Tony Wrote:-
In the old days, QL work used to be my living, and a good one.
For the last 6 years at least, I have stayed because I have made many
good friends. I don't make money or even do it for free. It actually
costs me money to stay with the QL.
Tony
I couldn't agree more. Although
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] was... Just an idea for a new Product.
In a message dated 26/04/05 01:33:54 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember that i'm still
In a message dated 26/04/05 13:28:16 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, the silly thing in past years was that you could buy programs like
QPAC2 or QD which happened to include Pointer Environment but AFAIK you could
never buy Pointer Environment by itself!
H! I
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Just to see how Turbo developed I tried to compile EasyPtr's AppMan
with it. I'd like to tell some of my quest in case anybody else wants
to try it, too.
First of all I'd like to note that whatever feature I thought it
would be cool if Turbo could do this Turbo could
Excellent. If it it will work with that, it'll probably work with
anything. Does anyone still use AH, when Minny is freely available?
Jeremy
Not many with AH, but plenty with the next two common versions (JM and JS). My
Aurora has a JM ROM and my QL+Gold Card have a switchable JM and
Marcel Kligus wrote:
jms1 wrote:
As Dilwyn Jones says in his article in Qtoady that TurboPtr is more
flexible than EasyPtr,
Well, but mostly in the sense that Assembler is more flexible than
Basic. Still most people prefer to program in Basic. EasyPtr is not
simply a wrapper around the
H! I now wonder what I bought from Jochen when he sent me QPTR. I thought
that was the Pointer Environment by itself. What I got was the QPTR Manual
(now much used), a set of Qmac macros for programming assembler pointer programs
using Qmac, QPTR extensions for programming Pointer
Marcel Kilgus writes:
First of all I'd like to note that whatever feature I thought it
would be cool if Turbo could do this Turbo could already do, one just
has to read the documentation.
Just is a pretty big word here ;) But you are right!
200 IF NOT(COMPILED) THEN
210 LRESPR
Apologies if this is duplication Roy, the Tesco Webmail beastie timed out on me
while I was trying to send the first copy and I don't think it got through.
I've been given so much advice that my head is spinning. In one email I
was advised to by QPAC2, but was then told that its the same as
Oops. That was meant to be forwarded to Roy not replied to this list (Tesco
Webmail strikes again). But as it ended up here, suggest adding difference
between QPTR and PE and all the other terms too!
Dilwyn Jones
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/27 Wed PM 01:00:46 GMT
To:
For me, the silly thing in past years was that you could buy programs like
QPAC2 or QD which happened to include Pointer Environment but AFAIK you
could
never buy Pointer Environment by itself!
H! I now wonder what I bought from Jochen when he sent me QPTR. I thought
that
(changed subject line to reflect change in thread)
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Does anyone have a list of 'old programs' written for QDOS that do not
run under the PE ?
If there is a known list, then some action may taken.
--
Malcolm Cadman
John Gregory made a similar remark at the Quanta AGM
On the other hand there are lots of freeware products available too.
Tell me about that one! Every now and then I have a flurry of updating my PD
Library catalogue and I realise there's more and more free QL software out
there than I can ever find time to catalogue and add to the library, let
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On the other hand there are lots of freeware products available too.
Tell me about that one! Every now and then I have a flurry of updating
my PD Library catalogue and I realise there's more and more free QL
software out
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
(changed subject line to reflect change in thread)
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Does anyone have a list of 'old programs' written for QDOS that do not
run under the PE ?
If there is a known list, then some action may taken.
--
Malcolm
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Darren
Branagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Reminds me, I really must organise another Irish Show, maybe in Galway for a
change.
Would that be an Irish Show or a show held in Ireland ... :-)
--
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
Roy, I don't think this type of query can be answered too often. Could
you perhaps do something for your beginners series along these lines:
I had planned to do something on 'Essential Programs and Very Useful
Ones' I am
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], jms1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
The main benefit of the free software movement is that source is distributed
normally with the code and anybody is free to develope it, and within the
license conditions distribute it.
This may be an area where some programmers may
Hi Malcolm,
I may have not given the right info.
When I type in ex win1_lx_lynxenter
I get the window displayed and in the window is a message saying
Your Terminal Type is Unknown ... Enter a Terminal Type I enter VT-52 or
VT100 but it just drops out
.
Arnold
Send instant messages to
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [ql-users] was... Just an idea for a new Product.
Some platforms actually offer the best of both worlds to some degree. Q40
and Q60 users can use
- Original Message -
From: Roy wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] was... Just an idea for a new Product.
Ok some of the advice was maybe not quite worded concisely. The Pointer
Environment is the three files
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
.
Jeremy got a bit flamed for his suggestion to make things (QPC in
this case) cheaper, even free.
Actually, I never suggested free. It still didn't seem to prevent people
from thinking that was where I was coming from, but that is not the
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:24:18 -0400, Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I fear my knowledge of Turbo compiler is too rusty after years of not
using it, and my knowledge of TurboPTR very minimal, so I'd appreciate
some articles from someone (probably along the lines of the ones I
23 matches
Mail list logo
