMSQ/E v2.99, QPCA2 v1.38 JOBS
v1.02.
Any bright ideas? Should I have upgraded QPAC2 sometime?
Yes.
Marcel
On 15 Oct 2003 at 21:53, Christopher Cave wrote:
Any bright ideas? Should I have upgraded QPAC2 sometime?
Oh yes, ask your supplier to send you a new version of QPAC2
Wolfgang
On 14 Oct 2003 at 3:13, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(...)
Yes, if I was motivated by $$$ I would have left the scene several
years ago, I'd have to sell at least 1 QPC per hour to really make it
commercially viable for me. But writing computer software is my only
income and therefore I must somehow
On 13 Oct 2003 at 23:11, Peter Graf wrote:
Well and we felt we walked 100 miles toward a compromise while you didn't
move an inch.
Fortunately enough, then, the amendments to the licence, in reply to
your requests (and those of others) have been done publicly, in this
forum, so I'll let
On 13 Oct 2003 at 21:35, John Taylor wrote:
Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing.
There are differences of opinion in almost all aspects of QL computing.
The 'licence' is just one of them. Long may this continue.
All we have to do is just keep pushing.
Perhaps, though, some
On 13 Oct 2003 at 15:58, Phoebus R. Dokos (è á. ç) wrote:
As for Wolfgang's comments I would respectfully disagree.
Well, at least we can agree to disagree :-).
As I said
earlier it's anyone's choice how much they value their principles. Maybe
Peter (and I do not speak for him
Marcel Kilgus makes some magical things to make me read
} Jerome Grimbert wrote:
} I have not yet seen the block operation in C for 24 bits colours...
}
} http://www.itimpi.freeserve.co.uk/ql/gd2b.zip
}
} iow_blkt ( chanid_t channel, timeout_t timeout, GDSTP_t *, QLRECT_t *rect)
Ok, will have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This lack of common ground seems to stem from the fact that you prefer
to profit from
developments made for other systems (eg. Marcel's new wman etc) and not
chip in
anything of your own.
I never used any version of SMSQ/E after those from Tony Tebby, so
On 14 Oct 2003 at 10:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
Most Q60 users??? AFAIKS the number of Q60 users who requested _upgrade_
of SMSQ/E binaries to _your_ versions is ZERO in about one and a half
year. Which proves total failure of your only through reseller concept.
Sure SMSQ/E is
In a message dated 13/10/03 13:25:15 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Further to my earlier email, I could, if that is wished, publish the changes_txt file here on the list.Any opinions on that, anyone?
Good idea!
George
Again,
It should be clear that I am not an expert on this matter , i do not have any special expertise .
Just one think , I have as my "hobby" to play with QL and its derivatives.
I bought a QL in '84, then I boughteverything related to it : egGoldCard, QXl etc etc . I have all the emulator etc,
Most Q60 users??? AFAIKS the number of Q60 users who requested _upgrade_
of SMSQ/E binaries to _your_ versions is ZERO in about one and a half
year. Which proves total failure of your only through reseller concept.
Sure SMSQ/E is still used on most Q60, but this is for 99% an achievement
of
In a message dated 13/10/03 19:36:32 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
iow_blkt ( chanid_t channel, timeout_t timeout, GDSTP_t *, QLRECT_t *rect)
This command, and all the others connected with GD2 were put into C68 in April 2001.I certainly have these in my C68 library and have used
SMSQ makes some magical things to make me read
} Sure SMSQ/E is still used on most Q60, but this is for 99% an achievement
} of Tony Tebby and not your new facilities.
}
} Well, if that is REALLY the case, then both you two, Marcel and
} Wolfgang, completely wasted your time for the last 1
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
SMSQ makes some magical things to make me read
} Sure SMSQ/E is still used on most Q60, but this is for 99% an achievement
} of Tony Tebby and not your new facilities.
}
} Well, if that is REALLY the case, then both you two, Marcel and
} Wolfgang, completely wasted your
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Oh, excuse-me, but I'm only using (and developping it too) on Q40.
I won't call that a waste!
Of course not. It's not Jochen who actually suggested that NO Qx0 user
uses the new SMSQ/E. If that was the case, we could really have saved
a lot of time. Obviously this
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Well, Peter sells hardware, of course he wouldn't mind the software
being totally free.
I never asked for SMSQ/E to be free of charge for me, or to indirectly
reduce overall Q60 costs, as you seem to allude. As a matter of fact, I
had offered compensation for Tony Tebby
I need a spot of advice on a Windows/PC related subject, so any
replies send to me privately, please, if you think they'll cause
offence on this list. There is a slight QPC angle to this (see below)
which I hope someone can explain.
As my PC has slowed down and some programs needing large files
and Marcel, Tony, Jochen, Wolfgang and all with the OS. That's all
we needed to know.
--
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: SMSQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor
Most Q60
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Oh, excuse-me, but I'm only using (and developping it too) on Q40.
I won't call that a waste!
