Hi Everyone,
Is there any way to install Zimbra Webmail with qmail toaster? Can both be
installed on same PC?
Regards,
Amit
I would say no as zimbra is an entire mailserver not just a webmail client
-original message-
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Zimbra Webmail with Qmail-toaster
From: amit IKF a...@ikf.co.in
Date: 13/07/2009 1:21 pm
Hi Everyone,
Is there any way to install Zimbra Webmail with qmail toaster? Can both be
Thanks Dean.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Dean Mumby d...@mumby.co.za wrote:
I would say no as zimbra is an entire mailserver not just a webmail client
-original message-
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Zimbra Webmail with Qmail-toaster
From: amit IKF a...@ikf.co.in
Date: 13/07/2009 1:21 pm
list, I am in despair, all of a sudden I heard my qmailtostaer connections
on port 25 if 587 works submission, I have not changed anything, move
suddenly, also disable the firewall
qmailctl stat
authlib: up (pid 3049) 90 seconds
clamd: up (pid 3045) 90 seconds
imap4: up (pid 3033) 90 seconds
Ariel wrote:
list, I am in despair, all of a sudden I heard my qmailtostaer
connections on port 25 if 587 works submission, I have not changed
anything, move suddenly, also disable the firewall
qmailctl stat
authlib: up (pid 3049) 90 seconds
clamd: up (pid 3045) 90 seconds
imap4: up (pid
I have spamdyke in front of Qmail Toaster and this morning all incoming
emails were being timed out.
I have had to temprarily remove Spamdyke from the server, ugh, already
getting more spam.
From the maillog:
Jul 13 06:59:28 mail spamdyke[21362]: TIMEOUT from: (unknown) to: (unknown)
Hi,
this morning a strange problem start on my qmailtoaster server, the SMTP
service become really slow.
Al the other service (pop3, imap, submission port)
are still ok.
I've restarted a couple of times the server and I tried also to
disable rbls, spf, spamdike, clamav and spamassassin but
This may be my problem also. My spamdyke filter started timing out bigtime but
when I removed the spamdyke, it still takes the smtp server about 30 seconds to
answer when I telnet to port 25.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: an...@libero.it [mailto:an...@libero.it]
Sent: Monday, July
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
I have spamdyke in front of Qmail Toaster and this morning all incoming
emails were being timed out.
I have had to temprarily remove Spamdyke from the server, ugh, already
getting more spam.
From the maillog:
Jul 13 06:59:28 mail spamdyke[21362]: TIMEOUT from: (unknown)
Very possibly the same problem. What RBLs are you using?
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
This may be my problem also. My spamdyke filter started timing out bigtime but
when I removed the spamdyke, it still takes the smtp server about 30 seconds to
answer when I telnet to port 25.
Regards
How do I correct configure tinydns to work with my new
qmailtoster environment:
domain: jcampus.pt
email server: atena.jcampos.pt
emails list pattern: @mail.jcampos.pt
I did tried configure it out, but I
Hi,
at the moment my blacklists file is empty so I don't use any RBLs, but the
smtp is still slow.
Messaggio originale
Da: e...@shubes.net
Data:
13/07/2009 18.24
A: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Ogg: Re:
[qmailtoaster] Strange problem : smtp become really slow
Very possibly the
You're looking in the wrong place for your solution. Are you using
tinydns as the authoritative nameserver for your domain?
Short answer: you need to set up an MX record for your domain in your
*authoritative* dns server.
To be more helpful, tell us a little about your installation.
Is it a
Could be name resolution. What's in your /etc/resolv.conf ?
an...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
at the moment my blacklists file is empty so I don't use any RBLs, but the
smtp is still slow.
Messaggio originale
Da: e...@shubes.net
Data:
13/07/2009 18.24
A:
Thanks for your quick answer.
I installed qmailtoaster on centos 5.3, I assumed everything was
allright but need this left configuration.
The email server I planned to install/configure has an static ip
(172.22.0.58) and is part of an private network.
I've already changed my DNS from one of Italian Telecom to one of OpenDNS but
also I dind't noticed any speed gain.
At the moment my /etc/resolv.conf is :
search x.it#(my domain)
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 208.67.220.220
Fabio
Messaggio originale
Da: e...@shubes.net
I'm not using any with Qmail, my /var/qmail/control/blacklists file is empty.
I was using them with Spamdyke.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:25 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re:
an...@libero.it wrote:
I've already changed my DNS from one of Italian Telecom to one of OpenDNS but
also I dind't noticed any speed gain.
