Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect handling in any way I can detect. Rear rack trunks OTOH cause problems nearly no matter what. On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:11 PM, jimD rasterd...@comcast.net wrote: I'll echo Patrick's observation. My Riv custom is my most favorite handling bike of all time. I have a Tournesol that's a front loader and fun to ride but takes more concentration than the Riv. That having been said, once I ride either bike for several days in a row I get totally accommodated to how they handle. My experience with my Riv is that it is very happy with a seat bag. In addition to the seat bag I often add a bar tube and carry something less than 10 lbs in the bar bag with minimal impact on handling. I may not be particularly sensitive to handling nuances. My theory is, ride what you brung. -JimD On Nov 23, 2011, at 7:59 AM, PATRICK MOORE wrote: This was my experience exactly on the Sam Hillborne, both with all the weight (no more than 35 lb in my case) in the back and even worse when some of that weight was in the front in a bar bag (Ostrich, firmly attached by decaleur to stem and front rack). Front low riders did slow the flop a bit but made the steering feel very sluggish -- very *oddly* sluggish with 30 lb divided evenly between the two: it was very hard to initiate a turn!. My own solutions was to sell the Sam Hill and buy a Fargo, which handles unobjectionably in all loaded conditions; but of course that is rather drastic. I personally would also be interested in others' suggestions for solutions. I expect finding the right mix of front/rear and high/low is one area to investigate? Jan's experience of feeling more confident in mid, fast turn with a low trail bike is interesting; perhaps it's simply lack of experience with either or both kinds, but my own impression is that higher trail corner as on rails bikes (Rivs) feel more confidence inspiring than the Herse -- not that the Herse is bad, just not ideal -- it takes more concentration; one is not as blithely and unconcernedly ready to let the bike go. Now the trike seems to handle the same with or without a front load. (That's a joke, Steve -- tho' it's true.) On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:05 AM, allenmichael allenmich...@mac.comwrote: I just did my first tour this past summer on a 56 Atlantis. The Atlantis was terrific except for climbing at very low speeds. I was carrying a lot of weight, about 65 lbs., and some of it was on the front. I had a riv high rider nitto rack with two loaded panniers and my wife's sleeping pad riding up there. At low speed, almost no speed, the front tire (and all of the front weight) kept wanting to flop over. The worst part of the trip, by far, was fighting with this weight and trying to keep the bike on the road under these conditions. To the point where I don't think I would take this bike again if I had to carry so much weight. Any suggestions, apart from carrying less weight or balancing it better or loading it lower? Other bikes? Other handlebar set-ups (I had noodle drop bars, just above the saddle)? Other tires (I had 1.75 Marathon Plus)? Thanks, Michael Allen -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW http://resumespecialties.com/index.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- Ken Freeman Ann Arbor, MI USA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
On Nov 23, 10:47 am, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote: Imagine trying to carry a heavy backpack. You lean forward. When you remove the backpack, while still leaning forward, you fall over. On the other hand, when you add a backpack and don't lean forward, you also fall over. So does the backpack help or hurt your balance? It's neither, the backpack is part of the system that balances. Trying to add a backpack without changing the other variables (lean angle forward/back) does not work well. I like that metaphor. Thanks for that. Have you used that one before? I'd never heard it before. It came to me as I was thinking about how to explain the load being a factor. That is what I like about online discussions - they get you to think about things in different ways. Jan Heine Editor Bicycle Quarterly http://www.bikequarterly.com Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
On Nov 24, 4:17 am, Ken Freeman kenfreeman...@gmail.com wrote: My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect handling in any way I can detect. Except when you rise out of the saddle. Then, the load is unsupported, and tends to be the tail wagging the bike. But that applies to all rear loads, including panniers. Rear low-riders perhaps have the least effect in that situation, as they are so low that you don't move them much as you move the bike from side to side. (But rear low-riders, being so far back, have other issues that make them a good choice only if you carefully balance your weight distribution when loading the bike.) Jan Heine Editor Bicycle Quarterly http://www.bikequarterly.com Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I have a Carradice but haven't used it much yet. My usual saddle bags are 3-liter or so wedges, that are tightly coupled to the saddle. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jan Heine hein...@earthlink.net wrote: On Nov 24, 4:17 am, Ken Freeman kenfreeman...@gmail.com wrote: My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect handling in any way I can detect. Except when you rise out of the saddle. Then, the load is unsupported, and tends to be the tail wagging the bike. But that applies to all rear loads, including panniers. Rear low-riders perhaps have the least effect in that situation, as they are so low that you don't move them much as you move the bike from side to side. (But rear low-riders, being so far back, have other issues that make them a good choice only if you carefully balance your weight distribution when loading the bike.) Jan Heine Editor Bicycle Quarterly http://www.bikequarterly.com Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- Ken Freeman Ann Arbor, MI USA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Large and heavily loaded saddlebags do wag but not horribly so; and, at least on the right bikes, rear panniers affect handling very little even with rather heavy loads: I was amazed, at least on one of my Rivs, the first one, at how well I could corner (eg, tight S bends across narrow wooden bridges on bike paths) with a rear load in panniers on a Tubus rack, and how easy it was, with even 40 lb (I weighed the load) to ride at 10 mph with no hands (faster was even easier). My later and present Riv commuter does not handle rear loads nearly as well, even though, unladen, it handes better. And I've owned at least one bike (that Fuji) that handled better with a 30 lb rear load than unladen. And it's not merely the stiffness of the frame. The Motobecane that I sold to Eric Norris was a very light 531 frame and a considerably lighter frame than that of the current Riv, yet it handled rear loads much better -- the rear *would* wag when I stood but only if the load was over 30 lb or so. I think that the cause is something about the frame geometry; and of course this all implies a stiff rack. *And* I never hand any problem with asymmetric loading -- I'd often carry 25 lb in just one rear pannier with no ill effect. I remember once carrying a 2' high stack of library books 10 miles, all stuffed into one very large rear pannier; this on an early Raleigh Technium that did waggle but not because of one-sided loading. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Jan Heine hein...@earthlink.net wrote: On Nov 24, 4:17 am, Ken Freeman kenfreeman...@gmail.com wrote: My experience with seat bags is that they essentially do not affect handling in any way I can detect. Except when you rise out of the saddle. Then, the load is unsupported, and tends to be the tail wagging the bike. But that applies to all rear loads, including panniers. Rear low-riders perhaps have the least effect in that situation, as they are so low that you don't move them much as you move the bike from side to side. (But rear low-riders, being so far back, have other issues that make them a good choice only if you carefully balance your weight distribution when loading the bike.) Jan Heine Editor Bicycle Quarterly http://www.bikequarterly.com Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW http://resumespecialties.com/index.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
It really isn't low trail against every other trail. Yet you couldn't tell that from this thread. Down the line there are nothing but excuses and defiance of the experience of others. Many say their bikes ride great with medium to high trail and have no issues with front loads... Oh that's because you don't know ... The low trail (extra low) road bad at low speeds and bad at high speeds but I got used to it. The high trail is unnoticeable with front load... low trail folks yell... but if you ride low trail bike it's much better you just don't know it because you are used to it. Sheesh sounds like politicians.. no matter what low trail is the only way to go... now it's ohh saddle bags and rear loads are bad too.. if loose and you are sprinting, climbing blah blah and throwing the bike side to side ... throw a loose load on the front and throw the bike side to side... hell put a big loose load anywhere and throw it side to side... ohhh wait you'll get used to it. Kinda of reminds me of the cheating husband to his wife... are you going to believe me or your lying eyes The truth is some people prefer the handling of low trail bike and others medium and other high and some in-between... some want to take the way they ride and tweak trail, weight load, handlebar height, stem length, body weight, arm length, shoe size, and run formulas. Then there is a new racers (oh sorry randonneurs) routine to ride a bike... weight front bag, banana, nuts, rain coat... place 2 lbs packages at 10 mile intervals incase it rains and I need to replace weight of rain gear in front rack along the way.. (after all optimal performance on this bike is with 12.7779076 lbs front)Get the air pressure to exactly 40.1155576 lbs (new electronic air monitoring for tires will be