remove
On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3.
removing, or upgrading to the latest version?
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn
# rpm -e perl-Net-DNS
On 10/26/06, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remove
On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3.
removing, or upgrading to the latest version
-tls-20060104 and I didn't see any reference to FOCE_TLS and
AUTH_REQUIRED. Than I try to find an optional patch.
What is wrong?
I really need this port to work!
You can try test that port on my server.
Thanks in advanced,
Sérgio Costa
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Get http://devel.qmailtoaster.com
Could someone on FC4 give this a try:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.2.src.rpm
If you downloaded and attempted to test this yesterday, please re-download.
I should have some virtual machines available all the time soon,
thanks to Kyle and Wifi7.com.
Try making a cname entry for something outside of your domain.
For example make a cname from blah.e2000.es to mail.yahoo.com
Erik
On 10/24/06, David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is TinyDNS being used to serve e2000.es?
Yep :-)
Hey ES,
I think I can modify the rpm to save the script. Usually when you do
an upgrade, it will leave an rpmsave.
I'll try to change the behavior to make the new
admin.pass/admin.htpass as rpmnew, and leave the old files untouched.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/24/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll work on this with Nick. We are working to support Mandriva 2006.1 and FC6.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/24/06, Samuel Díaz García [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having the same problem with FC5.
I can't uninstall the libs because are being used by freeradius and
another FC5 components that I have
Hello Ariel,
You should point the nameserver in resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1 and add
forwarders to your named.conf that point to your isp's dns server.
=Google Translation=
Debes señalar el nameserver en resolv.conf a 127.0.0.1 y agregar
promotores a tus named.conf que señalen al servidor del
Hey Guys,
I think we should keep the main list English. Let's try to encourage
foreign language only posters to translate via Google or otherwise. We
should attempt to keep this community together, for efficiency. If
this isn't a workable solution, we can put up a secondary list.
In the mean
Looks like you are using packages frm a different clam distribution.
You may want to resolve that before attempting to apply our patches.
Erik
On 10/18/06, Lucian Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Lucian Cristian wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Lucian Cristian wrote:
Eric
Dunno.
On 10/19/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Incorrect, but close.
1) download the src.rpm
2) compile
3) service qmail stop
4) rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
5) install the compiled binary
6) service qmail cdb (rebuild versions)
7) service qmail start
Seems like a pretty close tie between people who want two and people
who want just one single list.
I'll contact Nick off list to see what he thinks.
Erik
On 10/19/06, Ben King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There should be a Spanish list to go along with the Spanish qmailtoaster
wiki.
If I were
It may be possible to do yum for all but the djb licensed bits. Which
is okay, since the djb licensed bits do not change very often
(qmail-toaster, ucspi-tcp, daemontools, etc), while the stuff that
does change often is permissible in binary (clamav, spamassassin,
courier, maildrop, etc).
On
=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=1500,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=150,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:15 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I switch something
Nope, you can't.
This requires simscan 1.2, and subsequently ripmime.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/18/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can simply create a /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file (it became
included with version 1.3.something). Here's the default:
Greetings,
I have moved the latest spamassassin and clamav packages from the
devel site to the main site.
http://www.qmailtoaster.com/
Since these are both security updates, it is recommended that everyone
upgrade immediately.
One package, clamav-toaster-0.90RC1-1.3.5, remains only on the
Indeed
On 10/18/06, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK so I need to upgrade my toaster then?
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 17:59 -0700, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Nope, you can't.
This requires simscan 1.2, and subsequently ripmime.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/18/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes, there are many tutorials on bandwidth shaping and Linux on the internet.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/17/06, David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Is there a easy way to limit bandwith of incoming (i don't intend to limit
my relay users, but it's not a bad idea) mail from SMTP?
We don't have a config for smtp-ssl since it is deprecated. As such,
we don't include qmailmrtg configuration for it either.
On 10/17/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found the following in the list archives from April'06, written by EE. Is
this something that can/should be included
of the package?
Thank you so much
Ho
Erik Espinoza wrote:
This package will move in about 6 days. In the mean time just upgrade
from the devel site.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/17/06, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Secunia reported a highly critical vulnearbility in clamav:
http
Greetings,
I have put an updated package for ClamAV 0.90RC1 on my site,
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ for download.
This currently doesn't enable the experimental features mentioned on
the main site. I am currently using it on my server, it does appear to
use less resources.
Feel free to skip
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spf
On 10/16/06, Mattias Segerdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to find out how to disable spf checking, but I found no answer.
