Reviewboard GIT configuration

2011-05-04 Thread Fv
Hi there, We are using reviewboard with GIT. Until now, we access git repository through SSH and a single user account for all git pusher. For a more fine grained administration, we would like to use one user account per git pusher. The problem we have is that for post-review tool to work we

Re: Reviewboard GIT configuration

2011-05-04 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, If you're using a recent Review Board 1.5 release, and a recent RBTools, you can use named repositories instead. See http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/#repository Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Reviewboard GIT configuration

2011-05-04 Thread Jan Koprowski
Also using Gitolite as repository-hosting solution solve Your problem because You can dedicate one, the same user for access control to Git repositories. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, If you're using a recent Review Board 1.5 release, and a

Code block functionality in comment posts

2011-05-04 Thread Stephen Tyree
Hello all, I've been using ReviewBoard for over a year now, and the only thing I find a lacking from a user perspective is the commenting functionality. When posting comments, I don't have the ability to format fixed-width blocks of code or have the code in those blocks be properly syntax

Re: Code block functionality in comment posts

2011-05-04 Thread David Trowbridge
Thanks for the feedback! Can you clarify what you mean by ability to format fixed-width blocks of code? -David On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Stephen Tyree tyree...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I've been using ReviewBoard for over a year now, and the only thing I find a lacking from a

Re: Code block functionality in comment posts

2011-05-04 Thread Christian Hammond
I assume being able to have syntax-highlighted code in comments. If so, I'll say that I've wanted this for a while but never came up with a UI I love, as I really don't want to clutter the comment dialog. One thing that could work is following a ReST model where indented blocks of text are

Re: Code block functionality in comment posts

2011-05-04 Thread Stephen Tyree
This is basically what I had in mind. By default have comments use variable width text (as they do now) and not be interpreted as code, but if certain indentation is applied (ala StackOverflow) then the text is interpreted as code, a fixed width font is applied and the code is highlighted

Re: Code block functionality in comment posts

2011-05-04 Thread Stephen Tyree
I just assumed the text was variable width, but I guess I'm wrong. Maybe that could become the default if we had code block functionality? On May 4, 4:51 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The variable width part confuses me, though. Where are you seeing variable width text? We

Re: 4 questions re: RB 1.5.5 (RHEL 5 rpm)

2011-05-04 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Brian, On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Brian Hill bch...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have 4 questions: 1) I have a bk.py module (for bitkeeper) that is in /usr/lib/python2.4/ site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/. I'd like to keep in it in a more local location that isn't mixed in the

Re: 4 questions re: RB 1.5.5 (RHEL 5 rpm)

2011-05-04 Thread Brian Hill
Hello again, I figured out that 2) and 4) are DB options. I've fixed those. I still don't know what to do about 1) and 3). Thanks again for any help. Brian On May 4, 9:20 pm, Brian Hill bch...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have 4 questions: 1) I have a bk.py module (for bitkeeper) that is in

Re: # of reviews per reviewer

2011-05-04 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, No, this doesn't exist today. It wouldn't be hard to implement as, say, a dashboard column in RB 1.6+ (too expensive in older versions), but for now I think you'd just have to ask them. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware,

Re: 4 questions re: RB 1.5.5 (RHEL 5 rpm)

2011-05-04 Thread Brian Hill
Hi Christian, It is fairly generic. I'd like it very much if you'd include it in RB, but I am not the creator. I've emailed him asking him if it is ok (I can't imagine that he will have a problem with that). I'll let you know as soon as I here back from him. Thanks for the follow-up! Brian On

Issue 2091 in reviewboard: error for update diff and view diff

2011-05-04 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2091 by raghaven...@gmail.com: error for update diff and view diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate

Re: Issue 2091 in reviewboard: error for update diff and view diff

2011-05-04 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 2091 by raghaven...@gmail.com: error for update diff and view diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091 even though we change the dynamic ip address to static ip address and keep ip as 10.130.98.99 still the error is coming. Could anyone solve

Re: Issue 2091 in reviewboard: error for update diff and view diff

2011-05-04 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #2 on issue 2091 by trowb...@gmail.com: error for update diff and view diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091 It looks like you've added an SVN repository with the same IP as your review board installation? That doesn't

Re: Issue 2091 in reviewboard: error for update diff and view diff

2011-05-04 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2091 by raghaven...@gmail.com: error for update diff and view diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2091 yes , you are saying exactly right that same IP adddress has assigned for SVN repository and review board installation. How can we change the