seconds (I think) - best luck, Steve NU5D
On 5/27/07, skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moving along...
There is a method/circuit found at airports where pilots tx click
radio mics in rapid sequence to turn on night-time runway lights.
It's not high security at a locked electric gate but it does
and being damaged. Be careful up there,
Steve NU5D
Jay Urish wrote:
Hi Folks,
This weekend I will be un jury rigging a lame feed line install at my
repeater site. The tower is a 300' four sided guyed monster.
I am planning on using uni-strut on the side facing the building and
using
as much a part of D-Star as
the radio itself.
So, maybe this stuff needs to be looked at in a different light,
Ya'll have a great Sunday - headed to the farm to see if I can light up
EM11ma on 6 Meters - 1 KW, 6 Elements @ 75 feet headed your direction,
73, Steve NU5D (Nickel Under 5 Dollars
Use the best shielding possible between the RF equipment and the
duplexer and from the duplexer to the antenna low loss is more important
that sheilding.
Steve
Howard Z. wrote:
I have read that one should use dual-shielded cables.
Which cables are these?
Is Belden 9913F7 a good choice
Easy - use a straight db9 cable to program - requires software and you
will have to re-tune the front end. An extender card would be really nice.
FIRST - be sure the radio is working on 151.505 properly. After
reprogramming you will need to remove the antenna relay and you will
really enjoy
Unless something has dramatically changed recently, the only difference
between a conventional base station and a repeater is the antenna relay,
and programming. Steve NU5D
Eric Lemmon wrote:
Steven,
The SXHM01 identifies a base station (not a repeater) for 150.8-174 MHz, 110
watts, capable
registration come into play and FAA listing.
Seems like ATT used some mighty big cornucopia antennas with quad
diversity - serious bandwidth - in the old days longlines carried
network television programming - imagine an NTSC video monitor in a
transmission or toll office - 73, steve
Christopher Hodgdon
Exec 1 series - don't think I have a book, but might have microfische.
Steve.
Rpage wrote:
Can anyone identify the receiver in the photo section , UHF GE Repeater ?
http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/photos
There is no identification info stamped on or inside the receiver
Generally 199 ft unless you are close to an airport. There is a 110 ft
tower that requires registration but no painting or lighting because it
is close to the Temple, Texas airport.
Steve NU5D
texasexpediter wrote:
What is the maximum height a tower can be without falling under all
Don't know if this counts or not.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3457/is_n21_v10/ai_12712168
Personally, I do not know.
Steve NU5D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/17/2007 12:29:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tell that to the hams who have
and Morse ID are all built in. Steve NU5D
PS- lemme know if you need any parts of lbi's scanned. Also the last
thing I would think about is kluging an outboard controller to an M3
when is has most everything built in. Steve
Doug Bade wrote:
Externally controlling a Mastr III is documented
Sounds like you have a M2E that was only made for a few years between
the M2 and M3 generations. You cannot set frequency, but tone, etc is
programmed into the sys mod. Use a straight db9 cable and read what is
in the module using your software and computer. 73, Steve NU5D
Don Wankel wrote
to
enhance international goodwill.
(wonder if any one is more important than the next)?
Anyhow, that's my opinion, and with another 42 cents will get you a
senior coffee at McDonalds in Temple, Texas with the ham crew - donuts
on Fridays,
73, Steve NU5D
begin:vcard
fn:Steve Bosshard
Marty, did u ever get ur MVS programmed? I have the stuff - just
haven't used it in years. If I can find a working MVS, I could put your
eeprom in my radio and program the chip without having to ship the radio.
Steve NU5D
k8hvi wrote:
I would like to get this programmed. I see where you can
. Steve NU5D
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
This is a follow up to my original post.
The tower crew showed up yesterday to swap out the antenna. Once at
the top of the water tank, we had them connect a dummy load to the top
of the feedline and discovered that the feedline itself had a poor
repeater that would not make channel guard
tone, and had to reinit the sys mod to bring it back - much better than
a $k + module. Seems like TQS3353 R16A is already out of date.
Best luck, Steve NU5D
Doug Bade wrote:
I just checked this am.. Mine do not have a dipswitch in the rx
transmit audio. Steve NU5D
Doug Bade wrote:
To add to this, the transmitter is dip switch so the rx is the
problem at this point
it looks like the tx will go wherever needed.
My tx module has modulation issues too but that is another matter...
