Re: Dull problem when trying to automate post-commit review with svn
I didn't see it in your script, but are you running the script as sudo in
the hook somewhere?
What distro are you running? Is SELinux turned on?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Borislav Sabev borislavsa...@gmail.comwrote:
I have also created a question over at superuser so if anyone has this
issue also take a look there:
http://superuser.com/questions/479803/permissions-issue-when-trying-to-execute-command-in-post-commit-hook-in-svn
Cheers,
Borislav.
On Tuesday, 25 September 2012 16:23:06 UTC+3, Borislav Sabev wrote:
Hello all.
I have a dull problem that I can't seem to solve.
*What am I trying to do?*
I am trying to do:
*post-review
--repository-url=http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/testRepo2--revision-range=6:7
--server=
http://reviews.example.test/ --username=reviewposter
--password=mydullpass --submit-as=admin -p --target-groups=reviewers*
All is alright when I try this from bash logged in as my user. Review is
posted, published, etc. == All permissions and other miscellaneous
settings are OK.
*What happens when I try this from SVN's post-commit hook?*
The resources are commited but the svn operation hangs - actually the
post-commit hook does not finish.
*What is the problem?*
post-review seems to get the user that is executing it and tries to log
it in. The user that's executing it is www-data (apache user) I.e. when I
run the command as www-data:
*sudo -u www-data post-review --repository-url=**http://xxx.
xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/testRepo2** --revision-range=6:7 **--server=ht
tp://reviews.example.test/** --username=reviewposter --password=**
mydullpass**! --submit-as=admin -p --target-groups=reviewers -d*
*
*
I get (notice the -d parameter in the post-review command - DEBUG):
* RBTools 0.4.1*
* Home = /home/borislav*
*Password for 'www-data':*
This is where it hangs waiting for a password to be entered. The commit
operation cannot finish and it just stays there. On the other hand when I
do the same command with debug output but as myuser I get:
* RBTools 0.4.1*
* Home = /home/borislav*
* HTTP GETting api/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/info/*
* Using the new web API*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/1/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/1/info/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/2/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/2/info/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/3/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/3/info/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/4/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/4/info/*
* Attempting to create review request on http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/
testRepo2 for None*
* Submitting the review request as admin*
* HTTP POSTing to http://reviews.example.test/api/review-requests/:
{'submit_as': 'admin', 'repository': 'http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/
testRepo2'}*
* Review request created*
* Attempting to set field 'target_groups' to 'reviewers' for review
request '22'*
* HTTP PUTting to http://reviews.example.test/
api/review-requests/22/draft/: {'target_groups': 'reviewers'}*
* Uploading diff, size: 2316*
* HTTP POSTing to http://reviews.example.test/
api/review-requests/22/diffs/: {'basedir': '/'}*
* Publishing*
* HTTP PUTting to http://reviews.example.test/
api/review-requests/22/draft/: {'public': 1}*
*Review request #22 posted.*
*
*
*http://reviews.example.test/r/22/*
*
*
So actually everything with the posting/publishing etc. works.
One solution I thought of is to execute the command as my user from the
post-commit hook but that seems out-stretched and ugly to me.
Are there any other solutions?
