Hi Thomas,
Review Board does not maintain your clones, and never has. If you choose to
go the local clone route, then you have to handle that yourselves. Our
recommendation instead is to use a service like GitWeb, cgit, gitorious,
GitLab, or something else that wraps your Git repositories. Review
With the 1.7.20 version installed we experience that the repository clones
on the server
are out-dated. We fail sometimes when creating new review requests.
Going directly to those clones on the server doing a git pull we were
able to create the review request afterwards.
Is that expected to be
Hi Ompal,
Pre-commit is the standard way people use Review Board.
RBTools is how people typically interact with Review Board, both for
pre-commit and post-commit, and we have a lot of documentation on our site
that covers it. Go read through those, and let us know if you have any
specific
Hi All,
I want to use Pre -commit review. For now post-commit is working fine for
me but i want to move to pre -commit. If any one can pass me the necessary
script to be used for that.
Regards.
Ompal Sharma
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Hi, just installed reviewboard on brand new server. And it is very very
slow.
It takes 3 seconds to load the dashboard, and there almost none reviews,
three users, and three github private organization repositories. Example of
wget from local machine:
wget
Hi,
That's definitely not normal. You shouldn't be experiencing that level of
slowness.
Do you have an HTTP proxy configured on your browser? If so, make sure the
domain is in the exception list.
What happens if you repeat the same test on the server itself? That'll help
rule out a networking
Hi,
I am getting a failure while uploading diff file using rbt post command. I
have configured a bitbucket repo on ReviewBoard. The server is running on
my local host.
My .reviewboardrc looks as follows:
REVIEWBOARD_URL = http://localhost;
REPOSITORY = test-repo
BRANCH = master
Configurations
Kapil,
What version of hg is installed?
-David
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kapil Anand kapilana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am getting a failure while uploading diff file using rbt post command. I
have configured a bitbucket repo on ReviewBoard. The server is running on
my local host.
Hi,
there is no proxy, and wget i've shown was executed on the same machine, so
this should not be a network issue. I also have jenkins running on the same
machine, and it's fast, so once again - i guess not a network issue
On Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:36:10 PM UTC+2, Christian Hammond
If you repeat that wget test, say, 10 times, does that delay stay
consistent?
When using mod_wsgi in embedded mode (which is what the standard
configuration files make use of), Apache needs to load in all the modules
and go through our initialization each time it sets up a new process (or
worker
On Friday, February 7, 2014 7:40:10 AM UTC+2, Christian Hammond wrote:
If you repeat that wget test, say, 10 times, does that delay stay
consistent?
Yes
When using mod_wsgi in embedded mode (which is what the standard
configuration files make use of), Apache needs to load in all the
On Friday, February 7, 2014 8:15:47 AM UTC+2, Christian Hammond wrote:
On the server, run:
rb-site manage /path/to/site runserver 0.0.0.0:8080
(Or pick another port if that is taken.)
That's going to make use of Django's built-in single-threaded development
server. You can then
Glad it's working! Mystery solved.
We'll be out at an event the next few days, so I'll be largely unavailable,
but if you have any further issues, I'll try to back to you when I have a
free moment.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Finally I found out how to use utf8 in ReviewBoard.
It is the problem that charset of all ReviewBoard tables is set to be
'latin1', not 'utf8', which I mentioned above.
So, I could use utf8 by changing all table's charset by the solution below
link.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/2150335/1362584
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3219 by michaeld...@gmail.com: Support Unship It
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3219
*** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com
*** If you have a patch, please submit it
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 489
Comment #1 on issue 3219 by trowb...@gmail.com: Support Unship It
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3219
Fundamentally similar to bugs 489, 564, and 2106.
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #40 on issue 489 by trowb...@gmail.com: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489
Issue 3219 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You
Comment #2 on issue 3219 by chip...@gmail.com: Support Unship It
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3219
I want to address your comments on this though.
Different organizations have different workflows and different expectations
for what the data means to them. It's
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #22 on issue 1486 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff viewer displays
incorrectly diffs for files which were removed in later revision of the
change
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1486
Fixed in master (2da7f9e). This will ship in 2.0
19 matches
Mail list logo
