Hi Folks,
Can you guide me for the SPF, DKIM DMARC record creation and setup for my
domain.
--
*Regards,Manikandan.C*
Yes, all version of qmail-1.03-x.x.x
On 9/21/2020 8:50 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi
Anyone know if QMT 7 supports the 'spfrules' option from the
mail-spf-rc5.patch ?
Jeff Koch
Hi
Anyone know if QMT 7 supports the 'spfrules' option from the
mail-spf-rc5.patch ?
Jeff Koch
Hi Eric:
Maybe you remember a few months ago I had a problem with a QMT7
mailserver that was not checking SPF. We tried everything including
comparing /var/qmail/bin file sizes against known working mailservers
and were unable to find the problem.
So I setup a new instance at AWS and built a
What version are the others?
On 3/21/2020 9:41 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
qmailmrtg-4.2-3.qt.el7.x86_64
qmail-1.03-2.2.1.qt.el7.x86_64
qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.el7.x86_64
On 3/21/2020 11:41 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
rpm -qa | grep qmail
On 3/21/2020 9:38 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Eric:
No - the one that
qmailmrtg-4.2-3.qt.el7.x86_64
qmail-1.03-2.2.1.qt.el7.x86_64
qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.el7.x86_64
On 3/21/2020 11:41 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
rpm -qa | grep qmail
On 3/21/2020 9:38 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Eric:
No - the one that doesn't work was built in October 2019. Where would
I find the QMT 7
rpm -qa | grep qmail
On 3/21/2020 9:38 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Eric:
No - the one that doesn't work was built in October 2019. Where would
I find the QMT 7 version?
According to the file qt_install.sh - it is installing
qmt-release-1-7.qt.el7.noarch.rpm
Also, I ran the SPF test from
http
Hi Eric:
No - the one that doesn't work was built in October 2019. Where would I
find the QMT 7 version?
According to the file qt_install.sh - it is installing
qmt-release-1-7.qt.el7.noarch.rpm
Also, I ran the SPF test from
https://notes.sagredo.eu/en/qmail-notes-185/spf-239.html with SPF
Are all the servers running the same version of qmail?
On 3/21/2020 8:20 AM, Jeff Koch wrote:
Abel -
thanks. We see spf-reject entries in our older QMT7 mailservers but we
have one that was built in October 2019 that is not showing any
spf-rejects in it's smtp log despite the spfbehavior bei
Abel -
thanks. We see spf-reject entries in our older QMT7 mailservers but we
have one that was built in October 2019 that is not showing any
spf-rejects in it's smtp log despite the spfbehavior being set to '3'.
I don't see anything in tcprules.smtp or the
/var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run file
Abel - thank you - exactly what I needed to know - Jeff
On 3/20/2020 5:25 PM, a...@globalgate.com.ar wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi - last week we changed the SPF behavior on our mailservers to '3'
and restarted QMT7. Where would we see logging of SPF failures on
incoming
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi - last week we changed the SPF behavior on our mailservers to '3' and
restarted QMT7. Where would we see logging of SPF failures on incoming mail?
I did a grep of /var/log/qmail/smtp logs for 'SPF' and didn't see anything.
Just want to make sure SP
Hi - last week we changed the SPF behavior on our mailservers to '3' and
restarted QMT7. Where would we see logging of SPF failures on incoming
mail? I did a grep of /var/log/qmail/smtp logs for 'SPF' and didn't see
anything.
Just want to make sure SPF behavior is working.
Regards, Jeff
hi
qmailtoaster 64 bit latest on centos 6
pl refer to email headers given below
mail from : incoming@mycustomer.com
envelope sender was : t...@quest-global.com
we have set spf behaviour at 3 ie reject if spf fails
in this case the spf did not fail because envelope sender quest-global.com w
On 2015-04-29 10:03, Dave M wrote:
What test to confirm the SPF records ?
There are some good tools at:
http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html
Incidentally, don't expect too much from SPF. There are plenty of
services (Yahoo!, I'm looking at you) which will happily try to deliver
sp
A few comments here:
1) The "minimal" SPF record is common and sufficient in most cases"
TXT"v=spf1 mx -all"
What I mean by common and sufficient is that it works perfectly in
the cases where:
- There only valid sources of mail for your domain are your mail
servers (the o
Cheers tony,
On 29/04/2015 6:49 AM, Tony White wrote:
Hi Dave,
dig TXT
dig example.com TXT
best wishes
Tony White
Yea Computing Services
http://www.ycs.com.au
4 The Crescent
Yea
Victoria
Australia 3717
Telephone No's
VIC : 03 9008 5614
FAX : 03 9008 5610 (FAX2Email)
Be aware: All cal
Hi Dave,
dig TXT
dig example.com TXT
best wishes
Tony White
Yea Computing Services
http://www.ycs.com.au
4 The Crescent
Yea
Victoria
Australia 3717
Telephone No's
VIC : 03 9008 5614
FAX : 03 9008 5610 (FAX2Email)
Be aware: All calls to and from YCS landlines and mobiles are recorded
I
Cheers
On 29/04/2015 6:08 AM, Fox Hound wrote:
You only want a txt record. Spf records are deprecated.
- Fox
On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Dave M wrote:
Aslo ,
from the wiki ( Thanks Eric )
should we have both entries:
By far, the most common entries for an SPF definition will be:
d
You only want a txt record. Spf records are deprecated.
- Fox
> On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Dave M wrote:
>
> Aslo ,
> from the wiki ( Thanks Eric )
>
> should we have both entries:
> By far, the most common entries for an SPF definition will be:
>
> domain.tld. IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx -al
Aslo ,
from the wiki ( Thanks Eric )
should we have both entries:
By far, the most common entries for an SPF definition will be:
domain.tld. IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx -all"
domain.tld. IN SPF "v=spf1 a mx -all
Cheers
On 29/04/2015 7:03 AM, Dave M wrote:
What test to confirm the SPF rec
What test to confirm the SPF records ?
Also does anyone have a link to set domainkeys?
Cheers.
On 28/04/2015 4:34 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote:
Dave,
I use this:
v=spf1 mx a ip4: -all
An SPF record generator site:
http://www.spfwizard.info
SPF explanation:
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Sy
I thank you all for the SPF replies,
On 28/04/2015 4:34 PM, Fabian Santiago wrote:
Dave,
I use this:
v=spf1 mx a ip4: -all
An SPF record generator site:
http://www.spfwizard.info
SPF explanation:
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax
-
Sincerely,
Fabian Santiago
Sent from my iPh
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF
On 4/28/2015 2:25 PM, Dave M wrote:
> Is this good enopugh for SPF record,
>
> v=spf1 mx -all
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
> For
Hi
spf record on the bind like this.
TXT "v=spf1 +ip4:192.168.1.0 +ip4:192.168.1.1/28 ~all"
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:25:33 -0700
Dave M wrote:
> Is this good enopugh for SPF record,
>
> v=spf1 mx -all
>
>
>
>
> -
> To
Dave,
I use this:
v=spf1 mx a ip4: -all
An SPF record generator site:
http://www.spfwizard.info
SPF explanation:
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax
-
Sincerely,
Fabian Santiago
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Dave M wrote:
>
> Is this good enopugh for SPF re
Is this good enopugh for SPF record,
v=spf1 mx -all
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Hi All,
M not able to receive mails from @hdfcbank.com. When I checked the smtp
logs, I got following spf-reject log.
01-13 10:50:22 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(relay5.hdfcbank.com) from
192.168.2.1. MAILFROM:xxx@hdfcbank.com.
I have changed the spf Behavior from 3 to 0. But I dont w
Ok, so off-list I've been having this conversation with about 3 other
QMT users about SPF & QMT. Throughout the discussion, we've talked
about SPF handling of both INBOUND mail (the
/var/qmail/control/spfbehavior setting which controls how we process
other people's SPF records) -and- OUTBOUND
Dear All,
I am in trouble, I don't know ,"How to bypass any specific domain from spf
checking", so please somebody help me out.
