Hi there,
We are using reviewboard with GIT.
Until now, we access git repository through SSH and a single user
account for all git pusher.
For a more fine grained administration, we would like to use one user
account per git pusher.
The problem we have is that for post-review tool to work we
Hi,
If you're using a recent Review Board 1.5 release, and a recent RBTools, you
can use named repositories instead. See
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/#repository
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -
Also using Gitolite as repository-hosting solution solve Your problem
because You can dedicate one, the same user for access control to Git
repositories.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
If you're using a recent Review Board 1.5 release, and a
Hello all,
I've been using ReviewBoard for over a year now, and the only thing I
find a lacking from a user perspective is the commenting
functionality. When posting comments, I don't have the ability to
format fixed-width blocks of code or have the code in those blocks be
properly syntax
Thanks for the feedback!
Can you clarify what you mean by ability to format fixed-width blocks of
code?
-David
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Stephen Tyree tyree...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've been using ReviewBoard for over a year now, and the only thing I
find a lacking from a
I assume being able to have syntax-highlighted code in comments. If
so, I'll say that I've wanted this for a while but never came up with
a UI I love, as I really don't want to clutter the comment dialog.
One thing that could work is following a ReST model where indented
blocks of text are
This is basically what I had in mind. By default have comments use
variable width text (as they do now) and not be interpreted as code,
but if certain indentation is applied (ala StackOverflow) then the
text is interpreted as code, a fixed width font is applied and the
code is highlighted
I just assumed the text was variable width, but I guess I'm wrong.
Maybe that could become the default if we had code block
functionality?
On May 4, 4:51 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
The variable width part confuses me, though. Where are you seeing variable
width text? We
Hi Brian,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Brian Hill bch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have 4 questions:
1) I have a bk.py module (for bitkeeper) that is in /usr/lib/python2.4/
site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/. I'd like to keep in it in a more
local location that isn't mixed in the
Hello again,
I figured out that 2) and 4) are DB options. I've fixed those.
I still don't know what to do about 1) and 3).
Thanks again for any help.
Brian
On May 4, 9:20 pm, Brian Hill bch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have 4 questions:
1) I have a bk.py module (for bitkeeper) that is in
Hi,
No, this doesn't exist today. It wouldn't be hard to implement as, say, a
dashboard column in RB 1.6+ (too expensive in older versions), but for now I
think you'd just have to ask them.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware,
Hi Christian,
It is fairly generic.
I'd like it very much if you'd include it in RB, but I am not the
creator. I've emailed him asking him if it is ok (I can't imagine that
he will have a problem with that). I'll let you know as soon as I here
back from him.
Thanks for the follow-up!
Brian
On
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2091 by raghaven...@gmail.com: error for update diff and view diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate
Comment #1 on issue 2091 by raghaven...@gmail.com: error for update diff
and view diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091
even though we change the dynamic ip address to static ip address and keep
ip as 10.130.98.99 still the error is coming.
Could anyone solve
Updates:
Status: SetupIssue
Comment #2 on issue 2091 by trowb...@gmail.com: error for update diff and
view diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091
It looks like you've added an SVN repository with the same IP as your
review board installation? That doesn't
Comment #3 on issue 2091 by raghaven...@gmail.com: error for update diff
and view diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091
yes ,
you are saying exactly right that same IP adddress has assigned for SVN
repository and review board installation.
How can we change the
16 matches
Mail list logo