Doug
KD8B
At 12:00 PM 6/21/2007, you
I may have a few parts laying around for a station. Lemme know if you
need anything - The back plane ($1800) is a killer. I probably have a
working interface board. Steve NU5D
Doug Bade wrote:
It is inter spacing white noise over the modulation like a second
receiver open squelch being
Did u get the 720 programmed? Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cobalto27mx wrote:
Hi Group! Can anyone tell me how to program a Kenwood TK-720 mobile,I
have the kpt-20, i need a copy for manual, or procedure for
progam the eprom 27c64. and diagram fpr other cables .thanks. jesus
Roger, Roger, Roger.Steve NU5D
mch wrote:
*The length from the repeater to the duplexer is not critical (or SHOULD
not be when properly tuned). Therefore, there is no 'formula' other than
you want it as short as possible yet allowing enough flex/extra that it
won't get stressed
you could have much improvement doctoring cable lengths. Of
course there is stub tuning, and double stub tuning, etc. Me thinks the
losses would exceed the gains, Your mileage may vary, Have a great
weekend, Steve NU5D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric
I don't think the cable cares whether
http://www.eagle-1st.com/notes/duplex/body.htm
I saw that line stretcher guy, Ian. He was next to the striped tower
paint salesman. 73, Steve NU5D
PS - I have used an isolator in place of the TEE on the output of a
duplexer. Not very practical there, though, and it sure knocks down the
receive if you put it in series with the antenna, else
realize?
73, Steve NU5D
alone. The difference you see from a little tweaking will not be
noticeable, and external matching devices like a Z-Matcher or a tuning stub
don't generally offer enough benefit to be worth while. 73, Steve NU5D
On 6/30/07, Glenn Little WB4UIV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WE also use a line
http://www.antennex.com/preview/vswr.htm
--
Ham Radio Spoken Here !!!
EM11ma - South Mountain, Texas
begin:vcard
fn:Steve Bosshard
n:Bosshard;Steve
adr:;;503 B. South 25th. Street;Temple;Texas;76504;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:254-773-1102
tel;fax:254-773-1174
tel;home:254
have never run into a damaged isolator, but I am sure there
are instances - I have 14, 800 mhz smr boxes, and 80, 800 EDACS
stations, plus 30 something UHF repeaters, I can only recall one piston
capacitor failure on a telewave dual junction job. Steve NU5D.
Gary Schafer wrote:
Why would you
they gave trouble.. If I get the chance I will call him
on the phone - see how retirement is going, etc. Steve.
Gary Schafer wrote:
Hi Steve,
I don't recall ever seeing that done. What was the purpose of using an
isolator there?
As to toasting the isolator, if you should loose the antenna
time?
If you mean both on the same repeater at different times - no problem
notwithstanding 131.8 hz. We have mixed ctcss and dcs on community
business repeaters with no ill effects.
Steve NU5D
DaveH wrote:
chances are one will interfere with the other. They would but be present
and active
an application not for
this, if they were still in business.
Have your self a super 4th, Steve NU5D
mch wrote:
A problem? Why?
When the turn-off code is sent *after* you have unkeyed. Who cares what
stops decoding after you've stopped transmitting, as any decoder should
stop decoding then.
Granted
off the key, go for it...again, not at the same time.
Keep smiling,
Steve NU5D
mch wrote:
Interesting reply given my statement Granted, the TOC could false a
131.8 Hz decoder
You're describing a problem that may exist regardless of the dual
CTCSS/CDCSS encode (the topic of this thread
that would be the starting point, next support, power utility,
site rent, funding, etc.
Wishing you much success,
Steve NU5D
Original Message
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Hello...
From: lou_c1357 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, July 03, 2007 9:06 am
To: Repeater-Builder
Interface Module
and then the AIC Audio Interface Card.
EDG is the Ericsson Data Gateway
Ad Infinum
Steve NU5D
John J. Riddell wrote:
* Eric, the Kids my grandchildren, use LOL as Laugh out loud in
their E mails *
* *
* 73 John VE3AMZ *
- Original Message -
*From:* Eric
Thanks Ron - 73, Steve NU5D
Ron Wright wrote:
Steve,
The link to the D-Star you gave is an e-mail address.
Is the new group a yahoo group in the form of:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dstar_digital
This is the normal format for a yahoo group page.
