Issue 3835 in reviewboard: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' in reviewboard\admin\views.py, line 39

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3835 by der.se...@gmail.com: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' in reviewboard\admin\views.py, line 39 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3835 What version are you running?

Re: Issue 1125 in reviewboard: server port number is missing in review request email

Comment #11 on issue 1125 by dell...@gmail.com: server port number is missing in review request email https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1125 See issue, running 2.0.11. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to

Re: Can I create a new user in reviewboard using the Python Web API?

Okay, makes sense. I can work around that. Is there support for adding a perforce repository via the API? That's the only other piece I need to automate my tests. Thanks --Steve On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 6:41:32 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Steve, There's no support in the

Issue 3834 in reviewboard: Support SlikSVN version on Windows environment

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3834 by dumont@gmail.com: Support SlikSVN version on Windows environment https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3834 *** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *** If you

Issue 3836 in reviewboard: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3836 by vlov...@gmail.com: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module

Re: Issue 3836 in reviewboard: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module

Comment #2 on issue 3836 by vlov...@gmail.com: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3836

Re: Issue 3836 in reviewboard: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module

Comment #1 on issue 3836 by vlov...@gmail.com: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3836 djblets is at version 0.8.18 -- You

Re: RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

On a new Ubuntu 14.04 installation I am seeing something similar: (We are testing 14.04 before wider rollout.) Running: svn info --non-interactive Running: diff --version Running: svn --version -q repository info: Path: http://REVIEWBOARD_URL/NAME, Base path: PATH TO CHANGES, Supports

Re: Can I create a new user in reviewboard using the Python Web API?

Adding a repo turned out to be easy: root = client.get_root() root.get_repositories().create(name='perforce', tool=Perforce, path=localhost:1492) I'm all set. Thanks! --Steve On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 7:40:50 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: Okay, makes sense. I can work around that. Is there

Django exception re-indexing site after upgrading to 2.0.15

Hi, I'm hitting https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3836 after upgrading to 2.0.15 trying to do a full index. Any help would be appreciated. Exception pasted below in full for convenience: Removing all documents from your index because you said so. All documents removed.

Re: Django exception re-indexing site after upgrading to 2.0.15

Looks like the problem is that reviewboard 2.0.15 depends on django-haystack = 2.3.1 but that isn't expressed in the requirements. On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 10:12:54 AM UTC-7, Vitali Lovich wrote: Hi, I'm hitting https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3836 after upgrading

CRITICAL: not well-formed (invalid token): line 3, column 28

Hi, we're running two separate linux clusters, both with different versions of rbt, svn, python and linux but both show the same post error: CRITICAL: not well-formed (invalid token): line 3, column 28 This error comes up on any rbt diff or post, and is not a problem with the svn repo as I can

rbt diff object of type 'NoneType' has no len(). RBTools 0.7.2 with svn

Hi, I've used RBTools for several reviews with no problems but I've now encountered a problem with a svn repository where I have moved some files (deleted and added in svn) I'm running RBTools 0.7.2 and svn version 1.7.18 basic error is: rbt diff 12192 12208 CRITICAL: object of type 'NoneType'

limiting users to PowerPack (trial)

Hi. I'm installing the ReviewBoardPowerPack to do some experimenting with it. However, I don't want its features to be generally available just yet. When I click on manage licensed users in the configure form, it tells me that my (trial) license allows for unlimited users. Is there any way I

Re: Issue 3836 in reviewboard: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module

Comment #3 on issue 3836 by vlov...@gmail.com: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3836 Found the issue: django-haystack

Re: Django exception re-indexing site after upgrading to 2.0.15

Hi Vitali, I've been running this against Haystack 2.1 without problems. What about 2.3.1 fixed it? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Vitali Lovich

Re: limiting users to PowerPack (trial)

Hi David, A Power Pack trial is generally set up to allow anyone on the server to try it out. This is good feedback though, and we'll look into adding some limiting capabilities for trials. For now, send us an email at supp...@beanbaginc.com with your install key and I'll get you a special

Re: RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

Hey Dan, Would you be able to provide us with the raw contents of that svn diff command? We need some test data to help us repro the problem. Assuming this is confidential data, you can send that attachment along to supp...@beanbaginc.com (though we'll still discuss the issue here). Thanks! -

Re: Issue 3836 in reviewboard: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is missing a models.py module

Updates: Status: PendingReview Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: Milestone-Release2.0.x Component-Search Comment #4 on issue 3836 by chip...@gmail.com: Full index after upgrade to 2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with label djblets is

Re: Issue 3834 in reviewboard: Support SlikSVN version on Windows environment

Comment #1 on issue 3834 by griffin@gmail.com: Support SlikSVN version on Windows environment https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3834 I've posted a patch for review at https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/7182/ -- You received this message because this project is

Re: rbt diff object of type 'NoneType' has no len(). RBTools 0.7.2 with svn

I've posted a patch for review at https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/7183/ which should resolve this issue. On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 2:18:43 PM UTC-4, Richard Parks wrote: Hi, I've used RBTools for several reviews with no problems but I've now encountered a problem with a svn repository

Re: rbt diff object of type 'NoneType' has no len(). RBTools 0.7.2 with svn

Hey all, Griffin’s patch has landed on the release-0.7.x and master branches as commit 3afaf5dbf66c57e837a6521bb83ea712682817c5. This patch will be included in the next minor RBTools release (RBTools 0.7.3). Regards, Barret Rennie -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: