Well, i am doing so but it gives me diff posted as part of revision4 but not
actually diofff between base to revision4.
Please see attached snapshot for revision selection,what i am using.
-Amit
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:38 AM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.comwrote:
Click on the r4 in the
The way Review Board handles diffs today is that every revision of the diff
is meant to be a single change, from the base to the tip of the branch. What
I think you're wanting (please correct me if I'm wrong) is more of a
patchset concept, with each diff being an iteration of a change. This
Hi,
This may be due to some issue between Review Board and your repository. What
type of repository are you using?
Can you turn on logging in the administration UI (Admin - Settings -
Logging), reproduce the problem, and then see if there's anything in the log
files?
Christian
--
Christian
On 06/24/2010 02:43 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
The way Review Board handles diffs today is that every revision of the
diff is meant to be a single change, from the base to the tip of the
branch. What I think you're wanting (please correct me if I'm wrong)
is more of a patchset concept, with
Hi,
I used apache2 + mod_wsgi + reviewboard 1.0.8 and got page not found
error.
The error message when accessing http://my-host/reviews/:
-
Request Method: GET
Request URL:
Hi Edwin,
There shouldn't be any caches for this. The error means literally that there
is no Repository matching the path provided in either its Path or Mirror
Path fields. Make sure that there isn't some off-by-one somewhere (a
trailing / where there shouldn't be, or where there should be,
On that note, I notice that the post-review debug output shows the
relative path as /trunk. Is this expected? That is, will post-review
strip the '/' off the repository path and any characters following
this repository path are considered the base path? I'll check our
reviewboard server to double
I've now replicated this on an entirely different RB 1.5 beta 2
installation running on Debian Lenny. I will file a bug report.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
Hello,
The manual page about repositories contains no information whatsoever
about Mercurial. Is it possible to configure a remote Mercurial repo
either via HTTP(S) or SSH, or does Review Board require disk access to
the repository?
If it's possible via HTTP, what is the path to use? The path
Hi there,
I'm trying out RB 1.0.8 on linux with Git and I'm having trouble
configuring a local repository. When I go to New Review Request I
don't get any valid repositories in the list. I have configured the
git repository as follows in RB:
Name: Test Repo
Path:
On Jun 24, 1:28 pm, Gordon Morehouse gordon.moreho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've now replicated this on an entirely different RB 1.5 beta 2
installation running on Debian Lenny. I will file a bug report.
...and it turns out the bug report was filed against the
documentation, because upon looking at
When viewing diffs in Review Board, in some of the chunks I'm seeing
punctuation characters be enclosed in red borders.
This is happening on both the old and new side of the diff. What does
this signify, or is it a bug?
Example:
return array('type' = $action_handle,
Probably pygments has the wrong idea about what type of file it is,
and is highlighting what it thinks are errors.
-David
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Morehouse
gordon.moreho...@gmail.com wrote:
When viewing diffs in Review Board, in some of the chunks I'm seeing
punctuation
Ah, okay, it's a '.inc' file which contains PHP code.
On Jun 24, 4:52 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably pygments has the wrong idea about what type of file it is,
and is highlighting what it thinks are errors.
-David
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Morehouse
IIRC there's some naive logic in the remote Mercurial repo client inside
Reviewboard that screws up the number/presence of some '/' chars. I think
a recently accepted patch fixed the logic, but you can get it working with
older versions of ReviewBoard by doing something like this:
for the Path
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Component-Docs
New issue 1699 by gordon.morehouse: Manual contains zero information about
Mercurial repo setup
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1699
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1700 by gordon.morehouse: RB fails to get raw output from
Mercurial HTTP repo
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1700
What version are you running?
1.5 beta 2
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1701 by gordon.morehouse: Punctuation characters highlighted with
red border in .inc files containing PHP
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1701
What version are you running?
1.5 beta 2
What steps
18 matches
Mail list logo
