Re: mercurial repo configuration
David thanks for the answer, the original problem was that my review requests don't contain diffs, I thought it was because of a repo misconfiguration, what I do is call post-review from the command prompt and expect either the unpushed or uncommitted changes to be shown in reviewboard with a diff attached, all I get is an empty review request with the correct repo assigned. Any Idea on how to fix that? ADC On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 20:55:15 UTC+2, David Trowbridge wrote: > > The post-commit UI is only available for GitHub and SVN repositories right > now. Support for additional repository types will be coming in later > releases, but we don't have a timeline for that. In the meantime, if you > want to post existing commits, you can use RBTools to upload the changes. > > -David > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Angelo Diego Crabolu < > angelodie...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> I've checked the documentation to setup reviewboard with mercurial but >> without much luck, >> I've set up my repository path as >> http://myhgserver.mydomain.com/myrepository (using it in a web browser >> on the same machine I get to the repository listing so I suppose it's >> correct) but when i go to http://myreviewboardserver/r/new/ there are no >> commits under my repo, >> on the same machine I've added a test subversion repository and I see my >> commits. >> I've already set debug = true in settings_local.py but the only thing I >> see in the logs is DEBUG - - Initialized HgWebClient with url=u' >> http://myhgserver.mydomain.com, username=u'' >> Any guess on how to fix that? >> >> -- >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> --- >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >> --- >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: can't pip install RBTools - no packages on pypi?
Hi Kevin, There's been some ongoing discussions about changes to pip and the strategy for verification/external packages. We're waiting to see how those impact us. In the meantime, we've made some of the changes needed to get us closer to not needing allow-unverified, but we're not fully there yet. There's no plan to move everything onto PyPI's hosting. It shouldn't matter down the road, from my understanding, but it does depend on the future plans for pip/PyPI. Christian On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, wrote: > Apologies if this is already answered somewhere in history, but are there > any plans to revisit this change? > > We (Apache Aurora) use rbt in our development workflow via pip to no > apparent ill effect. We'd like to avoid the use of --allow-unverified > RBTools > > The currently-published version is only available via HTTP on a server > external to PyPI. That means it's vulnerable to MITMs and it doesn't > benefit from PyPI's caching infrastructure. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > On Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:55:47 PM UTC-7, Buck Evan wrote: >> >> For the record, the below command does result in a correctly-working rbt >> command. >> >> rbtools really should become compatible with the pip default options. >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 2:17:37 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: >>> >>> That will install the package, but I believe pip still doesn't properly >>> register python entry points, which means that rbt won't work right. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Edward Delaporte wrote: >>> >>> For what it's worth, there seems to be a combination of command line >>> flags that works as a workaround: >>> >>> pip install rbtools --allow-external rbtools --allow-unverified rbtools >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 8:03:11 AM UTC-5, Jason Antman wrote: I'm aware that pip is not a supported installation method for ReviewBoard itself. However, I have a number of cases where pip installation is the only method I can do, and I only need access to RBTools for the API client. As of a few months ago, I was able to `pip install RBTools==0.5.2` without a problem, and I have this in a number of requirements.txt files. This morning I tried re-deploying one of the applications that uses this, and got an error from pip saying "No distributions at all found" - there don't seem to be any valid packages on pypi itself, and even having it allow external URLs doesn't seem to work. Is this an intentional change in behavior? Thanks, Jason >>> -- >>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> --- >>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>> --- >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: can't pip install RBTools - no packages on pypi?