Thanks,
Borislav.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released
Hi Christian, Thank you for quick response. I forgot to do upgrade. But after upgrade,symbolic links inside static folder became broken. [reviewer@reviewboard01 static]$ ls -asl total 28 4 drwxrwxr-x 2 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 . 4 drwxr-xr-x 4 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 .. 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 reviewer reviewer 523 Sep 27 12:22 .htaccess 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 82 Sep 27 12:22 admin - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/admin 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 71 Sep 27 12:22 djblets - /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.1-py2.6.egg/djblets/static 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 80 Sep 27 12:22 lib - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/lib 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 79 Sep 27 12:22 rb - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/rb So after manual correction of them, all functionality work. Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:48:35 AM UTC+4, Christian Hammond wrote: Did you do an rb-site upgrade? Christian On Sep 26, 2012, at 15:54, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: There are few details. There is problem with new jQuery, it can't be retrieved from server: 1. Request URL: http://reviewboard.../static/lib/js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js 2. Request Method: GET 3. Status Code: 404 NOT FOUND It seems mapping of static resources didn't reload even if I've restarted httpd service. Could please give me advice how to load static mapping? Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:44:50 AM UTC+4, Michael Zhilin wrote: Hi, I've another issue. After upgrade from 1.7b1 to 1.7b2 I can't open close dropdown list on request or expand hide lines of code. I didn't perform any analysis of issue, but do you have any idea why it happens? Thank you in advance, Michael среда, 26 сентября 2012 г., 22:19:32 UTC+4 пользователь Christian Hammond написал: Did you upgrade from 1.6.x or 1.7 beta 1? Did you make the static media upgrade it asked for? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:17 AM, siva kumar 85s...@gmail.com wrote: Just now i have updated latest version of Review Board 1.7 Beta 2 . Everything is installed fine - while looking UI style is not applied . I have attached screen shot . Please let us know - what i have to do ? FYI : I have restarted my m/c and also cleared cache and cookies Regards, Siva On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:16:13 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Another day, another release! Last for a few days at least :) Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is out, which has all the fixes and features in 1.6.12, plus a new site style, fixes, and the beginnings of some internal enhancements that will make it easier to extend Review Board in the future. Check the news post for more information: http://www.reviewboard.org/* *news/2012/09/26/review-board-**1-7-beta-2-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/09/26/review-board-1-7-beta-2-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released
Hi Michael, Just to clarify, you did an rb-site upgrade, and the resulting symlinks were broken? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thank you for quick response. I forgot to do upgrade. But after upgrade,symbolic links inside static folder became broken. [reviewer@reviewboard01 static]$ ls -asl total 28 4 drwxrwxr-x 2 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 . 4 drwxr-xr-x 4 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 .. 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 reviewer reviewer 523 Sep 27 12:22 .htaccess 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 82 Sep 27 12:22 admin - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/admin 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 71 Sep 27 12:22 djblets - /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.1-py2.6.egg/djblets/static 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 80 Sep 27 12:22 lib - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/lib 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 79 Sep 27 12:22 rb - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/rb So after manual correction of them, all functionality work. Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:48:35 AM UTC+4, Christian Hammond wrote: Did you do an rb-site upgrade? Christian On Sep 26, 2012, at 15:54, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com wrote: There are few details. There is problem with new jQuery, it can't be retrieved from server: 1. Request URL: http://reviewboard.../static/**lib/js/jquery-1.8.2.min.jshttp://reviewboard.../static/lib/js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js 2. Request Method: GET 3. Status Code: 404 NOT FOUND It seems mapping of static resources didn't reload even if I've restarted httpd service. Could please give me advice how to load static mapping? Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:44:50 AM UTC+4, Michael Zhilin wrote: Hi, I've another issue. After upgrade from 1.7b1 to 1.7b2 I can't open close dropdown list on request or expand hide lines of code. I didn't perform any analysis of issue, but do you have any idea why it happens? Thank you in advance, Michael среда, 26 сентября 2012 г., 22:19:32 UTC+4 пользователь Christian Hammond написал: Did you upgrade from 1.6.x or 1.7 beta 1? Did you make the static media upgrade it asked for? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:17 AM, siva kumar 85s...@gmail.com wrote: Just now i have updated latest version of Review Board 1.7 Beta 2 . Everything is installed fine - while looking UI style is not applied . I have attached screen shot . Please let us know - what i have to do ? FYI : I have restarted my m/c and also cleared cache and cookies Regards, Siva On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:16:13 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Another day, another release! Last for a few days at least :) Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is out, which has all the fixes and features in 1.6.12, plus a new site style, fixes, and the beginnings of some internal enhancements that will make it easier to extend Review Board in the future. Check the news post for more information: http://www.reviewboard.org/ **new**s/2012/09/26/review-board-**1-7-**beta-2-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/09/26/review-board-1-7-beta-2-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/ http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@** googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Dull problem when trying to automate post-commit review with svn
Hello Christian.
I am not running sudo anywhere in the script.
