On Thursday 29 June 2006 21:36, Hisashi Hifumi wrote:
Hi,
At 09:47 06/06/30, Chris Mason wrote:
Thanks for the patch. One problem is this will bump the transaction
marker for atime updates too. I'd rather see the change done inside
reiserfs_file_write.
I did not realize that an atime
Hello everyone,
Here is my current queue of reiserfs patches. These originated from
various bugs solved in the suse sles9 kernel, and have been ported to
2.6.15-git9.
-chris
--
After a transaction has closed but before it has finished commit, there
is a window where data=ordered mode requires invalidatepage to pin pages
instead of freeing them. This patch fixes a race between the
invalidatepage checks and data=ordered writeback, and it also adds a
check to the reiserfs
The b_private field in buffer heads needs to be zero filled
when the buffers are allocated. Thanks to Nathan Scott for
finding this. It was causing problems on systems with both XFS and
reiserfs.
diff -r 5ef1fa0a021a fs/buffer.c
--- a/fs/buffer.c Fri Jan 13 13:50:39 2006 -0500
+++
write_ordered_buffers should handle dirty non-uptodate buffers without
a BUG()
diff -r 18fa5554d7e2 fs/reiserfs/journal.c
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c Fri Jan 13 13:55:10 2006 -0500
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c Fri Jan 13 14:00:49 2006 -0500
@@ -848,6 +848,14 @@ static int
In data=journal mode, reiserfs writepage needs to make sure not to
trigger transactions while being run under PF_MEMALLOC. This patch
makes sure to redirty the page instead of forcing a transaction start
in this case.
Also, calling filemap_fdata* in order to trigger io on the block device
can
When a filesystem has been converted from 3.5.x to 3.6.x, we need
an extra check during file write to make sure we are not trying
to make a 3.5.x file 2GB.
diff -r ee81eb208598 fs/reiserfs/file.c
--- a/fs/reiserfs/file.cFri Jan 13 14:01:37 2006 -0500
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/file.cFri
reiserfs: journal_transaction_should_end should increase the count of blocks
allocated so the transaction subsystem can keep new writers from creating
a transaction that is too large.
diff -r 890bf922a629 fs/reiserfs/journal.c
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c Fri Jan 13 14:00:50 2006 -0500
+++
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:35:52 -0700
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks much Hifumi!
Chris, please comment on the patch.
The problem is that I'm not always making the inode dirty during the
reiserfs_file_write. The get_block based write function does an
explicit commit during O_SYNC
On Thursday 19 May 2005 05:36, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch makes reiserfs BUG() when somebody tries to start a
larger transaction than it's allowed (currently the code just silently
deadlocks). I think this is a better behaviour. Can you please apply the
patch?
Ack, looks ok.
On Thursday 19 May 2005 05:40, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
attached patch improves the estimates on the number of credits needed
for a quota operation. This is needed as currently quota overflows the
maximum size of a transaction if 1KB blocksize is used. Please apply.
Thanks Jan,
It would
On Friday 11 March 2005 18:39, Hans Reiser wrote:
I/O errors usually indicate bad hardware not bad software,
probably you need to get a new disk and use dd_rescue to copy everything
This is your user friendly error message targeted at users that don't know
what an I/O error is?
What's an
On Monday 07 February 2005 15:50, Pierre Etchemaite wrote:
Le lun 07 fév 2005 13:22:51 CET, Vladimir Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit
Hello
Hi,
yes, reiserfs reuses inode number of removed files for newly created
files. However, ext2 also does that. Have you ever noticed this
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 14:17 +0100, Joachim Reichelt wrote:
Dear all,
I just got in my dmesg:
reiserfs/1: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x21
This is an atomic allocation, which is allowed to fail. You can ignore
the message (which comes from the VM), later versions of the suse
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 14:46 -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
| Hello,
|
| On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Richard Gregory wrote:
|
|Hi Alex,
|
|That fixed it. I created a 617gig file that filled the filesystem.
