roblems like this, or NOT having these
problems with this same hardware?
TIA
-Hunter
Hunter Parrot, I.S. Administrator
New England Biolabs Inc. 32 Tozer Rd. Beverly, MA. 01915
978-927-5054 ext 329 Fax: 978-921-1350
800-632-5227
http://www.neb.com
--
At 6:36 PM +0200 8/15/00, jakob krabbe wrote:
>Hi and thanx for your post! That was a good one to be the first one! Maybe
>that explains some of our problems related to some clients. They also just
>stops for no clear reason, running Sonnet and 8.6. You are talking about
>the processorupgrade, rig
At 10:14 AM -0800 8/15/00, Matt Barkdull wrote:
>Just as another step to test, did you try going to the TCP/IP control
>panel and unchecking the "Load only when needed" button"? I'm
>wondering if the timing factor is doing something weird to the
>interface and shutting it down.
>
Actually, tha
At 8:11 AM +0100 8/16/00, Ken Gillett wrote:
>Whatever the reason for these communication failure problems it
>worries me that (in my case) the LAN works perfectly for everything
>else, yet Retrospect falls down every time. I realise that it hits
>the network pretty hard, but this is no surprise
At 9:17 AM -0400 8/16/00, Sara M wrote:
>I am very new to the Retrospect backup program, but looking for an alternate
>back up destination. Currently we are running a G4/400, OS 9.0.4, ASIP
>6.3.1, Retrospect 4.2. We have approximately 250 GB of hard drive storage
>space that needs to be backed
At 6:27 PM -0700 8/16/00, Pat Lee wrote:
>>> What would give better performance, a G3 upgrade to the 6100 or a 100
>>> base T card. I can only do one since the 6100 only has one slot.
>>
>> Go with the G3 upgrade. The 6100 bus is too slow to benefit from a 100Mbps
>> Ethernet card, but the G3 card
At 9:27 AM -0500 8/18/00, Jeffry C. Nichols wrote:
>My feature request would be to have a "skip" client option along with
>the "pause" and "stop" options so that either you could manually skip
>a client, or even better, set a parameter to skip a client if the
>backup on that client has exceeded "
At 8:27 AM +0200 8/18/00, jakob krabbe wrote:
>I started a script manually of all our computers yesterday and it took 6
>1/2 hours to complete. I watched it all the time and got shure everything
>was right. So I had high expectations for the automatic script at night,
>the log included below.
>
>T
