On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:26 PM, John W. Long johnwlong2...@gmail.com wrote:
Its just another thing to maintain. One of the chief advantages of migrating
stuff over to github is that upgrades and maintenance are free.
I'd say that Redmine does more than github but I can also understand your
Ollivier Robert wrote:
Why not using Redmine (redmine.org) it is also Rails based, has its
own forums/wiki/repository managements and a nice interface?
I've been using it for http://dev.keltia.net/ with great success
(while www.keltia.net is radiant).
It looks like some of the projects
Hi!
Are we really 100% sure that we want to keep the project forever at
GitHub? I mean not so long ago SVN was the standard for Rails
projects, now Git is in five years something else might be. And even
though we'd stick to using Git are we sure that we want to host our
things at
Simon Rönnqvist wrote:
Hi!
Are we really 100% sure that we want to keep the project forever at
GitHub? I mean not so long ago SVN was the standard for Rails
projects, now Git is in five years something else might be. And even
though we'd stick to using Git are we sure that we want to host
On 08.04.2009, at 09:33, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Simon Rönnqvist wrote:
Hi!
Are we really 100% sure that we want to keep the project forever at
GitHub? I mean not so long ago SVN was the standard for Rails
projects, now Git is in five years something else might be. And
even though we'd
As I was looking for an open source Rails based wiki recently I came
across Confluence by Atlassian. It's Java based but they offer a free
license for open source projects.
http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/licensing.jsp#nonprofit
I've come across several open source projects
On Apr 8, 2009, at 10:49 , michael starke wrote:
On 08.04.2009, at 09:33, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Simon Rönnqvist wrote:
Hi!
Are we really 100% sure that we want to keep the project forever
at GitHub? I mean not so long ago SVN was the standard for Rails
projects, now Git is in five
On Apr 8, 2009, at 2:37 AM, Simon Rönnqvist wrote:
Are we really 100% sure that we want to keep the project forever at
GitHub?
Few things are forever. But this does look like a good strategic move
for the future. There isn't a great Ruby-based wiki solution. And if
we hosted it ourselves
On Apr 7, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Steven Southard wrote:
I'm happy to help. I'll do the first part or the second. It only
looks like about 50 pages. Let me know which you want from me.
Awesome Steven. Why don't you start on the first part.
--
John Long
http://wiseheartdesign.com
John W. Long wrote:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Steven Southard wrote:
I'm happy to help. I'll do the first part or the second. It only
looks like about 50 pages. Let me know which you want from me.
Awesome Steven. Why don't you start on the first part.
I took a quick look at the site and
The images look like they can stay were they are for now. Is a txt
file named with the page title containing the page content okay? I
don't see the author and date info, do we need that? If it's okay
I'll make a file for any page that has content under http://wiki.radiantcms.org/all/list
If there's only around 50 pages, that doesn't seem a substantial amount
to a quick audit. Also, any of you can feel free to ask questions about
specific pages.
Something else someone could do that wouldn't take long:
The current Home page on the github wiki is oriented toward developers
On Apr 7, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Steven Southard wrote:
The images look like they can stay were they are for now.
Agreed. I believe they are all hosted on other servers.
Is a txt file named with the page title containing the page content
okay? I don't see the author and date info, do we need
Here are the files for part 1:
http://stevensouthard.com/radiantwiki.zip
On Apr 7, 2009, at 2:24 PM, John W. Long wrote:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Steven Southard wrote:
The images look like they can stay were they are for now.
Agreed. I believe they are all hosted on other servers.
Is
John W. Long wrote:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Steven Southard wrote:
The images look like they can stay were they are for now.
Agreed. I believe they are all hosted on other servers.
You are right - most of the pictures are screen shots that I had put
in. They are all hosted on my site.
15 matches
Mail list logo