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 12:49 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch fixes oops of reiserfs on a filesystem with just one
bitmap block - current code always tries to return second bitmap even if
there's not any. Could someone review it please so that it can be merged
in mainline?
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 13:00 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch makes reiserfs provide sync_fs() function. It is
necessary for a new quota code to work correctly and expose quota data
to the user space after quotaoff. Currently the functionality is hidden
behind the
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 12:44 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch fixes debugging messages of the quota code in the
reiserfs so that they compile. Could some of the reiserfs developers
have a look at it please so that it can be merged in the mainline?
Looks fine, thanks Jan.
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 10:31, Hans Reiser wrote:
Jeff Mahoney wrote:
Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
| I assume that was tested with some simulated i/o errors, wasn't it?.
Of course. The debugging code is since removed, but every place there
was a !buffer_uptodate(bh) check, I added a trigger
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:02, Vijayan Prabhakaran wrote:
Dear Chris Mason,
I found a bug in Reiserfs journal thread. This bug is in function
reiserfs_journal_commit_thread().
Hi,
Which version of the code are you reading?
-chris
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 16:41, Hans Reiser wrote:
I just want to add that I AM capable of working with the other
filesystem developers in a team-player way, and I am happy to cooperate
with making portions more reusable where there is serious interest from
other filesystems in that,
Prove
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 08:52, Christophe Saout wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 15.08.2004, 23:16 +0200 schrieb Felix E. Klee:
I'd like to store the directory structure of a partition formatted as
ReiserFS into a file. Currently, I use
find / file
This process takes approximately 5
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 09:19, Spam wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 15.08.2004, 23:16 +0200 schrieb Felix E. Klee:
I'd like to store the directory structure of a partition formatted as
ReiserFS into a file. Currently, I use
find / file
This process takes approximately 5 minutes (the
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 18:04, Sonny Rao wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:30:51PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 16:19, Sonny Rao wrote:
Hi, I'm investigating filesystem performance on sequential read
patterns of large files, and I discovered an odd pattern of block
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 13:38, Hans Reiser wrote:
Please do whatever you can to reproduce this. We are going to delay
release by one day to see if it can be reproduced. Vs thinks it might
be a hardware problem, I am not so optimistic, what are your thoughts?
If it currently passes all of
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 10:14, Mike Young wrote:
Has anyone put Reiser4 on the latest SuSE 9.1 release? I'd like to use it
there without having to patch a pristine kernel. Preferably, I'd like to be
able to use their RPM build environment so I can continue to take updates
from SuSE.
I've
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 13:02, Hans Reiser wrote:
I can't promise that I'll never making another
change in there, but my goal is to keep them to a minimum.
Also, I would like to see some serious benchmarks of the bitmap
algorithm changes before they go in. They seem nice in theory,
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 11:12, Redeeman wrote:
hey, i just lost power today, and i saw it mentioned some transactions
it replayed. now, i dont like that, but happend is happend. though, i
would like to know what the transactions really were, is such thing
possible?
note: reiserfs, not
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:42, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Chris,
As a comparison data point, could you please try 2.6.6-mm3? I realize
you don't want to run this kernel in production, but it would tell us if
I understand the problems at hand.
the results in 2.6.6-mm3 are below, we
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:48, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently testing our new server and though it will primarily not serve
really large files (about 40-60 users will have a quota of 25GB each on a 2TB
array), I'm still testing the performance for large files.
So I created an
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 14:24, Mike Benoit wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 09:59, Hans Reiser wrote:
There were a few bugs of ours that acted as red herrings, but Linspire
is now up and running on this system with ReiserFS 3 and kernel 2.6.5.
While I'm here, I have some other questions:
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 01:19, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 12:22, Nikita Danilov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:59:22 +0400, Nikita Danilov said:
chmod u+rx backup/fsplit.c
x bit is necessary for lookups, and r
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 12:15, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 01:36:11PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Please try 2.6.6-rc2-mm2, which has new block allocator patches and
other speedups.