Vivek
Il 18/10/2012 11:09, Christian Ferrati
ha scritto:
Hi,
I have turn on SPF checking with value=3 (3: Reject
mails when SPF resolves to fail (deny))
Is possibile remove the
SPF Check only for one do
Hi,
I have turn on SPF checking with value=3 (3: Reject mails when SPF
resolves to fail (deny))
Is possibile remove the SPF Check only for one domain?
regards
Christian
No, i dont think so. The problem isnt when im sending email, but receiving.
1) a...@bbb.com (foreign domain) send an email to c...@ddd.com (my domain)
2) FOPE receives the email, checks it and forwards it to my qmail
server (my domain).
3) my qmail server (my domain) checks the SPF record of doma
Don't you just add an entry in your DNS SPF line that the FOPE servers
are allowed to send mail? I had the same problem with a credit card
processing company that sent receipts to customers with my from address.
On 09/19/2011 04:51 AM, Jaime Ventura wrote:
Hello.
Im experiencing the following
Hello.
Im experiencing the following problem.
Im using forefront online protection for exchange (FOPE) as anti-spam
system.
MX records points to FOFE.
FOPE receives the email and if its clean forwards it to a on-premise
mail server.
Im this case the on-premise mail server runs qmailtoaster.
This w
On 07/13/2011 12:50 PM, Carlos Herrera Polo wrote:
Hello..
I have mount a smtp backup server, when the principal is down (MX 10)
the second get the email (MX 20) and sendit to principal.
My problem is qmail SPF in principal server, mi level is "3" and the
emails backups always arrive for al IP
Hello..
I have mount a smtp backup server, when the principal is down (MX 10) the
second get the email (MX 20) and sendit to principal.
My problem is qmail SPF in principal server, mi level is "3" and the emails
backups always arrive for al IP LAN (192.168.1.5) then the SFP REJECT.
Can I bypass S
Hello!
I am having an issue with one domain sending emails to my toaster. I am
running latest versions which have been upgraded occasionally, original
install is via QMT-ISO; currently up to date on all regularly distributed
packages per QMT Plus update check.
This particular domain, lightcraftou
Hi David,
you can add these lines on your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf then
restart spamassasin
change the score to suits your needs
# add score to none SPF
header spf_softfail Received-SPF =~ /\bnone\b/
describe spf_softfail SPF Test None
score spf_softfail 1.5
# add score to softfail SP
Hi all,
I want to use spf to block unwanted mail from att.net,yahoo,gmail
and other big ones that use spf on their domains.
If spf is not the way. What is the best way because I get alot of
stupid spam that look like this in the header.
Return-Path:
Deliv
Thanks Scott, that's very helpful. I like the detail that it provides.
Todd
From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sonicscott9...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:30 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] SPF / Domain Keys / DKIM Testing
Just for every
thanks scott
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Scott Hughes wrote:
> Just for everyone's knowledge, here is an email address I've found for SPF /
> Domain Keys / DKIM testing.
>
> You simply send an email to: check-a...@verifier.port25.com
>
> It will then email you back and give you the report.
Just for everyone's knowledge, here is an email address I've found for SPF /
Domain Keys / DKIM testing.
You simply send an email to: check-a...@verifier.port25.com
It will then email you back and give you the report. Here is an example:
This message is an automatic response from Port25's aut
Thanks, Dave. These aren't what I'm trying to remember though.
Some time ago (could be 2 years or so) I backed off my spfbehavior from
3 to 1 due to some sort of problem with SPF checking. Might have been
when SPF rejections weren't logged.
I'll just bump it (back) up to 3 and see what happen
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jake, I'm of the opinion that there's an (intermittent) bug in the
SPF patch. I believe I was running at '3' a long time back, but have
been running '1' for some time now.
