Is Tracking possible in Review Board?

2010-08-25 Thread sakthi
I finally made ReviewBoard up. I wish to know whether the following things are possible in Review Board, I tested the Review Board like this, Step 1: I changed a file which is already in repository and checked in. Step 2: Posted the change (diff between current and previous version)into

post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread RShelley
I've been struggling recently getting post-review to pick up the P4PASSWD properly. We have post-review as part of a script and we first run p4 login -p to get a ticket and then put that ticket in the environment. Subsequent p4 describe -P ticket changelist commands work fine, but post-review

Re: reviewboard.settings lost?

2010-08-25 Thread tag_98007work
RB is definitely installed for Python 2.5. So is reviewboard.settings a file? I've done a find . -name reviewboard.settings in /usr/lib/ python2.5 and /var/www/reviewboard and the file is not there. As far as I know until the restart on Sunday, no files have been changed. What do I need to do

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread tag_98007work
I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with the changes from http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/. After I patched the file I restarted the server (don't know if that's needed or not) On Aug 25, 8:56 am, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com wrote: I've been

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread RShelley
Where would perforce.py be located? I've hunted around and can't find it. On Aug 25, 9:28 am, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote: I was having P4PASSWD issues until I patched the perforce.py file with the changes fromhttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1537/diff/.  After I patched the

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread tag_98007work
It's located under reviewboard/scmtools. The full path for mine is: / usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg/ reviewboard/scmtools. Obviously this is a Unix install. I'm not quite sure where it would be for windows. Does that help? On Aug 25, 11:50 am, RShelley

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread RShelley
I'm on Linux and I found the site-packages, but I don't have any directories under it, just the eggs. I also tried: find / -name perforce.py and that didn't come up with anything On Aug 25, 12:22 pm, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote: It's located under reviewboard/scmtools.  The

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread tag_98007work
hmm, at one point (I'm having issues and attmpting to re-install, whole 'nother story) my ReviewBoard-1.5rc1-py2.5.egg was a top level directory. Under that was the scmtools directory. So I'm not quite sure how to resolve that they egg isn't a directory. On Aug 25, 1:11 pm, RShelley

Re: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread RShelley
My head hurts... Perforce consistently gives me reasons to not like it... Git can't come soon enough. Thanks for trying, I appreciate it! On Aug 25, 1:20 pm, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.com wrote: hmm, at one point (I'm having issues and attmpting to re-install, whole 'nother story) my

RE: post-review and P4PASSWD

2010-08-25 Thread Dana Lacoste
So, to summarize in case someone is searching through these archives later: Perforce, when security is turned on (this is a p4d server setting) will have different restrictions on what can and can't be done with the password on the CLIENT (i.e. you can't necessarily simply set an environment

how to double check a comment/action has been done?

2010-08-25 Thread J Arrizza
Hi, We are just starting to use RB and we've hit a bit of a snag with regards to the workflow. Here's the scenario: 1) Dev1 submits a review. 2) Dev2 reviews the code, finds a problem P1 and posts a comment 3) Dev1 submits a code update but fails to fix P1 4) Dev1 posts a comment saying P1 is

Re: Issue 1723 in reviewboard: Attempt to recover password causes CSRF verification failed

2010-08-25 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 1723 by d...@vidsolbach.de: Attempt to recover password causes CSRF verification failed http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1723 This bug is still valid for 1.5RC1 (reviewboard.kde.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Issue 1787 in reviewboard: Something broke! (Error 500)

2010-08-25 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1787 by GHJun10: Something broke! (Error 500) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1787 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? What's the URL of the

Issue 1788 in reviewboard: Updating a review before it's published wipes out unpublished comments

2010-08-25 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1788 by ben.hollis: Updating a review before it's published wipes out unpublished comments http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1788 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What