At the moment my /etc/resolv.conf is :
search x.it#(my domain)
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 208.67.220.220
Fabio
If you're running
Ok, then you'll need to set up an authoritative nameserver. JP on the
list just went through this.
You'll need to learn up a bit about DNS. The best book I've found for
this is The Linux Cookbook by Carla Schroder, published by O'Reilly. It
has a series of recipes that will help you get your
Like JC, let's look at DNS.
What's in your /etc/resolv.conf?
What happens when you
# dig some.externaldomain.com?
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
I'm not using any with Qmail, my /var/qmail/control/blacklists file is empty.
I was using them with Spamdyke.
-Original Message-
From: news
Your first nameserver is localhost.
Is your localhost DNS running properly? Which caching nameserver is
installed on your toaster?
When you
# dig some.externaldomain.com
which server answers the request?
an...@libero.it wrote:
I've already changed my DNS from one of Italian Telecom to one of
This was a standard installation of Qmailtoaster and I use djbdns.
I've tried
the speed against microsoft.com google.com and yahoo.com and all have take less
than 0.050ms for REAL and less than 0.005 for USER and SYS
Fabio
Messaggio originale
Da: j...@qmailtoaster.com
Data:
As soon as I pass through this, I want my email server to be able to
send email to others domains.
I tried earlier qmailrocks installations, it did work at this level,
I had no dns trouble as now, but the installation was hard. I did
Qmailtoster install on centos on 1 hour.
I presume you've registered your domain name. Who is your registrar? Do
they provide DNS services?
José Campos wrote:
As soon as I pass through this, I want my email server to be able to
send email to others domains.
I tried earlier qmailrocks installations, it did work at
Hi,
I'm using djbdns, this is the otput of dig www.hwupgrade.net
;
DiG 9.3.4-P1 www.hwupgrade.net
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 12519
;; flags: qr rd ra;
QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
my name servers are very quick. Same results for several domains.
[r...@mail ~]# time dig mx +short yahoo.com
1 g.mx.mail.yahoo.com.
1 a.mx.mail.yahoo.com.
1 b.mx.mail.yahoo.com.
1 c.mx.mail.yahoo.com.
1 d.mx.mail.yahoo.com.
1 e.mx.mail.yahoo.com.
1 f.mx.mail.yahoo.com.
real0m0.007s
user
Fabio,
What platform are you running your toaster? I am running Cent5.2 64bit.
Regards
- Original Message -
From: an...@libero.it
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] R: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange problem : smtp
I don't use djbdns, so I can't help you much.
Which nameserver answers when you dig a domain name? (It shows near the
end of the display)
If it makes no difference to you, I would
# rpm -e djbdns-toaster
(if that's the right package name for it)
# yum install caching-nameserver
I expect that
That looks quite all right to me. Perhaps the problem is not with DNS then.
I know we've seen this happen before. Perhaps you can search the list
archives while we ponder this.
an...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
I'm using djbdns, this is the otput of dig www.hwupgrade.net
;
DiG 9.3.4-P1
Hi,
I'm also on CeontOS 5.2 64BIt running on a dual Xeon-quadcorer with 8Gb of
ram.
It was installed in late April and NEVER updated .
Faio
Messaggio
originale
Da: rtar...@host2max.com
Data: 13/07/2009 19.17
A:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Ogg: Re: [qmailtoaster] R: Re:
You too? What the heck's going on???
(BTW, nice to see you again on Saturday)
I don't see anything in particular, except that your system appears to
be busy scanning a lot at times.
Timeouts are intermittent I'm guessing, right?
I'm also guessing that timeouts occur when there are many scans
How long has your toaster been running?
When did you notice the slowness?
When was the last update of any software?
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
Fabio,
What platform are you running your toaster? I am running Cent5.2 64bit.
Regards
- Original Message - From: an...@libero.it
To:
Same in my case. I'm running virtualized on Xen. Also using Xeon
processors.
I wonder if there is a problem with 5.2 64bit?
- Original Message -
From: an...@libero.it
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] R: Re:
I'm betting it's related to 64Bit. What are your softlimit settings?
an...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
I'm also on CeontOS 5.2 64BIt running on a dual Xeon-quadcorer with 8Gb of
ram.
It was installed in late April and NEVER updated .
Faio
Messaggio
originale
Da: rtar...@host2max.com
Eric Shubert wrote:
That looks quite all right to me. Perhaps the problem is not with DNS
then.