Could anyone tell me how to do this?
// mattias
-
I may not be that good at QmailToaster or Spanish, but I'd subscribe to both.
Erik
On 10/16/06, Jon Darrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My feeling for what its worth is:
Qmail Toaster is about the community, the list is one of the great things
about it, enabling quick answers to problems that
I really like qmail-toaster and qmail in general (using it for 4 years
now!), but it's extensibility is not the best.
It's what happens when you can't distribute modified source. If DJB
would open up his license, it'd probably be easier.
You must patch to get a new feature all the time.
Nope, it's writen in c (see http://qmail-spp.sourceforge.net/doc/ ) with
native qmail libraries with no external dependencies.
My mistake, you are correct.
Plugins are written in your language of choice ( spanish? hehe ), from C
to perl to anything, if you think any part must be written in C
Of course!, it's an experimental suggestion :-)
Might be time to create a new dev branch. We've been directing all
resources to the stable branch.
From qmail-spp website:
GodShell (http://godshell.com/toaster/)
and qmail-spp father project dqd (http://dqd.sourceforge.net/)
But that two
I'd recommend setting up a caching nameserver. Just point your caching
name server to theirs. That way you can take advantage of their cache
as well as grow your own.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/16/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked the techs at Rackspace (where we have our qmail
OT, I am getting tons of Undelivered Mail, is there any plans on
setting up any kind of Email Rules per user so that we can get rid of
all of these emails. They are even worse than the amount of spam coming
through the filters.
Seems like the best way to do that would be to implement Sieve
ROFL! Excelente idea, I love it.
I agree. We should have a second list.
On 10/15/06, Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EXCELENTE idea
El día 15/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola a todos:
Estoy viendo que hay gente que escribe en castellano en la lista, lo
cual
Greetings,
I have released an updated ClamAV package. As usual, this package is
available on my site, http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ for download.
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Greetings,
I have updated my site to include an updated spamassassin pacakge. It
is available at http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/ and is upgraded to the
current version.
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
Slamp, that's not how dnlsbl's work
DNS Blacklists work by using txt entries.
For example, this ip address attempted to send me mail, but was banned
by spamhaus.
70.103.74.235
So you put the order of the octets in reverse and put the dnsbl
suffix. Then you look for the txt record:
$ host -t
Disable web access is to disable qmailadmin access, not webmail
access. The only way to remove webmail access is to disable IMAP
access for the user. That will block direct IMAP as well as webmail.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/11/06, Taxxolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is that i have to give
the wiki?
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Slamp, that's not how dnlsbl's work
DNS Blacklists work by using txt entries.
For example, this ip address attempted to send me mail, but was banned
by spamhaus.
70.103.74.235
So you put the order of the octets in reverse and put the dnsbl
suffix. Then you
I find my qmailtoaster running well on my CentOS, Every spam are re-marked
with SPAM, and send a notification mail to senders and postmaster
about the spam e-mails they sent.
That's odd. It shouldn't do that. It should send the mail to the
reciever with the subject ***SPAM***. The only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik,
Did this change in the 3.1.6 update, meaning that mailfilter is active
again? Because in the versions before that, even spam with 12+ didn't
get rejected.
mattias
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I find my qmailtoaster running well on my CentOS, Every spam are
re-marked
settings that can be done inside simscan?
//
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Mattias,
This is a simscan 1.2 thing. If you're using all the latest packages,
spam with 12+ settings would work just fine.
This is why I've not been working on mailfilter. I just plain don't
have the time to develop
that?
Ho
Erik Espinoza wrote:
It's all in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
This is the default
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif
If you adjust the spam_hits to anything other than 12, it will reject
spam at that level.
Erik
On 10/8/06, Mattias Segerdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED
to know which email are dropped and how
much the server drop.
Can we do that?
Ho
Erik Espinoza wrote:
It's all in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
This is the default
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif
If you adjust the spam_hits to anything other than 12
:
how can I know the statistics about Spamassassin, Clamav, how
many mail I receive and how many mail drop by the server?
Can I get a report to know all that information?
Thanks!!
Ho
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Actually you could, if you use the unsupported qmail-scanner package I
mentioned
http://myserver/stats-toaster/
On 10/9/06, Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can I know the statistics about Spamassassin, Clamav, how many
mail I receive and how many mail drop by the server?
Can I get a report to know all that information?
Thanks!!
Ho
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Actually you
You have to check to see if your server has
On 10/9/06, Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the domain is netvigator.com which is a largest ISP of Hong Kong.