This is the full hook script I already posted:
*===repo/hooks/post-commit script paste
start===*
*REPOS=$1*
*REV=$(($2))*
*OLDREV=$(($REV-1))*
*RBSRV=http://reviews.example.test/*
*SVNLOOK=/usr/bin/svnlook*
*AUTHOR=$($SVNLOOK author $REPOS -r $REV)*
*
*
*LogDir=/var/log/svn/*
*#Get only the name of the REPOSITORY as REPOS is a filesystem path:*
*RepoName=${REPOS##*/}*
*RepoURL=http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/${RepoName}*
*
*
*#Some debugging info*
*echo = /srv/logs/test*
*whoami /srv/logs/test*
*echo svnlook: ${SVNLOOK} /srv/logs/test*
*echo authhor: ${AUTHOR} /srv/logs/test*
*echo Commited rev: ${REV} /srv/logs/test*
*echo Old rev: ${OLDREV} /srv/logs/test*
*echo RepoName-REPOS: ${RepoName} /srv/logs/test*
*echo Repository URL: ${RepoURL} /srv/logs/test*
*
*
*post-review --repository-url=${RepoURL}
--revision-range=${OLDREV}:${REV} --server=${RBSRV}
--username=reviewposter --password=password --submit-as=${AUTHOR} -p
--target-groups=reviewers --debug /srv/logs/post-rev 21*
*exit 0*
*=repo/hooks/post-commit**
script
paste start**===*
SELinux *is not installed.*
Test Platform Distribution is (Ubuntu 10.10): == This is the platform on
which I am experiencing the problem. This has not been tested on the live
server.
*Linux xx 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:45:36 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux*
SVN version is: *1.6.12 (r955767)*
*
*
Future Server Distribution is (Ubuntu 10.10):
*Linux xxx 2.6.32-41-server #94-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 6 18:15:07 UTC 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux*
SVN version is: *1.6.6 (r40053)*
*
*
Regards,
Borislav.
*
*On Thursday, 27 September 2012 10:33:54 UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote:
I didn't see it in your script, but are you running the script as sudo in
the hook somewhere?
What distro are you running? Is SELinux turned on?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Borislav Sabev
borisl...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I have also created a question over at superuser so if anyone has this
issue also take a look there:
http://superuser.com/questions/479803/permissions-issue-when-trying-to-execute-command-in-post-commit-hook-in-svn
Cheers,
Borislav.
On Tuesday, 25 September 2012 16:23:06 UTC+3, Borislav Sabev wrote:
Hello all.
I have a dull problem that I can't seem to solve.
*What am I trying to do?*
I am trying to do:
*post-review
--repository-url=http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/testRepo2--revision-range=6:7
--server=
http://reviews.example.test/ --username=reviewposter
--password=mydullpass --submit-as=admin -p --target-groups=reviewers*
All is alright when I try this from bash logged in as my user. Review is
posted, published, etc. == All permissions and other miscellaneous
settings are OK.
*What happens when I try this from SVN's post-commit hook?*
The resources are commited but the svn operation hangs - actually the
post-commit hook does not finish.
*What is the problem?*
post-review seems to get the user that is executing it and tries to log
it in. The user that's executing it is www-data (apache user) I.e. when I
run the command as www-data:
*sudo -u www-data post-review --repository-url=**http://xxx.
xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/testRepo2** --revision-range=6:7 **--server=ht
tp://reviews.example.test/** --username=reviewposter --password=**
mydullpass**! --submit-as=admin -p --target-groups=reviewers -d*
*
*
I get (notice the -d parameter in the post-review command - DEBUG):
* RBTools 0.4.1*
* Home = /home/borislav*
*Password for 'www-data':*
This is where it hangs waiting for a password to be entered. The commit
operation cannot finish and it just stays there. On the other hand when I
do the same command with debug output but as myuser I get:
* RBTools 0.4.1*
* Home = /home/borislav*
* HTTP GETting api/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/info/*
* Using the new web API*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/1/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/1/info/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/2/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/2/info/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/3/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/3/info/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/4/*
* HTTP GETting http://reviews.example.test/api/repositories/4/info/*
* Attempting to create review request on http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/svn/
testRepo2 for None*
* Submitting the
easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12
Hello, Looks like it happens for every release. I'm trying to upgrade 1.6.11 to 1.6.12. I can see that 1.6.12 is already available in both http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6 and http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard. However, easy_install -U ReviewBoard doesn't find it: Searching for ReviewBoard Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6.11 Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ReviewBoard-1.6.11-py2.7.egg Processing ReviewBoard-1.6.11-py2.7.egg removing '/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.11-py2.7.egg' (and everything under it) creating /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.11-py2.7.egg Extracting ReviewBoard-1.6.11-py2.7.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages ReviewBoard 1.6.11 is already the active version in easy-install.pth Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin Installing rbssh script to /usr/local/bin Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.11-py2.7.egg Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/ Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Any ideas? Thanks, Igor. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12