Apologies if this is already answered somewhere in history, but are there any plans to revisit this change? We (Apache Aurora) use rbt in our development workflow via pip to no apparent ill effect. We'd like to avoid the use of --allow-unverified RBTools The currently-published version is only available via HTTP on a server external to PyPI. That means it's vulnerable to MITMs and it doesn't benefit from PyPI's caching infrastructure. Thanks, Kevin On Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:55:47 PM UTC-7, Buck Evan wrote: > > For the record, the below command does result in a correctly-working rbt > command. > > rbtools really should become compatible with the pip default options. > > > > On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 2:17:37 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: >> >> That will install the package, but I believe pip still doesn't properly >> register python entry points, which means that rbt won't work right. >> >> -David >> >> On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Edward Delaporte wrote: >> >> For what it's worth, there seems to be a combination of command line >> flags that works as a workaround: >> >> pip install rbtools --allow-external rbtools --allow-unverified rbtools >> >> >> On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 8:03:11 AM UTC-5, Jason Antman wrote: >>> >>> I'm aware that pip is not a supported installation method for >>> ReviewBoard itself. However, I have a number of cases where pip >>> installation is the only method I can do, and I only need access to RBTools >>> for the API client. >>> >>> As of a few months ago, I was able to `pip install RBTools==0.5.2` >>> without a problem, and I have this in a number of requirements.txt files. >>> >>> This morning I tried re-deploying one of the applications that uses >>> this, and got an error from pip saying "No distributions at all found" - >>> there don't seem to be any valid packages on pypi itself, and even having >>> it allow external URLs doesn't seem to work. >>> >>> Is this an intentional change in behavior? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jason >>> >> -- >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> --- >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >> --- >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Some doubts
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:37 AM, wrote: > 1) Do i need to create corresponding users in ReviewBoard for svn users to > see correct commiter name ? > Each user who will be posting code to Review Board will need an account. Usually people either connect to a central authentication system (like ldap or AD), or allow users to register their own accounts. > 2) How can i upload full code for ReviewBoard to manage it ? > I'm not sure what you mean by this. Can you clarify? > 3) Do ReviewBoard contain built-in code quality checks ? > By default, no. There is the Review Bot extension, which can automatically run some static analysis tools (like pep-8 or pyflakes) and post the results as a code review. -David -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Unable to add repository to ReviewBoard
If you run the following command as your web server user, it should offer to save the certificate permanently: svn list https://your.repository.url You could also do this as a normal user and then copy the relevant file from ~/.subversion into the web server user home directory. -David On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:37 AM, wrote: > Hi David, > > Can you please point me to some links where I can get some help in > resolving this issue. I am really pitching my company to buy cloud from > review board, but this can only be done once i am able to give a live demo > on our own code working with review board. > > Thanks > > On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 9:45:23 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: >> >> It looks like you have an invalid SSL certificate on your SVN server. I >> believe that you can add something to the ~/.subversion directory on your >> review board host (within the home directory of the httpd user) to trust >> this certificate, but I'm not sure what that is. Perhaps check the contents >> of a normal user's .subversion directory who is able to use this repository. >> >> -David >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:08 PM, wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Any update? >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 11:38:37 AM UTC+5:30, testin...@gmail.com >>> wrote: Hi David, I am still stuck at above mentioned problem. Please provide me with a resolution Thanks On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 12:36:42 PM UTC+5:30, testin...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi David, > > I have removed subvertpy and installed pysvn. Now on adding URL to > "add repository" page i am getting below mentioned error: > > Unable to connect to a repository at URL ' URL>' Server SSL certificate verification failed: issuer is not trusted > > Please tell what next can I do. > > Thanks > > On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 12:09:24 PM UTC+5:30, > testin...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Sure, >> I will revert back after removing subvertpy and installing pysvn >> >> On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:55:09 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We've seen some people having trouble with subvertpy. Can you try >>> with pysvn? >>> >>> -David >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:01 PM, wrote: >>> Hi David, I am using reviewboard 2.0.8 . It is deployed on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS ... I am using subvertpy. I am working as per installation documentation provided on https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/admin/installati on/linux Please help me resolve this issue. Thanks On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 1:14:21 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: > > What version of Review Board? What OS have you deployed Review > Board on? Are you using the pysvn or subvertpy backend? > > -David > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:27 AM, wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I have a SVN server deployed on Windows 7. I am adding the url of >> the repository to "Add repository" page with username and password. >> >> I am getting below mentioned error: >> >> Unable to connect to a repository at URL ''", >> 230001 >> >> Please look into the issue. >> >> -- >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/pow >> erpack/ >> --- >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: >> https://rbcommons.com/ >> --- >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google Groups "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/pow erpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> --- >>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>> --- >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/
Re: Search review descriptions?