I'm using this ISP so I use my personal account for testing.
Any information you need to know?
Ho
Erik Espinoza wrote:
I'd need log files
.
Any help Appreciate.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
It's definitely not listening in. Perhaps you have a firewall.
Erik
On 10/8/06, kernel.2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi when i am doing the same command i got the following op.
# telnet shailvita.homeunix.com 25
Trying 210.18.170.226...
Connected
Looks like a DNS issue:
***ns1.isp.com can't find shail.homeunix.com: Non-existent domain
On 10/8/06, kernel.2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Friends,
i have configured the qmail-toaster on suse_10.1 x86 .
i have one network card eth0: with static ip : 61.11.11.x
this ip and nameservers
and rebuilt
spamassassin again, this time the header is updated. thanks!
On 10/8/06, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you do service qmail stop before performing the upgrade? It's
possible that you have the old version running in memory. The fact
that simscan detects the correct
Greetings,
Would people prefer updates to move from devel to the main site faster
or do you like it as is, where they stay on devel for about a month
before going to the release site?
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by:
Might still be a DNS, as it doesn't look like shailvita is pointing to
the correct ip. Unless, of course, 61.11.11.x was just an example of
an IP.
$ host -t mx shailvita.homeunix.com
shailvita.homeunix.com mail is handled by 10 shailvita.homeunix.com.
$ host shailvita.homeunix.com
would always like more frequent updates. But since we all realize
that you have a life besides qmailtoaster. It's fine how it is right now.
Thanks for some great development.
Now, get cracking on that mailfilter issue :)
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
Would people prefer updates to move from
is '^]'.
220 - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Might still be a DNS, as it doesn't look like shailvita is pointing to
the correct ip. Unless, of course, 61.11.11.x was just an example of
an IP.
$ host -t mx shailvita.homeunix.com
shailvita.homeunix.com
Hey Eric,
I'd recommend downloading
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/submission.tar.gz and
extracting this in /var/qmail/supervise. This will start a submission
SMTP Server (port 587) with the following options:
AUTH Required
TLS/SSL Required
Blacklists Disabled
It's what should be used
make out.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey Eric,
I'd recommend downloading
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/submission.tar.gz and
extracting this in /var/qmail/supervise. This will start a submission
SMTP Server (port 587) with the following options:
AUTH Required
TLS/SSL Required
Greetings,
I've moved the following packages from the development site to the
main site (http://www.qmailtoaster.com/):
Changelog
spamassassin-toaster-3.1.5-1.3.3.src.rpm
* Sun Sep 10 2006 Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.1.5-1.3.3
- Upgraded to SpamAssassin 3.1.5
Greetings,
I have released a new update for spamassassin on my web page:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/
This now defaults to local checks only off, as requested by many in this list.
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by:
Because SMTP over SSL never gained a foothold, and then SMTP w/ TLS
became a standard.
POP3/SSL and IMAP/SSL both became standards and are supported by most
clients. I don't know of too many clients that support IMAP/TLS or
POP3/TLS.
It can be supported, but there really hasn't been a need for
Courier-authlib uses vpopmail libs to talk to the db. It needs to be
rebuilt as well.
On 10/7/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to enable many-domains. I got it working (rebuild the RPMs,
dropped the mysql db, readd test user), but then POP over SSL stopped
working.
I get
http://www.qmailwiki.org/Vpopmail#Configuring_vpopmail
--enable-roaming-users Enable POP-before-SMTP functionality.
On 10/7/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to enable support for roaming users. Is there still a --with
roaming flag available in QT? I read somewhere on
Some hours after I brought my new QT online, I received this message,
and with it I as my first bag-o-questions.
1. Qmail tried sending the original cron error to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where did it get this? Is it a virtual user, or from /etc/aliases?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/0 ~]$egrep ^root /etc/aliases
Ah, this is one of those things that has been mentioned, but never
added to the bug tracker. I have made a note of it and will make sure
this dir is included in the next updated clamav rpm.
Yes, just create the dir.
Erik
On 10/5/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had errors in my
I'd have to agree with Duncan. I'd recommend running memtest on this machine.
Erik
On 10/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to
believe that it isn't an issue with the content of the message killing
qmail-smtpd,
do an 'ls -al /var/qmail/control/*.pem
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/4/06, Chris Godwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I do this:
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
220 ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server
ESMTP
ehlo
250-ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster
There is something seriously wrong with your install. You may want to
start over from scratch and ensure that you follow the instructions as
closely as possible.