To verify connectivity, I tried the following command, which worked: curl -o dummy.egg http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ReviewBoard-1.6.12-py2.7.egg -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released
Exactly. ;-) I don't know root cause, but it seems environment issue, not ReviewBoard solution. I'll try to found out root cause and I'll come back. On Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC+4, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Michael, Just to clarify, you did an rb-site upgrade, and the resulting symlinks were broken? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi Christian, Thank you for quick response. I forgot to do upgrade. But after upgrade,symbolic links inside static folder became broken. [reviewer@reviewboard01 static]$ ls -asl total 28 4 drwxrwxr-x 2 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 . 4 drwxr-xr-x 4 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 .. 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 reviewer reviewer 523 Sep 27 12:22 .htaccess 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 82 Sep 27 12:22 admin - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/admin 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 71 Sep 27 12:22 djblets - /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.1-py2.6.egg/djblets/static 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 80 Sep 27 12:22 lib - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/lib 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 reviewer reviewer 79 Sep 27 12:22 rb - /home/reviewer/work/reviewboard-master/reviewboard/reviewboard/htdocs/static/rb So after manual correction of them, all functionality work. Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:48:35 AM UTC+4, Christian Hammond wrote: Did you do an rb-site upgrade? Christian On Sep 26, 2012, at 15:54, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com wrote: There are few details. There is problem with new jQuery, it can't be retrieved from server: 1. Request URL: http://reviewboard.../static/**lib/js/jquery-1.8.2.min.jshttp://reviewboard.../static/lib/js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js 2. Request Method: GET 3. Status Code: 404 NOT FOUND It seems mapping of static resources didn't reload even if I've restarted httpd service. Could please give me advice how to load static mapping? Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:44:50 AM UTC+4, Michael Zhilin wrote: Hi, I've another issue. After upgrade from 1.7b1 to 1.7b2 I can't open close dropdown list on request or expand hide lines of code. I didn't perform any analysis of issue, but do you have any idea why it happens? Thank you in advance, Michael среда, 26 сентября 2012 г., 22:19:32 UTC+4 пользователь Christian Hammond написал: Did you upgrade from 1.6.x or 1.7 beta 1? Did you make the static media upgrade it asked for? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:17 AM, siva kumar 85s...@gmail.com wrote: Just now i have updated latest version of Review Board 1.7 Beta 2 . Everything is installed fine - while looking UI style is not applied . I have attached screen shot . Please let us know - what i have to do ? FYI : I have restarted my m/c and also cleared cache and cookies Regards, Siva On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:16:13 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, Another day, another release! Last for a few days at least :) Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is out, which has all the fixes and features in 1.6.12, plus a new site style, fixes, and the beginnings of some internal enhancements that will make it easier to extend Review Board in the future. Check the news post for more information: http://www.reviewboard.org/**new**s/2012/09/26/review-board-**1-7-** beta-2-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/09/26/review-board-1-7-beta-2-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@** googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12
Very weird. How about ReviewBoard==1.6.12 ? Christian On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:35, Igor Berger codewiz...@gmail.com wrote: To verify connectivity, I tried the following command, which worked: curl -o dummy.egg http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ReviewBoard-1.6.12-py2.7.egg -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build infrastructure are assuming unixisms. Christian On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things that must be installed in order to build the package. Christian I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code. setup.py bdist_egg And the result is given below. running bdist_egg running egg_info running build_media error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application But 1.6.x code got successfully built. On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: May I know how did you make the egg file? Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out. On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply. But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install from source. On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12
Different error:
# easy_install -U ReviewBoard==1.6.12
Searching for ReviewBoard==1.6.12
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
No local packages or download links found for ReviewBoard==1.6.12
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('ReviewBoard==1.6.12')
I've seen this in the past. Eventually it works.
Perhaps, something is cached somewhere and I need to wait for it to expire.
But I can't think of what this could be. :(
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:23:04 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Very weird. How about ReviewBoard==1.6.12 ?
