.
- Original Message -
From:
Mathew Quaife
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 7:47
AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got
Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers
No, the frequency
that I am on is 146.925, and he is on
Bob Dengler wrote:
>
> This is why SoCal is on an inverted 15 kHz bandplan in the 146-148 MHz
> range: every 15 kHz the offset is inverted, so in our bandplan you'd
> be on 146.325 (+) & the other system would remain at 146.91 (-). Then
> your distant user would be TXing on 146.925 & not bother
At 2/25/2005 04:47 AM, you wrote:
>No, the frequency that I am on is 146.925, and he is on 146.910, we are 15
>Khz away, a user was attempting to use my repeater where his signal passes
>through their repeater, he was using about 160 watts of power with a beam
>to get into the system.
OK, so
HI Matt,
It seems to me that if one of your users (not a very informed one, at that!) is
interfering with another repeater, that is between him and the other repeater
owner. The interfering user should learn to use his CTCSS!
I'd toss this hot potato back into the coordinator's court! He's t
: Jim B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:44 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need
Answers
Mathew Quaife wrote:
> No, the frequency that I am on is 146.925, and he is on 146.910, we are 15
&g
Mathew Quaife wrote:
> No, the frequency that I am on is 146.925, and he is on 146.910, we are 15
> Khz away, a user was attempting to use my repeater where his signal passes
> through their repeater, he was using about 160 watts of power with a beam to
> get into the system. His signal then caus
Bob Dengler wrote:
> At 2/23/2005 03:46 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has it
>>that one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeater
>>I've had all along, and now the coordinator says I have to move.
>>
>>Not sure how well all t
Sounds like politics to me. The coordinator should have first
stayed out of this, per FCC guidelines, and recommend that the repeater
owners work it out between themselves. Then, if the situation is
not resolved, the coordinator should step in. The coordinator then
must determine if the spec
From: NØATH
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005
7:53 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers
Matthew - I was looking at the Indianna Repeater
council page and it
only shows
Matthew - I was looking at the Indianna Repeater
council page and it
only shows the call you mention on 146.910 - not .925
- Is it possible
the coordinators messed up and he is on the wrong
freq?
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.co
See Inserts,
> GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver
Should not have a problem at all with the receiver.
> Vocom Amp, tuned for 146.925
You might have to play with the amp, but it should also tune up just fine.
Use a good dummy load and minimal power to tune.
> and then to top if off, I just got the
In a message dated 2/24/05 2:49:11 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All understood there, but the kicker is that my equipment did not interferewith his repeater, it was a user that is about 70 miles away that got intoone of his remote receiver's. I'm considering the fig
Am I missing something or would a change in PL eliminate the other repeater from opening?? I have a similar situation with my repeater and while we are over a 100 miles apart and a mountain range between, occassionly is we open the PL, we can weakly hear the repeater. With the PL activated.
At 2/24/2005 11:41 AM, you wrote:
>All understood there, but the kicker is that my equipment did not interfere
>with his repeater, it was a user that is about 70 miles away that got into
>one of his remote receiver's.
Is that 70 miles from your repeater or his?
> I'm considering the fight of
is the
coordinator that screwed up and not you.
Gar
- Original Message -
From: "Mathew Quaife" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:41
PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough,
Forced to change F
om
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need
Answers
At 2/23/2005 03:46 PM, you wrote:
>Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has it
>that one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeater
>I've had all along, and
At 2/23/2005 03:46 PM, you wrote:
>Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has it
>that one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeater
>I've had all along, and now the coordinator says I have to move.
>
>Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the chang
start getting interference. The
one I'm referring to uses no P.L. at all.
Dave / NOATH
Original Message -
From: "Mathew Quaife" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to chang
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need
Answers
The Master Pro RX will work fine down there.
We used to use a Master Pro repeater for a 144/145 split repeater without
any problems.
Ralph W4XE
-Original Message-
From: w9mwq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need
Answers
Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the change. Here is
what I have as equipment, and will it all make it there. We are
moving from 146.925- to 145.410-, and the expense is the last thing
I needed right now
Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has it
that one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeater
I've had all along, and now the coordinator says I have to move.
Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the change. Here is
what I have as equipment,
21 matches
Mail list logo