out next year to update your home computer that will send snmp traps to you via email in case of fluctuation about 2.3357%) Ok... check.. I can ride my bike now and carve turns and feel like a really good race bike No Thank You.. I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, front and rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great.. I check the tires once a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I change handle bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners group on the web to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it.. only to have to defend not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides unilaterally that since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no evidence from anyone is valid...they are just used to it and don't know. I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't. Low trail sounds great the way Jan did it .. built the bike to be a performance (race machine) for a specific purpose.. He loves it. The bikes are beautiful and I'm sure they ride great and people get used to them just as Most bikes ride wonderfully and people get used to them. After all they are bicycles After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just opinions it's obvious that it's not just a trail thing. It's also true that there are trade offs in bike design. It may be true that low trail bikes with xyz handle a front load of x better than bike z with x amount of load at frame size k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N amount of power. It's not the answer to all loads though and writing off others experience is just tiring at best. Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know it already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did. Guess we only need one bike geometry after all. FYI: this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may want to try and feel it is. Also no single sentence by itself above stands alone.. overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of opinion based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others. It also goes back to my original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the instant assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your bike can't handle it BS! Mine and others experience and knowledge of how our bikes handle are just as valid as others opinions. I don't argue or believe my bike is better than yours except for me, that is the same respect I expect / demand from you. If not I am sarcastic enough and a big enough asshole to be as obnoxious and oblivious to the truth as anyone just not as eloquent. Your friendly bear in the china shop Kelly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/KYrH8-T-tx4J. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Thanks, Kelly, for saying what many of us are probably thinking! Every hobby has a joyous geekery about it, and every hobby shared with like-mined enthusiasts always gets explored to its extremes. I think that's normal and, to some degree, part of the fun; but the fun bleeds right out of it when the discussions devolve into intellectual warfare. I think you are a very good representative of how bicycle enthusiasm ought to be enjoyed. A great number of folks on this groups make it about the minutia instead of the fundamental enjoyment. Having someone occasionally call bullshit! to the crowd is grounding and refreshing, and thank you for it. Dave On 11/24/2011 9:19 AM, Kelly Sleeper wrote: It really isn't low trail against every other trail. Yet you couldn't tell that from this thread. Down the line there are nothing but excuses and defiance of the experience of others. Many say their bikes ride great with medium to high trail and have no issues with front loads... Oh that's because you don't know ... The low trail (extra low) road bad at low speeds and bad at high speeds but I got used to it. The high trail is unnoticeable with front load... low trail folks yell... but if you ride low trail bike it's much better you just don't know it because you are used to it. Sheesh sounds like politicians.. no matter what low trail is the only way to go... now it's ohh saddle bags and rear loads are bad too.. if loose and you are sprinting, climbing blah blah and throwing the bike side to side ... throw a loose load on the front and throw the bike side to side... hell put a big loose load anywhere and throw it side to side... ohhh wait you'll get used to it. Kinda of reminds me of the cheating husband to his wife... are you going to believe me or your lying eyes The truth is some people prefer the handling of low trail bike and others medium and other high and some in-between... some want to take the way they ride and tweak trail, weight load, handlebar height, stem length, body weight, arm length, shoe size, and run formulas. Then there is a new racers (oh sorry randonneurs) routine to ride a bike... weight front bag, banana, nuts, rain coat... place 2 lbs packages at 10 mile intervals incase it rains and I need to replace weight of rain gear in front rack along the way.. (after all optimal performance on this bike is with 12.7779076 lbs front)Get the air pressure to exactly 40.1155576 lbs (new electronic air monitoring for tires will be out next year to update your home computer that will send snmp traps to you via email in case of fluctuation about 2.3357%) Ok... check.. I can ride my bike now and carve turns and feel like a really good race bike No Thank You.. I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, front and rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great.. I check the tires once a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I change handle bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners group on the web to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it.. only to have to defend not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides unilaterally that since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no evidence from anyone is valid...they are just used to it and don't know. I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't. Low trail sounds great the way Jan did it .. built the bike to be a performance (race machine) for a specific purpose.. He loves it. The bikes are beautiful and I'm sure they ride great and people get used to them just as Most bikes ride wonderfully and people get used to them. After all they are bicycles After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just opinions it's obvious that it's not just a trail thing. It's also true that there are trade offs in bike design. It may be true that low trail bikes with xyz handle a front load of x better than bike z with x amount of load at frame size k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N amount of power. It's not the answer to all loads though and writing off others experience is just tiring at best. Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know it already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did. Guess we only need one bike geometry after all. FYI: this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may want to try and feel it is. Also no single sentence by itself above stands alone.. overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of opinion based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others. It also goes back to my original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the instant assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your bike can't handle it BS! Mine and others experience and knowledge of how our bikes handle are just as valid as
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I like bikes that ride differently. I like my front loader, I like my Saluki, I love my Riv custom. Not one of them rides like the other. All of then are fun. Shoot, I even like my Madone though I haven't ridden it in more than a year. For me it's a gestalt thing (to steal an R.Sach's perspective). -JimD On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Kelly Sleeper wrote: It really isn't low trail against every other trail. Yet you couldn't tell that from this thread. Down the line there are nothing but excuses and defiance of the experience of others. Many say their bikes ride great with medium to high trail and have no issues with front loads... Oh that's because you don't know ... The low trail (extra low) road bad at low speeds and bad at high speeds but I got used to it. The high trail is unnoticeable with front load... low trail folks yell... but if you ride low trail bike it's much better you just don't know it because you are used to it. Sheesh sounds like politicians.. no matter what low trail is the only way to go... now it's ohh saddle bags and rear loads are bad too.. if loose and you are sprinting, climbing blah blah and throwing the bike side to side ... throw a loose load on the front and throw the bike side to side... hell put a big loose load anywhere and throw it side to side... ohhh wait you'll get used to it. Kinda of reminds me of the cheating husband to his wife... are you going to believe me or your lying eyes The truth is some people prefer the handling of low trail bike and others medium and other high and some in-between... some want to take the way they ride and tweak trail, weight load, handlebar height, stem length, body weight, arm length, shoe size, and run formulas. Then there is a new racers (oh sorry randonneurs) routine to ride a bike... weight front bag, banana, nuts, rain coat... place 2 lbs packages at 10 mile intervals incase it rains and I need to replace weight of rain gear in front rack along the way.. (after all optimal performance on this bike is with 12.7779076 lbs front) Get the air pressure to exactly 40.1155576 lbs (new electronic air monitoring for tires will be out next year to update your home computer that will send snmp traps to you via email in case of fluctuation about 2.3357%) Ok... check.. I can ride my bike now and carve turns and feel like a really good race bike No Thank You.. I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, front and rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great.. I check the tires once a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I change handle bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners group on the web to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it.. only to have to defend not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides unilaterally that since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no evidence from anyone is valid...they are just used to it and don't know. I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't. Low trail sounds great the way Jan did it .. built the bike to be a performance (race machine) for a specific purpose.. He loves it. The bikes are beautiful and I'm sure they ride great and people get used to them just as Most bikes ride wonderfully and people get used to them. After all they are bicycles After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just opinions it's obvious that it's not just a trail thing. It's also true that there are trade offs in bike design. It may be true that low trail bikes with xyz handle a front load of x better than bike z with x amount of load at frame size k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N amount of power. It's not the answer to all loads though and writing off others experience is just tiring at best. Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know it already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did. Guess we only need one bike geometry after all. FYI: this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may want to try and feel it is. Also no single sentence by itself above stands alone.. overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of opinion based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others. It also goes back to my original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the instant assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your bike can't handle it BS! Mine and others experience and knowledge of how our bikes handle are just as valid as others opinions. I don't argue or believe my bike is better than yours except for me, that is the same respect I expect / demand from you. If not I am sarcastic enough and a big enough asshole to be as obnoxious and oblivious to the truth as anyone just not
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
What he said.. On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:23 PM, David Faller wrote: . I purchased a Rivendell as it handles front loads, rear loads, front and rear loads and doesn't need a load to feel great.. I check the tires once a week.. and carry what I need as an all around bicycle... I change handle bars, tires, bags etc often .. then join a Rivendell Owners group on the web to discuss and explore the wonderful uses of it.. only to have to defend not the bike but my own experience as someone else decides unilaterally that since they don't feel the same way I'm wrong... and no evidence from anyone is valid...they are just used to it and don't know. I'm sarcastic blunt and things make sense or they don't. Low trail sounds great the way Jan did it .. built the bike to be a performance (race machine) for a specific purpose.. He loves it. The bikes are beautiful and I'm sure they ride great and people get used to them just as Most bikes ride wonderfully and people get used to them. After all they are bicycles After all from the vast difference of experiences and not just opinions it's obvious that it's not just a trail thing. It's also true that there are trade offs in bike design. It may be true that low trail bikes with xyz handle a front load of x better than bike z with x amount of load at frame size k rider weight L and front to rear load weight M under N amount of power. It's not the answer to all loads though and writing off others experience is just tiring at best. Don't tell low trail bike owners they have a nice bike either... they know it already.. you were just to dumb to figure it out as quickly as they did. Guess we only need one bike geometry after all. FYI: this is not a personal attack on anyone no matter how much you may want to try and feel it is. Also no single sentence by itself above stands alone.. overall this is just stating in a sarcastic but honest statement of opinion based perceptions.. so far in this thread and others. It also goes back to my original notice to the original poster that I disagree with the instant assertion that front loads are bad for all but bike X because your bike can't handle it BS! Mine and others experience and knowledge of how our bikes handle are just as valid as others opinions. I don't argue or believe my bike is better than yours except for me, that is the same respect I expect / demand from you. If not I am sarcastic enough and a big enough asshole to be as obnoxious and oblivious to the truth as anyone just not as eloquent. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
On Nov 22, 12:46 pm, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote: My question is: Does adding a front load to a low trail bike improve that bike's handling? Or does it just change it *less negatively* than it does a high trail bike? My new 650B bike handles better with a handlebar bag than without. Basically, it handles like a very good racing bike... So the load improves the handling. Simply put, the load is one variable that needs to be in place to optimize the bike. If adding a front load IMPROVES a low trail bike and DEGRADES a high trail bike, then is there a middleground that is unaffected? When does it flip from hurting to helping? It's not like that. It's that the load is one component of the big picture. So if you remove the load, something is missing. Imagine trying to carry a heavy backpack. You lean forward. When you remove the backpack, while still leaning forward, you fall over. On the other hand, when you add a backpack and don't lean forward, you also fall over. So does the backpack help or hurt your balance? It's neither, the backpack is part of the system that balances. Trying to add a backpack without changing the other variables (lean angle forward/back) does not work well. If adding a front load just degrades a low trail bike less, then is there a super-low-trail design that is even less sensitive? In other words, have you Jan ever ridden a legitimate bike for spirited riding that had too little trail? I have: the 1947 Alex Singer that is shown in The Golden Age of Handbuilt Bicycles. It's got somewhere between 5 and 10 mm trail. It's not as bad as you'd think - I rode it for 65 miles in one setting, and for the most part, it was just fine. However, at low speeds, it was too stable. Imagine a car with the power steering switched off. I was climbing a hill, and saw a pothole, but the bike continued to go straight much longer than I anticipated. I barely missed the hole. Conversely, in high-speed corners, the Singer didn't hold its line very well. You had to correct constantly to stay on course. Beyond that, it was fine. It was no problem during high-speed descents on the straights, nor during normal cruising on the flats. I am sure that if the current standard was 10 mm trail, then we'd have people say: I don't know what the advocates of HIGH TRAIL are talking about. My 10 mm trail bike is just fine, and I don't see any need to go to 30 or even 35 mm trail. All this is discussed in much more detail in the current issue of Bicycle Quarterly, where we have a detailed article titled: An Overview of Frame Geometry – What it Means and Why It's Important. (Sorry for the plug, but I figure there are a few people here who might appreciate learning about another resource on the topic.) Jan Heine Editor Bicycle Quarterly http://www.bikequarterly.com Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
This was my experience exactly on the Sam Hillborne, both with all the weight (no more than 35 lb in my case) in the back and even worse when some of that weight was in the front in a bar bag (Ostrich, firmly attached by decaleur to stem and front rack). Front low riders did slow the flop a bit but made the steering feel very sluggish -- very *oddly* sluggish with 30 lb divided evenly between the two: it was very hard to initiate a turn!. My own solutions was to sell the Sam Hill and buy a Fargo, which handles unobjectionably in all loaded conditions; but of course that is rather drastic. I personally would also be interested in others' suggestions for solutions. I expect finding the right mix of front/rear and high/low is one area to investigate? Jan's experience of feeling more confident in mid, fast turn with a low trail bike is interesting; perhaps it's simply lack of experience with either or both kinds, but my own impression is that higher trail corner as on rails bikes (Rivs) feel more confidence inspiring than the Herse -- not that the Herse is bad, just not ideal -- it takes more concentration; one is not as blithely and unconcernedly ready to let the bike go. Now the trike seems to handle the same with or without a front load. (That's a joke, Steve -- tho' it's true.) On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:05 AM, allenmichael allenmich...@mac.com wrote: I just did my first tour this past summer on a 56 Atlantis. The Atlantis was terrific except for climbing at very low speeds. I was carrying a lot of weight, about 65 lbs., and some of it was on the front. I had a riv high rider nitto rack with two loaded panniers and my wife's sleeping pad riding up there. At low speed, almost no speed, the front tire (and all of the front weight) kept wanting to flop over. The worst part of the trip, by far, was fighting with this weight and trying to keep the bike on the road under these conditions. To the point where I don't think I would take this bike again if I had to carry so much weight. Any suggestions, apart from carrying less weight or balancing it better or loading it lower? Other bikes? Other handlebar set-ups (I had noodle drop bars, just above the saddle)? Other tires (I had 1.75 Marathon Plus)? Thanks, Michael Allen -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW http://resumespecialties.com/index.