Dear All,
I cannot send email to another domains from webmail but i can send email
and receive from outlook for another domains.
Appreciate anyone help me.
My below settings are in tcp.smtp. file settng below
Hi,
In the first place, what is the error you had encountered?
Regards
Nic
On 7 Feb, 2014, at 2:37 pm, Chandran Manikandan tech2m...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I cannot send email to another domains from webmail but i can send email and
receive from outlook for another domains.
Dear All,
This problem is solved as i checked in the squirrelmail config file.
sendmail = true.
I changed from false to true. Now problem is solved.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Nicholas Chua nicholasc...@outlook.comwrote:
Hi,
In the first place, what is the error you had encountered?
what is smtp or send log?
2013/8/15 ChandranManikandan kand...@gmail.com
Hi All,
Our server is hosting in house with Public ip. Most of our roaming users
using outlook from their laptop from overseas. They are unable to send
email from their laptop and getting error. But if we send from our
|-- ChandranManikandan, le 15/08/2013 04:30, a dit :
Our server is hosting in house with Public ip. Most of our roaming
users using outlook from their laptop from overseas. They are unable
to send email from their laptop and getting error. But if we send from
our office with the same network
Hi All,
Our server is hosting in house with Public ip. Most of our roaming users
using outlook from their laptop from overseas. They are unable to send
email from their laptop and getting error. But if we send from our office
with the same network it's send perfect.Do i need to setup in our
djemmy yunus wrote:
I finished my Qmailtoaster installation on CentOS 5.2 x64 bit using
Mr. ERIC SCHWARTZ manual on
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/CentOS_5_QmailToaster_Install,
i can login using my account but
when i tried to send email using squiremail webmail i got this :
, March 25, 2009 9:18 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send email using squiremail and MS-Outlook
I finished my Qmailtoaster installation on CentOS 5.2 x64 bit using Mr. ERIC
SCHWARTZ manual on
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php
I finished my Qmailtoaster installation on CentOS 5.2 x64 bit using Mr. ERIC
SCHWARTZ manual on
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/CentOS_5_QmailToaster_Install, i can
login using my account but
when i tried to send email using squiremail webmail i got this :
ERROR :
The process turned out to be much simpler and painless than I
expected. I downloaded the clamav and simscan packages and did an
RPMBUILD of each. Then RPM -e for the existing simscan and clamav
packages, and then RPM -Uvh for each (clamav first, than simscan).
Clamd process is no longer
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
The process turned out to be much simpler and painless than I
expected. I downloaded the clamav and simscan packages and did an
RPMBUILD of each. Then RPM -e for the existing simscan and clamav
packages, and then RPM -Uvh for each (clamav first, than simscan).
Clamd
]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 5:01 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot Send Email!!!
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn
and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying
On Apr 1, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
The process turned out to be much simpler and painless than I
expected.
I downloaded the clamav and simscan packages and did an RPMBUILD of
each. Then RPM -e for the existing simscan and clamav packages,
and then
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
Clamd process is no longer dominating the box's CPU, and the other
errors seem to have faded away.
Just out of curiousity, do you recall which version of clamav-toaster
you
upgraded from?
Actually, I had the same version. But the version that I had included
the
I attempted an update (via qtp-newmodel) last night, which errored
out on the spamassassin package (per earlier messages on the list). I
didn't think this would be a problem and had no reason to believe
this would affect the server. There were a few other packages that
were updated via
Quoting Roxanne Sandesara [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I need help to troubleshoot and correct this. Where can I find details
on /why/ an attempt to send a message is soft-rejected? qmlog
submission shows the following:
03-28 09:27:19 connect(): No such file or directory
There's your repetative
The problem seems to come and go, with no rhyme or reason I can
figure out thus far.
There is nothing in qmlog send between 09:08 and 09:31, so nothing to
correspond with the connect() error below.
The SMTP log for the same approximate timeframe shows the following:
2008-03-28
Yes, you need it for more recent toaster versions (I don't recall when it
first came into play). I don't think it would hurt with older versions.
Put it in every line in your tcp.smtp file, rebuild the cdb, and see if that
doesn't fix things up.
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
No. What I have is:
OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I
can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem
or an actual honest-to-goodness solution.
