hi
had a question concerning Remote email delivery
does qmail retry mx server's as per their priority for remote emails ?
ie if i am sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and xyz.com has 3 mx servers and
if the first one is down is the second one tried immediately ?
regds
raj
It should do, as per RFC.
James
On 8 May 2008, at 11:01, Raj wrote:
hi
had a question concerning Remote email delivery
does qmail retry mx server's as per their priority for remote emails ?
ie if i am sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and xyz.com has 3 mx
servers and
if the first one
I'm not sure why qmail-inject is coming into play here.
What generated this message? The Cc: line indeed appears to be malformed
(missing initial ).
senthil vel wrote:
Hi list,
A mail sent to the local mail id bounced with the following
bounce message. I cant clearly understand the
Yeah, it *should*. I do recall though that the stock qmail program had a
problem in this area. I don't know if one of the many toaster patches fixes
that behavior or not. Have you searched that list archives?
James Palmer wrote:
It should do, as per RFC.
James
On 8 May 2008, at 11:01,
senthil vel wrote:
While i am sending mail from web interface, i am getting this
error...Kindly help me...
--
Thanks and Regards,
S.Senthilvel,
Is web interface (squirrelmail) running on a different machine?
Do you get this error when trying to log in, or when sending?
--
-Eric
So, having run find / -type f | xargs grep -i spamassassin-toaster-
root, I find the following:
/usr/bin/sa-compile:my $LOCAL_RULES_DIR = '/var/tmp/spamassassin-
toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin';# substituted at 'make' time
/usr/bin/sa-learn:my $LOCAL_RULES_DIR = '/var/tmp/spamassassin-
Hi guys I have the following message error when I try to update:
REQUIRED module out of date: HTML::Parser
optional module missing: Mail::SPF
optional module missing: Mail::SPF::Query
optional module missing: IP::Country
optional module missing: Razor2
optional module missing: Net::Ident
-Original Message-
From: Roxanne Sandesara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:24 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Soft Rejections
So, having run find / -type f | xargs grep -i spamassassin-toaster-
root, I find the
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
So, having run find / -type f | xargs grep -i
spamassassin-toaster-root, I find the following:
/usr/bin/sa-compile:my $LOCAL_RULES_DIR =
'/var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin';#
substituted at 'make' time
/usr/bin/sa-learn:my
Hello all
I just finish a final exam and so maybe I am just a little confused about
this email I am getting.
My toaster has been working great.
Then I started getting these emails Fri, May 2, 2008 8:20 pm
I got 5 of them on that friday, about a minute apart.
I then got one on sunday
this is what I get when I issue de install command:
CPAN: LWP::UserAgent loaded ok
Fetching with LWP:
ftp://cpan.upn.mx/pub/CPAN/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz
LWP failed with code[500] message[LWP::Protocol::MyFTP: connect: timeout]
Fetching with Net::FTP:
this is what I get when I issue de install command:
CPAN: LWP::UserAgent loaded ok
Fetching with LWP:
ftp://cpan.upn.mx/pub/CPAN/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz
LWP failed with code[500] message[LWP::Protocol::MyFTP: connect: timeout]
Fetching with Net::FTP:
Ah, ok... that explains it ... So whoever wrote this qtp-sa-update
deserves a smackdown... What are they thinking by touching the SA
executables ? That is just *very* bad (I would dare say *evil* ;)
programming... :\
Note to others: Configure sa-update's using these instructions - simple,
to the
Follow the directions at http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/FAQ.php#B for
B2. How to configure to use RPMforge,
then use yum to install them, e.g.:
# yum install perl-HTML-Parser perl-Mail-SPF
etc
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
Hi guys I have the following message error when I try to update:
REQUIRED
James Pratt wrote:
Ah, ok... that explains it ... So whoever wrote this qtp-sa-update
deserves a smackdown... What are they thinking by touching the SA
executables ? That is just *very* bad (I would dare say *evil* ;)
programming... :\
Note to others: Configure sa-update's using these
To be clear, I was not blaming Jake, or his utilities. I've had great
luck with everything Jake has ever done or offered. I was merely
answering the question of how it was I'd installed sa-update.
I'm also not really sure that the executables themselves /have/ been
messed up. It's
Eric,
Is there an easy way to go about removing various QTP packages? Such
as sa-update, newmodel etc?
Have them all installed at the minute with no problems, just wanting
the option!
Cheers,
James
On 8 May 2008, at 17:49, Jake Vickers wrote:
James Pratt wrote:
Ah, ok... that
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
To be clear, I was not blaming Jake, or his utilities. I've had great
luck with everything Jake has ever done or offered. I was merely
answering the question of how it was I'd installed sa-update.
I'm also not really sure that the executables themselves /have/ been
James Palmer wrote:
Eric,
Is there an easy way to go about removing various QTP packages? Such
as sa-update, newmodel etc?
Have them all installed at the minute with no problems, just wanting
the option!
rpm -e qmailtoaster-plus
Does that actually remove all the installed packages though, or just
the QTP installers? I.e. remove spamdyke, the new channel and cron
jobs added by sa-update and the yum repo added by newmodel?
Cheers,
James
On 8 May 2008, at 18:14, Jake Vickers wrote:
James Palmer wrote:
Eric,
Is
Hi Guys,
Unfortunately I still couldn't figure out the solution for my particular
problem. ClamAV has been running for many days now and still mail can't
be processed if i use simscan (currently I have disabled simscan from my
tcp.smtp, so bye bye SA and clamav). I've tried enabling simscan
Try rebuilding simscan and install that.