I know we've seen this happen before. Perhaps you can search the list
archives while we ponder this.
Can you give us a real domain name to test from our ends?
You may need to turn on recordio and
Eric,
When I am on my server i telnet to 127.0.0.1 25 it comes up immediately but
even on the same box when I telnet to the external ip it hangs. I don't
know if that helps any?
Regards
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
To:
This has been running for several months, 5+. I have had no updates to the
software.
I was running toaster on another box prior to migrating to this one.
Regards
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13,
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 85000 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \
$RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21
I'm betting it's related to 64Bit. What are your softlimit settings?
an...@libero.it
Eric Shubert wrote:
You too? What the heck's going on???
(BTW, nice to see you again on Saturday)
I don't see anything in particular, except that your system appears to
be busy scanning a lot at times.
Timeouts are intermittent I'm guessing, right?
I'm also guessing that timeouts occur when
Hi,
my softlimts are exactly the same:
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 85000 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \
$RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21
Messaggio originale
Da:
Hi,
my incoming message are stable in the 30/60 to 40/60 range.
Fabio
Messaggio originale
Da: j...@qmailtoaster.com
Data: 13/07/2009 19.59
A: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Ogg: Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP timeouts
Eric Shubert wrote:
You too? What the heck's going on???
(BTW, nice to
Jake helped me resolve this issue. My server was getting nailed for
connections and by enabling some blacklists, my server is sane again.
Gilbert
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
I see you've bumped it up. Quite a bit!
Hmmm.
rtar...@host2max.com wrote:
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 85000 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \
$RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21
I'm
I just applied qtp-newmodel yesterday. I ran into a few
issues that are noteworthy. I don't update my server that often so I
find I need to troubleshoot the same problems every time.
-
Admin Toaster password resets back to toaster
- If any of
the supervise softlimits are set, they are reset
Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote:
Jake helped me resolve this issue. My server was getting nailed for
connections and by enabling some blacklists, my server is sane again.
Gilbert
I would seriously consider installing spamdyke if you haven't already.
This will lessen the load even more.
From what Jake has said, having NO RBLs would make any performance
problem you have worsen. If you use zen.spamhaus.org that should make a
noticeable difference in the number of smtp processes running.
an...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
my incoming message are stable in the 30/60 to 40/60 range.
This appears to point in the direction of a network problem of some sort.
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
Eric,
When I am on my server i telnet to 127.0.0.1 25 it comes up immediately
but even on the same box when I telnet to the external ip it hangs. I
don't know if that helps any?
Regards
-
Mine are in the 16/100 range.
- Original Message -
From: Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP timeouts
Eric Shubert wrote:
You too? What the heck's going on???
(BTW, nice to
Yes, just from my initial load.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] R: Re: [qmailtoaster] Strange problem : smtp
become really slow
I see you've bumped it
I have spamdyke installed and it was still having the problems.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP issues
Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote:
Jake helped me
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I just applied qtp-newmodel yesterday. I ran into a few issues that
are noteworthy. I don't update my server that often so I find I need to
troubleshoot the same problems every time.
- Admin Toaster password resets back to toaster
- If any of the supervise softlimits
W dniu 13.07.2009 20:25, Eric Shubert pisze:
I see you've bumped it up. Quite a bit!
Hmmm.
rtar...@host2max.com wrote:
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 85000 \
[...]
On my Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz I have an option ,,-m
1'' and works fine. Standard parameter for Centos
This was the spamdyke error in the log, it was timing out sending it to
qmail.
Jul 13 06:59:28 mail spamdyke[21362]: TIMEOUT from: (unknown) to: (unknown)
origin_ip: 72.29.91.100 origin_rdns: prod12.designatedystems.com auth:
(unknown) reason: TIMEOUT
- Original Message -
From: Ronnie
This was the spamdyke error in the log, it was timing out sending it to
qmail.
Jul 13 06:59:28 mail spamdyke[21362]: TIMEOUT from: (unknown) to: (unknown)
origin_ip: 72.29.91.100 origin_rdns: prod12.designatedystems.com auth:
(unknown) reason: TIMEOUT
- Original Message -
From: Ronnie
Are there a lot of scans running at once?
# qmlog -g prefork spamd
will show you.
Are you using any RBLs at this point? I'd add spamhaus at least.
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
Mine are in the 16/100 range.
- Original Message - From: Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com
To:
That doesn't mean that removing spamdyke is a solution.
I've yet to see performance degrade due to spamdyke, and I've seen
impressive improvements due to its use.