On my own, personal toaster server, which I only installed a month
ago, fresh, this value was not added to the
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
OK. I've added that. Thus far, it does appear to have worked, but I
can't be sure if that's just the usual 'come and go' of this problem or
an actual honest-to-goodness solution.
The later. IIRC the reason it appeared to be intermittent would be that it
only applies to
I've had to remove that rule, whatever it may apply do. No one was
able to send email. Not one of the email clients in-house (Outlook,
Entourage, or Mac Mail) could send with that enabled. Once I removed
it, everyone was fine.
But now I'm getting reports from users of emails that are not
The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were
sent) appear to be bouncing back and forth between the sender's mail
server(s) and ours:
cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/current | tai64nlocal | grep senders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | more
2008-03-28 14:52:12.420736500 CHKUSER accepted
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were
sent) appear to be bouncing back and forth between the sender's mail
server(s) and ours:
What does top show during these times? Is clam taking all the CPU?
It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn
and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying
there.
On Mar 28, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
The messages that are not coming through (that I can confirm were
sent)
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
It's the most frequent customer at the top, along with the sa-learn
and spamd processes. But it's not just pegged at the top and staying
there.
Are you getting any errors in the clam or spamd logs?
For giggles, try manually rebuilding and reinstalling clamav, then do
Jake --
Is there a way that I can poke and prod at the sandbox functions of
qtp such that it would agree to rebuild each of the relevant packages
and then apply them? Or is that wishful thinking on my part?
Roxanne
FYI: No errors in either clamd or spamd logs. But a lot more positive
You can run the qtp-build-sandbox command from the command line. This will
build the old style sandbox, not unionfs. Then you can chroot to the sandbox
and do whatever trips your trigger (for the most part). ;) Whatever you do
inside of the chroot'd tree will not touch the running server. You can
Hi all,
I have tried and push my providers to put up rDNS entry to add my static
IP but they would not want to. Either they say it will affect other
users or they don't simply know how to add it, I'm still having this
problem. Is there anyway I can bypass my ISP and make my IP below point
to
Tom Manliclic wrote:
Hi all,
I have tried and push my providers to put up rDNS entry to add my
static IP but they would not want to. Either they say it will affect
other users or they don't simply know how to add it, I'm still having
this problem. Is there anyway I can bypass my ISP and make
Jake Vickers wrote:
Tom Manliclic wrote:
Hi all,
I have tried and push my providers to put up rDNS entry to add my
static IP but they would not want to. Either they say it will affect
other users or they don't simply know how to add it, I'm still having
this problem. Is there anyway I can
Tom Manliclic wrote:
I'm using a separate DNS server box to handle addressing and it is
working fine. Will there be a problem if its not running in the same box
where my email server is?
How can I check this? I think there might be a problem on RBLs but don't
know how to fix it.
Another test
I'm using a separate DNS server box to handle addressing and it is
working fine. Will there be a problem if its not running in the same box
where my email server is?
How can I check this? I think there might be a problem on RBLs but don't
know how to fix it.
Another test I made previously
Dear all,
I have a strange problem.
Previously we hosted our mailbox (mydomain.com) on an ISP. Then starting this
month we host the mailbox on our own box (Thanks to qmailtoaster). The MX was
changed to point to our box. We can send and receive from any domain without
any problem.
However, if
Yes, it seems like the ISP has still not deleted your domain information
from his DNS.
Regards,
Supriyo
-Original Message-
From: Fajar Priyanto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 7:07 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send
Looks like bad spf data
On 1/16/06, Fajar Priyanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I have a strange problem.
Previously we hosted our mailbox (mydomain.com) on an ISP. Then starting this
month we host the mailbox on our own box (Thanks to qmailtoaster). The MX was
changed to point to our
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 12:58 pm, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Looks like bad spf data
Hi Erik,
How do I fix it?
-
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial
http://linux2.arinet.org
13:04:44 up 5:29, 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4 GNU/Linux
Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
Have them delete the txt records or read up on http://spf.pobox.com/
and use the wizard.
Erik
On 1/16/06, Fajar Priyanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 12:58 pm, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Looks like bad spf data
Hi Erik,
How do I fix it?
-
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux
37 matches
Mail list logo