FYI: Did you migrate this from an older QmailToaster install? The
UID's you have and the defaults that QmailToaster picked here just
Hello Igor,
E-mail travels like this.
Sender - Sending SMTP Server - QmailToaster - You
When the Sending SMTP Server sends a virus to the QmailToaster, the
QmailToaster rejects the message with an error 5xx (hard reject)
stating that there was a virus. The Sending SMTP Server gets the
error,
No. It used to, but it was removed because it only caused problems.
On 10/3/06, Igor Smitran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sorry if this question was mentioned before, but does qmailtoaster have
tarpitting?
-
Not without either repatching the src.rpm yourself (research required)
Or rolling your own QmailToaster with tarpit patches included ala QmailRocks.
Erik
On 10/3/06, Igor Smitran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
No. It used to, but it was removed because it only caused problems
Nope.
FYI:
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/FAQs#I_upgraded_my_QmailToaster_to_the_latest_and_I_no_longer_have_the_.22Spam_Detection.22_box_in_Qmailadmin.
There is currently a project underway to restore this capability.
Who is working on this?
Erik
On 10/2/06, Mattias Segerdahl [EMAIL
I usually use the second nic on the server to hook up via nfs. A
dedicated nic goes a long way with nfs.
On 10/2/06, Michael Handiboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
I've seen a toaster with /home/vpopmail and /var/qmail set up on a NAS
device. You might consider a similar
Sounds like some serious infrastructure. How many users do you plan on
having and are you going to cluster this?
On 10/1/06, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Michael wrote:
If I put the 'Toaster on a dual or quad CPU machine, will Qmail be
able to process it's
Really depends on the long term. As the QmailToaster project grows to
combat more and more spam, so too will the requirements.
The setup sounds like it should last for a while.
Erik
On 10/1/06, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Sounds like some serious infrastructure
This is how vpopmail manages large user or domain servers. Without
doing this, traversing dir's could take a lot longer. I'd recommend
just going with it.
Erik
On 9/29/06, Gonzalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
We have more than 99 domains hosted in the qmail. Untlil the domain
number 99, the
try using
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2.unicode.src.rpm
Thanks,
Erik
On 9/28/06, Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have setup a qmail toaster using the newest packages. Everything find
but squirrelmail got the following problem.
After I setup the
Next release of the courier-imap package will include the unicode support.
Erik
On 9/28/06, Gary Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik,
My Linux box is also facing this issue on some users but not all.
After using this unicode version, it works properly.
Thanks a lot.
Could it include this
I actually don't have that much experience with Dovecot, but more than
Courier. I would vote in favor of using Dovecot for the following
reasons:
- It is part of the RHEL 4 distribution. It is already installed, and I
can trust the source. Patches are automatically available via up2date.
'yum update'
On 9/27/06, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like new bug had been discovered in OpenSSL that makes it possible
to exploit some certificates and login as root without a password.
Does anyone know what is the safest way to patch openssl on qmailtoaster
without disrupting other
Just so I understand you, you want to basically put the web sites in
the /home/vpopmail/domains directory?
Erik
On 9/27/06, Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know (before I hose something) if adding the setgid bit on the
vchkpw group will effect mail
delivery on qmail? The reason,
That's just bad policy. One miscoding in apache, one badly written
cgi, one bug in your config and you're serving mail directories.
It can be done, sure, but I'd recommend against it.
Erik
On 9/27/06, Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Just so I understand you, you
Does this machine have a caching name server? What do the logs say?
Erik
On 9/27/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to track down a problem with a high volume server and would
appreciate any insights.
To begin with, there was a networking problem which I know nothing about
Sounds like somebody likes pain . . .
Without virtualization, you can't do this.
Erik
On 9/26/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All!
(I couldn't find instructions for installing Qmail Toaster on top of an
existing Sendmail server, so I'm asking here. (I'll add a wiki page for
I'd also recommend going to the BIS website and modifying the From
address. Quick note, BIS doesn't do SRS, so you must add
blackberry.net stuff to any SPF records.
On 9/26/06, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Piekos wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to connect Blackberries to qmail
Is it that Dovecot doesn't support vpopmail at all or just the way that
QmailToaster implements it? From this FAQ entry, it seems Dovecot does
support vpopmail:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/QuestionsAndAnswers#head-153aa253aff40951a05cf238da4245b1cc1a4665
Weird. I looked into it a while back,but
Cool. Very nice. Perhaps if there is some interest, I will develop a
Dovecot qt package, but I don't really see the point. Perhaps you
could help me understand. Are there any particular reasons why you
want to use Dovecot over Courier?