Christian- Thanks for the info. As I mentioned, we're currently on 2.0.7 (probably upgrading to 2.0.9 later this week), but I don't see the commit ID field on the review request. Does it only show if it's populated? And yes, it would be nice to search that field, where do I file the request? Thanks, Stephen On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:49 PM, christ...@beanbaginc.com < christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Descriptions are a lot of text to quickly search for, so we don't search > through them for the quick search box. > > RB 2.0.x has a dedicated field for commit IDs on review requests. We don't > yet search that, but that functionality could be added in a future release, > if you want to either file a report or write a patch. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com > Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org > Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com > > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Bash > Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > > Date: October 22, 2014 at 8:50:37 AM > To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Search review descriptions? > > > Hi all- > > > > We have a Git hook script that posts commits to Review Board when they > are > > pushed to a special repository. The hook script always adds the commit ID > > (SHA) to the review's description, but with RB 2.0.7 typing the first few > > characters of a SHA in the search box doesn't turn up any results. Does > > the RB search not search the description? Or do I maybe have something > > configured wrong? > > > > Thanks, > > Stephen > > > > -- > > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > > --- > > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > > --- > > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "reviewboard" > > group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: mercurial repo configuration
The post-commit UI is only available for GitHub and SVN repositories right now. Support for additional repository types will be coming in later releases, but we don't have a timeline for that. In the meantime, if you want to post existing commits, you can use RBTools to upload the changes. -David On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Angelo Diego Crabolu < angelodiego.crab...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've checked the documentation to setup reviewboard with mercurial but > without much luck, > I've set up my repository path as > http://myhgserver.mydomain.com/myrepository (using it in a web browser on > the same machine I get to the repository listing so I suppose it's correct) > but when i go to http://myreviewboardserver/r/new/ there are no commits > under my repo, > on the same machine I've added a test subversion repository and I see my > commits. > I've already set debug = true in settings_local.py but the only thing I > see in the logs is DEBUG - - Initialized HgWebClient with url=u' > http://myhgserver.mydomain.com, username=u'' > Any guess on how to fix that? > > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: rbtools post with revision range spanning multiple branches
You can use the -I parameter to give only the directory (branches/X) that you want to include. -David On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Michelle Avery wrote: > I'm trying to implement a post-commit review approach using a post-commit > hook for subversion, and I'm not sure if the problem I'm running into is > due to a configuration error, or an error in my understanding of how > rbtools works. I'm trying to find a solution for the following scenario: > > I have a branch where I'm working on a new feature. At the end of my work > day, I'm not yet finished, but I commit anyway so that I can be sure not to > lose my work. At this point, my subversion repository is at revision 1000. > A co-worker, working on a different branch, makes a commit, bringing the > repository revision to 1001. > The next day, I finish up what I'm working on and make my final commit, > bringing the repository to revision 1002. I would like to submit a review > request for revision 1000-1002, but only for my branch. > > I thought I could use the --basedir parameter to specify specify my branch > in order to make this work, but despite the fact that my script is > correctly parsing out the revision and the basedir, the diff generated > includes changes in both branches. Any pointers? > > Thanks, > > Michelle Avery > > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Search review descriptions?
Hi Stephen, Descriptions are a lot of text to quickly search for, so we don't search through them for the quick search box. RB 2.0.x has a dedicated field for commit IDs on review requests. We don't yet search that, but that functionality could be added in a future release, if you want to either file a report or write a patch. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Stephen Bash Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > Date: October 22, 2014 at 8:50:37 AM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > Subject: Search review descriptions? > Hi all- > > We have a Git hook script that posts commits to Review Board when they are > pushed to a special repository. The hook script always adds the commit ID > (SHA) to the review's description, but with RB 2.0.7 typing the first few > characters of a SHA in the search box doesn't turn up any results. Does > the RB search not search the description? Or do I maybe have something > configured wrong? > > Thanks, > Stephen > > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" > group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: auto-complete for reviewer/people field
Ah, perfect timing! I was just about to file a bug. On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:23:51 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote: > > This was fixed in 2.0.9 > > -David > > On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:10 AM, David Carson > wrote: > > Well, since no one has responded to this, I will go ahead and open an > issue (assuming there is not one already). This is a bug as far as I'm > concerned. > > On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:44:45 PM UTC-4, David Carson wrote: >> >> Not sure if this should be considered a bug, but certainly not what I >> would expect. >> >> In order to add a reviewer to a request, I can start typing the username, >> or I can start typing the full name. This is great so far. If I start >> typing "Dav" I get three matches (two Dave and one David). >> >> However, it seems to me to be impossible to use or or >> anything else to actually cause one of these matches to be auto-filled in >> the field. The only way the field gets auto-filled is if I am typing the >> actual username when I attempt the auto-completion. Maybe I'm missing >> something? >> >> Moreover, the same is true if the case does not match. We have one group >> defined so far, which is an all-uppercase acronym. If I start typing the >> group in the group reviewer field using lowercase letters, it finds the >> group and tells me to press to auto-complete. When I press , it >> does not auto-complete. >> >> It seems like, if the matching occurs using either username or fullname, >> and if the matching occurs using either the exact case or not, then the >> tab should grab that match and fill in the appropriate username/groupname. >> Is this a bug? Should I open an issue? >> >> Running RB 2.0.8, CentOS 7.0, Chrome browser. >> > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
mercurial repo configuration
I've checked the documentation to setup reviewboard with mercurial but without much luck, I've set up my repository path as http://myhgserver.mydomain.com/myrepository (using it in a web browser on the same machine I get to the repository listing so I suppose it's correct) but when i go to http://myreviewboardserver/r/new/ there are no commits under my repo, on the same machine I've added a test subversion repository and I see my commits. I've already set debug = true in settings_local.py but the only thing I see in the logs is DEBUG - - Initialized HgWebClient with url=u'http://myhgserver.mydomain.com, username=u'' Any guess on how to fix that? -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to make RBTools to use certificate-based SSL authntication?
