P Witte wrote:
Some time ago I wrote about a problem with a green, jinxed PC I have, and I
received a lot of helpful advice on this list - Thank you! I had this
machine built for me at a local computer shop. Not the industry's brightest
people, pehaps, but very helpful and friendly. They were at a
On 15 Jan 2005 at 16:33, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
(...). Re-apply some of the cooling pasta
and don't forget the tomato sauce
(sorry Joachim, I couldn't resist that one)
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
Some time ago I wrote about a problem with a green, jinxed PC I have, and I
received a lot of helpful advice on this list - Thank you! I had this
machine built for me at a local computer shop. Not the industry's brightest
people, pehaps, but very helpful and friendly. They were at a complete loss.
Re. the SGC INGOT sources, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
He did type them up, though I'm not sure whether it was already 100%
complete back then. Perhaps somebody could ask Keith? I don't have
his address.
Keith gave me a copy at a semi-recent workshop (Hove, probably) which
I can send if required
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 at 02:21:35, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Tebby wrote:
btw there was a suggestion at QL2004 that a discussion group (rather
than a mailing list) could be set up to discuss principles, fundamentals
and long standing problems - any interest?
Well, I
Tony Tebby writes:
The worst aspect, I find, is the overthrow of the supervisor-level
programming model, which is fundamental to QDOS\SMSQ/E. I
should certainly like to hear TT's take on that.
There are two aspects here which are completely separate.
Thank you for the explanation. When
And you can subscribe to the SQLUG magazine for £5 a year.
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 at 16:17:43, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
btw there was a suggestion at QL2004 that a discussion group (rather
than a mailing list) could be set up to discuss principles, fundamentals
and long standing problems - any interest?
Tony
Surely anything that might
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Phoebus Dokos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
PhOEbus (Öïßâïò) Dokos
-or so you won't transpose it again... FOIVOS NTOKOS so there :-) -
Cor ... not him ! I know that guy :-)
--
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 at 23:28:02, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 16:52 02/12/2004 +, you wrote:
Clearly QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
cannot manage this. Maybe it can and you haven't configured it?
Turnpike optionally routes mail and assembles them in a forum-like
ZN wrote:
So didn't you get them? I had a brief look at them ages ago
and had the understanding that they're on their way to you.
No, never got them... I only saw them when Keith oiginally got them and
they were really faxed through and quite unreadable at that point. I have
no idea what
Tony Tebby wrote:
btw there was a suggestion at QL2004 that a discussion group (rather
than a mailing list) could be set up to discuss principles, fundamentals
and long standing problems - any interest?
Well, I hate web based groups, but there is for example the usenet
group
Nobody knows :-)
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Tony
Tebby
Envoyé : mardi 30 novembre 2004 15:55
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
- Aucun (Nobody?) - wrote:
Tony Tebby though designed RomDisq from day
On 30.11.2004 at 18:21 Marcel Kilgus wrote:
The SGC can actually access the Aurora ROM chip proper... what is
unclear is if it can also generate write cycles on the bus
for those addresses.
Can't one see that in the chip code Keith has recovered?
YES!
So didn't you get them? I had a brief
Nasta writes:
WARNING: THIS IS ONE LONG MAIL!!!
True to form, eh ;)
Here is an excerpt from MicroAPL's PortASM user's manual:
I find a lot of this pretty horrendous! Like being forced to speak English,
but not allowed to use AND, NOT, OR etc!
Having to re-write swaths of the OS (SMSQ/E,
On 1 Dec 2004 at 14:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(..),
although I suppose it might be true that most on this list are probably
members.
Most?
Probably not (any more).
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
Tarquin recently made a serious point when he asked if Quanta committee
meetings were secret. There are some of us on the committee who would like
to see members being much better informed about what the committee get up
to. That could be via this list, but it would be important to make a
On 30.11.2004 at 11:25 Dave P wrote:
I know a bit about the romdisq and it sounds like an interesting
piece of hardware.
How does the romdisq compare to a cut-down qubide with space for
one or many CF cards? Not that there's much to 'cut down' on the
already very sparse qubide!
If a
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
On 1 Dec 2004 at 14:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(..),
although I suppose it might be true that most
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 at 21:55:42, John Gilpin wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
JG
I did a quick survey a few days ago covering the last five months
contributions to this list and found as follows:
Out of 74 different contributors,
25 (34%) are on the Quanta member's database.
5 (7%) are
I use them for Worldnews - all under XP.
We have had a DVB-s satellite cards running for over two years.
They also have two HP PVR cards which have been running for a year or
so.