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I remember putting a Nitto Boxy Bag with bar-clamp rack on a 12 speed Fuji Royale and sticking, what, certainly no more than 10 lb in it, and trying to ride along a narrow road with fastish traffic and no shoulder in a gusty crosswind. White knuckles! That experience made me sell the Boxy Bag! Definitely a difference with the Fuji that, sans such a load, so placed (note qualification) was unexceptionable if not great. Oddly, the Fuji handled *best* with a considerable load in rear panniers -- sweet, docile, stable, no-hands-doable. Make of that what you will. On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Jim Cloud cloud...@aol.com wrote: I've never experienced any problems with front loading a moderate to high trail bicycle. I've used handlebar bags for about the last 35 years on bikes that have these geometries. I'm sorry, but the low- trail mantra just isn't supported by my own personal experience. Jim Cloud -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW http://resumespecialties.com/index.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Imagine trying to carry a heavy backpack. You lean forward. When you remove the backpack, while still leaning forward, you fall over. On the other hand, when you add a backpack and don't lean forward, you also fall over. So does the backpack help or hurt your balance? It's neither, the backpack is part of the system that balances. Trying to add a backpack without changing the other variables (lean angle forward/back) does not work well. I like that metaphor. Thanks for that. Have you used that one before? I'd never heard it before. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/uhfcbopYzFsJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I'll echo Patrick's observation. My Riv custom is my most favorite handling bike of all time. I have a Tournesol that's a front loader and fun to ride but takes more concentration than the Riv. That having been said, once I ride either bike for several days in a row I get totally accommodated to how they handle. My experience with my Riv is that it is very happy with a seat bag. In addition to the seat bag I often add a bar tube and carry something less than 10 lbs in the bar bag with minimal impact on handling. I may not be particularly sensitive to handling nuances. My theory is, ride what you brung. -JimD On Nov 23, 2011, at 7:59 AM, PATRICK MOORE wrote: This was my experience exactly on the Sam Hillborne, both with all the weight (no more than 35 lb in my case) in the back and even worse when some of that weight was in the front in a bar bag (Ostrich, firmly attached by decaleur to stem and front rack). Front low riders did slow the flop a bit but made the steering feel very sluggish -- very *oddly* sluggish with 30 lb divided evenly between the two: it was very hard to initiate a turn!. My own solutions was to sell the Sam Hill and buy a Fargo, which handles unobjectionably in all loaded conditions; but of course that is rather drastic. I personally would also be interested in others' suggestions for solutions. I expect finding the right mix of front/rear and high/low is one area to investigate? Jan's experience of feeling more confident in mid, fast turn with a low trail bike is interesting; perhaps it's simply lack of experience with either or both kinds, but my own impression is that higher trail corner as on rails bikes (Rivs) feel more confidence inspiring than the Herse -- not that the Herse is bad, just not ideal -- it takes more concentration; one is not as blithely and unconcernedly ready to let the bike go. Now the trike seems to handle the same with or without a front load. (That's a joke, Steve -- tho' it's true.) On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:05 AM, allenmichael allenmich...@mac.com wrote: I just did my first tour this past summer on a 56 Atlantis. The Atlantis was terrific except for climbing at very low speeds. I was carrying a lot of weight, about 65 lbs., and some of it was on the front. I had a riv high rider nitto rack with two loaded panniers and my wife's sleeping pad riding up there. At low speed, almost no speed, the front tire (and all of the front weight) kept wanting to flop over. The worst part of the trip, by far, was fighting with this weight and trying to keep the bike on the road under these conditions. To the point where I don't think I would take this bike again if I had to carry so much weight. Any suggestions, apart from carrying less weight or balancing it better or loading it lower? Other bikes? Other handlebar set-ups (I had noodle drop bars, just above the saddle)? Other tires (I had 1.75 Marathon Plus)? Thanks, Michael Allen -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW http://resumespecialties.com/index.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I rode a bike with 57 mm trail and a handlebar bag for years, and tens of thousands of happy miles. Never thought that there was anything wrong with it. Then I rode a few low-trail bikes (also with handlebar bags), and I found that they were significantly better even with a lightly loaded bag. There was no adjustment needed when I rode the low-trail bikes, even though they were unfamiliar to me. When I switched back to the 57 mm-trail bike, I tended to run wide on that bike, and hit things I thought I had barely missed, even though this was the bike to which I should have been most attuned, since I rode it all the time. So the conclusions for me are: • Mid-trail and bar bag is fine. You can ride it, and be happy. • Low-trail and bar bag is better. Almost anybody who has done a direct comparison appears to agree. Beyond that, it makes sense that if you change a significant handling parameter, such as the load attached to the steering or the tire width, that you would have to change the other parameters to suit if you want to keep the handling the same. Finally, I have ridden many unloaded bikes with high trail figures that handled wonderfully. The Calfee test bike in the latest Bicycle Quarterly is a case in point. It appears that wheel flop and trail counter each other, so that racing bikes with 50, 55 and 60 mm trail handle similarly. Adding a handlebar bag changes the picture, though. Jan Heine Editor Bicycle Quarterly http://www.bikequarterly.com Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I just did my first tour this past summer on a 56 Atlantis. The Atlantis was terrific except for climbing at very low speeds. I was carrying a lot of weight, about 65 lbs., and some of it was on the front. I had a riv high rider nitto rack with two loaded panniers and my wife's sleeping pad riding up there. At low speed, almost no speed, the front tire (and all of the front weight) kept wanting to flop over. The worst part of the trip, by far, was fighting with this weight and trying to keep the bike on the road under these conditions. To the point where I don't think I would take this bike again if I had to carry so much weight. Any suggestions, apart from carrying less weight or balancing it better or loading it lower? Other bikes? Other handlebar set-ups (I had noodle drop bars, just above the saddle)? Other tires (I had 1.75 Marathon Plus)? Thanks, Michael Allen On Nov 18, 6:50 pm, Shifty 1upand1d...@gmail.com wrote: So, I was just about to plunk down a couple of hundred dollars on a Berthoud front bag at Rene Herse. Mike kindly returned my phone call and immediately asked about the bike I was going to put it on. A Rivendell, I replied (A. Homer Hilsen). He said, do you know that the bag's weight will affect the handling somewhat; some people can't live with it while others aren't bothered by it at all. He said it was because of the trail high or low (I don't recall which) of all Rivendell bikes and that Herse bikes have a (high, low?) trail that accounts for weight carrying in the front. So what do YOU think Rivendell front bag owner? Have you ever regretted the effect the bag has on your Rivendell's handling? Thanks, Shifty -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
You should really spend some time and go through the group archives here and on iBob. There are strong opinions on trail and front bags and front end geometry. The whole topic of front end loading and fork trail can cause very strong opinions among some folks. The best thing to do might be play with a cheap bag to see if you absolutely hate it before plunking down any major expense. This bit was the take away lesson, I'd say. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:17 -0800, Rick wrote: You should really spend some time and go through the group archives here and on iBob. There are strong opinions on trail and front bags and front end geometry. The whole topic of front end loading and fork trail can cause very strong opinions among some folks. The best thing to do might be play with a cheap bag to see if you absolutely hate it before plunking down any major expense. This bit was the take away lesson, I'd say. Assuming the cheap bag is supported well, you could get some useful results. I had great success with a much-modified $25 Nashbar Elite bag I used for a couple of years on my Kogswell P/R. But if the bag isn't mounted and supported on a rack the same way as the better bag would be, the results might not be comparable, in that a bag that's loose and free to swing to and fro would have an undesirable effect on the steering that a better-installed bag would not have. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I imagine I could go through the various forums to look for the answer, but I'll ask anyway. Jan and others have said: 1. a high trail bike can ride very well without a front load 2. adding a front load to ANY bike changes the handling 3. adding a front load to a high trail bike changes the handling negatively 4. a low trail bike rides very well with a front load (better than a high trail bike) My question is: Does adding a front load to a low trail bike improve that bike's handling? Or does it just change it *less negatively* than it does a high trail bike? The follow up question to each of the two possible answers are obvious: If adding a front load IMPROVES a low trail bike and DEGRADES a high trail bike, then is there a middleground that is unaffected? When does it flip from hurting to helping? If adding a front load just degrades a low trail bike less, then is there a super-low-trail design that is even less sensitive? In other words, have you Jan ever ridden a legitimate bike for spirited riding that had too little trail? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ELBJ_otLE_wJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 12:46 -0800, William wrote: I imagine I could go through the various forums to look for the answer, but I'll ask anyway. Jan and others have said: 1. a high trail bike can ride very well without a front load 2. adding a front load to ANY bike changes the handling 3. adding a front load to a high trail bike changes the handling negatively 4. a low trail bike rides very well with a front load (better than a high trail bike) My question is: Does adding a front load to a low trail bike improve that bike's handling? Or does it just change it less negatively than it does a high trail bike? I had the LBS build up my Kogswell P/R, 30mm trail fork, and took the bike outside to ride around the parking lot. No load on the bike but me. Holy @#$%! What the #$$^ is wrong with this bike??? was my immediate reaction. The front end felt really, seriously, weird: far too light, not like anything I'd ever experienced. I later came to find the bike felt right only with a handlebar bag and /something/ in it - tools, wallet, altogether probably ~2 lb minimum. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Rode w/ 11lbs of bird seed in the front basket of my Atlantis last Sunday, through the snow for that matter. No problem. I believe the convenience and practicality of having a basket/bag up front (especially during a brevet) far out weighs any nominal changes in handling. My advice is just to make sure your load is low; on a front rack. I rode w/ a heavily loaded boxy bag suspended off my my Noodles w/ one of those Nitto bag holders, and that wasn't good. I don't do that anymore now that I have a proper front rack installed. Go for it. Berthoud bags are nice. Kevin RBA - Alaska On Nov 21, 3:30 pm, Kelly Sleeper tkslee...@gmail.com wrote: It's not only harsh, it's a grotesque distortion and exaggeration of what has been said. Go ahead and slay the straw man if you like, but don't forget it's a straw man and has little to no relationship to what's actually been said. Steve ... actually the sentence below actually stated it was this and other reading and time wasted... so not really about you or what had been said so far on this thread. More additional to the thread and NOT an exaggeration at all much less a grotesque one. And not all of the harsh is from this thread and more from all the reading and time wasted reading about trail has made me harsh. 2 lb worth of handlebar bag you probably wouldn't notice. Make it 5-6 lb, though and I'm confident you will; and 10 lb with the wrong geometry it'll have you swearing. Obviously our experiences have differed as the pictures I posted would also indicate. It may be wrong geometry for you. But obviously it's not a bad geometry for many. 10lbs on the front of my AHH is nothing ... 30lbs / 40lbs on front of my Bombadil handles fine. For me.. maybe not for you.. if not then don't buy it. Point being the low trail rhetoric / You apparently tend to jump up and yell wrong geometry every time someone talks about a front load. It' s just not that simple. Most people understand that. It's how I feel and I like my bikes.. you like or want low trail great.. I'm happy for you... the only grotesque exaggeration present was your reaction to my post .. and playing thread guard telling others what was said and what makes sense and doesn't. Regards, Kelly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Same experience here. This was with my Brompton that (I believe) has an approximately 24mm trail. Without any load (front or back), on the first ride, it was squirrelly to the point where I had to conscientiously ride it. However, after a week, it was no big deal. Certainly, it handled differently than my other normal trail (~60mm) bikes but it wasn't anything I couldn't get used to. Then I got a front bag and on my first ride with a laptop and some stuff up front, the Brompton was noticeably more stable. So chalk me up as one who believes adding a front load to a low trail bike can improve that bike's handling. On Nov 22, 1:10 pm, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote: I had the LBS build up my Kogswell P/R, 30mm trail fork, and took the bike outside to ride around the parking lot. No load on the bike but me. Holy @#$%! What the #$$^ is wrong with this bike??? was my immediate reaction. The front end felt really, seriously, weird: far too light, not like anything I'd ever experienced. I later came to find the bike felt right only with a handlebar bag and /something/ in it - tools, wallet, altogether probably ~2 lb minimum. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Glad this worked out for you, and it's nice to have a situation for comparison where there is one primary variable different. But you mention something that I have read elsewhere, which is that high trail bikes (around 60 mm) can't change direction in mid turn. This is not my experience; indeed the best handling bike I have ever ridden is my Ritchey road bike, which should have around 60 mm trail given its 73 or 73.5 head angle and 45 mm fork offset on 700 x 25 mm tires. I can easily flick the bike around objects in the road while cornering fast downhill. Indeed, if one couldn't do that, this sort of geometry would not be the standard for professional racing bikes. On Nov 20, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Mojo wrote: Tom recommended changing my rake from stock 45mm to a custom 68mm. This took the bike's trail from mid 60s to low 40s. Well the change with the new fork was not immediately strange or at all drastic. Now the bike just responds more quickly to my steering inputs. What I have noticed is that on fast descents the bike no longer tracks 'as if it is on rails' but will change course if I ask it to. You may or may not like that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Aside from the hundreds / thousands of bikes that must all be handling terrible and the people riding them are just to dumb to realize it (as low trail propaganda would suggest) or maybe it's not that big of a deal. I know the above is harsh. And not all of the harsh is from this thread and more from all the reading and time wasted reading about trail has made me harsh.Much as with other things I've found and verified that it is a long laundry list of things not just trail. I've also ridden everything from my plastic 16lb race bike to the Bombadil and one thing I laugh at is how someone says the weight of a small bag effects handling. My brooks handlebar bag on the handlebar of my carbon bike with a couple of pounds in it didn't effect anything and other than the straps being in the way of hand positions you wouldn't know it was there... then again others say they can tell when a water bottle is missing by the handling of the bike. (glad I have no feelings ahhh feel) Lets not forget that the low trail doesn't handle rear loading well .. or just as bad as the high trail handles front loads if you believe everything you read. So my opinion from experience and reading is that it's a tradeoff dependent upon how you want to carry the load and what you want to do with the bike. For 5ish pounds (a bag, tube, tire levers, gloves) it for most people won't make any difference on any bike. Most people will never even notice. For more weight regardless of the trail the load will feel better and more stable on a front rack than on the bars. If you are going to always have 20 plus pounds on the front of the bike maybe low trail is for you... Most of the time even with my camera and rain suit, tubes etc I carry less than 15 pounds. I've ridden this bike no handed loaded per the picture and on downhills in excess of 40 mph without any issues at all. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tksleeper/6172193515/in/set-72157627604208847 This bike road fine from Boulder to St Louis loaded.. Couldn't ride it free handed as the load wasn't equal but I'm sure low trail would have fixed that. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tksleeper/6172717388/in/set-72157627604208847/ So high trail or low, if you ride a quality bicycle you won't have to worry about a good ride as it will just be there. It will be a preference thing not a better than thing. The trail argument is as boring as the helmet one and seems to bring out the worst in all of us. :) Well with the exception of me.. I'm always at my worst. :) Kelly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/0gQJMbNMYmMJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Tim, I actually didn't say the high trail bike 'can't change direction in mid turn.' The term I have often heard about high trails bikes is it corners 'as if it is on rails.' I put that in quotes because it is oft used and I mostly agree with the description. That doesn't mean a high trail bike can't be adjusted in a corner, but that it resists the change. When my LHT's steering was changed to low trail, it now doesn't resist trajectory change at all. Thanks for bringing up tire size. I use 32mm width tires or larger on the LHT. When I discovered a front flat on the LHT I threw in a 27mm (Rolly Poly) tired wheel. I did not like the handling of the bike near as much with a skinny tire. From my limited experience and understanding, un-weighted skinny tires ( I think anything less then 28mm is skinny) do quite well with more trail. Plumper tires especially with weight over them, become more lively with decreased trail. An opposite mixing of tire size and trails can lead to less than desireable results. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/jjZmtJMuzz4J. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 07:52 -0800, Kelly Sleeper wrote: Aside from the hundreds / thousands of bikes that must all be handling terrible and the people riding them are just to dumb to realize it (as low trail propaganda would suggest) or maybe it's not that big of a deal. I know the above is harsh. It's not only harsh, it's a grotesque distortion and exaggeration of what has been said. Go ahead and slay the straw man if you like, but don't forget it's a straw man and has little to no relationship to what's actually been said. And not all of the harsh is from this thread and more from all the reading and time wasted reading about trail has made me harsh.Much as with other things I've found and verified that it is a long laundry list of things not just trail. I've also ridden everything from my plastic 16lb race bike to the Bombadil and one thing I laugh at is how someone says the weight of a small bag effects handling. My brooks handlebar bag on the handlebar of my carbon bike with a couple of pounds in it didn't effect anything and other than the straps being in the way of hand positions you wouldn't know it was there... then again others say they can tell when a water bottle is missing by the handling of the bike. (glad I have no feelings ahhh feel) 2 lb worth of handlebar bag you probably wouldn't notice. Make it 5-6 lb, though and I'm confident you will; and 10 lb with the wrong geometry it'll have you swearing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 08:47 -0600, Tim McNamara wrote: Glad this worked out for you, and it's nice to have a situation for comparison where there is one primary variable different. But you mention something that I have read elsewhere, which is that high trail bikes (around 60 mm) can't change direction in mid turn. No one said that. This is not my experience; indeed the best handling bike I have ever ridden is my Ritchey road bike, which should have around 60 mm trail given its 73 or 73.5 head angle and 45 mm fork offset on 700 x 25 mm tires. I can easily flick the bike around objects in the road while cornering fast downhill. Indeed, if one couldn't do that, this sort of geometry would not be the standard for professional racing bikes. There's a relationship between geometric trail and tire width: the narrower the tire, the less the pneumatic train, so the more geometric trail you need. It's true in the opposite direction as well: the wider the tire, the more pneumatic trail, and so the less geometric trail you need. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Thanks for the comparison, Mojo! For those wanting to try the same thing on a budget, note that the Cross Check fork is about 1cm longer A-to-C than the LHT fork, which should make it just about Frame Neutral after having a builder re-rake it for the LHT. The recent CC forks have the lowrider bosses but not the extra dropout boss. If you were willing to give up ~5mm tire/fender clearance, you could just have your LHT fork re-raked to a bit less than 68mm, steepening the head angle by about 0.5 degree. Best, joe broach portland, or -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
It's not only harsh, it's a grotesque distortion and exaggeration of what has been said. Go ahead and slay the straw man if you like, but don't forget it's a straw man and has little to no relationship to what's actually been said. Steve ... actually the sentence below actually stated it was this and other reading and time wasted... so not really about you or what had been said so far on this thread. More additional to the thread and NOT an exaggeration at all much less a grotesque one. And not all of the harsh is from this thread and more from all the reading and time wasted reading about trail has made me harsh. 2 lb worth of handlebar bag you probably wouldn't notice. Make it 5-6 lb, though and I'm confident you will; and 10 lb with the wrong geometry it'll have you swearing. Obviously our experiences have differed as the pictures I posted would also indicate. It may be wrong geometry for you. But obviously it's not a bad geometry for many. 10lbs on the front of my AHH is nothing ... 30lbs / 40lbs on front of my Bombadil handles fine. For me.. maybe not for you.. if not then don't buy it. Point being the low trail rhetoric / You apparently tend to jump up and yell wrong geometry every time someone talks about a front load. It' s just not that simple. Most people understand that. It's how I feel and I like my bikes.. you like or want low trail great.. I'm happy for you... the only grotesque exaggeration present was your reaction to my post .. and playing thread guard telling others what was said and what makes sense and doesn't. Regards, Kelly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/V04T8BNKvMYJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Shifty: Hope you got enough info on your bag question to help you sort it out. Trail discussions tend to get somewhat, eh, lively. But take heart: it's only geometry, not a religious experience. dougP On Nov 21, 4:30 pm, Kelly Sleeper tkslee...@gmail.com wrote: It's not only harsh, it's a grotesque distortion and exaggeration of what has been said. Go ahead and slay the straw man if you like, but don't forget it's a straw man and has little to no relationship to what's actually been said. Steve ... actually the sentence below actually stated it was this and other reading and time wasted... so not really about you or what had been said so far on this thread. More additional to the thread and NOT an exaggeration at all much less a grotesque one. And not all of the harsh is from this thread and more from all the reading and time wasted reading about trail has made me harsh. 2 lb worth of handlebar bag you probably wouldn't notice. Make it 5-6 lb, though and I'm confident you will; and 10 lb with the wrong geometry it'll have you swearing. Obviously our experiences have differed as the pictures I posted would also indicate. It may be wrong geometry for you. But obviously it's not a bad geometry for many. 10lbs on the front of my AHH is nothing ... 30lbs / 40lbs on front of my Bombadil handles fine. For me.. maybe not for you.. if not then don't buy it. Point being the low trail rhetoric / You apparently tend to jump up and yell wrong geometry every time someone talks about a front load. It' s just not that simple. Most people understand that. It's how I feel and I like my bikes.. you like or want low trail great.. I'm happy for you... the only grotesque exaggeration present was your reaction to my post .. and playing thread guard telling others what was said and what makes sense and doesn't. Regards, Kelly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I've never experienced any problems with front loading a moderate to high trail bicycle. I've used handlebar bags for about the last 35 years on bikes that have these geometries. I'm sorry, but the low- trail mantra just isn't supported by my own personal experience. Jim Cloud Tucson, AZ On Nov 21, 5:30 pm, Kelly Sleeper tkslee...@gmail.com wrote: It's not only harsh, it's a grotesque distortion and exaggeration of what has been said. Go ahead and slay the straw man if you like, but don't forget it's a straw man and has little to no relationship to what's actually been said. Steve ... actually the sentence below actually stated it was this and other reading and time wasted... so not really about you or what had been said so far on this thread. More additional to the thread and NOT an exaggeration at all much less a grotesque one. And not all of the harsh is from this thread and more from all the reading and time wasted reading about trail has made me harsh. 2 lb worth of handlebar bag you probably wouldn't notice. Make it 5-6 lb, though and I'm confident you will; and 10 lb with the wrong geometry it'll have you swearing. Obviously our experiences have differed as the pictures I posted would also indicate. It may be wrong geometry for you. But obviously it's not a bad geometry for many. 10lbs on the front of my AHH is nothing ... 30lbs / 40lbs on front of my Bombadil handles fine. For me.. maybe not for you.. if not then don't buy it. Point being the low trail rhetoric / You apparently tend to jump up and yell wrong geometry every time someone talks about a front load. It' s just not that simple. Most people understand that. It's how I feel and I like my bikes.. you like or want low trail great.. I'm happy for you... the only grotesque exaggeration present was your reaction to my post .. and playing thread guard telling others what was said and what makes sense and doesn't. Regards, Kelly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Kelly, I don't think you should suggest the pro-low-trail story is just rhetoric, much less outright say so. Just as your experience with front loads, which nobody is belittling and hence is here respected, my experience is in favor of reduced trail with front loads. I don't say it because of any Kool-aid or other drugs, I say it because I tried it, in an experiment that satisfies me. I tried the experiment because I am working on the purchase of a custom bike for such riding, and wanted to see if it is worth it to seek out a builder who can do this geometry. I've concluded that as long as I'm going custom, it is worthwhile to get low trail for this type of riding. Even though my experiment is really not completed (I'm balking at buying the rack, sometimes the inner cheapskate gets the better of me), I have concrete indications that low trail is better for front loads according to how I want to ride. By doing this experiment (see my first post in this thread for more information) I turned a suspicion or perhaps a new old wives' tale into a result with some insight. I'm not saying it works for anyone else; clearly you and Grant P don't buy it, just for two examples. But your opinion differing does not mean mine or that of Steve Palincsar is just rhetoric (making it seem to be part or a fallacious or sophistic argument and hence negligible). It simply means our experiences differ. Really differ. We can learn something by looking at why they differed, rather than by descending into ad hominem arguments. I ask you to stop doing that. Science moved forward by establishing a means of publicly accepted (the public of scientists) inquiry wherein others' assertions were not just permitted, but expected to be analyzed, critiqued, and tested to verify their validity (not truth!), and combine the knowledge gained to enrich the new insights being developed. That is what we should do, remaining above arguing ad hominem and in other fallacious modes. We need to learn from each other. My early posts (back to 2005, most likely) on this and other handling topics were skeptical and in some cases critical. But after a while you ask, is there really something in some of these new ideas? And by testing them yourself, which does not require buying three bikes for $5k each, you can find out what works and what does not. For me the first eye-opener was that a 10# front load does not enable a high-trail bike to handle well, and in my opinion diminishes the handling of an otherwise good frame. That alone said I had something to learn. Perhaps we all do. On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Kelly Sleeper tkslee...