Hi again,
At 22:37 4.7.2000 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
since I'm dealing with the SPAMCONTROL patch, I would like to comment your
problem:
1. You are right. Within the filtering mechanisms a logical "AND" scheme is
missing. To implement this requires some
this is a bit off topic,
but i consider it useful anyway ...
http://spamcop.net offers handy online forms
that process spam mails (do whois / dns lookups) and prepare a
ready-to-send
complaint emails with choices which ISP/Mail Server to send them to ... i
use it a lot with spam arriving in our
Hi there:
I'm not sure if this list is the right place, or I should post it to
vpopmail list. But please help.
---
I'm new to qmail, but have installed it according to the INSTALL file, and
faq. I also installed vpopmail. Problem is when I tested the system the
delivery works fine. All mails
Hi
I have used procmail to deliver to ~/Mail/* for a long time. There's a
lot of mail in mbox-format that I would like to convert (actually 20
mbox-files, gee!) in one go, like:
$ convert -R ~/Mail ~/Maildir
or something like that.
I couldn't find any programs/scripts for that anywherei, any
i need to unsubscribe:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from this list as he is no longer a user at this server. please help.
regards,
mark
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi again,
At 22:37 4.7.2000 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hello List,
I am back after a disaster which caused a complete loss of all data
including backups. I am trying to reinstate my previous
mutt-qmail-fetchmail-procmail setup but unlike the first time I cannot
do an error-free install of qmail.
Firstly as user when I open a term I get the message:
Would you mind also posting the contents of your file, /var/qmail/rc?
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eldar Imangulov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: URGENT!!! HELP!!! HP-UX fault
Hello ppl!
I have
HP-UX
here it is:
#!/sbin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
# Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Mailbox by default.
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail
Regards,
Eldar Imangulov
Hey thanks a lot Wayne, that fixed my problem.
And here I was ready to blame the alpha. :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Chan
To: Hubbard, David
Sent: 7/3/00 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: tcpserver alpha linux problems
If you have setup your qmail according to life-with-qmail, try
Hmm. My untrained eye isn't seeing anything offhand, but perhaps the
gurus here can comment.
You might start isolating the problem by removing the " echo -n '
qmail'" from your script, and running it again. Also, look in
/var/log/maillog; are there any messages being produced?
Dave
On 05-Jul-2000, Morten Liebach wrote:
lot of mail in mbox-format that I would like to convert (actually 20
mbox-files, gee!) in one go, like:
$ convert -R ~/Mail ~/Maildir
or something like that.
I couldn't find any programs/scripts for that anywherei, any ideas?
(I've looked at
Roberto Samarone Araújo (RSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any alias ... If a remote host send me an email , the qmail
doesn't put it in Maildir ... it logs the error message :
delivery 38: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
Did you check ~alias/Maildir? It's not
I had to re-compile qmail. Prior to the recompile, there were 10
messages (all for local delivery) in 'todo'. After the recompile, with
qmail running properly, those 10 have moved to the queue but are not
being delivered. The log is showing the same error message for all -
"wrong owner" (or
Hello,
Running a network test against my recent qmail installation, I get reports
on the mailto programs hole, which allows users to telnet to port 25 and
issue:
MAIL FROM: root@this_host
RCPT: any program
This allows users to potentially execute any command with root authority.
The warning
"Eldar Imangulov" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my qmail start script runs Ok, but qmail stops.
When? Shortly after rebooting?
When I restart qmail deamon manualy it keeps runing.
Until you reboot?
If so, it sounds like you need to disassociate qmail from the
controlling tty, e.g. by "nohup"'ing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The other question that arises is that I'd quite like qmail *not* to
accept SMTP mail from the outside world (my ISP delivers using SMTP
but want it to continue to accept SMTP mail from other computers on my
home LAN. How can I do this?
man tcprules. If you have
Steffan Hoeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What *does* the last number in
@4000395b7d5233ba0ecc delivery 123: success: did_1+0+0/
stand for ?
The first number is a local delivery
The second number is a remote delivery
The third number is .. ?
program deliveries
-Dave
On Jul 04 2000, Markus Stumpf wrote:
But this is exactly the point.
Valid (e.g.!!!) hotmail.com eMails should come from an outgoing
hotmail.com smtp server. If they don't they're most probably faked
sender addresses used by spammers.
