Thank you Marcel! Really good news.
I am using QL-SD adapter since quite a lot of time and it is
definitively an important upgrade for the BBQL
I am not sure if I understood well and you will produce some units by
yourself, In case yes I will be delighted to have one board (may be 2
Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
>> As far as I could gather in my limited tests, INGOT 5 never worked
>> (which includes the Tetroid) and INGOT 6 worked or at least mostly
>> worked.
> That makes me a little sceptic, because I have one labelled "INGOT 5"
> which worked (with the original driver and
Am 30.03.2018 um 00:47 schrieb Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users:
> Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
>> Did you test your logic changes with a non-Tetroid GC inside a QL where
>> the original logic did *not* work reliably?
>>
>> I'm asking, because IIRC you reported total failure of the original
>> logic
Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
> Did you test your logic changes with a non-Tetroid GC inside a QL where
> the original logic did *not* work reliably?
>
> I'm asking, because IIRC you reported total failure of the original
> logic with the Tetroid GC, while my experience was, that non-Tetroid GC
>
Am 29.03.2018 um 23:29 schrieb Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users:
> Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have
> made huge progress regarding my work on QL-SD that I was going to
> write about today anyway:
>
> https://www.kilgus.net/2018/03/29/ql-sd-news/
Must have been a
Awesome!You are the best!
2018-03-29 23:43 GMT+02:00 Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:42 PM, Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote:
> > A Lattice JTAG programmer is all.
> >
> I have a couple of FTDI JTAG doodats, but no specific Lattice one.
>
>
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:42 PM, Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote:
> A Lattice JTAG programmer is all.
>
I have a couple of FTDI JTAG doodats, but no specific Lattice one.
Graeme
___
QL-Users Mailing List
A Lattice JTAG programmer is all.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:29 PM, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
> > Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have
> > made huge
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:29 PM, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
> Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have
> made huge progress regarding my work on QL-SD that I was going to
> write about today anyway:
>
> https://www.kilgus.net/2018/03/29/ql-sd-news/
>
>
This is amazing work!
It also means I can stop my occasional work on my QL-SD version. I have no
desire to sell a QL-SD into a crowded marketplace.
Instead, I'd like to buy one for compatibility testing on Issue 8.
This lets me focus on other projects that I have been neglecting this last
That is great news Marcel :)
Rich Mellor RWAP Software www.rwapsoftware.co.uk www.sellmyretro.com
On 2018-03-29 22:29, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have
made huge progress regarding my work on QL-SD that I was going to
would be interested in
2/3 QL-SD units.
Ian Burkinshaw
- Original Message - From: Peter Graf pg...@q40.de
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News
Francois Lanciault wrote:
Looking forward to an official news
Hi,
thanks, Kenn, Lee, Ian.
From my side, QL-SD was purely a charity project. I'm not involved in any
commercial aspects. So except from seeing that the work of Adrian and me
is useful for a few QLers, it won't change much if I read this here.
If you like, maybe one of you can collect emails
Cool! Excellent work!
Dave
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Peter pg...@q40.de wrote:
Hi,
the restriction that a QL memory expansion is madatory for QL-SD has been
removed.
If a QL-SD filesystem of 3 MB size (and Groupsize 8) is attached, there
still remains 62.5 KB free memory on an
Totally agree, excellent work and exciting to say the least.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Dave Park d...@sinclairql.com wrote:
Cool! Excellent work!
Dave
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Peter pg...@q40.de wrote:
Hi,
the restriction that a QL memory expansion is madatory for
Looking forward to an official news with price and availability.
François
De: Lee Privett
Envoyé: mercredi 4 décembre 2013 10:50
À: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Répondre à: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Objet: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News
Totally agree, excellent work and exciting to say the least.
On Wed, Dec 4
Hi Peter
If it helps in gaining a measure outside Germany, I would be interested in
2/3 QL-SD units.
Ian Burkinshaw
- Original Message -
From: Peter Graf pg...@q40.de
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News
Francois
Two third of a unit !! :-)
De: Ian Burkinshaw
Envoyé: mercredi 4 décembre 2013 17:02
À: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Répondre à: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Objet: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News
Hi Peter
If it helps in gaining a measure outside Germany, I would be interested in
2/3 QL-SD units.
Ian Burkinshaw
18 matches
Mail list logo