@gmail.com wrote: It's not only harsh, it's a grotesque distortion and exaggeration of what has been said. Go ahead and slay the straw man if you like, but don't forget it's a straw man and has little to no relationship to what's actually been said. Steve ... actually the sentence below actually stated it was this and other reading and time wasted... so not really about you or what had been said so far on this thread. More additional to the thread and NOT an exaggeration at all much less a grotesque one. And not all of the harsh is from this thread and more from all the reading and time wasted reading about trail has made me harsh. 2 lb worth of handlebar bag you probably wouldn't notice. Make it 5-6 lb, though and I'm confident you will; and 10 lb with the wrong geometry it'll have you swearing. Obviously our experiences have differed as the pictures I posted would also indicate. It may be wrong geometry for you. But obviously it's not a bad geometry for many. 10lbs on the front of my AHH is nothing ... 30lbs / 40lbs on front of my Bombadil handles fine. For me.. maybe not for you.. if not then don't buy it. Point being the low trail rhetoric / You apparently tend to jump up and yell wrong geometry every time someone talks about a front load. It' s just not that simple. Most people understand that. It's how I feel and I like my bikes.. you like or want low trail great.. I'm happy for you... the only grotesque exaggeration present was your reaction to my post .. and playing thread guard telling others what was said and what makes sense and doesn't. Regards, Kelly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/V04T8BNKvMYJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- Ken Freeman Ann Arbor, MI USA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I've ridden a Rambouillet with about 10 pounds in a handlebar bag mounted directly on the handlebars, high up, for thousands of miles. I've also ridden a low-trail bike with about 10 pounds in a handlebar bag mounted on a front rack low down directly over the front fender for thousands of miles. The latter is by far the better set up. But the former is just fine. You're more tired at the end of the day with the higher trail bike. It takes more effort to keep the steering in line, particularly when climbing out of the saddle. But it's not a deal breaker from my perspective. Nick Bull On Nov 18, 9:50 pm, Shifty 1upand1d...@gmail.com wrote: So, I was just about to plunk down a couple of hundred dollars on a Berthoud front bag at Rene Herse. Mike kindly returned my phone call and immediately asked about the bike I was going to put it on. A Rivendell, I replied (A. Homer Hilsen). He said, do you know that the bag's weight will affect the handling somewhat; some people can't live with it while others aren't bothered by it at all. He said it was because of the trail high or low (I don't recall which) of all Rivendell bikes and that Herse bikes have a (high, low?) trail that accounts for weight carrying in the front. So what do YOU think Rivendell front bag owner? Have you ever regretted the effect the bag has on your Rivendell's handling? Thanks, Shifty -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I have held off this topic, but perhaps I have a some experience to share. I bought a Tom Matchak fork to fit my utility vehicle, a Surly Long Haul Trucker. http://tommatchakcycles.blogspot.com/2007/03/frame-neutral-replacement-fork.html I did this because this bike is my tourer and grocery hauler, and I live in Colorado where climbs can go on for hours, and I was curious about the low trail concept. I found the handling of the stock LHT slow and cumbersome that only got worse with any front load and at slow speeds such as climbing and or heavily loaded. I came to (probably imperfectly) understand this was mainly due to the large wheel flop associated with the high trail geometry. I didn't mind its descending manners. Tom recommended changing my rake from stock 45mm to a custom 68mm. This took the bike's trail from mid 60s to low 40s. Well the change with the new fork was not immediately strange or at all drastic. Now the bike just responds more quickly to my steering inputs. What I have noticed is that on fast descents the bike no longer tracks 'as if it is on rails' but will change course if I ask it to. You may or may not like that. The bike still has very reliable steering, not at all unstable. The bike rides very easily no handed. It really likes front loads now and I always carry my groceries home on the front racks. I attribute this to significantly less wheel flop. Nothing else changed with this experiment. All the same racksfendershandlebar bag were used before and after. My riding position did not change. The wheelbase did increase by nearly an inch due to the increased rake. This was a splurge for me. I bought an LHT instead of an Atlantis to save money and to feel I could use it hard and in any weather without guilt. With the new fork I nearly doubled the cost of the frame. For me it was worth it. The LHT is more fun for me now and more pleasant in its intended purpose, carrying stuff. But it may not be the same for you and your bike. Before: http://www.flickr.com/photos/79695460@N00/5268867525/in/set-72157607471577085/ Comparing: http://www.flickr.com/photos/79695460@N00/5268866551/in/set-72157607471577085/ After: http://www.flickr.com/photos/79695460@N00/5269479652/in/set-72157607471577085/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/hoFTUIbDsWkJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Shifty: +1 for getting an inexpensive front bag to see how you react to front weight. Consider your answers to a couple of questions: Why do you want the bag in the front? How sensitive are you to changes in a bike? Do you really notice any difference between say 32 35 mm tires or when you add a rack to a bike? Subtle stuff like that. Personally, I like have access to my stuff (food, jacket, etc) right in front of me. And I'm not very sensitive to minor changes. The executive summary of my bag adventures started with a Rivendell Hobo used as a saddle bag and over time ended with an Acorn Boxy Rando on a Nitto small front rack. This is on an Atlantis set up for touring (chubby tires, Nitto big back rack, etc). I did not care for the handling with 2 panniers on the back and a saddlebag. Over time, weight gradually got moved forward until I figured out my optimal distribution. This is entirely personal and tough to generalize. For unloaded, day to day riding, the little Nitto plus Acorn plus minimal junk adds perhaps 3 lbs to the front of the bike. Wherever you add a few pounds to a bike, you are aware of it. If I get the Acorn crammed to 10 lbs or so, it's noticeable but so is 10 lbs strapped to the rear rack. In neither case does the bike handle poorly. It's good that the bag vendor asked about the bike but it's not a deal breaker. As Jim mentioned, this group the BOBs have worked over the trail issue ad nauseum. Rivs are considered high trail in comparison to the school of thought that likes low trail. The short answer is a bicycle is a complex design (at least to me) and the trail is only one of several variables that influence handling. How you personally like to load your bike, how you ride it, your riding position, etc., has much more influence on handling than the more subtle variables of the bike's design. My guess is you'll like having your stuff right there in front of you even if you notice the weight it won't be a big deal. But I've been wrong before. dougP On Nov 18, 6:50 pm, Shifty 1upand1d...@gmail.com wrote: So, I was just about to plunk down a couple of hundred dollars on a Berthoud front bag at Rene Herse. Mike kindly returned my phone call and immediately asked about the bike I was going to put it on. A Rivendell, I replied (A. Homer Hilsen). He said, do you know that the bag's weight will affect the handling somewhat; some people can't live with it while others aren't bothered by it at all. He said it was because of the trail high or low (I don't recall which) of all Rivendell bikes and that Herse bikes have a (high, low?) trail that accounts for weight carrying in the front. So what do YOU think Rivendell front bag owner? Have you ever regretted the effect the bag has on your Rivendell's handling? Thanks, Shifty -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Not all Rivendell bikes are the same, but they tend to have a narrow range of trail, depending on how extreme you get with tire sizes. Weight on the front will change the feel of any bike, some more, some less. Some recent experimental results on my bikes. On my Bleriot prototype (theoretically 71 deg head angle, 50mm rake), I have had around 25 pounds of stuff split between the saddle bag and the handlebar bag, and it handled horribly. The last of the 600km was as bad as the first, so I had plenty of time to get used to it. With a 15 pound commuting load, mostly in the saddlebag, some on the handlebar, the bike wants to develop a bit of shimmy under moderate pedaling effort. The same setup on a Heron Road 650B conversion wants to shimmy even worse. I recently put all 15 pounds on the front, securely fastened to a rack, and there's no shimmy developing. So, I tried firmly attaching the saddlebag to the rear rack, and there's a bit of a shimmy coming back. Interestingly, with all the weight on the front, I find it easier to ride no-hands than with the weight split front and rear. The problem on the Bleriot is the wheel flop. It's okay as long as you're moving at faster than a jogging pace, but at slow speed, it's VERY difficult to handle with 10-15 pounds on the front. The 71 degree head angle is a key culprit there. If your Rivendell has a more typical 73 degree head angle, you may find that weight on the handlebars doesn't affect it as much. As someone else said, you just have to try experiment with various combinations and see what works for you. Another interesting, somewhat related data point. I put Albatross bars on my Quickbeam, and that is about the most dramatic change in handling I've ever observed on a bike. Unfortunately, it's not a good change - way too twitchy. So, I'm thinking about putting a bunch of weight on the front to see what happens. By this time next year I expect to have some experience with a very low trail, very light weight bicycle carrying the load up front. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