73, ron, n9ee/r
--
Ham Radio
I was thinking most every radio used a crystal (TCXO) as the reference
from which everything else frequency wise is derived. One really stable
oscillator vs many oscillators. Steve NU5D
MCH wrote:
Regardless of how many modern radios use temperature stabilization, that
does nothing
Sounds like you have the makings of a db 228 if you add the proper
harness. Else maybe run the repeater on one antenna, and used the
second antenna with proper cavity filtering as a diversity (term loosely
used) receive antenna. Steve NU5D
s3hampton wrote:
I presently have a DB-224E as my
Just remembered another plus for rock bound equipment - used to be lower
power consumption (before mosfet technology) because it took less power
to run a xtal osc than to run a synthesizer plus a crystal reference
oscillator. Don't know if power consumption is true today, though.
Steve NU5D
Worth for plating.
Steve
Anyone interested in how the Brazos got is's name? Steve
Ron Wright wrote:
Some have built coax, hardline type, duplexers for 6. When using 7/8 I've
been told 1 MHz split is needed. Some have used 1-5/8 with better success.
I have the plans from a site of 5
Be sure the control line is terminated. I have seen m3's get repeat
disable from voice on the control line (even if remote control is not
used). Vexing problem. Steve NU5D - BTW that tip came from Pete
Lascelle at GE, or EGE, or Comnet, or MA/COM now days...
Vincent Caruso wrote:
Is it out
satellite receivers carried back to the hub on 438 mhz - been very
solid repeater.We do not have any outboard controllers / noise makers
wired in. The repeater is W5LM in Temple, Texas www.tarc.org Steve NU5D
Almost forgot - did have a problem with talkies talking down the channel
guard tone
difference, but as my friend Jack Daniel at RF Solutions
sez, but I might be wrong.
Best 73 and let us know how the extra can works out.
Steve NU5D
skipp025 wrote:
I don't have time to debate or argue the point...
Whilst I have my GE books out, was anyone needing any info on the M3 or
M2e - lemme know - Steve NU5D
Jim wrote:
Jamey Wright wrote:
Based on the year you specified, it was probably Mastr II or Mastr IIE
although it could be Mastr III. I'm not sure when the Mastr III were
introduced
post - don't remember.
73,
Steve
www.bosshardradio.com
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Jul 26 12:14 -0500]:
Thanks for all of your input. I'm learning more as I go along.
I did not get a chance to performance check the RX on site. It just
happened
http://www.bosshardradio.com/m3
discg.doc
You have to send this file to the repeater after you program the other
info, and resend it every time you reprogram the repeater. Steve
The Zetron file shows how to wire a Zetron Community Repeater Panel (or
any other outboard controller
- I called Lloyd Alcorn this morning but got his answering machine -
will call back later in the day.
Steve NU5D.
Jim wrote:
Ron Wright wrote:
Nate,
A local, in Tampa, FL, high profile repeater has a similar problem.
They are on 2 meters along side a 800 MHz repeater which gives them
not reject signals 5 to 10 mhz from the pass
frequency but do a splendid job of rejecting signals 600 khz from the
pass frequency.
Your pdf is excellent and very well done. Thanks for the great
presentation Jeff.
Best regards,
Steve NU5D
Jeff DePolo wrote:
According to Lloyd, the cable length between
with, but this gave an
extra measure of safety.
At 90 mph wind, each foot in length of the tower has 113 pounds of force
exerted by the wind. This can be a formidable amount of force.
Best success and 73, Steve NU5D
Jack Taylor wrote:
Depending upon the wind loading on the tower, I would be cautious
Do I need to call Lloyd again??
Steve NU5D
Bob Dengler wrote:
At 7/30/2007 02:21 PM, you wrote:
Bob
That doesn't square with the large body of repeater owners who have used
Wacom cavities. Their UHF products used RG-142. However, their VHF
Ever run a 6V Carter on 12 V - gets kinda broad on the output. Steve NU5D
Beats a Mallory 1701 hands down.
Paul Finch wrote:
How about a Dynamotor? Worked on, talked on 100’s back when I first
started in two way business. Course they had a vibrator in them also
for the receiver. Still
Saw this on eham.net
2007-07-14
*KD0YX http://www.eham.net/user/profile/KD0YX*
Test Equipment
*FS: About 20 Cushman Plug Mods $50 Ea
http://www.eham.net/classifieds/detail/235720*
I have a large selection of about 20 Cushman Plug in Modules. I know
they will work fine
Best I recall there was a choice between hardwiring COR to the TNC or
using internal Data Carrier Detect for the TNC to recognize activity on
the radio channel. This was an input signal from the radio to the TNC.
