Michael,
Try making a storage set for each tape you want to use in your backup
script. If your backup script is set to "full" or "recycle" (depending on
your version of retro) the backup script will overwrite the tape when it's
re-inserted.
Mark
MICHAEL PRUSSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Greetings all.
Just in the last couple of days, one of my Windows clients has started
returning the following error message:
"Can't access volume DISK (C:) on WIN_CLIENT, error 5 (unknown)"
The client computer is running Windows 98 with Retro client 5.1 for
windows.
The backup station is a
Here's an oddity. I used to get a lot of 519 errors when I had DAT
tape changers, but since switching to DLT I hardly have any problems
and the problems I do have are directly related to the end users
machine.
I ran DLT on a mixed 10BaseT with Hubs and switches for about 6
months before I
At 10:52 AM -0500 02/21/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I go with a tape
system for backing up, or stick with a hd?
I've always found it more affordable to do multiple backups to tape
instead of convincing others to purchase multiple HDs.
Stephen K. Suh
I personally would get a buslink USB hard drive (or two or howevermany
you need.)
I might get some flack for suggesting this but It works great and its
cheaper than tape.
You also never have to change a tape. The only thing to be leary
about is its extention.
being yet another 3rd party
Just encountered a bad situation. I had turned off file and mail
servers on my ASIP server to run a RS backup. During the backup
something happened and RS shows a 519 error and of course quit
backing up. Upon checking on the server, I discovered that it was
running just fine, but no longer
Just in the last couple of days, one of my Windows clients has started
returning the following error message:
"Can't access volume DISK (C:) on WIN_CLIENT, error 5 (unknown)"
The client computer is running Windows 98 with Retro client 5.1 for
windows.
Anytime I have retro not finding a
on 22/2/01 2:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I go with a tape system for backing up, or stick with a hd?
Not really an easy question to answer because selecting appropriate media
depends a lot on how much data needs to be backed up.
Personally I like to use both.
Hey Erik, your point about the "...6months ago..." is true!.
This is why we have elected to get yet another USB drive when it comes
to it.
The 3rd drive will always be an old back-up. 3 drives will cost
us $1200.00. We think this will provide the security we need
and still for
less cost than
thanks very much for taking the time to share yr backup strategy with
me, Malcom -- excellent ideas, since I basically have had no overall
efficient strategy myself! i like yr idea of using a disc for
increments, then weekly backing to tape. I'll also do off-site storage
for one backup set this
I was just looking through my log file and I notice that there are a lot
of entries for a user that say that the user was deferred every
4 minutes yesterday from 9:48am to 4:48 pm.
I have seen this before with different users.
Does anyone know why this happens? What is going on?
I've seen this happen with MacOS 9 and Multiple users installed and running.
I removed Multiple users from all the Macs I use and it now works fine.
Perhaps Dantz has a better solution though?
I was just looking through my log file and I notice that there are a lot
of entries for a user that
Does anyone know why this happens? What is going on?
Sounds like the user clicked "Defer" and then didn't enter a time.
The only problem with this theory is that the users are not at their
desk when it happens. Believe me, that's one troubleshooting step I
took. I walked up to their
13 matches
Mail list logo