My A. Homer Hilsen is a 58cm with 650B wheels. According to the Riv Geo charts that bike has a 71 degree headtube angle and 49mm of rake. That calculates out to 63mm of trail and 19mm of flop with my 38mm tires. I only run it with a handlebar bag. The Marks rack weighs about a pound and the empty handlebar bag weighs maybe closer to 2 pounds. I've probably had as much as 15 pounds of total stuff in it. When I park the bike the front wheel wants to flop over BIG TIME, but riding at any speed I can't imagine a bike being much more stable. Climbing a steep hill at 8km/hr it goes in a straight line perfectly well. Descending at up to 80km/hr I've been confident and shimmy free. Riding no handed is no problem. I've never ridden this bike with a rear rack at all, but I have one for if and when I need to carry more stuff for a 600k. I'm also setting up a low-trail bike this winter, so I'll probably have some kind of Pillsbury bake off to see if there is a noticeable difference. It's got 36mm of trail and 10mm of flop with the same tires that I run on the Homer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/EnUdXkB6MmQJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I have noticed differences. I set my Trek 610 with it's modified high-trail (58 mm trail, 28 mm 700c Gators) fork with a front rack and tested riding it with about 10# up front. It was controllable and rideable for 30 milers, but only with two hands firmly on the bars. One handed it was sketchy (tending to shudder) and no-handed was impossible. I could ride it at low speeds, but lost control once at low speed, too. The bike rides with perfect alignment with no added front stuff. I put the same wheels and load on my former Woodrup with about 45 mm trail. It was a lot better one handed, possible to ride no-handed, but still some tendency to shimmy. I can definitely say I think reducing trail makes a positive difference in front loads. The wheel base of the Woodrup is 2 cm longer than the Trek, and its drop is 1 cm less. I now have a custom 65 mm fork on the Trek, which gives a trail of 39 mm with the Gator wheels. Only problem yet is that I haven't gotten a rack on it, so I can't test it out with a load yet. Since I got it back, rain got in my way, as did saddle issues, fitting big fenders with 32s, revising the alignment and dish of the rear wheel (it was never right! Grrr), and sorting out front wheel braking (settled on Mafac with red KoolStops). The new fork is waayyy longer than the old one. The Mafac pad posiiton is maxed out. Now the bike again rides like a bike, so I'm back to selecting a rack, bag, and decaleur. I also now have a mid-trail 1983 Trek 620 (55 mm fork rake, 73 degree angle, 684 diameter) which sports 47 mm trail and a normal 7.2 cm drop. We'll see how it handles sometime in the Spring. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:00 PM, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote: My A. Homer Hilsen is a 58cm with 650B wheels. According to the Riv Geo charts that bike has a 71 degree headtube angle and 49mm of rake. That calculates out to 63mm of trail and 19mm of flop with my 38mm tires. I only run it with a handlebar bag. The Marks rack weighs about a pound and the empty handlebar bag weighs maybe closer to 2 pounds. I've probably had as much as 15 pounds of total stuff in it. When I park the bike the front wheel wants to flop over BIG TIME, but riding at any speed I can't imagine a bike being much more stable. Climbing a steep hill at 8km/hr it goes in a straight line perfectly well. Descending at up to 80km/hr I've been confident and shimmy free. Riding no handed is no problem. I've never ridden this bike with a rear rack at all, but I have one for if and when I need to carry more stuff for a 600k. I'm also setting up a low-trail bike this winter, so I'll probably have some kind of Pillsbury bake off to see if there is a noticeable difference. It's got 36mm of trail and 10mm of flop with the same tires that I run on the Homer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/EnUdXkB6MmQJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- Ken Freeman Ann Arbor, MI USA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
[RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Thanks for your replies. I plan to simulate the bag + weight as mentioned. We just got a couple of inches of snow here today in Minneapolis. I hope to test the idea in a few days after a brief. Then, like other hard cores in the area, will go through the ritual of installing studded tires on our bikes for the next several months. A Berthoud bag wouldn't be subjected to such slop riding, of course. I'm just feeding my perfectionism and this is a problem I can't seem to solve. For the record, I love the ride of my Hilsen with medium saddlebag or rear pannier loads and anticipate it to handle the front weight just fine. Mike's wise comment comments just gave me pause. I owned a Surly LHT that I thought rode like a brick with, or without weight. Ugh. My former Salsa Casseroll was better but not worth keeping. I have a sweet riding Merlin ti/carbon fork road bike that's awaiting a new owner. I'll happily ride my AHH over it most days of the week though, it's that good of a ride. Happy Thankgiving! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/EixtbsPQuCYJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
I agree and I forgot to mention that my Homer also lets it's front wheel flop over when parked but is very stable with the Berthoud bag at any speed - except zero. I run 700cm wheels and 28mm Conti 4 Season tires. A funny side note: on PBP on the return, I stopped to pee. I had the bike behind me (supported by my butt) when the front wheel flopped and the chin ring hit my calf and left a beautiful scar. It looked like a bear had clawed me (about one to two inches of blood from each of the four puncture wounds). I had riders in three languages ask me what the hell happened. It's healed quickly and was never a problem on the ride but I'm thinking of getting a similar tattoo. Way cool! By the way, love the Berthoud 22 front bag. It's one of their smaller ones but it's allowed me to carry everything I could possibly need on a 1200 K brevet. I love the various pockets on the front, side, and rear. They let me organize, bars, gels, pills, salves, etc. and leave the main conpartment for extra cloths, rain jacket, mini pump, etc. I also chose the Berthoud 22 because it sits slightly below the handlebars. My generator light is on the handle bars and it illuminates the cue sheet as well as the road. Placing the light on the handle bars also protects it from heavy rain spray. Of course it still gets wet but I've seen too many failures on local brevets here in Kentucky as well as on the Texas 1200k because the lights are lower and were bombarded by road and wheel spray. Bill Louisville, Ky On Nov 19, 2011, at 7:00 PM, William wrote: When I park the bike the front wheel wants to flop over BIG TIME, but riding at any speed I can't imagine a bike being much more stable. Climbing a steep hill at 8km/hr it goes in a straight line perfectly well. Descending at up to 80km/hr I've been confident and shimmy free. Riding no handed is no problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
and before anyone mentions it: fenders would solve this problem but here in Kentucky (and it probably applies to the folks in Texas) we normally don't use fenders because we normally don't need them - except on rare occasions when it rains really really hard. On Nov 19, 2011, at 8:01 PM, William Pustow wrote: Of course it still gets wet but I've seen too many failures on local brevets here in Kentucky as well as on the Texas 1200k because the lights are lower and were bombarded by road and wheel spray. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
Re: [RBW] Re: Noticed anything different about front bag handling
Enjoy experimenting. This is a good group to discuss it with, because we like this stuff. For a serious analysis look to Bicycle Quarterly. But your experience must be your own. I am very pleased at how my Quickbeam handles front loads, compared to a 1997 Cannondale F-1000 mountain bike converted with Albatross bars and a Wald front basket way overloaded with groceries after my Hoss saddlebag was stolen in front of a local Trader Joe's. I don't shop there much anymore. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Shifty 1upand1d...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your replies. I plan to simulate the bag + weight mentioned. We just got a couple of inches of snow here today in Minneapolis. I hope to test the idea in a few days after a brief. Then, like other hard cores in the area, will go through the ritual of installing studded tires on our bikes for the next several months. A Berthoud bag wouldn't be subjected to such slop riding, of course. I'm just feeding my perfectionism and this is a problem I can't seem to solve. For the record, I love the ride of my Hilsen with medium saddlebag or rear pannier loads and anticipate it to handle the front weight just fine. Mike's wise comment comments just gave me pause. I owned a Surly LHT that I thought rode like a brick with, or without weight. Ugh. My former Salsa Casseroll was better but not worth keeping. I have a sweet riding Merlin ti/carbon fork road bike that's awaiting a new owner. I'll happily ride my AHH over it most days of the week though, it's that good of a ride. Happy Thankgiving! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/EixtbsPQuCYJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- Bill Gibson Tempe, Arizona, USA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