No, they should not.
For instance, all my
"clemensF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scott Gifford:
to use apop, germanynet (calisto) barked, thay would not change their
entire setup for just one customer, when i asked them for apop. i dared
to ask only because their greeting looks like an apop prompt, and it
even changes on
Quoting John Steniger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Running a network test against my recent qmail installation, I get reports
on the mailto programs hole, which allows users to telnet to port 25 and
issue:
MAIL FROM: root@this_host
RCPT: any program
Huh. I've never heard of this exploit! Now,
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 11:41:16AM -0400, Sill, Dave wrote:
Steffan Hoeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What *does* the last number in
@4000395b7d5233ba0ecc delivery 123: success: did_1+0+0/
stand for ?
The first number is a local delivery
The second number is a remote delivery
The
It is not an issue. I don't remember if qmail will silently drop
these messages or return a bounce for them, but it most certainly will
not run any programs as root because of them.
ScottG.
John Steniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Running a network test against my recent qmail
Hello,
I fixed the /sbin/loader errors I mentioned before the weekend
by increasing the softlimit to 5000, but now I have another
problem:
According to TEST.delivery qmail should syslog a line whenever
it starts. In my logs, I can't find anything, even though all
of the qmail processes
my qmail start script runs Ok, but qmail stops.
When? Shortly after rebooting?
can't see when but when after the login into the system right after the
reboot and say "ps -e | grep qmail" I see nothing.
When I restart qmail deamon manualy it keeps runing.
Until you reboot?
Yes, untill next
Steffan Hoeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 11:41:16AM -0400, Sill, Dave wrote:
Steffan Hoeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What *does* the last number in
@4000395b7d5233ba0ecc delivery 123: success: did_1+0+0/
stand for ?
The first number is a local delivery
The
I've read the information in the four page printout that covers Quick
Mail Transfer Protocol (QMTP-19970201).
Qmail and Qmtp has been set up on a linux machine. I can telnet into
port 209 (no problems).
The problem is, while writing a piece of software, I cannot "QMTP" e-
mail to the linux
Hi,
I had applied the patch for this and work very well with BIND.
recently, I changed to DNScache and this message came back.
where's the problem ??
--
Claudinei Luis Bianchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claudinei Luis Bianchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had applied the patch for this and work very well with BIND.
recently, I changed to DNScache and this message came back.
where's the problem ??
Exactly. What makes you think this message indicates a problem on your
end?
-Dave
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:54:25AM +0800, ??? wrote:
for example:
If I use ezmlm to build a mailling list.
Which has 26 subscribers : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All on the same host "remote.host"
Then I send a message to the mailling list, does qmail+ezmlm
1.Send ONE
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, wolfgang zeikat wrote:
Also sprach Karl Voit [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04.07.2000:
Ow. This is getting complicated now :(
No its not. its logical:
;)
I ment _my_ needs/configuration.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] connects to your qmail via SMTP
with a mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ian Layton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for all the comments I received about my previous question.
I am now needing to make a program that will analyses bounced messages from
Qmail and be able to distinguish between hard (permanent bounces) and soft
(temporary) bounces. Is there any
Barry Dwyer writes:
My tcp.smtp file has proper settings to allow the local clients to work
as RELAYCLIENTS:
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
Just a speculation, but is the firewall doing NAT? Does the
mail server really see 192.168.0.n as client IP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When sending all mail as user me for remote hosts out of ./mailppp/ by:
me@bbrade:~ maildirsmtp ./mailppp "" mail.arco.de bbrade
I get following answer:
It seems to me that this has nothing to do with masquerading
issues.
What are you trying to do? If you would
Cerberus - the Guardian of Hades writes:
i need to unsubscribe:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from this list as he is no longer a user at this server. please help.
0. Arrange for mail to those addresses to be delivered somewhere where
you can get to it.
1.
Dennis Robertson writes:
Firstly as user when I open a term I get the message:
env: qmail-start: Permission denied.
I have followed both LWQ and the how-to and have checked permissions
without finding what is wrong.
Secondly, when I open a term I get a number like [1] 27087 in the top
left
The Powers That Be are making noises about not liking the text of qmail's
bounce message. The whole "This is the qmail-send program at" thingy.
