On Don, 03 Aug 2000, Wayne Chu wrote:
I installed ezmlm-0.53+ezmlm-idx-0.40.
Patched qmail-qmqpc as instructed in qmail-qmqpc.tar.gz
(I checked qmail-qmqpc.c, it's patched.)
Put a "DIR/qmqpservers" file in my list directory.
You did replace qmail-queue by a link to qmail-qmqpc?
--
Oliver
When launching a program under svscan/supervise that has no port
connections, (I just want to keep it running,) what is the correct
line in the "run" script if I want to use syslog?
Would something like:
exec env - PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/bin" my_prog | \
splogger my_prog_id 3
or:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 07:08:38AM -, John Conover wrote:
! exec env - PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/bin" my_prog 21 | \
! splogger my_prog_id 3
Almost. Use the log directory instead, if you can (replace qmaill with
whatever user you want to run your log process on):
cd /service/foobar
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:41:19AM +0800, Wayne Chu wrote:
I installed ezmlm-0.53+ezmlm-idx-0.40.
Patched qmail-qmqpc as instructed in qmail-qmqpc.tar.gz
(I checked qmail-qmqpc.c, it's patched.)
Put a "DIR/qmqpservers" file in my list directory.
But ezmlm-send still uses qmail-queue
hi,
I have a lot of these entries in my /var/log/syslog file. what do these
entries mean? do I have to care about them or are these messages just
'information'?
Aug 3 06:26:22 joshua qmail: 965276782.869518 warning: trouble injecting
bounce message, will try later
thanks for an answer
Joel
Hi,
I have just recently had the same problem although in my case I have to
remove alot of spam that was caught in my queue and the ever growing queue
was choking the system... I very brutally removed alot of the spammers mail
from /var/qmail/queue/mess and the others since then the problem
On 2 Aug 2000, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
Generating a random permutation algorithmically is not too easy.
Oh really?
int i, j, x;
int a[N];
for (i = 0; i N; ++i)
a[i] = i;
for (i = N - 1; i 0; --i) {
j = random(i);
x = a[i]; a[i] = a[j]; a[j] = x;
}
where random(i) is
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 08:32:37PM -0600, Irwan Hadi wrote:
I saw, at least at evaluation 3, postfix beat qmail ;)
BTW, still don't know how about exact configuration that the author's
using while doing the experiments.
If this information could be gathered from:
Hey,
Please can anyone inform me as to the best anti virus package that is not
going to cost me an absolute fortune and is really reliable to plug onto the
server side!
Thanks
Slider
Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/eindex.html
I saw, at least at evaluation 3, postfix beat qmail ;)
Check again. qmail won all three tests. In Evaluation 3, qmail
finished in ~125 seconds, and Postfix took over 150 seconds--next to
last place.
So
"P.Y. Adi Prasaja" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this information could be gathered from:
http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/eoperation.html
then one can make a conclusion that the authors no nothing about
postfix. /etc/postfix/master.cf has nothing todo with concurrency
control in
* Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please can anyone inform me as to the best anti virus package that is
not going to cost me an absolute fortune and is really reliable to
plug onto the server side!
Use procmail to filter out all attachments. Keep a LART at hand in case
your cow-orkers start
Hello again!
Thanks for the tip on procmail, looking at it, it seems to be more a
personal solution. apologies for not being clear, is there a bulk method
of scanning viruses?
Thanks
AC
-Original Message-
From: Robin S. Socha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 August 2000 13:33
Hello,
does anyone know or has working the connection
from qmail to IMAP-daemon Cyrus?
I am experimenting with these two, but qmail
does not deliver mail to cyrus.
I want to use qmail as MTA and cyrus as IMAP-daemon
for all users.
TIA
Wolfgang Wagner
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
does anyone know or has working the connection
from qmail to IMAP-daemon Cyrus?
I am experimenting with these two, but qmail
does not deliver mail to cyrus.
I want to use qmail as MTA and cyrus as IMAP-daemon
for all users.
Are you using the deliver program that comes with
Peter Green said in June 12, that he modified the qmailmrtg stuff to work
with multilog format
Do you have some infos on it ??? Where can I find that ???
Or what shall I do if I want to use the qmailmrtg stuff ??
Thanks
Sumith Ail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody tell me where can I find source rpm of
qmail + patches + init scripts for my RH Linux 6.2 on
i386
Try http://www.em.ca/~bruceg/ and look under "qmail+patches" or something
along those lines.
Charles
--
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 04:21:00PM +0200, Cedric Fontaine wrote:
Peter Green said in June 12, that he modified the qmailmrtg stuff to work
with multilog format
Do you have some infos on it ??? Where can I find that ???
Or what shall I do if I want to use the qmailmrtg stuff ??
Have
I'm (still) getting request time-outs from the same server. Checking the
client's amandad.debug reveals:
amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad:
Sorry, wrong mailing list ;-). I haven't had my coffee yet.
--
Albert Hopkins
Sr. Systems Specialist
Dynacare Laboratories
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Robin S. Socha wrote:
* Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please can anyone inform me as to the best anti virus package that is
not going to cost me an absolute fortune and is really reliable to
plug onto the server side!
Use procmail to filter
* Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your quoting is an abomination. Please fix it or refrain from using
software that simply is not meant to be used in a technical environment.
Thanks for the tip on procmail, looking at it, it seems to be more a
personal solution.
It isn't. Take a look
Pavel Kankovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2 Aug 2000, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
Generating a random permutation algorithmically is not too easy.
Oh really?
[ swap each element with a randomly chosen partner ]
Yes, that will do it. When I was originally working with this stuff
the
I'm trying to set up a redundant "store-and-forward" mail server.
