Hmmm, well goes to show that our phone company here does not know all they claimed to know. I have a customer that will just be over excited. His problem is he lives in such an area that cell phone coverage is very poor, we put up an antenna, but then he his tied to a wire, which does not work
I would greatly appreciate some assistance.
I have a Kenwood HT TH-78 and I forgot how to switch it into
ALPHANUMERIC MODE.
Please help !
73s,
Norbert
KC7PCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
Look up Tellular, they have cell phones specificly designd for what you
are wanting to do. but be prepared for the sticker shock as they are not
subsidised by the carrier and also are for a specialised market.
Stan
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:40:30 -0600, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mathew,
You could try to do a passive antenna
system that would cost a whole lot less. The last time I purchased a cell
extender they were not 600.00 but not sure what they recommended. I installed a
passive system at a friends cabin in the cascades East of Eugene, OR and he has
Is this for repeater control? Or for voice autopatch? If it is for the
former I may have a solution. Write me off list.
Ronny K4RJJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look up Tellular, they have cell phones specificly designd for what you
are wanting to do. but be prepared for the sticker shock as
- Original Message -
From: YY1CIR-RADIONAUTA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 9:44 AM
Subject: MORE CHEAPER REPEATER
| HI colleagues,
| looking for no simple answers but alternatives for build and install
VHF/UHF
|
Right now they are about $500.00 for the one that I seen, the mobile unit is about $400.00, I have not done any research recently since we came up with the beam antenna. It works, just that he has worn out umpteen connectors plugin' and unplugin'... Will run this machine by him, I think he will
I have used old Polyphasor surge suppressors for RF tight boxes, look at:
http://www.polyphaser.com/kommerce_productdetail.aspx?item=IS-PT50HN
These are 4.25 long, 2.25 wide and 1.25 deep outside dimensions. They
are cast aluminum, so the inside dimensions will be less. I can't find the
Why don't someone configure one up and send it to the guy for a great
priceman we sure are spoiled in the USAIR will work for free on one if
someone has parts they can offer. I am very new at building but I can follow
instructions :).
-Original Message-
From:
Sounds good, I would be willing to try it, as I plan on using n
connectors. Here is my e-mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Re:
Hammond Mfg.makes all kinds of these boxes:
http://www.hammondmfg.com/scpgDIEC.htm
They have an office in Buffalo. Their main plant is in Guelph Ont.
73 John VE3AMZ
- Original Message -
From: Jim, K8COP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December
Eric,
I forgot to include that the station is used in the base station
configuration. I have a CAT300DX hooked up to the station. I checked the
code plug information, and changed the setting to PL DPL only. It was set
to carrier and PL DPL.
I am having the same problem with the signal
Jim,
This IS interesting! Just for grins, try disconnecting the external controller
and set up the MTR2000 as a repeater. It's very important to set the activation
and hold-in options to carrier and PL/DPL as I mentioned in an earlier
posting. I suspect that the external controller is
- Original Message -
From: Maire-Radios [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there is the PL units and the DPL units you can not mix them. and only
one tone per repeater. also you don't need the rib.
I got two questions on the R100. On the board that is attached to the lid,
when you
unlock it and
A week ago, there was an exchange of postings regarding the
specifications of the two-tone sequential paging format. After some
searching of my Motorola archives, I found a document which I believe is
the Rosetta Stone we seek.
It is Motorola Publication 6881103C80, entitled Two-Tone Sequential
I think all we wanted to find out was the frequency
tolerance. Is that in the document? The general
concensus seemed to be well under 1 percent, just
based on the odd frequencies in use.
Bob M.
==
--- Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A week ago, there was an exchange of postings
Mathew, just a thought here. Have him contact the cell company
and offer them a place on his property to set up a cell tower. This
would help him and the cell company - the company would make
more money from more people being able to use their system in that
area. Plus, the company can pay him
Bob,
Well, I guess the Rosetta Stone document is not as valuable as I had
hoped. I went through it carefully, but found no statement of tone
tolerance. However, I can infer from the printed frequencies- which are
specified to 1/10 Hz- that the tolerance is +/- 0.1 Hz or better. That
jibes with
18 matches
Mail list logo