Way back whenSteve NU5D
Nate Duehr wrote:
Nate Bargmann wrote
Generally the duplexer only makes a slight contribution to the reflected
power. How doe the reflected power between the transmitter and antenna,
without the duplexer in line look? Steve NU5D
dallasreact112 wrote:
Anyone one know what to expect SWR wise with a duplexer?
I have a DB products 2
If you S1 is like mine Chuck, do you remember the low battery alert -
the user could not hear it, but everyone else could ?
steve - former S1 owner.
Chuck Kelsey wrote:
Yep. That's what I did, added a ComSpec encoder to my 4AT.
My Tempo S1 has the added encode with DIP switch. Both radios
.
Best success, Steve NU5D
wadeds2003 wrote:
Hello group. Just looking at putting up a ltr system. I would like
to go 2 channels for now just to see how it all works. My plan is to
use it for my business plus sublease some space to other companies.
Has anyone here ever tried a 2 channel
(or else use a very poor guard
receiver.) Steve NU5D
Jim wrote:
I have to agree with what Skip said. The big issue with LTR (and other
trunking formats) is that you have to either 1)have an exclusive license
for each channel for the area you want to cover (may be hard to find
.
De-Centralized trunking lets mobile units decide when to transmit. LTR
does not have a provision for the mobile radios not to transmit on a
busy channel. In centralized trunking, the site orchestrates mobile
transmissions.
But I may be wrong,
Steve NU5D
Jim wrote:
Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D
- the 42' and RLC's never gave any trouble. Several other sites
have a mix of 460 VX with on board logic and RLC's and Model 42's. Have
somewhere around 50 channels of LTR running. Steve
Mike Mullarkey wrote:
Skip,
If I can add my two cents in, use the Zetron controllers and your
project
servers for RS232 links. When it worked it worked well.
Got tired of having to go to sites for hard reset. Watch dog timers
would not hunt ! Steve
Tom Parker wrote:
Try to buy a Trident Raider book... $35 hardly buys the postage...
Also, home channel needs to be FB8 if at all possible
repeaters lay virtually
dead. Time and the market will tell.
Visit http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/dstar_digital for D-STAR ONLY
discussions.
73, Steve NU5D /K5CTX A or B
of the night
and I had the computer running, and stopped to shut it off when I saw
your posts. Back to
bed,
Best 73, Steve, NU5D
their repeater pair by surprise.
73, Steve NU5D
Jim wrote:
George Henry wrote:
The point-to-point communications within a D-Star system take place over a
LAN, WAN, or the internet, not over-the-air. Therefore, I doubt very much
that the claim that D-star systems are auxiliary stations
Wonder how much of the delay is inherent in the subscriber units, and
how much is attributed to the repeater ? Measure response on simplex,
then through a repeater, unless of course, these ducks aren't repeaters,
then it won't matter. Coffee time, Steve NU5D /K5CTX B, Temple, Texas
Jamey
or an audio delay
for squelch tail elimination make it no longer a repeater ?
Steve NU5D /K5CTX B
Jim wrote:
MCH wrote:
If the I/O is the same, it cannot simultaneously retransmit and cannot
be deemed a repeater under the current Part 97 definition.
Part 97 does not consider simplex repeaters
- returned them both dead. Seems like State of Utah may have
bought a bunch around 1990 or so. Steve NU5D
Gary wrote:
Anyone heard or seen the Teletec Corporation IQ 2000 Omni series
radios/repeaters (circa 1987-?)? I'm looking for info on these so any
help would be appreciated. I'm aware Teletec
try launching the program Mastr.exe /M3 and see if that does the trick.
Steve NU5D
Tina wrote:
I recently purchased a Mastr III repeater and the person i bought it
from said he would include the software. Well, after over a month I
finally got the software and it's for a Mastr IIe (from
Your local NOAA Weather station is a good test transmitter for frequency
and peak deviation.. Steve NU5D
JOHN MACKEY wrote:
If your service monitor showed 13 to 15 KHz deviation from 3 different
digipeaters in this area, something is definately wrong. The radios
those digipeaters
I am surprised. That has not been the case in the Temple/Waco Texas
area. Steve
Ken Arck wrote:
At 04:29 PM 9/18/2007, you wrote:
Your local NOAA Weather station is a good test transmitter for frequency
and peak deviation.. Steve NU5D
---I disagree. I have seen MANY NOAA WX
are not permitted.
