Hi Sean,
Thanks for the info, I already did some testing using cucumber on
extensions, but I was curios if we have it in 0.8.
Cristi
On 6/20/09 6:30 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Cristi,
I knew there was something that we missed in 0.8. For now, you have
to write your own env.rb file. Look at t
On Jun 20, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Merk S wrote:
Dear Radiant Folks,I am working on a website for a martial arts
studio where families/guardians register their children for
classes. By hacking on a fork of the fantastic
simple_product_manager extension (http://github.com/rubymn-f1/radiant-simple
Hi All,
Is the expectation that unless the GitHub page specifically says that
an extension works with 0.8, that it WON'T work?
I've tried and failed to install a few extensions, and now there's so
much non-working cruft that I'm thinking it'd be easier to start a new
instance and transfer all my
Jim, thanks a lot for your input.
I'm considering restful-authentication -- do you think using something like
that (or authlogic) is overkill or might cause problems?
I do like the fact that out of the box RA supports roles and states :)
thanks again jim.
> From: j...@saturnflyer.com
> To:
Jeff,
I find that a combination of checking the last updated date stamp, with tags
and text in most docs are the most reliable 'filters' for checking if stuff
might work on .8.
It would be helpful if Radiant utilizied something similar to the approach
wordpress' plugin directory takes (ie
On Jun 21, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Jeff Casimir wrote:
Hi All,
Is the expectation that unless the GitHub page specifically says that
an extension works with 0.8, that it WON'T work?
Maybe. It depends. Some extensions might not require an update.
I've tried and failed to install a few extensions,
If restful authentication works for you, it should be fine. You'll
just need to make sure that any of the methods for authentication
don't overlap.
http://github.com/radiant/radiant/blob/69cdd08d287199810fa515c04a3563e26acfb11c/lib/login_system.rb
Jim Gay
http://www.saturnflyer.com
On Jun
Jim,
Wow, great info. I was actually fighting with "comments" among others
for a few hours, but I'm sure I made it more work than necessary. Now
everything is going great and I have a lot better understanding of how
the extensions are managed and work.
It would be pretty awesome if some kind, f
Jim Gay wrote:
I haven't looked closely at the extensions out there for member
management. I believe that a common approach is to just piggy-back on
the existing users, but personally I would not do that. The purpose of
Radiant's users and your extra users are different enough that they
make s
I haven't looked closely at the extensions out there for member
management. I believe that a common approach is to just piggy-back on
the existing users, but personally I would not do that. The purpose of
Radiant's users and your extra users are different enough that they
make sense being separate
Maybe a cached/not-cached flag should be part of any page (and a feature
of the core Radiant CMS). Static content is better edited by Radiant but
served by apache/nginx/... anyway.
Jan
Petrik de Heus scripsit dd. Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:17:05 +0200 (internet: @303)
>> I haven't looked closely at the
Ah yes thank you. Probably would have bumped into that.
I suppose i can get around this pretty easily by doing restful_authentication
generation with "siteuser" rather than "user".
I think this is still poignant and should avoid issue.
> From: j...@saturnflyer.com
> To: radiant@radiantcms
12 matches
Mail list logo