Whatever the problem you have ends up being, I'm pretty sure that it's
not spamdyke. Of course some configurations of spamdyke
Dear List,
All my services are working fine. can get response
instantly from ports 110,587,143. But it takes 40 to 50 sseconds to
get resonse from port 25. My smtp and other log look very ordinary. I
am getting this problem from 3 different servers.
1. My blacklist file is empty.
I agree, I think the problem was spamdyke was not able to hand off the email
to the qmail smtp service. It was timing out.
The only way I could get any emails in was to remove spamdyke out of the
equation.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
To:
There was a bug in the spamdyke 3.x version regarding timeouts. I set
idle-timeout-secs=660
which seems to fix that.
Which version of spamdyke are you running?
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
This was the spamdyke error in the log, it was timing out sending it to
qmail.
Jul 13 06:59:28 mail
I cut mine to the same but still have the issues.
Eric, I turned my recordio back off, is there anything in there I should
look @ ?
Regards
- Original Message -
From: Aleksander Podsiadly a...@westside.kielce.pl
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 13.07.2009 20:25, Eric Shubert pisze:
I see you've bumped it up. Quite a bit!
Hmmm.
rtar...@host2max.com wrote:
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 85000 \
[...]
On my Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz I have an option ,,-m
1'' and works fine.
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I just applied qtp-newmodel yesterday. I ran into a few issues that
are noteworthy. I don't update my server that often so I find I need
to troubleshoot the same problems every time.
- Admin Toaster password resets back to toaster
This will be controlled in the RPM
I think you'll be looking for a needle in a haystack.
I think it'd be better to turn on spamdyke's detailed logging. That way
each session's log ends up in a separate file. Plus you can trash them
when you're done w/out tossing your primary logs.
I think you'd be looking for a log time
senthil vel wrote:
Dear List,
All my services are working fine. can get response
instantly from ports 110,587,143. But it takes 40 to 50 sseconds to
get resonse from port 25. My smtp and other log look very ordinary. I
am getting this problem from 3 different servers.
1. My
Are you running spamdyke?
32 or 64 bit?
senthil vel wrote:
Dear List,
All my services are working fine. can get response
instantly from ports 110,587,143. But it takes 40 to 50 sseconds to
get resonse from port 25. My smtp and other log look very ordinary. I
am getting this
Problem with turning spamdyke back on is that no email are able to come
through.
Any suggestions ?
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] R: Re: [qmailtoaster]
I don't think spamdyke will block everything.
Try using
idle-timeout-secs=660
and putting spamdyke back on.
I think Jake hit the nail on the head. I think we should start a new thread.
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
Problem with turning spamdyke back on is that no email are able to come
through.
Any
Sorry for not providing entire details. Running with centos 4.4 (32
bit server). I am not using spamdyke. For a very long period the
blacklist file is empty.
Thanks and Regards,
S.Senthilvel,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
Are you running spamdyke?
32
W dniu 13.07.2009 21:02, Ronnie Tartar pisze:
I cut mine to the same but still have the issues.
Eric, I turned my recordio back off, is there anything in there I
should look @ ?
Regards
IMHO You should read Your logs, do the tests like ping. Maybe You do not
control outbound transmission.
I think Jake hit the nail on the head with this one. I'm seeing an
inordinate number of active smtp sessions on a couple servers. I don't
think it has anything to do with QMT per se.
However, now's probably a very good time to do some performance tuning.
;) This would *include* installing
Running 4.0.10 (latest). First thing I did was update from 4.0.8.
I put qmail back in. I did have my timeout set way to low. I bumped it to
660, it was 30. That would have definitely caused no mail to come through
because it was taking just over 30 seconds for qmail to answer.
-
I think the spam storm simply choked your somewhat vulnerable server.
IMHO installing spamdyke is the best way to beef up your toaster's
ability to withstand such situations (and increase its overall
capacity). Short of that, you should be at least using a few RBLs.
senthil vel wrote:
Sorry
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I just applied
qtp-newmodel yesterday. I ran into a few issues that
are noteworthy. I don't update my server that often so I find
I need
to troubleshoot the same problems every time.
- Admin Toaster password resets back to
toaster
This will be controlled in the
I had increased my connections to a high number to avoid this issue a year
ago when I was more active with the server and was having issues with clam
being slow (was an older version and the newer rule sets had made it slow).
I had not messed with it for a while. Initially, I thought todays
On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote:
I think I will stay with some basic blacklists now. I am not sure
which ones though.