I have the same problem. does somebody have an answer ? On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 23:49:05 UTC+2, Andrey Kulikov wrote: > > Hello, > > My review board installed behind reverse-proxy with certificate-based SSL > authentication. > I would like to use RBTools to post review-request. > > As expected, any rbt command end up with > > ERROR: Unexpected API Error: HTTP 400 > > Is there any configuration option, which could make possible to use it > with certificate-based SSL authentication? > > If it is not possible (at the moment), may be it can be done on underlying > level? (for python globally, or something like this) > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: auto-complete for reviewer/people field
This was fixed in 2.0.9 -David > On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:10 AM, David Carson wrote: > > Well, since no one has responded to this, I will go ahead and open an issue > (assuming there is not one already). This is a bug as far as I'm concerned. > >> On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:44:45 PM UTC-4, David Carson wrote: >> Not sure if this should be considered a bug, but certainly not what I would >> expect. >> >> In order to add a reviewer to a request, I can start typing the username, or >> I can start typing the full name. This is great so far. If I start typing >> "Dav" I get three matches (two Dave and one David). >> >> However, it seems to me to be impossible to use or or anything >> else to actually cause one of these matches to be auto-filled in the field. >> The only way the field gets auto-filled is if I am typing the actual >> username when I attempt the auto-completion. Maybe I'm missing something? >> >> Moreover, the same is true if the case does not match. We have one group >> defined so far, which is an all-uppercase acronym. If I start typing the >> group in the group reviewer field using lowercase letters, it finds the >> group and tells me to press to auto-complete. When I press , it >> does not auto-complete. >> >> It seems like, if the matching occurs using either username or fullname, and >> if the matching occurs using either the exact case or not, then the tab >> should grab that match and fill in the appropriate username/groupname. Is >> this a bug? Should I open an issue? >> >> Running RB 2.0.8, CentOS 7.0, Chrome browser. > > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: auto-complete for reviewer/people field
Well, since no one has responded to this, I will go ahead and open an issue (assuming there is not one already). This is a bug as far as I'm concerned. On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:44:45 PM UTC-4, David Carson wrote: > > Not sure if this should be considered a bug, but certainly not what I > would expect. > > In order to add a reviewer to a request, I can start typing the username, > or I can start typing the full name. This is great so far. If I start > typing "Dav" I get three matches (two Dave and one David). > > However, it seems to me to be impossible to use or or > anything else to actually cause one of these matches to be auto-filled in > the field. The only way the field gets auto-filled is if I am typing the > actual username when I attempt the auto-completion. Maybe I'm missing > something? > > Moreover, the same is true if the case does not match. We have one group > defined so far, which is an all-uppercase acronym. If I start typing the > group in the group reviewer field using lowercase letters, it finds the > group and tells me to press to auto-complete. When I press , it > does not auto-complete. > > It seems like, if the matching occurs using either username or fullname, > and if the matching occurs using either the exact case or not, then the > tab should grab that match and fill in the appropriate username/groupname. > Is this a bug? Should I open an issue? > > Running RB 2.0.8, CentOS 7.0, Chrome browser. > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Search review descriptions?
Hi all- We have a Git hook script that posts commits to Review Board when they are pushed to a special repository. The hook script always adds the commit ID (SHA) to the review's description, but with RB 2.0.7 typing the first few characters of a SHA in the search box doesn't turn up any results. Does the RB search not search the description? Or do I maybe have something configured wrong? Thanks, Stephen -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Review Board 2.0.9 is released!
Hi everyone, We just put out a release of Review Board 2.0.9. This has a number of bug fixes for things like auto-complete, issue counters in the dashboard, dynamic cache settings, and more. Also, performance enhancements for the API and text entry fields, better security defaults, text copying improvements in the diff viewer, and an option to turn off mailing yourself on actions you perform. Check out the news post for some more info, and make sure to read the release notes! https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2014/10/22/review-board-2-0-9-released/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
