-Original Message-
On Tuesday, 5. February 2008 18:15:24 you wrote:
I used to have higher SA scores for 95-100% spam confidence.
However, I found that I could not increase the score very much.
Occasionally, I would get a false positive for a blank
email, no text with
a few
-Original Message-
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:51:47PM -0600, Jim Hermann - UUN
Hostmaster wrote:
The RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100 and RAZOR2_IGNORE were my custom
RAZOR rules. I
could not get RAZOR2_IGNORE consistently to recognize when
to ignore the
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100
Hello Jim,
On Tuesday, 5. February 2008 18:15:24 you wrote:
I used to have higher SA scores for 95-100% spam confidence.
However, I found that I could not increase the score very much.
Occasionally, I would get a false positive for a blank email, no text with
a few HTML tags and just
-Original Message-
From: 'Thomas Jarosch'; ''
Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Spamassassin's Razor scores
Hello together,
I'm wondering if it would make sense to add additional rules
for 95% to 100%
spam confidence? Is anybody already using a setup like that?
Any drawbacks?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: 'Thomas Jarosch'; ''
Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Spamassassin's Razor scores
Hello together,
I'm wondering if it would make sense to add additional rules
for 95% to 100%
spam confidence? Is anybody already using a setup like that?
Any drawbacks?
Cheers
Hello Matt,
On Thursday, 31. January 2008 17:18:35 you wrote:
e4 total hits: 981
e4 cf 100: 857
e4 cf 90-99: 12
e4 cf 80-89: 2
e4 cf 70-79: 10
e4 cf 60-69: 21
e4 cf 50-59: 16
e4 cf 40-49: 8
e4 cf 30-39: 30
e4 cf 20-29: 25
e4 cf 10-19:
On Wednesday, 30. January 2008 20:36:09 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:11:53PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
You can try it if you like. The existing rules are the result of some
testing that was done several years ago. I think it was Theo that did
it..
Yeah, I wrote the
Thomas Jarosch wrote:
On Wednesday, 30. January 2008 20:36:09 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
My recollection was that w/ e8 the cf was either really low or really high,
and we just took the 51_100 values from the older pre-e8 rules and made it
all consistent.
I don't recall e4 stats.
Maybe Vipul
Thomas Jarosch wrote:
Hello together,
I've been using Razor and SpamAssassin quite a while now
using the standard rules distributed with SpamAssassin.
SpamAssassin normally evalutes Razor's spam confidence level
between 51% and 100%. This results in the following score:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:11:53PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
You can try it if you like. The existing rules are the result of some testing
that was done several years ago. I think it was Theo that did it..
Yeah, I wrote the rules + code way back when... I've been trying to find some
stats
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:11:53PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
You can try it if you like. The existing rules are the result of some
testing
that was done several years ago. I think it was Theo that did it..
Yeah, I wrote the rules + code way back when... I've been
11 matches
Mail list logo