Again, thanks to the volunteer coordinators who do their best to make
things fit for the betterment of our hobby and service, Steve NU5D
moderator dstar_digital yahoo group.
MCH wrote:
I know, but in many areas there are a lot of unused frequencies.
Still, I would never seriously tell
to digital - by no means a wholesale jump like the
cellular folks did. Also there are still folks with radios that don't
have channel guard tone - some things don't change.
Lets put your 2 cents and a few others together and have a cup of
coffee, 73, Steve NU5D
(BTW - I can assure you that not all
is that Joe would not be agreeable to the new folks proposal,
maybe he would be.
Anyhow this is all intended in the spirit of amateur radio and I don't
want to provoke any arguments or ill will, as before I am thinking about
ways to make this work for everyone. Almost coffee time, 73, Steve
, because
primarily the repeater works as a repeater, and I would venture that 2/3
of the DSTAR systems in the US are not connected to the internet.
73, Steve NU5D
not gonna go probing around
surface mount chips with my simpson and weller - better to box and ship.
Anyhow that another 2 cents - might make payroll if this keeps up...
73, Steve NU5D
Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
And one more point - and it's a major one
You can get P25 test equipment
a bend in the road is not the end of
the road, unless you fail to turn.
73, Steve NU5D
n9wys wrote:
Gentle people,
Although I'm usually very open to newer technology, this digital (or better
said, digitized) voice thing has me very concerned. As a public safety
worker, I shudder to think
Hutton no longer carries Comspec. I just ordered 3 ID8s yesterday. My
account from 1985 was still good. Steve NU5D
I wonder if I should have purchased one of the micro repeater
controllers, though - get ID plus controllersb
Mike Morris wrote:
At 09:13 AM 09/20/07, you wrote:
Milt
I
That would be Ed O'Conner at Simulcast Solutions
http://www.simulcastsolutions.com/
Steve NU5D
Brian Gieryk wrote:
I am looking to set up a simulcast tx with voted rx system on VHF hi
band (2 meters) using 3 MSF-5000 digital capable stations, with spectra
tac rx'ers.
the work these folks do) Steve NU5D
.
Bottom line guys gals, The D-Star units have two frequencies one for
Transmit and one for Receive
Incorrect. Most D-Star systems have multiple inputs outputs are
networked via radio internet to other D-Star systems around the world
Time for an isolated TEE test with a dummy load. Why did you have the
duplexers tuned ? Was there a problem prior?
You should be able to split the duplexer without any trouble - just mark
things so you can go back as it was.
Best luck and 73, Steve NU5D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having
with the side pin cut away (makes 60 dB lossy coupling, there
abouts) you probably will need to find someone who does locally that can
help. 73, Steve NU5D
Eric Lemmon wrote:
Vern,
Did this problem exist before you had the duplexer tuned? Was anything at
all done to your repeater system just before
the best solution was to go to a monoband antenna.
Wishing you best success, Steve NU5D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the great info as soon as we get the service
monitor back we are going to try these things.
I have already seperated the 2 sides and have seen much
improvement so I
work. Steve NU5D ex AAV6NQ.
Scott Zimmerman wrote:
Fellows,
I have finally published my article on why the UHF mastr II radio self
quiets when converted to a repeater using low-side receiver injection.
Please read over it and let me know of any problems or things that
just don't make sense
is the light bulb in terms of power applied to the
antenna - the bandwidth should not matter unless you get out of the
design bandwidth of the antenna.
Maybe some graduate engineering student has a thesis on this topic?
Steve NU5D (tired old bench technician)
Kris Kirby wrote:
I've been milling a few
.
Contact Ed O'Connor at Simulcast Solutions or visit their site for some
good information.
http://www.simulcastsolutions.com/
73
Steve NU5D
Bill Powell wrote:
I'm considering a trunked (type TBD) system on 470 that will have
significant on-channel overlap.
The overlap comes about due
If it works into a dummy load without desense you either have a
feedline/antenna problem or external noise and most likely not the
duplexer - be sure and use an isolated TEE and sig gen with a dummy load
to test. Steve NU5D
jminn699 wrote:
-I am having the same problem also with a wacom
If this is going mobile on a 40 ft crank up I would sure consider
separate antennas is possible. You can get into some real challenges,
and even with separate antennas you will still have issues to consider.
