I'm actually the lone mac support in a large organisation. I would
never give up my mac but the company uses PeeCees and I need to
support that world as well. So I need to find the best solution for
support without making it too obvious that I'm terribly biased. How
many times have I said "get
Thanks Eric,
Well I do think something needs to be done to fix this, the situation
is going to get worse. Imagine Win2001 or something like that, the
base installation will be enormous, many files and peoples needs ever
increasing. Only 10 years ago I was fine with 20mg, these days it's
20gig
The question I have is related to load. You stated there are issues
with security permissions and registry data during comparison. Yet I
have noticed that the load on the server and the client much larger
when backing up a windows client than a mac client. This during the
whole backup process
Hi Michael,
Most likely, these differences boil down to NTFS security permissions and
registry data. This data is backed up during the snapshot phase. Both are
stored with the snapshot, and the most recent snapshot from each volume is
saved in the catalog. So your assumption is correct--there's m
Michael Kennard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I much prefer a Mac any day. <
Trust yr heart, Michael ... ;-)
I started with a Tandy, was intimately familiar with DOS -- even Edlin
-- in pre-Windows days ... but:
the ease of troubleshooting a Mac, ease of installing/removing yr own
RAM and card
I know this was discussed late last year but this still baffles me...
The PC takes ages to do a snapshot whereas the mac doesn't take
anytime. Shouldn't the PC gather all the information it needs at the
start when it's reading the disk or does it change a flag on the
files/folders to mark that