Erik
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Pablo Zavalia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
Unfortunately I still couldn't figure out the solution for my particular
problem. ClamAV has been running for many days now and still mail can't be
processed if i
How do I do that? rpm --rebuild?
Pablo Zavalia
Erik A. Espinoza escribió:
Try rebuilding simscan and install that.
Erik
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Pablo Zavalia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
Unfortunately I still couldn't figure out the solution for my particular
problem.
QTP is a set of tools which provide easy ways to do things that an
administrator might typically do. There are no QTP packages per se, only
qmailtoaster-plus itself.
As far as undoing what a qtp tool has done, that would need to be addressed
on a case by case basis:
.) for spamdyke, that has been
No probs, was just curious!
James
On 8 May 2008, at 20:21, Eric Shubert wrote:
QTP is a set of tools which provide easy ways to do things that an
administrator might typically do. There are no QTP packages per se,
only
qmailtoaster-plus itself.
As far as undoing what a qtp tool has
James Palmer wrote:
Does that actually remove all the installed packages though, or just
the QTP installers? I.e. remove spamdyke, the new channel and cron
jobs added by sa-update and the yum repo added by newmodel?
That removes the qmailtoaster-plus package. It does not undo any
I do have a question. When the last Spamassassin-toaster package came
out, there were problems. This was then followed by a thread that
included a package Eric put together that was version 3.2.4 release
1.3.14. I have that package. But the QMT website is only showing
release 1.3.13.
Did:
rpm -e simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6 --nodeps
rpmbuild --rebuild --with fdr60 simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6.src.rpm
rpm -i /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6.i386.rpm
Then I put everything back to normal in tcp.smtp
Worked like a charm! rebuilding simscan was the solution
Use 1.3.14. It contains a bug fix in the spec file (otherwise they're the
same). The bug it fixes is:
install: cannot create regular file
`/var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.bz2': No
such file or directory
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
I do have a question. When the
OK. Should probably put 1.3.14 on the website, then. So that qtp-
newmodel and other upgrades don't run into the same problem.
Interesting. That directory is the one that was coming up as part of
my 'issues'.
I'm afraid I'm not quite up to 'spec file mod' level status. Is it at
all
Ok, I have to really question the development habits/cycle of this
project at this point... Why is this guy recommending a version that's
not on the official site, and further, he writes the fix has to do with
the OP's original problem. Wasn't' it just last night he was blaming it
on dns? Wth?...
Mr Pratt --
I have to be honest. I find the attitude perceived in this post to be
rude, demeaning, and uncalled for. Like you, I was in a situation a
few years ago wherein I had to migrate my office's mail server needs
from a machine I'd had nothing to do with and no control over to
Hey there,
I was going through a test run today trying out the qtp-backup and qtp-restore.
I made sure both machines had the same version of qtp.
One was a toaster that has been running for some months and is now centos 4.6.
The new one is a brand spanking new centos 5.1 install, with a blank
Jaime,
I should think you'd have a little more courtesy on a list associated with a
product that apparently helped to bail out your rear end.
Be amazed Jaime, be very amazed. No RTFMs here. That's not our gig. We're
not here to stroke egos.
I think the fact that you've worked with qmail since
-Original Message-
From: Roxanne Sandesara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 7:50 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Soft Rejections
Mr Pratt --
I have to be honest. I find the attitude perceived in this post to be
James Pratt wrote:
Ok, I have to really question the development habits/cycle of this
project at this point... Why is this guy recommending a version that's
not on the official site, and further, he writes the fix has to do with
the OP's original problem. Wasn't' it just last night he was
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 8:07 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Soft Rejections
Jaime,
I should think you'd have a little more courtesy on a list associated
with a
dnk wrote:
Hey there,
I was going through a test run today trying out the qtp-backup and
qtp-restore.
I made sure both machines had the same version of qtp.
One was a toaster that has been running for some months and is now centos 4.6.
The new one is a brand spanking new centos 5.1
dnk wrote:
Hey there,
I was going through a test run today trying out the qtp-backup and qtp-restore.
I made sure both machines had the same version of qtp.
One was a toaster that has been running for some months and is now centos 4.6.
The new one is a brand spanking new centos 5.1 install,
James Pratt wrote:
I agree, list support seems great, however that is true of any oss list
out there, that is the point of them. My point was that it should not be
simple for just anyone to install a mail server, as that is at least 50%
of the reason email is growing more and more worthless.
Yes. That missing '' is the problem here..But the qmail-inject will also
responsible for delivering local mails? Please help me to check this(in
which file?). Or please provide me some links to understand the concept of
qmail-inject.. Thanks Eric...
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Eric Shubert
Sorry..Here too the mistake is mine.. In /nutsmail/config/config.php file
the host name was wrongly set..So the authentication
tried in some other host.Sorry again Eric,Thanks for the valuable help...
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
senthil vel wrote:
I have a toaster which is working fine for quite some time now for a client
of mine. Now one of their back office machine generates about 900 daily
email statements for their clients which needs to be send thru this toaster.
The backoffice software generates those emails and put into outlook
Hello all. I'm getting the dredded 553 message out of the blue. I am able
to send email using squirrel, however if I try to send email to any address
on the 3 domains I have on the server, it fails.
My tcp.smtp seems fine for the local and the public IP.
Hey ES,
I'll take a look at this in the weekend and post it if all looks good.
EE
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the large attachment, but I know some folks are eager to get this
(and I forgot it on my previous post!)
--
-Eric 'shubes'
45 matches
Mail list logo
