That is what I was thinking as well.
Perhaps if I had two more small cans the size of these
Oh well
Needs to be small to fit in 36 tall outdoor cabinet with TKR-751 and able to
provide needed isolation at 50w for a 1.315 (to be precise) split...
As for now it is no big deal. This TKR-751
Matthew,
Can you direct me to some online discussions regarding this? I would like to
read more about it.
Tom
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Kaufman matt...@... wrote:
On 8/27/2010 8:18 PM, wb6dgn wrote:
If you reduce the modulation without reducing the receiver
Change of direction for a brief second or three
Does anyone have the PC programing software for these radios, and perhaps by
slim chance the wiring diagram for the PC cable to interconnect
Thanks in advance
Marcus
By these radios do you mean the TKR-751 (same as TKR-750) and the TK-862G?
- Original Message -
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat Aug 28 01:17:07 2010
Subject: Re:
um not sure there, mine is either Tk705d or Tk805d both are 99% same
software to use is KPG6D programming software and KPG4 cable
Marcus
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 6:26 PM, NORM KNAPP nkn...@twowayradio.net wrote:
By these radios do you mean the TKR-751 (same as TKR-750) and the
TK-862G?
I would agree with the quality issues, but does that really equate to
unintelligibility on any significant scale?
Joe M.
Matthew Kaufman wrote:
On 8/27/2010 8:18 PM, wb6dgn wrote:
If you reduce the modulation without reducing the receiver bandwidth, then,
yes, the range will be reduced.
TKR-751 is a full blown VHF high band repeater Nothing similar there to the
TK-705 or TK-805.
The TK-862G is somewhat similar to the TK-805 in that it is a UHF mobile rig.
It requires KPG-56D software and the cable that works on the TK-705/805 will
also work on the TKR-751 and the TK-862.
my unit is a mobile
and yes the wiring diagram would be awesome
i bought my unit from Pacific Aerials in Auckland New Zealand a pretty few
years back, they are now however as best i know, not the agents for Kenwood,
hence i am trying to locate the software,
Marcus
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at
Also, wouldn't Carson's rule mitigate that characteristic?
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, MCH m...@... wrote:
I would agree with the quality issues, but does that really equate to
unintelligibility on any significant scale?
Joe M.
Matthew Kaufman wrote:
On 8/27/2010 8:18
Hey, guys! I'm trying to rewire my workbench area and I can't keep my mind on
what I'm doing, thinking about this subject! Where were you guys when I had
nothing else to do??? Nuts! Back to the workbench.
Tom
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, wb6dgn wb6...@... wrote:
Also, wouldn't
We were waiting for you to get busy with something else. :-P
Joe M.
wb6dgn wrote:
Hey, guys! I'm trying to rewire my workbench area and I can't keep my mind
on what I'm doing, thinking about this subject! Where were you guys when I
had nothing else to do??? Nuts! Back to the workbench.
We were waiting for you to get busy with something else. :-P
Are you trying to tell me I was hogging the board? Sorry, I'll behave!
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, MCH m...@... wrote:
We were waiting for you to get busy with something else. :-P
Joe M.
wb6dgn wrote:
Hey,
Ok, so you need a mic connector diagram for a Kenwood TK-705. How about a
KCT-19 as installed in a 705, or do you just need directions on how to
construct a programming cable?
- Original Message -
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
To:
Rudy, Try Icom's IDAS belive is the commerical version of or close to it
D-STAR. Its Analog and digital narrow band. 73,Jim N4NID
- Original Message -
From: rudy_n2wq
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 12:08 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder]
And there is the issue of PL tone. Keep dropping the modulation level and
decoding becomes tougher, at least with boards like ComSpec.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: wb6dgn wb6...@att.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 11:43 PM
Subject:
I am looking to build an APRS Digi on 2 metres. I had considered using a Yaesu
FT-1802 radio, but was concerned that the receiver may not work very well on a
community RF siite. My other radio of choice could be the Vertex VX-2200
commercial model? Only problem is the audio level requirement
A Maxtrac would probalby do the job. It takes some work to get it down
below 146 MHz though. Check the Repeater Builder website for info.
73,
Mike
WM4B
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 9:59 AM, vk4jrc wrote:
I am looking to build an APRS Digi on 2 metres. I had considered
using a Yaesu
I like my GE phoenix solid radio .. it has been running APRS in my van and
at the repeater for years with no problems ..
SOLID radio ...
Rick
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, mwbese...@cox.net wrote:
A Maxtrac would probalby do the job. It takes some work to get it down
below 146 MHz
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Kaufman matt...@... wrote:
Reducing the modulation index and simultaneously reducing the receiver
bandwidth from 5 to 2.5 kHz results in a situation which requires ~6 db more
signal level for the same demodulated quality (ex. 12db SINAD)
The new repeaters are exactly the same at the older ones, and the older ones
are capable of being converted to narrowband with programming, all Motorola and
the all are in simulcast mode, we have plotted the differences between one that
is wide band and one that is narrowband in over 50
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, MCH m...@... wrote:
I would agree with the quality issues, but does that really equate to
unintelligibility on any significant scale?
-
Use of the term 'quality' is based on
On 8/28/2010 7:54 AM, nj902 wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Kaufmanmatt...@... wrote:
Reducing the modulation index and simultaneously reducing the receiver
bandwidth from 5 to 2.5 kHz results in a situation which requires ~6 db more
signal level for the same
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Seybold aseyb...@... wrote:
The new repeaters are exactly the same at the older ones, and the older ones
are capable of being converted to narrowband with programming, all Motorola and
the all are in simulcast mode, we have plotted the
N. Just saying Murphy is on the list: If there is a topic you are
interested in, it will come up just as you get busy with something else.