Also you will have a much better idea when the repeater pair is
determined. Steve NU5D
I am working on a obsolete Sinclair F-201G-WP Hybrid Ring Duplexer that has
2 of the 4 Rexolite rods broken. They are 6 long by .500 in diamter. I
have photos at:
http://k4slb.com/pages/Tower/10-15-2007/index.htm also one of the sleves is
kinked.
Any Help? Please?
73
de K4SLB
Steve
Wonder if any of these here diodes 'tunnel' ?
Steve NU5D
Jeff DePolo wrote:
Even magnetic amplifiers and tunnel diodes..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10/24/2007 19:26, you wrote:
I would consider anything that uses a semi-condutor material to be
active, Silicon and Germanium transistors included.
According to Wikipedia, a passive device is a device
junction isolators ?
Steve NU5D
The primary reason for a isolator is to prevent intermod
I strongly disagree...
An isolators main purpose is to prevent a power amplifier from burning
up due to excessive reflected power; due to antenna system issues.
http://groups.yahoo.com
headphones to hear a
receiver, make such installations unpleasant at best. I believe the
reasoning was RF emissions possibly affecting elevator controls.
Steve NU5D
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Oct 31, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Eric Lemmon wrote:
to go. If I remember correctly, the issue was resolved
http://www.batlabs.com/models.html
Jim wrote:
Ron Wright, Skywarn Coodinator wrote:
hi all,
Anyone know details of a MSR2000 with part number C73GSB-3145B.
--
/Subscribe to dstar_digital/
Powered by groups.yahoo.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dstar_digital
. Today and NOW.
I know this is probably a bit off topic, and I appreciate your indulgence.
visit www.dstarusers.org and see who's talking.
Steve NU5D, /K5CTX B Temple, Texas US
--
/Subscribe to dstar_digital/
Powered by groups.yahoo.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dstar_digital/
Be very sure the repeater is working properly BEFORE you re-crystal and
re-tune. This is probably old hat for you, but I have seen many
problems in recrystalling an unknown status station. Steve NU5D
Ron Wright wrote:
Joe,
I order a number of crystals each month and use Bomar. I also like
and movs make great line protection for lightning mitigation.
73, Steve NU5D
Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
At 05:58 AM 11/21/07, you wrote:
(big chunk cut out)
Al published my EchoLink interface on his web site
See if the screw in side connecting pin on the TEE is loose - glad you
found it. I have had a type N tee with a loose connection where the
side pin screws into the other pin. sb
Keith, KB7M wrote:
Just an update on the status of this project. I thought what I've
found might be
with the cable severed by the mower, but there is no reason
the circuit should not work. Also the .001 line to line and line to
ground may help. We had music on hold from an AM broadcast station into
a telephone patch years ago, and the .001 capacitors fixed that
particular problem. Best luck, Steve NU5D
http://www.zetron.com/data/site/templates/zetrontemplate.asp?area_0=pages/menus/privateradioprodarea_1=pages/products/privateradio/m48-max
http://tinyurl.com/yva5pd
R.Wesley Bazell Jr wrote:
Picked up this Model at fort Wayne Hamfest for my MastrII 440 Repeater.
Have been using Software
Which radio and which chip - Xicor 2212 and 9346 are pretty simple.
Others are not as common. Steve NU5D
PS - 2212 is a parallel eeprom and 9346 is a serial eeprom. Neither has
links to burn. 2764s ? are different. steve
w4wsm wrote:
Just got a programmer to burn GE chips. I've tried
Ditto on the super flex - or 1/2 heliax. de nu5d
Jay Urish wrote:
Just go get some 1/2 suplerflex and call it good.
Willis M. Hagler wrote:
Hello All,
I am putting up a UHF repeater in Seattle and have a question
regarding feedline losses. The repeater site is on top of a
to
bed with visions of left over of sugar plumbs going through my head,
etc. Steve NU5D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12/23/2007 23:52, you wrote:
Bob, those 1/12 wave lenths are prety short, I figuerd (in my head)
worse, then you might want to cut and try. 73, Steve
NU5D
Eric Lemmon wrote:
Bill,
This topic has been addressed several times in recent years. There is no
formula for the harness; Sinclair makes two harnesses, one with 12
801 - 900 of 935 matches
Mail list logo
