not at all.
You just want to check for mail, before you send mail.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 1999 5:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Auth. SMTP-after-POP
Of course you might have to send
qmail Digest 2 Oct 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 777
Topics (messages 31121 through 31160):
Aack child crashed on Solaris
31121 by: Fred Backman
Autoresponder Written by Eric Huss
31122 by: Tony Wade
31125 by: Dave Sill
sorted (Re: Aack child crashed on Solaris)
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:53:42PM -0400, David Harris wrote:
I'm happy with my inetd service and tcpserver for my qmail-smtp. I'm running a
few low-load services through inetd and it's doing fine. Perhaps if pop3 or
imap become a larger load when I deploy web based email, I'll run them with
Hi!
I followed the instruction by install.xxx text. Everything's OK until
local-error test. When I sent a mail to an nonexistent local user, I didn't
have a bounce message in my maildir. I saw the syslog, there was an error
message _Unable to chdir to Maildir_ instead of _No such address_.
I have setup qmail host domains monja.com.sg.
I add educast.com.sg as local too. With these settings:
in control/locals:
monja.com.sg
po.monja.com.sg
educast.com.sg
po.educast.com.sg
in control/rcpthosts:
monja.com.sg
po.monja.com.sg
educast.com.sg
po.educast.com.sg
On server I can
Is there an MX record in DNS for educast.com.sg? Where does it say the
mail should be delivered. You should have a DNS entry like this:
educast.com.sg. IN MX 10po.monja.com.sg.
po.educast.com.sg. IN MX 10po.monja.com.sg.
If there is no MX record, the SMTP protocol
My administrator had set DNS for educast.com.sg with this entry
educast.com.sg.INMX10kids.monja.com.sg.
INA203.127.238.161
kids is the host name of monja.com.sg. Is the problem lies on DNS setting.
My understanding is qmail setting are
Hi,
I am currently setting up a new machine for my
Webhosting(forwarding)-Service. Since I have heard a lot about qmail I
would like to use it as MTA on this machine.
I did read some docs on www.qmail.org but since I need some non-standart
stuff I don't exactly know where to start. It would be
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Diego Puertas wrote:
Greetings to everyone
How can I make qmail stop receiving large mails.
This is probably heavily discussed in a qmail FAQ or man page, but...
1. For all mail inbound (i.e., via SMTP), just put the number of bytes
(as in 2048000 for basically 2
Good luck Dan!
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2345714,00.html
--
The 5 year plan:
In five years we'll make up another plan.
Or just re-use this one.
Why do the processes started by the qmail/rc script keep dissapearing? Also is using
this script ok for a heavy load site? I call smtp and pop3 from tcpserver wrappers.
cheers,
--
Marek Narkiewicz, Webmaster Intercreations
Reply to -marek @ intercreations . com-
"People in glass houses seldom
Hello List,
I'm curious as to the average size of an Internet mail. I know this is
very subjective, but would like to hear what people think is the average
size.
My calculations based on qmailanalog over a long run give me 64K, and
that seems big.
Looking at my inbox, the average seems more
Found what seems to be an answer at
http://www.groupcomputing.com/Issues/1998/98SeptOct/98SOp32_EmailCrisis/98sop32_emailcrisis.html
Looks like around 25K is the average.
- Eric
Eric Dahnke escribió:
Hello List,
I'm curious as to the average size of an Internet mail. I know this is
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
Found what seems to be an answer at
http://www.groupcomputing.com/Issues/1998/98SeptOct/98SOp32_EmailCrisis/98sop32_emailcrisis.html
Looks like around 25K is the average.
Someone will scold me for this post, but would appreciate any thoughts:
A T1 would be ~ 80% utilized passing 22,000msgs/hr if the average msg
size was 23K.
Thx
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
Someone will scold me for this post, but would appreciate any thoughts:
A T1 would be ~ 80% utilized passing 22,000msgs/hr if the average msg
size was 23K.
I would not bet on it. The average message size is not an indicator of
network traffic. For
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
A T1 would be ~ 80% utilized passing 22,000msgs/hr if the average msg
size was 23K.
Not really. You need to differentiate peak load from sustained.
(average message size) * (number of messages per hour)
Rumor has it that Todd A. Jacobs may have mentioned these words:
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
A T1 would be ~ 80% utilized passing 22,000msgs/hr if the average msg
size was 23K.
Not really. You need to differentiate peak load from sustained.
(average message size) * (number of
Forgive me if the two posts from Eric were not related:
saturating a T1:
Todd presents a good formula, but this is not taking into account anything but the
message size. As Stan mentions, email size is not a good indicator of total network
traffic - even if you are only in
I've having problems with the local-remote delivery. There are no problems
with local-local delivery, and I can do remote-local delivery (using fetchmail).
My system is RedHat 6.0 (with fixes from their ERRATA), qmail 1.03, ucspi-tcp
v0.84, serialmail v0.75
ISP is called bayarea.net (mailserver
Does a user masquerading solution exist in which it is not necessary to
add MAILHOST and MAILUSER environment variables for every user on a
system hosting a half dozen virtual domains with hundreds of users? I
have read FAQ sections 1.1 and 1.2:
-
1.1. How do I set up host masquerading? All
21 matches
Mail list logo