Of course not. It's not Jochen who actually suggested that NO Qx0 user
uses the new SMSQ/E. If that was the case, we could really have saved
a lot
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:50:50 +0100, Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I need a spot of advice on a Windows/PC related subject, so any
replies send to me privately, please, if you think they'll cause
offence on this list. There is a slight QPC angle to this (see below)
which I hope someone
Bill wrote:
[snip]
I don't have a problem with the current way SMSQ/E is managed and I know the
people involved work hard with little monetary reward. I think an open source
model would work better but that is just my opinion. Open source is not
against
there being proprietary software for
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
As revealed and by Geoff's long article publicised here a little while
ago, rifts and factions are plaguing the QL community for a long time.
Please can someone email off list with details of the disagreement in 1996.
As to the argument, I think this argument (free v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Peter sells hardware, of course he wouldn't mind the software
being totally free.
I never asked for SMSQ/E to be free of charge for me, or to indirectly
reduce overall Q60 costs, as you seem to allude.
In no way I wanted to imply that you are a cheapskate or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course not. It's not Jochen who actually suggested that NO Qx0 user
uses the new SMSQ/E. If that was the case, we could really have saved
a lot of time. Obviously this assertion is, to speak plainly, rubbish.
So read _exactly_ what I wrote, before using nice words.
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] What printers
do people use with
r.net their QL??
Sent
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version
(sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra).
Normally http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/versionssms.html should be
up-to-date (though due to some special circumstances this time it
isn't yet.
Marcel Kilgus makes some magical things to make me read
}
} Jerome Grimbert wrote:
} Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version
} (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra).
}
} Normally http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/versionssms.html should be
}
On 11 Oct 2003 at 23:17, Peter Graf wrote:
(...)
Q60 Successor:
(...)
After the departure of Tony Tebby,
I see no basis for projects like this anymore, because there's no common ground
with the new SMSQ/E maintainers,
Well of course not, you never tried to find one.
and at the same
On 13 Oct 2003 at 8:51, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version
(sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra).
No, not to my knowledge.
I do keep a list of bugs that are sent to me/published here on the list.
Yours will be
Fabrizio Diversi makes some magical things to make me read
} Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...)
} one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of reason that I do
not understand (!!) nothing was done on the Q40 side, not because missing of
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
I have not yet seen the block operation in C for 24 bits colours...
http://www.itimpi.freeserve.co.uk/ql/gd2b.zip
iow_blkt ( chanid_t channel, timeout_t timeout, GDSTP_t *, QLRECT_t *rect)
Means I will have to enter debug/patch kernel mode before continuing
the
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL??
My solution regarding postscript would also very much solve the
problem for Qxx. SGC is probably too slow or doesn't have enough
memory to run Ghostscript
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:56:26 +0100, gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL??
My solution regarding postscript would also very much solve the
problem for Qxx. SGC
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:48:32 +0200 (MET DST), Jerome Grimbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabrizio Diversi makes some magical things to make me read
} Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...)
} one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of
reason that
Well I think that this whole discussion is an overkill. We did it before
but it may be useful to see things a little more removed from the heat now
:-)
Phoebus
Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing.
There are differences of opinion in almost all aspects of QL computing.
The 'licence'
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:35:50 +0100, John Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I think that this whole discussion is an overkill. We did it before
but it may be useful to see things a little more removed from the heat
now
:-)
Phoebus
Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing.
There are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Oct 2003 at 23:17, Peter Graf wrote:
(...)
Q60 Successor:
(...)
After the departure of Tony Tebby,
I see no basis for projects like this anymore, because there's no
common ground
with the new SMSQ/E maintainers,
Well of course not, you never tried to find
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:41:37 +0200, Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Nobody is stopping anybody from releasing a piece of code under 2
licenses.
That is not possible under any legal agreement. It's other one or the
other especially for GPL style licenses as the premise is so
Phoebus R. Dokos (F??ß?? ?. ?t) wrote:
That is not possible under any legal agreement. It's other one or the
other especially for GPL style licenses as the premise is so different
that it is impossible to do so.
I can release my software under any number of licences I chose to do.
I can
In a message dated 24/09/03 19:33:23 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll try to pick up all bugs reported.Wolfgang
Here is another bug in SMSQ/E.
1. SMSQ/E v3.01 on Q40/60
WM_PAPER, WM_INK etc find the WMAN vector (for the new WM.TRAP3) by using IOP.PINF which puts it into A1.
All this talk of printers for the QL has been quite interesting and I
would have joined in earlier except that Demon's mail server has been
playing up and some of the messages have been severely delayed.
If anyone wants a laser printer that will work with most QL programs
they should look into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. SMSQ/E v3.01 on Q40/60
WM_PAPER, WM_INK etc find the WMAN vector (for the new WM.TRAP3) by using
IOP.PINF which puts it into A1. Unfortunately this is done before getting the
parameters. This means that if a parameter is an expression, so that its value
is on
901 - 1000 of 3927 matches
Mail list logo
