Django-tagging would still require a lot of work to implement properly. Once
you're at the point of modifying Review Board to this degree, you may as
well just add this to Review Board directly.
This sort of feature request is fairly common, and we've been discussing to
what degree we want to impl
Could you use the django-tagging application? I'm not sure if that
would help but I thought I'd suggest it.
On Feb 7, 6:53 pm, B S Srinidhi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to ReviewBoard (and Django :) and need some help in
> customizing RB for an internal deployment.
>
> I would like to introduc
If people can provide sample diffs that break against the Review Board
repository, we'll have an easier time testing this and verify it doesn't
break again.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Th
Mine too. We really need some example diffs that break things so we can put
them into the unit test suite and verify when we fix it that other diffs
don't break.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
The settings module should just be 'reviewboard.settings'. The
'settings_local' is imported from that. That could be the problem you were
hitting.
I would advise going this route.
Down the road, I'd like to have better support for users to write Django
management commands that live in the site di
Having a version that doesn't require an SCM is unlikely to happen in the
foreseeable future. We require an SCM to grab the full files so we can even
build the diffs. There's way too much that would have to be changed and
worked around if we were to remove this requirement.
I would much rather som
What version of Djblets is on there? I believe this may now be fixed as of
0.5.6.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, David Resnick wrote:
> No, I'm still stuck w
Hi Srinidhi,
Sorry for not getting back to you on this.
The data for comments are stored in reviewboard/reviews/models.py. You'd
need to update the API (webapi/) and the UI (htdocs/media/rb/js/*) and the
review request page (reviews/views.py) and probably more things.
You're going to hit a probl
Glad to hear it :)
There seem to be issues with the newer pysvn and Subversion. I suspect pysvn
isn't properly checking for its own compatibility with the Subversion in the
path.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http:/
You can go into the Database section of the Admin UI and look in the Site
Configuration section.
Make sure not to save anything in there or you may end up messing up the
settings. It's meant to be a read-only page (and will be in the future).
Generally what i'd suggest is to make the changes and
Hi,
That *should* work. As long as the files are in the same repository, and the
files are unique, Review Board should be able to handlle it. You could then
pass the result to post-review --diff-filename.
To my knowledge, there aren't other sites for Review Board information. It's
just the Google
Thanks for the very quick replies! How can I verify the settings?
Are they stored in a table, or a file on disk?
thanks, Jeff
On Feb 26, 10:36 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> There's some issue with our settings code and various server threads knowing
> when to update their local caches of the s
There's some issue with our settings code and various server threads knowing
when to update their local caches of the settings. Thought we had it fixed
before but it's been cropping up, so I'm looking into a fix hopefully for
beta 2.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Bo
I've also seen that behavior. I think ReviewBoard doesn't set the right
no-cache header for that page.
On 02/26/2010 01:25 PM, Jeff Leyser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just setup ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1, and am having some problems. The
> basics are working (connected to our SVN repo, able to create, view &
Hi,
I've just setup ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1, and am having some problems. The
basics are working (connected to our SVN repo, able to create, view &
edit reviews, etc)
My primary problem is that email is not being sent. As far as I can
tell from the mail server logs on the machine, ReviewBoard is ne
Ah okay. I've been giving you instructions for the 1.5 case.
You could proceed with 1.0, which will require that you instead maintain a
local clone of the repository on the Review Board server (or make the main
one accessible from the Review Board server in some way) and have it always
in sync. Th
16 matches
Mail list logo