The default mount options should work best for you, but this might work
too:
mount -o
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 14:15, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 12:59, Hans Reiser wrote:
v4 didn't factor into these decisions because it was still in extremely
early stages back then (2.4.16 or so).
It was clearly indicated then that accessing acls
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 13:51, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:00, Jure Pear wrote:
Hi all,
Is it theoretically posible?
Like, does it need a drastic redesing of reiserfs or just sufficient $$
directed to the team to be implemented?
Because i
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 01:53, Hans Reiser wrote:
Burnes, James wrote:
I thought nearly all filesystems designed since Berkeley FFS were nearly
immune to fragmentation problems.
After reading the following analysis at Harvard, it seems that
fragmentation is still a problem.
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 14:29, camis wrote:
Seem to run fine so far with
rw,noatime,nodiratime,acl,user_xattr,data=ordered,alloc=skip_busy:dirid_groups,packing_groups
Has anyone done any throughput/benchmarks for the various
new patches/code?
The block allocator stuff is fresh from the
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 15:17, camis wrote:
Has anyone done any throughput/benchmarks for the various
new patches/code?
The block allocator stuff is fresh from the oven and still warm inside.
I'll be posting benchmarks for it as the week goes on.
Something interesitng:
I have 8 dell
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 15:53, camis wrote:
The majority of the rest of the machines iowait hover around the 1%
mark.. CPU time tends to be about the same, just the iowait is much
much higher..
Very interesting. data=ordered makes fsync more expensive, since it
ends up syncing more then
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 15:53, camis wrote:
The majority of the rest of the machines iowait hover around the 1%
mark.. CPU time tends to be about the same, just the iowait is much
much higher..
Very interesting. data=ordered makes fsync more expensive, since it
ends up syncing more then
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:51, Cami wrote:
The majority of the rest of the machines iowait hover around the 1%
mark.. CPU time tends to be about the same, just the iowait is much
much higher..
Very interesting. data=ordered makes fsync more expensive, since it
ends up syncing more then just
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 08:18, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 14:53, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
Hi!
A short question:
What are the remaining differences between reiserfs and ext3 regarding
NFS?
We thought no before your mail
Details:
I have two
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 09:09, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 26 Mar 2004 08:42, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Helios Ethershare use the standard linux in kernel nfs server, or
does it patch things somehow?
System1 (dematl04) is Debian/woody with Linux 2.4.25 kernel
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 09:20, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
On 26 Mar 2004 09:18, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did compile both kernels myself from original kernel.org source.
Thanks for the clarification. Running dt under strace as Vladimir
suggested will help.
I did send
Hello everyone,
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/experimental/2.6.5-rc2-mm2
Has a new set of reiserfs patches. These should also work on 2.6.5-rc2,
but I did testing on top of -mm2 because I'm submitting part of the
patch set to Andrew.
New since the 2.6.4 code:
- add
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 14:49, Hubert Chan wrote:
Chris == Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Chris - add reiserfs laptop mode support
Can you explain what laptop mode is?
Take a look at linux/Documentation/laptop-mode.txt on any recent -mm
kernel.
The short description
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 17:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/experimental/2.6.5-rc2-mm2
Has a new set of reiserfs patches.
-ENODOCCO. If people are going to test this stuff we will need setup and
usage
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 17:35, Andrew Morton wrote:
For data=ordered? The only docs are to mount -o data=writeback if you
don't want data=ordered (which is the new default). No tool upgrades
are required.
OK, thanks. Switching the default on day one sounds radical doesn't it?
It
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 17:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
The top of each patch has a boring old changelog. I can reformat them
if needed.
Oh, I didn't notice that.
Anything other than one-patch-per-email with changelog in the body is a bit
of a pain.