I don't want to mess with DJB's pristine code, so I would rather not
change it. Are there any good, concrete reasons to leave it alone? Or am
I being
Now here's my problem:
When my fetchmail sends all mails from my provider-server (sbox) to my
server (tux), the mails don't come to my account. In fact, I don't know,
where they're delivered to anyway :(
Jul 5 19:03:36 tux qmail: 962816616.563087 delivery
160: success:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upon starting qmail, I get a looping error as svscan attempts to
acquire these two directories, returning this error:
supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-send/supervise/lock:
temporary failure
supervise: fatal: unable to acuire qmail-smtpd/supervise/lock:
Karl Voit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When my fetchmail sends all mails from my provider-server (sbox) to my
server (tux), the mails don't come to my account. In fact, I don't know,
where they're delivered to anyway :(
That's a fetchmail issue. What's in your .fetchmailrc? Have you looked
in
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:55:44PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
The Powers That Be are making noises about not liking the text of qmail's
bounce message. The whole "This is the qmail-send program at" thingy.
I don't want to mess with DJB's pristine code, so I would rather not
change it. Are
Peter Mitev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just installed the QMAIL package (i've done this many times).
It seems to be running KO, except that when a message is delivered to
the queue - nothing happens. QMAIL waits for about 10-20-60 minutes
and then it sends the messages that are in the
Big wigs probably don't like the humor in qmails bounce message. It's a
shame.. I know I got a chuckle out of it the first time I read it.
Chad
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Bodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 3:13 PM
To: qmail list
Subject: Re: Changing
Charles Boening [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can get everything working just fine. It's when I try to copy my domains
directory from my current production server that all goes bonkers.
No kidding? Bonkers? Bummer...
Perhaps if you were more specific about how exactly it went "bonkers"
we could
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 09:12:46PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
Because it's the nearest to a suggestion to a standard that is:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt
It's well defined and polite.
What part of this bounce is it that you don't like?
I *do* like it! I don't want to change it.
Barry Dwyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I clear the queue of these messages? I don't care if they get
deleted in the process.
You have several choices:
1) Do nothing: they'll be purged automatically either by being
delivered or bounced.
2) Stop qmail, delete the queue files associated
Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *do* like it! I don't want to change it. I'm just trying to come up
with reasonable arguments defending my position.
Feel free to change it, but if you do, be careful not to break QSBMF
(qmail-send bounce message format), which bounce parsers like those
wolfgang zeikat:
http://spamcop.net offers handy online forms
i have used all sorts of anti-spam tricks, but presently i just look at the
headers of a spam-mail trying to spot from which domain it really originated
by scanning the recieved-lines and use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as well
as
Rogerio Brito:
For instance, all my e-mails use iname.com as the envelope and
as the From: field, but I don't send mail from them (in fact,
they are in another country); I use my ISP's relays.
my spam peeked up when i got myself an iname.com-account. i think they
sell
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
Karl Voit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When my fetchmail sends all mails from my provider-server (sbox) to my
server (tux), the mails don't come to my account. In fact, I don't know,
where they're delivered to anyway :(
That's a fetchmail issue.
Please, do not misinform users of qmail out there. By deleting rcphosts
file, you open up qmail for third-party relaying. DON'T.
What you rater ought to do, is to control who can relay against your
SMTP-server with tools like tcpserver http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html
package.
Keep helping
Cyril Bitterich:
But there is a good Point in you proposal. Maybe you just wanted to
reject the mail with a notification that you do not accept this mail
because they are not sent via Hotmail.
that's dangerous. my experience told me never to answer suspect spammers.
clemens
Karl Voit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now here's my problem:
When my fetchmail sends all mails from my provider-server (sbox) to my
server (tux), the mails don't come to my account. In fact, I don't know,
where they're delivered to anyway :(
The biggest problem here is that you're
How does one setup qmail and ezmlm to allow subscribes and unsubscribes to
be done ONLY by command line. I apologize if this is documented somewhere
but I only found out how to prevent posts to the mailing lists itself.
Brian
Hand, Brian C. writes:
How does one setup qmail and ezmlm to allow subscribes and unsubscribes to
be done ONLY by command line.
If you remove listdir/public, ezmlm-manage will stop responding to all
administrative requests, including -subscribe, -unsubscribe, and -get.
If you want -get to keep
Apologies ... amazing what lack of sleep and frustration can do.
I figured it out though. When I installed the new server, I put vpopmail in
a different location and neglected to change the home directory in the
vpasswd file.
