t; on 12/06/2000 10:59:31 AM
Please respond to "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US)
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
At 10:05 -0800 12/6/00, Ben Eastwood wrote
ROTECTED]>
To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US)
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
At 10:05 -0800 12/6/00, Ben Eastwood wrote:
>AHHH HA! Thanks Eric, that explains alot... the folder I backed up had
well
>ove
It's not a stupid question at all, Ben! I just wish I could be more precise
with an answer.
Best regards,
Eric Ullman
Dantz Development
Ben Eastwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I know. Stupid question... You guys work so many miracles already, I
> guess I was just hoping for one more! T
> on 12/06/2000 11:10:42 AM
Please respond to "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US)
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
ETA? On software? Ha ha ha! That's funny, Ben! Yo
ETA? On software? Ha ha ha! That's funny, Ben! You crack me up, man...
;-)
Sorry. Couldn't help myself. I could say early Q2, 2001, but we _are_
talking about backup software here. That means that any bug that causes data
loss is unacceptable. So, whenever coding and testing is complete. Still,
At 10:05 -0800 12/6/00, Ben Eastwood wrote:
>AHHH HA! Thanks Eric, that explains alot... the folder I backed up had well
>over 300K files and the memory usage was pretty high during some portions
>of the process. Thanks for the workaround. Any ETA on the fix?
Hey Ben, if it's not too much trouble
ond to "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US)
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
Doug is correct, though the limit is somewhere closer to 300,000 files.
Retrospect for Windo
Since this comparing is one of the keys to Retrospect's ease of use
(something I wouldn't want to give up), I hope you are considering
ways to make it faster. I'm only going to be wanting to back up more
clients with more files (most likely a lot of small ones rather than a
few big ones) in the f
Doug is correct, though the limit is somewhere closer to 300,000 files.
Retrospect for Windows 5.15 (and earlier) has an unexpected memory usage
limitation (i.e., a bug) that prevents it from successfully scanning a
volume containing more than 300K files. In such a case, Retrospect will
respond wi
-talk
Subject: RE: How Long does this take for you?
Hmmm, I wasn't aware of the half million file limit... that is a
_major_
concern for me as I am backing up lots of html files and the like. Is
is a
half million files from one source? What are the details of this
problem?
Also, how soon a
IL PROTECTED]>
To: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US)
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you? (long)
Wow. There's a lot to respond to, here! I'll start with IncrementalPLUS,
Snapshot, and the scanning and matching process.
care
to comment on that?
--Ben
"Douglas B. McKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/04/2000 07:38:27 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US)
Subje
tory.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Mihailescu
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 7:13 AM
> To: retro-talk
> Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm totally with you here. My full backup takes about 30 hours on a
> we
Wow. There's a lot to respond to, here! I'll start with IncrementalPLUS,
Snapshot, and the scanning and matching process.
Retrospect's normal backup operation is something we call IncrementalPLUS.
Essentially, it's an incremental backup, but with one major difference from
the way that all other f
have some white papers if anyone is interested in them.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Ben Mihailescu
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:13 AM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
Hi,
I'm totally with yo
lient using
> its CPU! - my backups happen after hours).
>
>...Doug
>
>Douglas B. McKay
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data Mgt Group
>http://www.datamgt.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf
>
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf
Of Ben Eastwood
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 5:30 PM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: How Long does this take for you?
More on this:
Retrospect is still "building snapshot" and appears to be hogging
about
95-99% CPU, but not stuck, really because it varies... I
only 6364K... Any hints?
Thanks
--Ben
"Ben Eastwood" <"Ben_Eastwood/HMG/Wilson_Learning/US"@wlcmail.com> on
12/04/2000 04:12:40 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Ben Eastwood/HMG/Wilson Learning/US
I have questions for y'all:
When running a backup operation of a LOCAL disk (RAID 5 Array, actually)to
a DLT7000 drive, I noticed that the Performance reported varied widely,
from a high of 450MB/min to a low of 13 MB/min, and the "Time Remaining"
would jump around pretty much based on this. Is
19 matches
Mail list logo