Christian
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
reviewboard 1.6.11 and reviewing problems with FireFox 3.6 and IE 9
We upgraded a few weeks ago to 1.6.11 and we've hit a few minor problems. For IE users when they edit the description the newlines disappear and they get one massive line of text. Some times this occurs when viewing the description too and not editing. The IE compatibility mode usually helps with the display issue but not editing. I'm promoting Chrome and FF (15) internally to avoid both issues :-) I've had a few people with older FF version (3.6) where they can't edit/publish/discard reviews they started (e.g. comments on other peoples or their own review). Using FF 15 or Chrome has worked in most cases. I just now had a user tell me the are using FF 15.0.1 and they've had issues hitting the Publish button too. We've hit http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2728 too but I think I have a fix for that (without migrating to 1.7 beta) What kind of information can I get to help diagnose what is going on? For the FF 3.6 case I have a dump of what the web browser showed (which showed no www errors), see end of message for that. I've seen the IE newline issue (over someones shoulder) so I think I can probably get more information about that one. Thanks! --- FF 3.6 error: Error Code: 200 Error Text: OK Request URL: http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/draft/ Request Data: (none) Response Data: There may be useful error details below. The following error page may be useful to your system administrator or when reporting a bug. To save the page, right-click the error below and choose Save Page As, if available, or View Source and save the result as a .html file. Warning: Be sure to remove any sensitive material that may exist in the error page before reporting a bug! ok 0 http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/diff-comments/ GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/file-attachment-comments/ GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/ GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/ PUT http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/screenshot-comments/ GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/users/Gosia/ GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/replies/ GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/ DELETE 2012-09-24 06:18:30 33072 0 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Screenshots for version 1.7?
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:26:36 AM UTC-7, Robert Dailey wrote: Are there any screenshots I can look at for various UI improvements for version 1.7? What do code review pages look like? Have you seen the live site http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3347/ ? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: reviewboard 1.6.11 and reviewing problems with FireFox 3.6 and IE 9
Hi Chris, The IE thing is weird, because I don't think anything should have changed as far as text entry goes in a while... Which IE? For Firefox, is there anything in the JavaScript console? Installing Firebug (you may need an older one for FF3.6) would give you a lot more useful information. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Chris Clark chris.cl...@actian.com wrote: We upgraded a few weeks ago to 1.6.11 and we've hit a few minor problems. For IE users when they edit the description the newlines disappear and they get one massive line of text. Some times this occurs when viewing the description too and not editing. The IE compatibility mode usually helps with the display issue but not editing. I'm promoting Chrome and FF (15) internally to avoid both issues :-) I've had a few people with older FF version (3.6) where they can't edit/publish/discard reviews they started (e.g. comments on other peoples or their own review). Using FF 15 or Chrome has worked in most cases. I just now had a user tell me the are using FF 15.0.1 and they've had issues hitting the Publish button too. We've hit http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2728 too but I think I have a fix for that (without migrating to 1.7 beta) What kind of information can I get to help diagnose what is going on? For the FF 3.6 case I have a dump of what the web browser showed (which showed no www errors), see end of message for that. I've seen the IE newline issue (over someones shoulder) so I think I can probably get more information about that one. Thanks! --- FF 3.6 error: Error Code: 200 Error Text: OK Request URL: http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/draft/ Request Data: (none) Response Data: There may be useful error details below. The following error page may be useful to your system administrator or when reporting a bug. To save the page, right-click the error below and choose Save Page As, if available, or View Source and save the result as a .html file. Warning: Be sure to remove any sensitive material that may exist in the error page before reporting a bug! ok 0 http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/diff-comments/GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/file-attachment-comments/GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/PUT http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/screenshot-comments/GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/users/Gosia/ GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/replies/GET http://MYREVIEWBOARDSERVERADDR/api/review-requests/16046/reviews/33072/DELETE 2012-09-24 06:18:30 33072 0 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12
I wish I had some idea, but that's just plain weird.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Igor Berger codewiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Different error:
# easy_install -U ReviewBoard==1.6.12
Searching for ReviewBoard==1.6.12
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
No local packages or download links found for ReviewBoard==1.6.12
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('ReviewBoard==1.6.12')
I've seen this in the past. Eventually it works.
