Noel J. Bergman wrote:
My idea of collaboration is something *totally* different.
It sure can be once you get rid of anyone who doesn't agree with you.
Neither of you has the most perfect record on collaboration. Fine. Please
drop it and focus on the actual task to be addressed. Sniping at each
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 01:08, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 00:35, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Jason:
I must confess that I am intrigued by your approach to collaboration!
That's because you're at least as deficien
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is about safe downloading of dependencies from a virtual
repository that extends across mirrored systems on a heterogeneous,
multi-organizational network. The underlying infrastructure is
going to be file based because it will be replicated with rsync.
I sure as hell don
> > My idea of collaboration is something *totally* different.
> It sure can be once you get rid of anyone who doesn't agree with you.
Neither of you has the most perfect record on collaboration. Fine. Please
drop it and focus on the actual task to be addressed. Sniping at each other
is not go
I would add one more requirement to above statement - namely
"machine-friendly". There is an emerging requirement for application
driven downloading that has the potential to significantly exceed the
classic browser driven requirements that the ASF is addressing today.
This has a direct impac
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 01:08, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 00:35, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Jason:
> >>
> >>I must confess that I am intrigued by your approach to collaboration!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >That's because you're at least as def
> Neither you or I are any great shining examples of an
> ideal collaborator. You'll have to bear with me while
> I try to make ammends. I will try to bear with you.
Let take this at face value: someone admitting to faults, pledging to
improve, asking for allowances while making even more mistakes
It is usually unwise to mix insults with requests. However,
the point of collaboration is not to obtain the civility of a
collegial discussion over tea; the point is to accomplish the
task. Continual discussion of issues that are not relevant to
the task being collaborated upon is not collaborati
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 00:35, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Jason:
I must confess that I am intrigued by your approach to collaboration!
That's because you're at least as deficient as I am in the realm of
collaboration. Neither you or I are any great shining examples of an
i
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 00:35, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Jason:
>
> I must confess that I am intrigued by your approach to collaboration!
That's because you're at least as deficient as I am in the realm of
collaboration. Neither you or I are any great shining examples of an
ideal collaborator. Yo
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:18, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have challenged you to give me a scenerio that I can't satisfy with
something like the current Maven repository. Instead you drone on ad
nauseum about the theoretical. Let's have a concrete
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:18, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >I have challenged you to give me a scenerio that I can't satisfy with
> >something like the current Maven repository. Instead you drone on ad
> >nauseum about the theoretical. Let's have a concrete example.
> >
>
> Ja
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 21:47, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Small note - some of the participants on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
discussing the actual requirements - which from my (and other) point(s)
of view go beyond a file-system http protocol cut-and
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 21:47, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> >> Small note - some of the participants on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
> >> discussing the actual requirements - which from my (and other) point(s)
> >> of view go beyond a file-system http protocol cut-and-dried
>
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Small note - some of the participants on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
discussing the actual requirements - which from my (and other) point(s)
of view go beyond a file-system http protocol cut-and-dried
implementation
solution. Some consider this area to be much more than an H
Small note - some of the participants on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
discussing the actual requirements - which from my (and other) point(s)
of view go beyond a file-system http protocol cut-and-dried
implementation
solution. Some consider this area to be much more than an HTTP
download
handler. I
- repository and board are CCed -
- please reply to general@incubator.apache.org -
There is a discussion going on over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the
creation of an Apache jar and artifact repository. The discussion is
being constructive and is bringing in people from diverse efforts:
Maven, Rup
17 matches
Mail list logo