These all save video 24hrs, and have given no problem.
Ben uses a HP Nexus terrestrial satellite card in a
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:48:37 +, Roy wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
Heh, nice in theory (except that I've returned the Aurora system to
Roy anyway ;-) But does one know when the vertical retrace is
happening?
If it
Please do fill in the form. It is now very much not just a Quanta
questionnaire.
Tony
Tony, remember when I mentioned I didn't see a 'thank you' page? Did you
actually get a form from me at the time? If not, let me know, I'll fill it in
again.
Dilwyn Jones
These two guys at Hauppauge UK have always solved my problems:
Ben Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elton Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, you obviously had access to better people than I did then.
Their software needs nursing. In particular, it is vital you have a
compatible MSIE loaded. The picture
At 08:36 30/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Anyway, it's gone now, swapped it for something much more useful (front
panel USB sockets and cabling so I no longer have to go round behind ot
plug things in )from someone at work
Dilwyn Jones
For that very reason I have knocked up a couple of boxes in the
- Aucun (Nobody?) - wrote:
Tony Tebby though designed RomDisq from day one for any size
possibly.
He once told me that the driver would work up to 64MB.
But was he right?
Tony
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
PS: I am really looking forward to ZN's post explaining unsuitability
issues with coldfire processors. (hah, on topic!)
It would be easy if I could post attachments - Micro APL provide a cross
compiler (68k to ColdFire) and emulation pack for CF V3 and 4 free of
charge, it's worth getting if
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 at 15:54:43, Tony Tebby wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Aucun (Nobody?) - wrote:
Tony Tebby though designed RomDisq from day one for any size
possibly.
He once told me that the driver would work up to 64MB.
But was he right?
Tony
(8-)#
I would love to put you to the test,
I know a bit about the romdisq and it sounds like an interesting piece of
hardware.
How does the romdisq compare to a cut-down qubide with space for one or
many CF cards? Not that there's much to 'cut down' on the already very
sparse qubide!
Dave
ZN wrote:
The SGC can actually access the Aurora ROM chip proper... what is
unclear is if it can also generate write cycles on the bus for those
addresses.
Can't one see that in the chip code Keith has recovered?
YES!
So didn't you get them? I had a brief look at them ages ago and had
the
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:17 -0600 (CST),() Dave P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
I know a bit about the romdisq and it sounds like an interesting piece of
hardware.
How does the romdisq compare to a cut-down qubide with space for one or
many CF cards? Not that there's much to 'cut down' on the
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 at 11:25:17, Dave P wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I know a bit about the romdisq and it sounds like an interesting piece of
hardware.
How does the romdisq compare to a cut-down qubide with space for one or
many CF cards? Not that there's much to 'cut down' on the already
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tony Firshman wrote:
The RomDisq is a QL boot device. I use it at shows with borrowed QLs.
It is also _very_ fast reading. I forget the figures, but it beat
qubide.
When reading, it's accessed just like a ROM, with extended addressing,
right?
One of the things that
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, gwicks wrote:
Don't forget there are some organisations that forbid committee members from
expressing personal opinions in public. Quanta is fortunately not one of
them, as you have well seen from my ouput over the last month, but I think
it has the right to expect
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:20:05 +,() Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
snip
It also shows the importance of an expansion system. Any future
QL-hardware will need an expansion system.
This raises the question of what interesting things people have done
with
their Qx0 ISA slots.
Someone at
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich
Mellor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
What have you got available Roy - I might be interested.
I will email you. I wouldn't mind selling some of it.
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill, Portslade, Sussex.BN41 2LB
Tel: +44 (0) 1273 386030fax: +44 (0) 1273
Dilwyn Jones writes:
It was a drivers issue. Hauppauge's Win-TV-PCI drivers for XP actually
knacker other XP drivers (and I tried all driver versions for XP from
3.35 to 3.43beta). Hence the problems every other bit of hardware was
having. Bin the Win-TV card (which worked fine on this
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 at 19:52:59, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dilwyn Jones writes:
It was a drivers issue. Hauppauge's Win-TV-PCI drivers for XP actually
knacker other XP drivers (and I tried all driver versions for XP from
3.35 to 3.43beta). Hence the problems every other bit of
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 at 10:20:43, John Gilpin wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Taffel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
printer issue (I think)
I think
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Quite right - shall amend website accordingly...
Not really...
Yes really.
The Aurora CAN display 256 colours on 640x480 but the Super Gold
Card prevents that by taking some of its addressing space.
