Costin Manolache wrote:
On 1 Mar 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:12, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also redundant information - each jar has a well-defined Manifest
that should include version.
But I agree - re
Costin Manolache wrote:
On 1 Mar 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:12, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also redundant information - each jar has a well-defined Manifest
that should include version.
But I agree - re
Restarting discusion on this list.
This is a top of my head list of requirements for the Apache Jar
Repository (AJR)
* ASF Repository shall
o only host artifacts approved by a PMC
o be accessible to the public via http
o be mirrorable.
o allow browsin
The consensus seems to be forming around a basic URI of
/project/version/artifact
such as
http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/1.5/ant.jar
--
Nick Chalko Show me the code.
Centipede
Ant + autodownloadable build plugins + needed jars
> Lets improve the list and post it on the wiki.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository
--- Noel
> The consensus seems to be forming around a basic URI of
> /project/version/artifact
> such as
> http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/1.5/ant.jar
I'm not sure, yet, that there is a consensus forming. For example, Peter
Kazmier replied to Craig McClanahan's message about commons-foo-x.y.jar,
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The consensus seems to be forming around a basic URI of
/project/version/artifact
such as
http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/1.5/ant.jar
I'm not sure, yet, that there is a consensus forming. For example, Peter
Kazmier replied to Craig McClanahan's message about comm
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:00 PM
> The consensus seems to be forming around a basic URI of
>
> /project/version/artifact
>
> such as
> http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/1.5/ant.jar
Why not collapse version i
O'brien, Tim wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:00 PM
The consensus seems to be forming around a basic URI of
/project/version/artifact
such as
http://repo.apache.org/org.apache.ant/1.5/ant.jar
Why not collapse vers
How about this:
http:///--//.
> > I think in general ./ or ./index.html should return a human readable
> > form and ./index.xml should give machine readable form of the following
> Or use the Accept-type: as a selector.
Could you clarify your thoughts? I assume that you are refering to the
Accept: header as defined by RFC
11 matches
Mail list logo