Thanks
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill
On 05-Jul-00 Tetsu Ushijima wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When sending all mail as user me for remote hosts out of ./mailppp/
by:
me@bbrade:~ maildirsmtp ./mailppp "" mail.arco.de bbrade
I get following answer:
It seems to me that this has nothing to do with masquerading
issues.
I need a little help,
I got finally got qmail installed and everything appears to working fine.
The problem is when I telnet to localhost 25 and follow the direction from
the TEST.deliver, I connect to the port and run all the commands but the
mail does not get delivered. I took a look at the
I want to move away from splogger w/o
making the full jump (yet) to supervise
and other daemontools...
here is my qmail rc file:
mail1.wlv# more /var/qmail/rc
#!/bin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
# Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Mailbox by default.
ulimit -n
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 05:27:05PM -0700, M.B. wrote:
I want to move away from splogger w/o
making the full jump (yet) to supervise
and other daemontools...
here is my qmail rc file:
mail1.wlv# more /var/qmail/rc
#!/bin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
# Using
Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 05:27:05PM -0700, M.B. wrote:
I want to move away from splogger w/o
making the full jump (yet) to supervise
and other daemontools...
here is my qmail rc file:
mail1.wlv# more /var/qmail/rc
#!/bin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 08:50:52PM -0400, Mark Mentovai wrote:
I don't know about the correctness of that line, but before adding it in you
would also want to add "setuidgid qmaill" before it.
Not true. qmail-start starts the logger as the log user (qmaill),
eliminating the need for
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start ./Maildir/ /usr/local/bin/multilog t s100 /var/log/qmail
qmail
unfortunately the above does no logging for me...
nor if i put some quotes in...
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start ./Maildir/ '/usr/local/bin/multilog t
Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 08:50:52PM -0400, Mark Mentovai wrote:
I don't know about the correctness of that line, but before adding it in you
would also want to add "setuidgid qmaill" before it.
Not true. qmail-start starts the logger as the log user (qmaill),
eliminating
M.B. wrote:
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start ./Maildir/ /usr/local/bin/multilog t s100 /var/log/qmail
qmail
unfortunately the above does no logging for me...
Get rid of the trailing qmail. It was an argument to splogger to tell it
what program name to use.
nor if i put
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 09:39:56PM -0400, Mark Mentovai wrote:
Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 08:50:52PM -0400, Mark Mentovai wrote:
I don't know about the correctness of that line, but before adding it in you
would also want to add "setuidgid qmaill" before it.
Not true.
M.B. wrote:
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start ./Maildir/ /usr/local/bin/multilog t s100
/var/log/qmail
qmail
unfortunately the above does no logging for me...
Get rid of the trailing qmail. It was an argument to
splogger to tell it
what program name to use.
M.B. wrote:
now how might i pipe this thru tai64nlocal to get some readable
(by me) time stamps in there?
Yup. tai64nlocal converts what it sees on stdin and places it on stdout, so
instead of "cat /export/home/qmaillogs/current" (or similar), you can use
"tai64nlocal
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 09:41:50PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
that's dangerous. my experience told me never to answer suspect spammers.
As I recall, the argument is that by responding, you confirm that the
e-mail address is valid. I can't say I've dealt with enough spam to
have relevant
Scott Gifford:
Just a guess; if the provider that won't provide APOP can provide
you with plaintext passwords, then I don't know what their excuse is.
well i told you mom! first they asked what apop is and when i explained
it and hinted i'd want it -- pause -- and then they said they
Adam McKenna:
should i be able to replace splogger w/ a multilog entry? say like:
'multilog t s100 /var/log/qmail' instead of the splogger above?
would this then write files into /var/log/qmail?
yes.
clemens
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 07:04:51AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
Adam McKenna:
should i be able to replace splogger w/ a multilog entry? say like:
'multilog t s100 /var/log/qmail' instead of the splogger above?
would this then write files into /var/log/qmail?
yes.
clemens
Hi, I
M.B.:
now how might i pipe this thru tai64nlocal to get some readable
(by me) time stamps in there?
qmail-start ./Maildir/ multilog t s500 !tai64nlocal /export/home/qmaillogs
then every log that gets rotated out of business (current - @...) will have
human readable timestamps.
clemens
72 matches
Mail list logo