Erik
On 9/26/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having issues with forwarding mail to SPF enabled recipient
domains. I read that you can rewrite headers with SRS to avoid
rejections.
Currently the QmailToaster doesn't support SRS. This is being worked
on, but it is a tough thing to implement properly
Is there a working patch for
Yes
On 9/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could I work around this issue by using a ezmlm mailing list in
qmailtoaster for forwarding mail to an external recepient list instead of
having an alias?
I am having issues with forwarding mail to SPF enabled recipient
domains. I
Hey Guys,
Just wanted to say thanks to all involved in the SURBL page. I have
just turned SURBL on for my server and this is a big time improvement.
Thanks for the help community.
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
looks like _domiankey.canus.org is missing a period.
Erik
On 9/24/06, Chris Marcellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon;
I know, that's the test i did to confirm my problems. The records at my
parent servers are fine.
here's a copy of my bind zone file for canus.org:
$TTL86400
$ORIGIN
Looking at your dns, you don't have an smtp.canus.org.
On 9/23/06, Chris Marcellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone;
yesterday, my connection got dropped for about 2 hours.
and ever since then, i can send mail, but, for some very strange
reason, i can not receive mail. I pretty much
IN A 206.248.143.19
or, you don't mean an A record?
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Looking at your dns, you don't have an smtp.canus.org.
On 9/23/06, Chris Marcellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone;
yesterday, my connection got dropped for about 2 hours.
and ever since
We have nothing to do with QmailRocks.
You may want to try their mailing list.
Erik
On 9/20/06, Cantemir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I installed the Qmailrocks package on CentOS, and of course everything
worked fine until yesterday.
Now I can't login with POP. A telnet to port 110
Okay . . .
On 9/19/06, Chris Marcellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but, like i mentioned several times
i just sent that mail with the link, because i recall someone asking if
it was possible
Erik Espinoza wrote:
It also breaks html mail.
Since we strive to follow best practices, the footers
FC4 support is getting a bit scary, especially now that Fedora has
moved this OS has moved to Fedora Legacy. Not sure if it's worth
investing the time to fix this or work on support for the upcoming
FC6.
Erik
On 9/19/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for posterity, I exported
Create a file in /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/.qmail-rt-general
containing
| /opt/rt3/bin/rt-mailgate --queue General --action correspond --url
http://rt.mydomain.com/; without the quotes.
I have a similar setup using the free cerberus helpdesk, and it works peachy.
Erik
On 9/17/06,
Hello George,
I don't believe anyone has reported using the qmailtoaster on a
Kurobox. My guess is that it would take some work to port it over.
I had installed CentOS 4.2 beta on a sparc, and was unable to get
QmailToaster to cleanly compile on it. You can give it a shot and let
us know.
Erik
, this list is the best.
Regards
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2006 01:47
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] 3rd party spamassassin scanning service
The answer is yes. You can scan other domains frm
sure my boss will be pleased.
Regards
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2006 11:24
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] 3rd party spamassassin scanning service
That's excellent thanks. Are there any
The answer is yes. You can scan other domains frm your box.
The mx points to you. You put an smtproute that points to their server
and you add the domain to rcpthosts.
The problem is going to be double bounces. Since your box doesn't have
a list of valid users, it will accept any mail addressed
smtp up 0 seconds, looks like your smtp is restating every couple of
seconds. You need to look at the smtp service log to determine what
went wrong.
Erik
On 9/14/06, Ron Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to send an email via the web interface, I get this error at the
top of
Security is like an onion. If someone cuts through all your security,
you'll be in tears. However it also means that one should have many
layers.
Technically you don't need the iptables firewall. It won't give you
any more protection to the internet, but could provide protection from
within,
Qmail doesn't use /etc/hosts.
Erik
On 9/13/06, Ron Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been poking around at this for two days now.
In my /var/qmail/control/locals is
Make sure that neither domain is in /var/qmail/control/locals I have on the
first line - localhost and on the second line -
But now I have this problem: I get spamd and clamd processes stuck.
Why not disable this and find out?
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
On 9/12/06, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys, from time to time I get this error message from qmailtoaster
list. It doesn't happen all the time and I do get most of the messages. What
can this be? I have run queue-repair-0.9.0 just to see if there are any
issues and nothing comes
-
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] 554 qq permanent problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
69.xxx.xxx.xxx failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 554 qq permanent problem (#5.3.0
301 - 400 of 900 matches
Mail list logo