Check your facts. This is simply wrong. The memory organization in 256
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 at 10:20:43, John Gilpin wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message
OK, let's see if my email is FINALLY working right!
Phoebus Dokos and Marcel Kilgus wrote:
The Aurora CAN display 256 colours on 640x480 but the Super Gold
Card prevents that by taking some of its addressing space.
Check your facts. This is simply wrong. The memory organization in 256
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 at 13:22:41, John Gilpin wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Taffel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
printer issue (I think)
I
A replacement motherboard for the QL - gave better resolution up to
1024x768 and 256 colour modes.
Like the sentence on your web site this is a bit misleading. An Aurora
can give you 1024x768 resolution and 256 colours, but not both at the
same time! The highest resolution with 256
On 29/11/04 at 15:56 Marcel Kilgus wrote:
ZN wrote:
OK, let's see if my email is FINALLY working right!
Hooray :-)
Ditto = finally!!!
This setting could be fairly easily replaced by a new monitor
definition that would use all the available memory.
But which would only result in even
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I use a ROMDisq in this situation, though a new 128MB ROMDisq would
solve the problem.
Technically I could make a 16mb RomDisq with the existing hardware.
Unfortunately the minimum chip buy is about UKP5,000, so not on.
This all
On 25/11/04 at 21:07 Dave P wrote:
The QL uses such minimal power that unless we are using Coldfire this
can be ignored.
Not so. On the typical PC laptop motherboard is a charge control circuit
to regulate the current to the battery, and power monitoring to select
whether the battery is
On 25/11/04 at 13:18 Dave P wrote:
Most elements of Nasta's Aurora II design are tried and tested, but the
ethernet part is completely new. I would be inclined to suggest a short
run of prototype ethernet only QL-standard expansion cards to go to
developers. Once the hardware exists, it becomes
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 at 18:08:43, ZN wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
PS, special note to TF: Aurora II and GF are routed with 8.333mil wide
tracks and 8.333mil spacing - so not quite to romDisq standards but then,
both sides are completely covered by components ;-)
(8-)#
I didn't actually
Tony Tebby though designed RomDisq from day one for any size
possibly.
He once told me that the driver would work up to 64MB.
Arnould
WebMail / Magic OnLine
http://www.magic.fr
___
QL-Users Mailing List
Hmm.
Do we fill in another form, or just 1 question, or do nothing
mike
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 at 23:28:03
John Gilpin (individual) writes:
PS. Just to explain this signature format: It was agreed at the Quanta
Committee meeting at Byfleet yesterday that no one member of that
committee
should pass an opinion and leave it such that it could be taken to be an
opinion of the Quanta Committee. In
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, P Witte wrote:
Wouldnt it be better if the default mode was (individual) ? We're all
(individual)s on this list. If you were making some Committe announcement or
writing in your official capacity you could use (QUANTA) to make that clear.
Dear (*)Sir ( )Madam
Your (
Tnx
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 at 19:48:50, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hmm.
Do we fill
Unfortunately, getting it to work with some machine combinations
would
take longer than copying Rich's pile of floppy disks.
:-)))
Never quite known anything like Sernet. Once you get it to work it
works brilliantly. Getting past the serial connections stage is a
nightmare other than between
Now that comment shows you to be a bit far removed from the average
user. Serial ports might be easy to you, so you haven't had to deal
with the regular flow of 'sernet doesn't work' messages. It's taken me
this long to (fail) to get sernet working from PC or Aurora to
anything, yet it works just
USB to (any kind of) networking is a bad solution at best...
especially if
your USB/NIC are USB 1.1 compatible... you WILL experience at best
hiccups
or temporary lock-ups and that's not the machine's fault (nor
Windows'
impressively :-)
On this machine, XP allowed USB peripherals to work
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
What exactly is the registry?
The mother of all INI files. Actually it's a database which stores all
configuration information.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Incidentally, can anyone tell me if my line wrap at 70 characetrs is
working now?
Don't bother, Outlook Express is broken in this respect and has always
been. Only solution is to use a real email program.
Marcel
___
QL-Users
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Firshman wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 at 13:28:02, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I use a ROMDisq in this situation, though a new 128MB ROMDisq would
solve the problem.
(8-)#
Technically I could make a 16mb RomDisq with the existing
At 16:24 28/11/2004 +, you wrote:
It was a drivers issue. Hauppauge's Win-TV-PCI drivers for XP actually
knacker other XP drivers (and I tried all driver versions for XP from
3.35 to 3.43beta). Hence the problems every other bit of hardware was
having. Bin the Win-TV card (which worked fine on
At 17:02 28/11/2004 +, you wrote:
What exactly is the registry? Although I've had to change one or two
settings, it's pretty gibberish to me. Gives me the impression of
being something akin to what we would call a BOOT program or config
block.