Joe M.
wb6dgn wrote:
We were waiting for you to get busy with something else. :-P
Are you trying to tell me I was hogging the board? Sorry, I'll
On 8/28/2010 8:38 AM, nj902 wrote:
Because a mobile radio really has no way to provide a meaningful delivered
audio quality indication, coverage acceptance testing of analog systems is
usually done by measuring carrier level at [mobile] locations throughout the
system's service area and
The same, perhaps not, but wouldn't intelligibility decrease as the
quality degrades?
Joe M.
nj902 wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, MCH m...@... wrote:
I would agree with the quality issues, but does that really equate to
unintelligibility on any significant scale?
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Kaufman matt...@... wrote:
Correct. Which is also why measuring DAQ equivalent this way is pretty much
useless for anyplace that has substantial terrain (hills and mountains) or
even reflective urban structures that aren't in the center of
If you chose to go digital, like P25 then you could also measure BER in
your coverage test? This maybe more meaningful. Although many public safety
customers will still ask for voice checks as well.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.atwrote:
On 8/28/2010
On 8/28/2010 10:13 AM, nj902 wrote:
These faded sensitivity targets require significantly greater carrier level
to meet a given DAQ value specifically because of the flutter and multipath -
which are reasonably well understood and incorporated into a number of
predictive algorithms which
Hello List,
Hope this is not too off-topic, but am trying to locate anyone who might have a
Head for a Yeasu FT-8000. Perhaps you have, or know someone who has a Dead
radio that could be a parts donor?
73's de Tim W7TRH Wa.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, petedcur...@... wrote:
If you chose to go digital, like P25 then you could also measure BER in your
coverage test? This maybe more meaningful. Although many public safety
customers will still ask for voice checks as well.
Hello folks,
I have a TKR-850 operating as a UHF repeater and EchoLink/IRLP node.
It works great!
I have a TKR-750 that I would like to put into service on a simplex
frequency. The advertising literature and the service manual both
state that it can be used on simplex using only one antenna,
For simplex use, you have to have an external antenna relay.
JT
De: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de Dave Schultheis
Enviado el: Sábado, 28 de Agosto de 2010 01:34 p.m.
Para: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Asunto: [Repeater-Builder]
At 01:47 PM 8/28/2010, Juan Tellez wrote:
For simplex use, you have to have an external antenna relay.
-Yup. You need an external relay. Checkout RF Parts as they have
fairly reasonably priced ones
Ken
--
This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. I saw some dual band
portables on eBay, new for about $100, made by Wouxun. I doubt very much they
are FCC type accepted. Is it okay to use these on amateur frequencies? Thanks
in advance.
Terry, KM5UQ
They are Part 90 accepted and they work fine in the ham bands if you're talking
about the KG-UVD1P
Joe M.
On Sat 28/08/10 11:29 AM , terry dalpoas km...@yahoo.com sent:
This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. I saw some dual band
portables on eBay, new for about $100, made by
I have several Micor squelch boards that I plan to use on some future repeater
projects. I want the repeaters to be accessed with a PL tone. I will set this
up where there has to be a carrier along with PL. If I do this, will I still
have the nice sounding Micor squelch, or will the PL
Terry,
Ideally, the Micor squelch should be used in conjunction with the Micor PL
decoder, so that you can realize the benefit of reverse-burst squelch tail
elimination. The TS-64 does not have reverse-burst STE. You may be able to
achieve a satisfactory squelch action by using a short audio
as best i know the Tk705 and TK805 use the same wiring, i maybe wrong there,
but yes i wish to make up a cloning cable to do mike to mike programming,
and the wiring diagram to make up a pc program cable for the 705 and 805
as for the KCT-19, i am sorry, my knowledge of Kenwoods is extremely
My family and I have been using them for some time. They are kind of
wide on the frontend but we are in the country so no problem there. If
you get one get the programming kit also as they are a real pain to
program from the keyboard and easy thru the software.
Larry WA0VUS
Thanks to everyone for your help, I've got the problem solved. The word
update is what led me astray. Very much appreciate all the helpful
suggestions
Tom DGN
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Glenn (Butch) Kanvick hotl...@...
wrote:
Go into Yahoogroups and uncheck the box that
I do have a few of the PL boards for these, a few even NOS. I think these use
the Vibrasponder reeds, which I have a few of these as well. I do like the
reverse burst. I take care of a few public safety systems that has that and I
like the way they sound. I have decided any repeater I build
What you say is somewhat true, but last weekend I was with someone who had a
Yaesu, and he was picking up all kinds of overload while I was not.
Joe M.
On Sat 28/08/10 8:06 PM , Larry K wa0...@hughes.net sent:
My family and I have been using them for some time. They are kind of
wide on
Thankyou for that
Marcus
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Paul Lambert stra...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
See page 9 of the service manual or page 10 of the pdf document. I have
done this for a TKR-750 and it worked great.
small problem i have found,
1, i don't have a manual, no problem you have given me a pdf version
2, problem is you have given me a TKR-750 thats a repeater,
i only have a Mobile unit
TK705 or TK805 same ship different smoke stack
Marcus
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Paul Lambert
I am looking for imformation to make a cable to connect a Pyramid VRS to a
Motorola Lowband X9000. The print out provided by Pyramid works but its keeps
the Pyramid in constant transmit.
Thanks for any help in advance
Mike
46 matches
Mail list logo