I'll go fetch the patches again :(
I
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 19:47, Bernd Schubert wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It does, but the code has been in testing -suse and on the reiserfs
list. This dooesn't mean data=ordered is perfect, but it's not quite
day one either. I can switch the default back, but
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 07:49, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 19:18, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
hi all,
in trying to figure out what is the unpack program in reiserfsprogs
and if it supposed to be distributed in the debian package,
No, it should not be distributed
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 03:00, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've just uploaded all the reiserfs patches from the suse 2.6 kernel to:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/experimental/2.6.4
(they should also apply to 2.6.5-rc1 and 2.6.5-rc1-mm2
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 09:03, Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 03:00, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've just uploaded all the reiserfs patches from the suse 2.6 kernel to:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/experimental/2.6.4
Hello everyone,
I've just uploaded all the reiserfs patches from the suse 2.6 kernel to:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/experimental/2.6.4
(they should also apply to 2.6.5-rc1 and 2.6.5-rc1-mm2)
These include:
Latency fixes
Logging performance fixes
data=ordered support
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:32, Fabiano Reis wrote:
Hi list,
I´m having problems to mount a reiserfs filesystem using kernel 2.6.3 on
RedHat 9.
The fs I´m trying to mount was formated using kernel 2.4.20-24.9 (the latest
kernel for RH9) with ReiserFS version 3.6.25 (from dmesg) and
Hello everyone,
These two patches fix corruption problems I've been hitting on 2.6.
Both bugs are present in the vanilla and suse kernels.
reiserfs-search-restart:
This was originally from [EMAIL PROTECTED], I recently made a small
addition to make sure the expected height was checked after
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 08:30, Christophe Saout wrote:
Hi,
Also, the code has some extra performance tweaks to smooth out
performance both with and without data=ordered. There are new
mechanisms to trigger metadata/commit block writeback and to help
throttle writers. The goal is to
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 09:30, Christophe Saout wrote:
Am Mo, den 01.03.2004 schrieb Chris Mason um 15:01:
It seems you introduced a bug here. I installed the patches yesterday
and found a lockup on my notebook when running lilo (with /boot on the
root reiserfs filesystem
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 07:40, Jens Benecke wrote:
Hi,
Chris' data-logging patches do not apply cleanly to 2.4.25, are they being
updated?
I think the fix for inode.c is not very hard but I don't dare to fiddle
around with file system code. ;)
Ok, I'll rediff the data logging + quota
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 09:02, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2004 12:39, Oliver Pabst wrote:
Hello list,
Hello Oliver,
I try to mkreiserfs /dev/evms/userhomes and /dev/evms/userhomes is a
drive-linked evms feature object with a sum of 18.8TB.
mkreiserfs
Hello everyone,
I've updated the reiserfs logging speedups and data=ordered support to
2.6.3, and fixed a few bugs:
i_block count not properly updated on files with holes
oops when the disk is full
small files were not being packed into tails
Also, the code has some extra performance tweaks to
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 10:09, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:59:31AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
thousands (hundreds of thousands) of times per day. It wasn't an easy
bug to hit.
What are the symptoms?
The rpm database is corrupted, rpm --rebuild-db is required
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 17:53, Dieter Nützel wrote:
05 and 06 needed some handwork 'cause the SuSE kernel inclues xattrs and posix
acl's but nothing special.
Good to hear. I wasn't expecting the suse merge to be difficult,
luckily it doesn't have many patches in it yet. Jeff and I will look
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 00:23, Neil Robinson wrote:
Chris,
I haven't heard anything since my response, so just in case it wasn't
complete enough:
uname -a results:
2.4.20-gentoo-r9 #1 Sat Dec 6 03:17:43 GMT 2003 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R)
4 CPU 2.66GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
This is
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 11:33, Neil Robinson wrote:
Ok, please tell me more about the vmware setup. Is are the vmware
drives configured to do copy on write?