If you have to ask you really don't want to know -
At 17:00 28/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Rich is right: back to a QL!
No IV
No Scanner
No mobile disks
No USB
and printer problems as a bonus !
Incidentally, can anyone tell me if my line wrap at 70 characetrs is
working now? It isn't on-screen as I type this, but you never know
what it might be
I think that is quite proper, the CD is working properly, just
the
SETUP is
intended to run in Windows. There is no external DOS with XP.
I created a DOS boot disk from XP to test that. Sure enough, even
booting into that DOS disk, the XP CD still would not start, it
says
something about
Thanks Malcolm. There's something wrong with how it displays on my
machine in OE, but as long as I'm sending correctly, I'll sort my end
out later. I've set it to use Courier for both compose and read, but
it's using Arial non-proportional for both. For plain text, I'd prefer
a fixed pitch font,
: Friday, November 26, 2004 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict...
On 26 Nov 2004 at 13:30, Rich Mellor wrote:
No idea - I never owned it alas - guess a serial lead was supplied
with
the package
In that case, use sernet to transfer the files
It wouldn't be slower than
On 27 Nov 2004 at 13:43, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
SERNET is great when you get it to work.
Unfortunately, getting it to work with some machine combinations would
take longer than copying Rich's pile of floppy disks.
:-)))
I never managed to get it to work between my MinisQL and PC or between
Windows XP is so well behaved at work, I just can't understand why I
get all this hassle with everything that isn't made by Micro$oft.
Have you considered that it may actually be a hardware problem - memory or
the hard drive seem the most likely candidates - XP is a lot more hungry
of both than
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 at 13:28:02, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I use a ROMDisq in this situation, though a new 128MB ROMDisq would
solve the problem.
(8-)#
Technically I could make a 16mb RomDisq with the existing hardware.
Unfortunately the minimum chip buy is about
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 at 13:49:26, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Yes, but as standard QLs can't have split tx and rx devices (STX and
SRX I think SMSQ/E calls them) you would need something like Hans
Peter Recktenwald's SIMSER extensions for standard QDOS QLs to be able
to cope.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 at 15:38:53, Rich Mellor wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Windows XP is so well behaved at work, I just can't understand why I
get all this hassle with everything that isn't made by Micro$oft.
Have you considered that it may actually be a hardware problem - memory
or the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], James
Hunkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm,
As an alternative on your side can't you set your email program to wrap
the lines for you? Both my email programs do this automatically and
all the emails that I have received from this list are fitted
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
This PC is set to 70 characters line width in Outlook Express. Since
moving to XP the setting seems to get ignored.
The ones I send from work (usually daytime times on them) are sent
from Tesco Webmail where you have no control
My experiences with XP are mixed. Normally I have no problems
whatsoever. However I have encountered one AMD Athlon powered machine
from Time which is guaranteed to have a fit any time any new USB
device is attached and sometimes throws a fit when new software (eg
open office) are
Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:14:26 +,() Jeremy Taffel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
My experiences with XP are mixed. Normally I have no problems
whatsoever. However I have encountered one AMD Athlon powered machine
from Time which is guaranteed to have a fit any time any new USB
device is
Tony Firshman writes:
It is also a good opportunity to clean the registry, like a de-coke.
Sounds painful, ie de-cokeing and cleaning the registry.
Per
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
At 14:05 27/11/2004 +, you wrote:
During my recent XPriences I had to set my PC to boot
up
from CD, as the CD would not install from DOS.
I think that is quite proper, the CD is working properly, just the SETUP is
intended to run in Windows. There is no external DOS with XP.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 at 19:17:47, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman writes:
It is also a good opportunity to clean the registry, like a de-coke.
Sounds painful, ie de-cokeing and cleaning the registry.
de-coking is cleaning a car cylinder head of carbon.
Tony
--
Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:02:37 +,() Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 at 19:17:47, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman writes:
It is also a good opportunity to clean the registry, like a de-coke.
Sounds painful, ie de-cokeing and cleaning the
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
USB to (any kind of) networking is a bad solution at best...
especially if your USB/NIC are USB 1.1 compatible... you WILL
experience at best hiccups or temporary lock-ups and that's not the
machine's fault (nor Windows' impressively :-)
That was not the problem.
This
Jeremy Taffel wrote:
My experiences with XP are mixed. Normally I have no problems
whatsoever...
