On Oct 18, 2007, at 1:10 AM, Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
Btw, here is a more recent "comparison" on the same blog: http://
raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/comparing_open_source_application_servers
Still just a single thread though, so still not a performance
comparison. (And this time the author hi
Jan:
>> Exactly my thought. I don't see any information about the number of
>> concurrent threads, so unless this is implicit by some means out of my
>> knowledge, this measures only a single request. Doesn't say much about
>> how an appserver performs in a live environment. Most comparisons I've
>
hi,
> Exactly my thought. I don't see any information about the number of
> concurrent threads, so unless this is implicit by some means out of my
> knowledge, this measures only a single request. Doesn't say much about
> how an appserver performs in a live environment. Most comparisons I've
> se
Scott:
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 6:25 AM, Jan Kriesten wrote:
>
>> a recent comparison between resin 3.0.9 and tomcat 5.5.3 can be
>> found here:
>> http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/resin_slower_than_tomcat_fails
>>
>> on this comparison maybe scott could comment?
>>
>
> It's not a useful be
Hari,
Would you be able to run the performance test again, on Resin and Tomcat ?
That way, you can charge your client company more time for 'evaluating' the
products,
and the results of the tests would be an asset for your client company
management
to make them look smarter (justification of you
We're listening to your feedback regarding documentation, and are in
the process of improving it across the board, starting with Hessian.
On Oct 17, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Jan Kriesten wrote:
hi hari,
i have been using resin since early version 2 and haven't regret it.
there are some cases whi
On Oct 17, 2007, at 6:25 AM, Jan Kriesten wrote:
>
> a recent comparison between resin 3.0.9 and tomcat 5.5.3 can be
> found here:
> http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/resin_slower_than_tomcat_fails
>
> on this comparison maybe scott could comment?
It's not a useful benchmark. It measures star
hi hari,
i have been using resin since early version 2 and haven't regret it.
there are some cases which i'd say are compelling reasons to use it over tomcat,
where you already brought up some yourself:
> To close, I should say that I personally love resin - its elegance,
> configuration simpli
I have also heard that Tomcat's performance has been improved. Has anyone
actually done a head-to-head performance comparison between the latest
version of Resin and Tomcat? I had wanted to do one but have not been able
to find the time. If I ever get around to do so, I will post my findings
her
On Oct 16, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Hari Selvarajan wrote:
> To close, I should say that I personally love resin - its elegance,
> configuration simplicity and developer-friendliness.
That's a compelling reason right there. Developer time isn't free
unless you're volunteering your own time.
For a t
Greetings,
I've been a Resin advocate for several years now. When I first did a
performance comparison between Resin 2 and Tomcat, Resin's performance
simply blew me away. Like many other people on this list, I imagine I
switched entirely to recommending resin as the application server for
all
11 matches
Mail list logo