Does anyone recall what the problem with SPF checking was? Will
someone check the list archives
Eric,
I spent a little time looking through archives for an issue with SPF
checking. There was an issue related to SPF and Blackberries in 2006.
See this post
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg07438.html
. also found this one re: blackbery
http://www.mail-archi
Sollunga S wrote:
Hi
recently i started gettng the following message, can anyone help me please,
qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(smtp06.bis.eu.blackberry.com) from
67.223.93.102. MAILFROM:SRS0=RPyuk9=AE=
I presume this a legitimate message?
I see no SPF record for blackberry.com, so I'm gu
Hi
recently i started gettng the following message, can anyone help me please,
qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(smtp06.bis.eu.blackberry.com) from 67.223.93.102.
MAILFROM:SRS0=RPyuk9=AE=
On Saturday 07 March 2009 00:19:08 Tim Mancour wrote:
> Can I suggest that you change the ~all in your SPF record to to -all
> instead. This will cause SPF to report "fail" and block the message.
Yess, you are right.
It is now working well as I need.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Adi Nugroho
te
Eric Shubert wrote:
Has the SPF patch been fixed? Last I knew spfbehavior 1 was the best
(safest) setting.
It was recommended that everyone use "1" as the spfbehavior since SPF is
not widely adopted (and was circumvented within about 20 minutes of
being invented) and the fact that if a m
: [qmailtoaster] SPF
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Adi Nugroho wrote:
>> I have installed qmailtoaster on opensuse 10.3.
>> it is working nice.
>>
>> One thing I don't know is about the SPF.
>> In my installation, as default, /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior = 3
>>
.
Regards,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Adi Nugroho [mailto:a...@internux.co.id]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:56 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF
On Friday 06 March 2009 23:45:24 Tim Mancour wrote:
> Do you see "Received-SPF: " headers in
On Friday 06 March 2009 23:45:47 Jake Vickers wrote:
> There is a good write-up in the wiki on SPF:
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spf
> Basically unless the other domain has set their SPF correctly (and to
> deny unknowns) then your system cannot check or deny messages since it
> has no
Jake Vickers wrote:
Adi Nugroho wrote:
I have installed qmailtoaster on opensuse 10.3.
it is working nice.
One thing I don't know is about the SPF.
In my installation, as default, /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior = 3
But my mail server is not rejecting mail not permitted by SPF.
How to activate
On Friday 06 March 2009 23:45:24 Tim Mancour wrote:
> Do you see "Received-SPF: " headers in the Emails that your server
> receives?
Yes...
Here is one of it:
Received-SPF: softfail (mailserver: transitioning SPF record at internux.co.id
does not designate 85.103.159.33 as permitted sender)
Why
Adi Nugroho wrote:
I have installed qmailtoaster on opensuse 10.3.
it is working nice.
One thing I don't know is about the SPF.
In my installation, as default, /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior = 3
But my mail server is not rejecting mail not permitted by SPF.
How to activate SPF blocking in qmail
Do you see "Received-SPF: " headers in the Emails that your server receives?
-Original Message-
From: Adi Nugroho [mailto:a...@internux.co.id]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:29 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] SPF
I have installed qmail
I have installed qmailtoaster on opensuse 10.3.
it is working nice.
One thing I don't know is about the SPF.
In my installation, as default, /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior = 3
But my mail server is not rejecting mail not permitted by SPF.
How to activate SPF blocking in qmailtoaster?
--
Have you tried spamdyke yet? It's trivial to install with the latest QTP.
I've had *very* noticeable improvement (even 'normal' users have noticed)
with it. I've actually had days with zero spam. I didn't expect that would
be possible. Kudos to Sam for a great piece of software.
slamp slamp wrote
There is no relation between these domains. jrasup.freeserve.co.uk is
a spammer. i guess it sucks that the MAIL FOM from the outside is not
being taken into account. How can we prevent this kind of spam?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I fol
I don't think I follow entirely, but I'll try to explain.
slamp slamp wrote:
> I thought that SPF checked MAIL FROM?