All I was trying to say is that when it comes to PCs, the hardware is so
variable that I really don't think you read across OS experiences from
one to another. My most stable machine runs windows
Jeremy Taffel writes:
My experiences with XP are mixed. Normally I have no problems
whatsoever. However I have encountered one AMD Athlon powered machine
from Time which is guaranteed to have a fit any time any new USB
device is attached and sometimes throws a fit when new software
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 at 21:07:54, Dave P wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Ironically, this is more-or-less what Nasta designed as the Aurora II.
My only discomfort over Nasta's design is that he is extremely concerned
about efficiency of space. Therefore, he's crammed an awful lot into a
very
To develop a board for a laptop is an interesting proposition. It's about
the same as the challenge of developing a board for a PC, but with
additional power challenges.
The QL uses such minimal power that unless we are using Coldfire this
can be ignored.
If a QL-replacement board
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:32:40 +, Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 at 19:10:03, Rich Mellor wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:00:34 -0600 (CST), Dave P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I know I could have used a serial lead but there is no longer
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 07:46:45 +, Derek Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I do not want to run Linux or Windows, so that makes the current laptops
a non starter.
Derek
Ooh - a call for QPC 1 :-)
--
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services
26 Oak Road, Shelfield, Walsall, West Midlands WS4 1RQ
Of course there is. What is wrong with qtpi? That will work with any old
terminal program on any platform.
Have never used qtpi I must admit - now here's another possible article
for Quanta if someone wants to write it.. How to use QTPI and/or transfer
files between the QL and PC.
Ooh - a call for QPC 1 :-)
--
Rich Mellor
What makes you think he wants to run DOS???
Dilwyn Jones
Yeah but at least you could set up the boot sector to boot straight into
QPC1 and therefore avoid seeing DOS altogether (could you not?? Or was
that just QXL) ??
--
Rich Mellor
On 26 Nov 2004 at 10:06, Rich Mellor wrote:
(...)
I still think that Di-Ren's software was a good idea - it allowed you to
use the hard disk on a PC for storage - now if that could be used to store
files within a QXL.WIN file on the PC Guess you'll say just run QTPI on
both the QL and from
On 26 Nov 2004 at 13:11, Rich Mellor wrote:
(...)
Basically yes - Di-rens fileserver program allowed you to use the PCs hard
drive as storage for the QL - useful for backups at least - no need for a
QL emulator and all the header info etc was automatically stored and
retrieved when you
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:18:23 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Nov 2004 at 13:11, Rich Mellor wrote:
(...)
Basically yes - Di-rens fileserver program allowed you to use the PCs
hard
drive as storage for the QL - useful for backups at least - no need for
a
QL emulator and
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 at 10:06:45, Rich Mellor wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:32:40 +, Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 at 19:10:03, Rich Mellor wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:00:34 -0600 (CST), Dave P
[EMAIL
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 at 13:11:08, Rich Mellor wrote:
(ref:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:00:39 +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lenerz.com wrote:
On 26 Nov 2004 at 10:06, Rich Mellor wrote:
(...)
I still think that Di-Ren's software was a good idea - it allowed you to
use
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 at 13:29:46, Tarquin Mills wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Rich Mellor wrote:
Basically yes - Di-rens fileserver program allowed you to use the PCs hard
drive as storage for the QL - useful for backups at least - no need for a
QL emulator and all the header info etc was
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Tony Firshman wrote:
... but he isn't costing his time (8-)#
If he did, the community would have been laid to rest LONG ago. I think we
should all give a round of applause for Nasta...
I must say I enjoy, especially with RomDisq, in getting a small compact
PCBs, and it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Derek Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi,
I do not want to run Linux or Windows, so that makes the current
laptops a non starter.
Ah but you are a rare beast, Derek. Most people want to do at least one
of these other things.
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill,
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Good point. During my recent XPriences I had to set my PC to boot up
from CD, as the CD would not install from DOS.
Did you solve the CD problem ? It only occurred to me today that it was
probably a lack of higher driver for the IDE bus
On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 at 21:07:54, Dave P wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
My only discomfort over Nasta's design is that he is extremely
concerned
about efficiency of space. Therefore, he's crammed an awful lot into a
very small 6-layer PCB. I
Malcolm,
As an alternative on your side can't you set your email program to wrap
the lines for you? Both my email programs do this automatically and
all the emails that I have received from this list are fitted
automatically to my window width which is great! If someone forces
hard stops in
from FAT16 - key difference is
obviously the size of pointer to FAT table sector.
Duncan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 November 2004 10:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [ql-users] The hardware conflict
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