`qtp-set-rbls -moderate` is probably a good start.
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
improbable
Hi,
I'm new to QMT and I'm migrating several servers from old hardware with
QMR installations to new hardware running QMT, as QMR just isn't being
kept up well anymore, and I'm tired of patching everything up on my own.
So far, everything has been running quite well with the new install and
Why show this in mail server
policy_check: local karla_solorz...@mail.com - local noel_tin...@mail.com
(UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)
@40004a5b8b0714cb99cc policy_parse: syntax error: no domain policy
seperator
@40004a5b8b0714cbdc34 policy_load(aimargroup.com): policy_parse failed
(line
On Mon, July 13, 2009 3:11 pm, Eric Shubert wrote:
Tim Pleiman wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to QMT and I'm migrating several servers from old hardware with
QMR installations to new hardware running QMT, as QMR just isn't being
kept up well anymore, and I'm tired of patching everything up on my own.
Robin W. Sanchez C. wrote:
Why show this in mail server
policy_check: local karla_solorz...@mail.com - local
noel_tin...@mail.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)
@40004a5b8b0714cb99cc policy_parse: syntax error: no domain policy
seperator
@40004a5b8b0714cbdc34
Tim Pleiman wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to QMT and I'm migrating several servers from old hardware with
QMR installations to new hardware running QMT, as QMR just isn't being
kept up well anymore, and I'm tired of patching everything up on my own.
So far, everything has been running quite well with the
W dniu 13.07.2009 22:16, Tim Pleiman pisze:
/var/qmail/control/me contains the primary server mail domain name, e.g:
mail.servername.org
Tim
It should be the same as result of `hostname`, just the servername. Not
,,mail.servername.org'' but FQDN servername with all dots. Not the
value of
What mean this error and How can I fix?
robin-sanc...@i.com: host mail.i.com[111.111.111.111] said: 550
cannot message robin-sanc...@i.com (#5.0.0 denied by policy) (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
Este correo electronico puede conteneder informacion confindencial y
W dniu 13.07.2009 22:48, Robin W. Sanchez C. pisze:
What mean this error and How can I fix?
robin-sanc...@i.com mailto:robin-sanc...@i.com: host
mail.i.com[111.111.111.111] said: 550
cannot message robin-sanc...@i.com mailto:robin-sanc...@i.com
(#5.0.0 denied by policy) (in
reply
On Mon, July 13, 2009 3:46 pm, Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 13.07.2009 22:16, Tim Pleiman pisze:
/var/qmail/control/me contains the primary server mail domain name, e.g:
mail.servername.org
Tim
It should be the same as result of `hostname`, just the servername. Not
Did anybody come up with a fix for this?
Port 25 still takes 30 seconds to answer even after turning my delay
greeting in Spamdyke to zero.
CPU load is .15
I looked in smtp log and when I telnet to port 25 I get the following
immediately
@40004a5ba9bb1ba5146c tcpserver: pid 22068 from
I think the cause was a spam storm. (Is that a technical term?)
Can you turn on spamdyke detailed logging and see what the last message
before the delay is?
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
Did anybody come up with a fix for this?
Port 25 still takes 30 seconds to answer even after turning my delay
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 13.07.2009 22:16, Tim Pleiman pisze:
/var/qmail/control/me contains the primary server mail domain name, e.g:
mail.servername.org
Tim
It should be the same as result of `hostname`, just the servername. Not
,,mail.servername.org'' but FQDN servername with
I think you may be right, as it seems to be fine now? I even put my
spamdyke timeout back to 5 second delay.
Are there any parameters that I can adjust to help with this type of issue?
There were no cpu/memory constraints?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: news
It sounds to me as though your system was bombarded with more than it
could handle.
Tuning is somewhat of a fine art.
concurrencyincoming should probably be throttled back a bit. At what
point was your system choking?
memory is limited by your softlimit setting.
I'm not aware of any sort
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
I think you may be right, as it seems to be fine now? I even put my
spamdyke timeout back to 5 second delay.
Are there any parameters that I can adjust to help with this type of issue?
There were no cpu/memory constraints?
If you dig back through the archives
On Mon, July 13, 2009 6:12 pm, Eric Shubert wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 13.07.2009 22:16, Tim Pleiman pisze:
/var/qmail/control/me contains the primary server mail domain name,
e.g:
mail.servername.org
Tim
It should be the same as result of `hostname`, just the servername.
91 matches
Mail list logo