The from on the 'envelope', not the from on the inside.
> The email has this:
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On the inside. That one doesn't matter.
> So shouldn't SPF be checking
I thought that SPF checked MAIL FROM?
The email has this:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So shouldn't SPF be checking mydomain.com ?
However below is what it checked:
Received-SPF: none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at
jrasup.freeserve.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
This domain is se
Randraa - Yahoo wrote:
Good Morning for all, here is 7:36AM ;}, Brazil Carnival is comming ...
I want to patch my qmail-toaser with SPF + Greylist, and I don't know
about the best solution...
Who has installed could comment.
Thanks so much.
spf already available on qmailtoaster,
to
Good Morning for all, here is 7:36AM ;}, Brazil Carnival is comming ...
I want to patch my qmail-toaser with SPF + Greylist, and I don't know about the
best solution...
Who has installed could comment.
Thanks so much.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I've setup SPF in bind and a zone just for one of my domains and the ns is
working. I have never been a guru at MTA's at all. But I know the linux
system like the back of my hand (at least I think I do) because I custom
build Gentoo Stage3/1 64bit system that wil
Hi guys,
I've setup SPF in bind and a zone just for one of my domains and the ns is
working. I have never been a guru at MTA's at all. But I know the linux
system like the back of my hand (at least I think I do) because I custom
build Gentoo Stage3/1 64bit system that will double the benchmarks of
ubject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
Okay, thanks for the response!
The following is the contents of my named.conf file. I really don't see
anything with my domain name (velocity-med.com) (see below):. I guess that
means that I am not the master, which is fine as I will just have to conta
*
I will contact my host provider and ask them to fill in the spf info which
after using the online tool looks like below:
v=spf1 a mx ~all
If anything is glowingly wrong please let me know.
Francisco "Paco" Peralta
- Original Message
From: Tim Mancour <[EMA
ECTED]>
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:17:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
>
> You should do It in the DNS Server that has your domain zone (master).
> Probably your own DNS Server (or is it just a cache server?)
>
>
plains SPF, the
> syntax and even has a wizard to generate SPF records.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> From: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 9:52 AM
>
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
ctober 11, 2007 9:52 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
Just to clarify. This exercise started out with a person emailing me and
their email not getting through my server because of their spf settings, but
when I checked my own settings it seems I
From: aledr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:17:21 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
You should do It in the DNS Server that has your domain zone (master).
Probably your own DNS Server (or is it just a cache server?
: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11:15:19 AM
> Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
>
>
> The following site allows you to test their SPF record against the Email's
> domain - http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/
> The server'
ROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11:15:19 AM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
The following site allows you to test their SPF record
against the Email's domain - http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/
The server's address pas
Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:48 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Hello List,
A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my
server. I took a look at the smtp logs and found the followi
The owner of publix.com doesn't want users sending mail that didn't go
through their mail servers, according to the way the MX record is
written.
This user is attempting to talk directly to your mail server and thus
getting rejected, as per the publix.com policy.
"v=spf1 mx a:mail.publix.com mx:m
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Hello List,
A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected
by my server. I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following
(I have changed the email address to x's to protect the innocent):
*
10-09
Hello List,
A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my
server. I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following (I have changed
the email address to x's to protect the innocent):
*
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: status: 1/10
Absolutely.
-Original Message-
From: PakOgah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 12:08 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF rejecting test mode
Hi Tim,
can we also create additional rule for SA if spf status = pass then the
oing to do it too!
George S
- Original Message - From: "Tim Mancour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] SPF rejecting test mode
Eric,
I had to back off to a value of 3 for the same reason. Since I've
ob
That's a very good idea Tim I'm going to do it too!
George S
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Mancour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] SPF rejecting test mode
Eric,
I
If you set spfbehavior to 4, which will reject softfail, then spf
records that set softfail will be rejected.