According to the documentation, changes made to the virtual drives are
committed to the physical drive immediately. Here is the
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 14:19, Neil Robinson wrote:
Uh oh, I think I now know what happened. Ouch. I was not clear what the
REDO files were for, since I seemed to have lots of them taking up a
considerable amount of drive space. I deleted them (probably taking all
of my changes with them). On
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 02:07, Jens Benecke wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is part one of the data logging port to 2.6, it includes all the
cleanups and journal performance fixes. Basically, it's everything
except the data=journal and data=ordered changes
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 13:47, Neil Robinson wrote:
Hi,
this morning when I started up my notebook (running Windows XP) with a
VMware session running Gentoo, the boot sequence claimed that the
reiserfs drives had not been cleanly umounted (not true, I powered down
the usual way on Friday
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 08:51, Jens Benecke wrote:
Hi,
I posted earlier about quota problems. WE updated to 2.4.23 b ecause of the
logging patches because some power failures made our /home partition spew
out these: (QUESTIONS at the end of the mail)
Sorry, before we got to the questions,
Hello everyone,
This is part one of the data logging port to 2.6, it includes all the
cleanups and journal performance fixes. Basically, it's everything
except the data=journal and data=ordered changes.
The 2.6 merge has a few new things as well, I've changed things around
so that metadata and
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 11:43, Jens Benecke wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 08:51, Jens Benecke wrote:
Hi,
I posted earlier about quota problems. WE updated to 2.4.23 b ecause of
the logging patches because some power failures made our /home partition
spew out
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 13:30, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2003 19:10 schrieb Chris Mason:
Hello everyone,
This is part one of the data logging port to 2.6, it includes all the
cleanups and journal performance fixes. Basically, it's everything
except the data=journal
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 03:35, Jens Benecke wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 16:38, Jens Benecke wrote:
b) bonnie++ on a (previously created) reiserfs partition (with
mkreiserfs 3.6.6) exited with random disk full errors, although
the disk was never full
[reiser4 plugins to make mail delivery faster]
There are a few basic things that slow down mail servers when they talk
to filesystems:
1) multiple threads delivering to the same directory contend for the
directory semaphore for creating new files
2) atomic creation of an entire file
3) high
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 18:03, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Sep 05, 2003 01:32 +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
Andreas Dilger wrote:
It is possible to do the same with ext3, namely exporting journal_start()
and journal_stop() (or some interface to them) to userspace so the application
can start a
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:03, Tom Vier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:41:03AM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
There was a discussion about that on Kernel Summit 2003 and general opinion was
that SCSI
does not need the WB stuff at all as it does the correct thing anyway.
i found this, but no
On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 09:45, Nikita Danilov wrote:
So, in the case of reiserfs_write_full_page(), the BUG() is falsely
triggered
due to a transaction that was started on another filesystem (ext3). And the
fix would simply be to do something along the lines of ext3...
The
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 17:19, Michael Gaughen wrote:
Hello,
We have a test machine that continues to BUG() in
reiserfs_write_full_page().
The machine is running SLES8 (2.4.19-152, UP). Here is the (kdb) stack
trace:
Hmmm, the allocation masks are supposed to be set such that writepage
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 11:44, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
Maybe it _IS_ time for this
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 13:27, Dieter Nützel wrote:
2.5 porting work has restarted at last, Oleg's really been helpful with
keeping the 2.4 stuff up to date.
Nice but.
Patches against latest -aa could be helpful, then.
Hmmm, the latest -aa isn't all that latest right now. Do you want
Hello all,
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.22
Has a merge of the data logging and quota code into 2.4.22-pre4 (should
apply to -pre5). Overall, the performance of pre5 + reiserfs-jh is nice
and smooth, I'm very happy with how things are turning out.
Thanks to Oleg for
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 14:53, Hans Reiser wrote:
This is called ordered data mode, and exists on ext3 and also reiserfs with
Chris Mason's patches. Under normal usage it shouldn't change performance
compared to writeback data mode (which is what reiserfs does by default).
It had some
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 15:08, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2003 20:59 schrieb Chris Mason:
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 14:53, Hans Reiser wrote:
This is called ordered data mode, and exists on ext3 and also reiserfs
with Chris Mason's patches. Under normal usage it shouldn't
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 20:46, Manuel Krause wrote:
Setting HZ=1000 (from 100) in linux/include/asm/param.h give me very
impressive latency boost. 2.4.21-rc1-jam1 (-rc1aa1)
Just tried this HZ=1000 setting, too.