Perhaps, something is cached somewhere and I need to wait for it to expire.
But I can't think of what this could be. :(
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:23:04 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Very weird. How about ReviewBoard==1.6.12 ?
Christian
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: reviewboard 1.6.11 and reviewing problems with FireFox 3.6 and IE 9
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:12:08 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: The IE thing is weird, because I don't think anything should have changed as far as text entry goes in a while... Which IE? The IE behavior may not be new, for the version see the title (9) but recall it was seen with 8 too. I can get access to someones machine where this seems to occur on a regular basis. For Firefox, is there anything in the JavaScript console? Installing Firebug (you may need an older one for FF3.6) would give you a lot more useful information. That might be tricky, I'm personally not seeing the problem but I'll mail out to the upgrade hold outs :-) and make sure they have it installed. I'll keep you posted on what we find. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Parent Dif - Options
I have configured hg repository module in review board . Parent Diff : What i have to give here ( I have given base diff contents but its not shown reviewboard ) ( An optional diff that the main diff is based on. This is usually used for distributed revision control systems (Git, Mercurial, etc.) ) If i missed anything pl let us know Thanks, Siva -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Issue 1796 in reviewboard: Make recaptcha an optional dependency.
Updates: Labels: -Milestone-Release1.7 Comment #4 on issue 1796 by chip...@gmail.com: Make recaptcha an optional dependency. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1796 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2747 in reviewboard: Dirty markup in /dashboard.
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2747 by abrou...@yelp.com: Dirty markup in /dashboard. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2747 Running 1.6.12, on OS X 10.7.4 and Chrome 22. --- Steps to repro: 1. Go to /dashboard/ 2. Edit your columns and check My comments if that's not active already. 3. Inspect the markup of on of the icon --- Expected: clean markup Actual: there are some nasty django.utils.functional.__proxy__ object at 0x1a31c50 in the title and alt attributes (see attached screenshot) --- Probable cause: string interpolation in django py 2.6.7 print u'%s' % _(foo) foo py 2.6.7 print '%s' % _(foo) django.utils.functional.__proxy__ object at 0x1a31c50 From the Django doc (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/topics/i18n/internationalization/#lazy-translation): # This is fine: putting a unicode proxy into a unicode string. uHello %s % ugettext_lazy(people) # This will not work, since you cannot insert a unicode object # into a bytestring (nor can you insert our unicode proxy there) Hello %s % ugettext_lazy(people) Cheers, Arnaud. Attachments: bad-markup-in-RB.png 20.7 KB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2748 in reviewboard: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload?????
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2748 by bwmayn...@gmail.com: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2748 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? What's the URL of the page containing the problem? What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? What operating system are you using? What browser? Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2749 in reviewboard: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload?????
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2749 by bwmayn...@gmail.com: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2749 Please provide any additional information below. The patch to 'trunk/CommonAPI/CommonC/Include/C:/WORK/NEW_ARCH/eng-mfg-apps-repos/CommonAPI/CommonC/Include/controller.h' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.2w3jya' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.2w3jya/tmppG_cQF Hunk #1 FAILED at 30. Hunk #2 FAILED at 53. Hunk #3 FAILED at 67. Hunk #4 FAILED at 165. 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.2w3jya/tmppG_cQF-new.rej Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 151, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1071, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.14-py2.4.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 156, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1070, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting)), File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 552, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 374, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 239, in patch raise Exception(_(The patch to '%s' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary + Exception: The patch to 'trunk/CommonAPI/CommonC/Include/C:/WORK/NEW_ARCH/eng-mfg-apps-repos/CommonAPI/CommonC/Include/controller.h' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.2w3jya' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.2w3jya/tmppG_cQF Hunk #1 FAILED at 30. Hunk #2 FAILED at 53. Hunk #3 FAILED at 67. Hunk #4 FAILED at 165. 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/reviewboard.2w3jya/tmppG_cQF-new.rej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2749 in reviewboard: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload?????
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 2749 by chip...@gmail.com: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2749 Sorry, going to close this and the other as invalid. Please file a new one with all the fields filled out exactly, or it makes it hard for us to deal with the support. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2748 in reviewboard: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload?????
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 2748 by chip...@gmail.com: How do I fix a invalid diff patch upload? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2748 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