By default, spfbehavior 3, will only reject things that set explicit fail.
Thanks,
Erik
On 4/9/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> It came to my attentio
al Message-
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:53 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF rejecting test mode
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> It came to my attention today that my toaster is rejecting messages
> based
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
It came to my attention today that my toaster is rejecting messages based on
SPF policy even though the sender's SPF policy indicates that the domain is
testing:
http://www.openspf.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&ip=63.109.97.44&receiver=doris
I have /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior se
It came to my attention today that my toaster is rejecting messages based on
SPF policy even though the sender's SPF policy indicates that the domain is
testing:
http://www.openspf.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&ip=63.109.97.44&receiver=doris
I have /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior set to 4 (reject softfail
Ed Morrison wrote:
> Tim Mancour wrote:
>> Ed,
>>
>> The qmail/control/spfrules file can also be used to allow local
>> receipt of
>> Email from your spam-filter machine. Just create the file with a
>> single line
>> similar to "ip4:0.0.0.0" where 0.0.0.0 is replaced with the filter
>> machine's
>>
Tim Mancour wrote:
Ed,
The qmail/control/spfrules file can also be used to allow local receipt of
Email from your spam-filter machine. Just create the file with a single line
similar to "ip4:0.0.0.0" where 0.0.0.0 is replaced with the filter machine's
IP address.
Regards,
Tim
Is the spfru
;> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:32 AM
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF causing delivery
I've updated http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spfrules.
-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:24 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF causing delivery failures
Good
TED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:32 AM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF causing delivery failures
>
> Tim Mancour wrote:
>> Ed,
>>
>> The qmail/control/spfrules file can also be used to allow local
>> receipt o
ementation should be valid.
Regards,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:32 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF causing delivery failures
Tim Mancour wrote:
> Ed,
>
Tim Mancour wrote:
> Ed,
>
> The qmail/control/spfrules file can also be used to allow local receipt of
> Email from your spam-filter machine. Just create the file with a single line
> similar to "ip4:0.0.0.0" where 0.0.0.0 is replaced with the filter machine's
> IP address.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
ssage-
From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 8:45 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF causing delivery failures
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF
On 1/31/07, Ed Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF
On 1/31/07, Ed Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Everyone:
I have a qmail toaster that sits behind a SPAM and virus filter. All
incoming email is first routed through the filter before getting handed
off to the toaster. Unfortunately the toaster
Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi Everyone:
I have a qmail toaster that sits behind a SPAM and virus filter. All
incoming email is first routed through the filter before getting
handed off to the toaster. Unfortunately the toaster is rejecting
some email due to SPF issues? How do I stop this? Is ther
Hi Everyone:
I have a qmail toaster that sits behind a SPAM and virus filter. All
incoming email is first routed through the filter before getting handed
off to the toaster. Unfortunately the toaster is rejecting some email
due to SPF issues? How do I stop this? Is there a way to disable S
Vince Callaway wrote:
Personally I think ALL hosting/ISP services should provide dynamic DNS.
The idea of static addresses should be reserved for data centers only.
Using a static address for a single website or mail server is a waste of
resources.
A bit offtop... nevertheless, I can agree with y
There is always xname or granitecanyon for free dns hosting.
Erik
On 1/24/07, Vince Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm coming into this conversation a bit late. My clueless ISP has had
me offline since last wed.
Having nameservers outsourced is good if you have redundant servers out
ther
I'm coming into this conversation a bit late. My clueless ISP has had
me offline since last wed.
Having nameservers outsourced is good if you have redundant servers out
there. If you have everything running on a single connection it does
not really matter if your dns stays up, you are already ho
Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
> Hy,
>
> My host is mail.abc.com and I also host domain bcd.com and dcg.com, my
> question is in what domain host file shall I place the spf record?
You should have an SPF record for each domain. I'm no expert with bind, but
I think the SPF record goes in the zone file f
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
