dateutil broke compatibility after 1.5, so Review Board had to lock it to a
known-good version.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:30 AM Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on porting ReviewBoard 2.x on FreeBSD system. Today I've faced
problem with versioning of python-dateutil.
That fixed it. Many Thanks!
On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:05:03 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Sorry, I've been pretty swamped.
First, make a backup of your database. Then, try:
DELETE FROM django_project_version WHERE id=4;
Then perform the upgrade again.
Thanks for your reply. :)
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:42 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com
wrote:
How long depends on whether the moderators are asleep.
-David
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:11 AM GC varuag.chha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Today i tried posting a query for the first time.
Hi,
Does Review Board provides a CLI for administrators? We use Git as our
version control system and we receive following requests from time-to-time:
Add repository
Add user
Add reviewers (Not very frequent)
Although these operations don’t consume much time, I would like to automate
them,
Hi,
Today i tried posting a query for the first time. This was done around
three hours back but i'm yet to see it on the board. Subject line was Command
Line tool for Review Board administration. Can anyone please let me know
as to how long it generally takes for a post to get approved?
How long depends on whether the moderators are asleep.
-David
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:11 AM GC varuag.chha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Today i tried posting a query for the first time. This was done around
three hours back but i'm yet to see it on the board. Subject line was Command
Line
Actually, maybe I should be testing out 2.5 anyway. I think I'll give that
a try first.
--steve
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 2:53:10 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote:
Will do. Thanks!
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:22:32 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
Would you mind filing a bug on our
So I wasn't using RBTools but I figured I'd try it first to see a working
solution with rbt rather than using the web interface.
After installing and invoking `rbt`, the first commit of ten (10) created
my first review for me. As soon as I try performing an `rbt posh
full_commit_index` on the
Will do. Thanks!
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:22:32 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
Would you mind filing a bug on our issue tracker?
Thanks,
-David
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM Steve seide...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Oops, sorry for forgetting that.
Review Board 2.0.15
How have you configured the repository on Review Board?
-David
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:50 PM James Knight james.d.kni...@live.com
wrote:
So I wasn't using RBTools but I figured I'd try it first to see a working
solution with rbt rather than using the web interface.
After installing and
Hi,
We don't provide a tool for adding those (though that'd be a handy project
for someone to work on). We do have an API, though, for adding/manipulating
repositories, default reviewers, review requests, and just about anything
else.
It does not support adding users, though. Most people use an
Hi there,
Hello;
Definitions for these functions don’t actually exist. The Resource class
(defined in rbtools.api.resource) generates these functions at run time from
the JSON returned by the Review Board web API.
Each returned JSON response has a “links” field, which contains a a JSON object
Hi,
I'm working on porting ReviewBoard 2.x on FreeBSD system. Today I've faced
problem with versioning of python-dateutil. According to setup.py, RB
requires dateutil ver.1.5 (exact), but actual version (with Py2 support) is
2.4.2.
My question is: is there any (hidden) reason to have exact
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3854 by davefid...@gmail.com: Bug links only work immediately
after editing a review description
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3854
What version are you running?
2.0.15
What's the URL of the page
14 matches
Mail list logo
