qmail Digest 29 Jul 2000 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1077

2000-07-29 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 29 Jul 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1077 Topics (messages 45724 through 45798): Re: qmail-1.03 on Solaris is broken 45724 by: Toens Bueker 45727 by: Andrew Richards Re: qmail SSL 45725 by: Miroslav Tempir qmail mailstart 45726 by: Lydia

bug in qmail-autoresponder version 0.92 ?

2000-07-29 Thread Olivier M.
Currently trying qmail-autoresponder (http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/) : Docs says: - Limits rate of automatic responses (defaults to a maximum of one message every hour). well, I always get _two_ messages, before the

From where to get tcpserver

2000-07-29 Thread tejal
Dear friends and gurus, Could anybody tell me that from where to get the tar or rpms for tcpserver for qmail, because i need to run qmail with tcpserver not with inetd. i m working on RH 6.2. thanx in advance Tejal Shah

Re: From where to get tcpserver

2000-07-29 Thread Robin S. Socha
* tejal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could anybody tell me that from where to get the tar or rpms for tcpserver for qmail, because i need to run qmail with tcpserver not with inetd. i m working on RH 6.2. http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html But if you're not familiar with installing sources, I'd

Re: Want to know your potential multiple recipient savings?

2000-07-29 Thread Greg Cope
Bruce Guenter wrote: As promised, I've posted the results of the benchmark testing at http://em.ca/~bruceg/bench-qmail-remote/ The receiving server is my PC, which has a DSL connection running at about 1.5Mb downlink bandwidth (the part that was actually used) running qmail, of

Re: Want to know your potential multiple recipient savings?

2000-07-29 Thread markd
Here goes on some feed back ... Very interesting - you seem to have backed up DJb's claims that a well connected host using single RCPTS is probably as good as one using multiple RCPTs. I always thought that Multiple would win hands down One of my clients is into sending "customized

Re: Want to know your potential multiple recipient savings?

2000-07-29 Thread Greg Cope
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here goes on some feed back ... Very interesting - you seem to have backed up DJb's claims that a well connected host using single RCPTS is probably as good as one using multiple RCPTs. I always thought that Multiple would win hands down One of my

Re: Want to know your potential multiple recipient savings?

2000-07-29 Thread markd
We are using sendmail - I'm a big qmail fan, use it it lots of places, but have been reluctant to change a working system. One of the arguments against was the multiple rcpt-to's that qmail does not support. But a customized email can never use multiple recipients. So that can't

POP delete mail on 2 places...

2000-07-29 Thread Magnus Löfqvist
Hi, Im need to rewrite the code for the pop3 server, need to get it delete mail from 2 places (the same mail, that are store on 2 dif. servers with nfs connection). Have looked a bit at qmail-pop3d.c code but dosent relise where it really delete the msg. Plz help me out here, // Magnus

Open letter

2000-07-29 Thread Patrick Lambert
Greetings, This is an open letter to the developers of the main SMTP servers that are used all over the Internet. In recent years, we have all seen in the news the many instances where our privacy has been compromised by big corporations or governments. Some recent examples include the recent

urgent help required ! tcpserver tcprules

2000-07-29 Thread reach_prashant
hello guys thanks for your guys ,i have gone through tcpserver tcprules docs and created a file named /etc/tcp.smtp content of which is 127.0.0.1local ip address then tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp /etc/tcp.smtp as per the documentation of tcpserver and

Re: POP delete mail on 2 places...

2000-07-29 Thread Uwe Ohse
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Magnus Löfqvist wrote: Have looked a bit at qmail-pop3d.c code but dosent relise where it really delete the msg. pop3_quit(), look for unlink(). Regards, Uwe

Re: dot-qmail deliver help

2000-07-29 Thread Uwe Ohse
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 08:38:11PM +0200, Einar Bordewich wrote: i think you don't want the `;' after "env". -snip- Are you sure? Not any more. Regards, Uwe

RE: urgent help required ! tcpserver tcprules

2000-07-29 Thread Alexander Jernejcic
do you have a ~/control/rcpthosts set up properly? qmail does relay if this file is missing. put you domains in this file (one per line) and your mailserver will only take mails for this domains. with tcp.smtp you specify ip-ranges for witch you are willing to relay - BUT only when

Re: Open letter

2000-07-29 Thread markd
This is an open letter to the developers of the main SMTP servers that are used all over the Internet. In recent years, we have all seen in the news the many instances where our privacy has been compromised by big corporations or governments. Some recent examples include the recent survey

Re: Open letter

2000-07-29 Thread Blackey
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Patrick Lambert wrote: compromised by big corporations or governments. Some recent examples include the recent survey results that showed over 50% of corporations in the USA check their employees Internet usage and e-mails, the Carnivore system from the FBI, aimed at

invalid characters in a email address?

2000-07-29 Thread Bill Parker
Hi All, Could someone give me a list of characters (ascii) which are NOT valid in a e-mail address...We had a problem with a user interface, and want to add code to prevent occurance from happening again... -Bill

Re: invalid characters in a email address?

2000-07-29 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 29-Jul-2000, Bill Parker wrote: Could someone give me a list of characters (ascii) which are NOT valid in a e-mail address...We had a problem with a user interface, and want to add code to prevent occurance from happening again... It's in RFC 822 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html

Re: Open letter

2000-07-29 Thread Adam McKenna
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 11:33:33AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I do agree with is that doing this is currently way too hard for the average user and any efforts to make this easier are a good thing. But you need to direct your letter at the email client programmers rather then the

Re: Open letter

2000-07-29 Thread markd
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 04:39:42PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 11:33:33AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I do agree with is that doing this is currently way too hard for the average user and any efforts to make this easier are a good thing. But you need to

Re: qmail-1.03 on Solaris is broken

2000-07-29 Thread Toens Bueker
Andrew Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The SMTP service may issue a QUIT, and immediately try again, resulting in a potential loop." The actual qmail-smtpd error message re bare LFs is 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html which would trigger the above fault if

Forwarding local account messages to POP mailbox.

2000-07-29 Thread Paul Broadwith
I have Hylafax set up on my server. I sent faxes from my username of paulb. Whenever a fax is sent, Hylafax notifies me by email to my local machine account, i.e. a message is sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] These messages sit in the local queue. I need to have them forwarded to:

Re: Forwarding local account messages to POP mailbox.

2000-07-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 05:58:54PM +0100, Paul Broadwith wrote: I have Hylafax set up on my server. I sent faxes from my username of paulb. Whenever a fax is sent, Hylafax notifies me by email to my local machine account, i.e. a message is sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Want to know your potential multiple recipient savings?

2000-07-29 Thread Bruce Guenter
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:17:19PM +, Greg Cope wrote: My question is thus - When does a host become well connected ? When the bandwidth required to send its mail is significantly smaller than the bandwidth available. That is, if you have to send 100,000 5K messages over a 1 hour period,

Re: Want to know your potential multiple recipient savings?

2000-07-29 Thread Bruce Guenter
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:30:08PM +, Greg Cope wrote: Well because of performance issue (Management wanted to send all the messages out in quite a short time - for reasons as yet unexplained!) we were considereding bining the customised part. If you *need* customized email per recipient,

Re: bug in qmail-autoresponder version 0.92 ?

2000-07-29 Thread Bruce Guenter
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote: Currently trying qmail-autoresponder (http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/) : Great! Docs says: - Limits rate of automatic responses (defaults to a maximum of one message every hour). well, I always get _two_ messages,