(With the following patches only: data-logging, search_reada-4 and
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 12:13, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:38:00PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
I was looking in the wrong direction, when I produced that patch,
so it will produce zero output.
I hope to come up with ultimate fix soon enough. ;)
Well, there is a
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:34, Nix wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Oleg Drokin moaned:
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:16:27PM +0100, Nix wrote:
Jun 22 13:52:42 loki kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at virtual address 0001
This is very strange address
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 08:26, Russell Coker wrote:
What is the status of xattr support in 2.5.x?
How is journalling of xattr's being handled?
For correct operation of SE Linux we need to have the xattr that is used for
the security context be changed atomically, and if a file is created
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:46, Russell Coker wrote:
On the topic of atomic xattr operations on ReiserFS as needed for the new
LSM/SE Linux operations.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:52, Chris Mason wrote:
How big are the xattrs you have in mind? We can get atomic writes of 4k
in length but beyond
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 13:25, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 11:21, Chris Mason wrote:
Ok, so in the new api, the xattr information is available at the time of
the create. reiserfs would be able to include it all into the same
transaction but doesn't do it right now
Hello all,
This doesn't have the data=ordered performance fixes because I got
distracted fixing io latency problems in 2.4.21. Those were screwing up
my benchmarks, so I couldn't really tell if things were faster or not
;-) Anyway, I'm back on track now, and since 2.4.21 is out I've just
copied
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:45, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
What has happened to 10-quota-link-fix.diff? Is it not necessary any more?
I'm asking because it is still mentioned in the README, but seems to have
been replaced by 10-quota_nospace_fix.diff
Whoops, I screwed that up.
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 09:26, Hans Reiser wrote:
This is a bit inconsiderate of you, don't you think? Why don't you just
unsubscribe? I have a sysadmin with too many tasks to get them done,
and he doesn't need his time wasted with such crap as dealing with spamcop.
Honestly Hans, this
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 08:59, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 03/14/2003 02:34 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 19:15, Hans Reiser wrote:
[ discussion on how to implement lower fragmentation on ReiserFS ]
Let's get lots of different testers. You may have a nice heuristic here
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 20:04, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 02/23/2003 01:50 AM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 02/22/2003 05:12 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
And here's one more patch for those of you that want to experiment a
little. reiserfs_dirty_inode gets called to log the inode every time
the vfs
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 08:54, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Replacement 05-data-logging-36.diff.gz file that applies to 2.4.21-pre4-ac5
is available at
ftp://namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/05-data-logging-36-ac5.diff.gz
Thanks Oleg.
It compiles, boots, survives my (simple) testing. (writing
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 07:41, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Which files are needed for 2.4.21-pre4aa3?
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21-aa
I just uploaded a fresh set of data logging and quota patches for -aa
-chris
Hello all,
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21 will soon be
updated with a new set of data logging and quota patches against
2.4.21-pre4
The data logging code is updated with another set of io stalling fixes,
they should improve performance of data=ordered and
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:39, Ookhoi wrote:
Hi Reiserfs team,
Today I put a new kernel on a server which has reiserfs and needs quota.
I searched for the quota patches (found them in the mail archive) and
saw that they are very old:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 15:55, Manuel Krause wrote:
Hi!
Is this patch from 030213 it needed by anyone using ReiserFS within
2.4.20 and 2.4.21-preX ?
What is DIRECT IO with reiserfs from the topic line of the patch:
# reiserfs: Fix DIRECT IO interference with tail packing ?
It fixes a bug
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 09:20, Hans Reiser wrote:
It is different from refusing to support the user who downloads
Marcelo's kernel after it does ship (after the distro CD went into the
stamping plant). That is what I am complaining about. The default
should be to support all Marcelo kernels
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