This box will reside much farther towards our network periphery
than the present Exchange server we are currently using. If we
lose a critical internal network node for, say, a day or two, the
intent is that this box will act
When (as root), I try to start qmail with
/var/qmail/etc/qmail.rc start
this is the output I see:
Starting qmail: svscan.
# supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: exec format error
supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: exec format error
Very likely, one or
As you can see from the header, it doesn't use qmail anymore.
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smv05.iname.net (lmtp06.iname.net [165.251.8.61])
by glitch.crosswinds.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA43670
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 14:36:32 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from
* Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As you can see from the header, it doesn't use qmail anymore.
[...]
Well, good luck to them...
,
| -
|Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory
|
| Synopsis:
Hi,
Speaking of filtering binary attachments?
Use my method...right here.
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/07/msg00518.html
just modify it at your own requirements.
cheers
Noel
-Original Message-
From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like AV. I really do. But the thing is "all" AV are "reactive".
You can only be protected all the time iff, your dat file is updated every
minute.
But if the LoveBug or Melissa or any html borne worm
is mutating every minute then your AV dat file is useless.
the choice is yours...
cheers
Charles Roten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I need is a configuration such that *all* emails coming into
the foo.com domain will be stored and, once the network link to
the primary server is back up, will be forwarded. There doesn't
seem to be any information at
James Raftery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If one week is too short, put the number of seconds after which messages
should bounce in control/queuelifetime.
This is standard configuration for a backup MX.
[I wibbled on about maildir2smtp]
James's advice is, of course, far more appropriate if
James R Grinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 4 August 2000 at 00:22:25 +0100
Charles Roten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I need is a configuration such that *all* emails coming into
the foo.com domain will be stored and, once the network link to
the primary server is back up, will be
I've been having problems running sslwrap out of inetd so I decided to run it
via tcpserver instead.. I'm using svscan. But for some reason, the logs
refuse to go to /var/log/qmail/ssl/.
Here's my "run" file:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=$PATH:/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 20:58:26 -0400
From: Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am pretty sure svscan expects the logging to come through on a certain file
descriptor, but not positive. Does anyone know if this is the case? If so,
which one is it? Should I just add a 21 at the end
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 06:08:10PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
svscan simply creates a pipe. That is, it redirects stdout of ./run
to stdin of ./log/run. It doesn't do anything with stderr. If your
program logs to stderr, then 21 in ./run will redirect the logs to
the stdout of ./run
I'm looking for an easy way to archive old messages in a Maildir (by
compressing them, like the gzip patch does, perhaps) for users who don't
believe in deleting old mail (especially their sent mail folder).
Incidentally, its an IMAP system, with several Maildirs (courier-imap).
eg:
scan
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:15:07PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
I'm looking for an easy way to archive old messages in a Maildir (by
compressing them, like the gzip patch does, perhaps) for users who don't
believe in deleting old mail (especially their sent mail folder).
Incidentally,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
find /Maildir/ -mtime 90 -print |xargs mv /somewhere/else
tar czvf mail.tgz /somewhere/else
Oops. Of course, there should be a "+" in front of that 90...
find /Maildir/ -mtime +90 -print |xargs mv /somewhere/else
tar czvf
At 10:43 PM 8/3/00 +0200, Robin S. Socha wrote:
* Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As you can see from the header, it doesn't use qmail anymore.
[...]
Well, good luck to them...
and seems
, PayPal/Confinity, Red Hat's mailing lists, Hypermart.net, Casema,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:14:32AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
then one can make a conclusion that the authors no nothing about
postfix. /etc/postfix/master.cf has nothing todo with concurrency
control in postfix, at least if he think that it has the same fashion
as qmail.
He apparently
Ben Beuchler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 08:52:16PM -0400, Sam Carleton wrote:
I am switching over to qmail from sendmail. I am no expert in sendmail,
I simply know that sendmail's virtusertable would allow incoming mail
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be mapped to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Pennace wrote:
Not all binary attachments are bad. PGP/MIME signed messages (such as
this one) put the PGP signature in a MIME attachment, see
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2015.txt.
I would be very unhappy if someone was removing the PGP signatures
from my messages.
What
Sam Carleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 3 August 2000 at 23:05:47 -0400
I have installed fastforward and I am aliasing incoming mail from
sam.carleton@domain to sam@domain, but I do not have a clue as to how to
use fastforward to change the From: header on out going mail from
sam@domain
I've got an interesting thing that I can't quite figure out. It
works, but I'm wondering if this is normal. I've got a user who is
reading/writing email on a machine with qmail as the MTA for the
domain pellaria.com. Her email address belongs to the domain
danen.net, which is run on another
also sprach vdanen:
Can someone let me know if the adding localhost to control/locals is
the "normal" behaviour? I think a lot of people would like to use
qmail as their own MTA instead of sendmail or postfix, so knowing
this would be of great help to me.
I don't know if it's the ``normal''
On another note...
Our organisation has an NT (sorry : ) box which acts as the primary MX
server for our domain. All mail goes to it and gets scanned via the
(brilliant, automatic, no-maintenance) Norton Antivirus Enterprise software
(worth a little money but what is your company's data worth to
Sorry, forgot to add that we use Norton Antivirus as a 'plug-in' for the
Lotus Notes e-mail server on our internet-viewable SMTP machine. This of
course adds the possibility of much more functionality, which we use as if
it was sand on the beach in summer, but that's up to your organisation's
But then again, scripts kiddies are "Always" one step
ahead compared to the dat files of your beautiful Norton Enterprise
Antivirus.
cheers
Noel
-Original Message-
From: Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, 4 August 2000 15:51
Subject: RE: Anti
48 matches
Mail list logo
