Issue 3854 in reviewboard: Bug links only work immediately after editing a review description
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3854 by davefid...@gmail.com: Bug links only work immediately after editing a review description https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3854 What version are you running? 2.0.15 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? Any review page e.g. http://reviews/r/24090/ What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create a review 2. Ensure that the Description contains a reference to a bugzilla bug such as bug 12345 3. Press OK 4. Observe that the text bug 12345 is rendered as a link to the repository bugzilla URL 5. Refresh the page or view as another user What is the expected output? The text bug 12345 remains rendered as a link to the repository bugzilla. What do you see instead? The text bug 12345 is not a hyperlink any more. What operating system are you using? What browser? Debian Squeeze, python easy_install Problem occurs on Firefox, Chrome and IE Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [question] python-dateutil version
dateutil broke compatibility after 1.5, so Review Board had to lock it to a known-good version. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:30 AM Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm working on porting ReviewBoard 2.x on FreeBSD system. Today I've faced problem with versioning of python-dateutil. According to setup.py, RB requires dateutil ver.1.5 (exact), but actual version (with Py2 support) is 2.4.2. My question is: is there any (hidden) reason to have exact version 1.5? AFAIK dateutil support Python 2.7 with versions 1.5 2.2+ Thank you in advance, Michael. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Problems upgrading to 2.0.13 and 2.0.15
That fixed it. Many Thanks! On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:05:03 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Daniel, Sorry, I've been pretty swamped. First, make a backup of your database. Then, try: DELETE FROM django_project_version WHERE id=4; Then perform the upgrade again. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Daniel Dominguez daniel.j@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Any update here? On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 1:29:07 PM UTC-7, Daniel Dominguez wrote: Running --hint --evolve had not been done before. It was just my experimenting after seeing this issue (with a current backup of the db first of course). Anyhow, I've attached the sql dump you requested. Thanks! On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 8:28:36 AM UTC-7, Daniel Dominguez wrote: When I performed the upgrade form 2.0.12 to 2.0.13, the site-upgrade failed. It didn't seem to break our reviewboard instance, so I just ignored it at the time. I recently upgraded to 2.0.15, and the result is the same. Again, our reviewboard server seems to be fine, but this is starting to make me nervous. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes required. The following are the changes that could not be resolved: In model reviews.ReviewRequest: Field 'description_rich_text' has been added Field 'testing_done_rich_text' has been added In model reviews.Review: Field 'body_top_rich_text' has been added Field 'body_bottom_rich_text' has been added In model reviews.ReviewRequestDraft: Field 'description_rich_text' has been added Field 'testing_done_rich_text' has been added In model accounts.Profile: Field 'default_use_rich_text' has been added CommandError: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve automatically. I've trying running evolve -- --hint --execute, but that fails with the following CommandError: Error applying evolution: (1060, Duplicate column name 'default_use_rich_text') I've checked that I have the latest django_evolution installed for my platform (0.7.4). This is running on a MySql database. It seems like the evolution is trying to add columns that already exist. Maybe a version table didn't get incremented in the prior evolution? Any hints on how I can troubleshoot this? -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: New comment moderation in effect
Thanks for your reply. :) On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:42 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: How long depends on whether the moderators are asleep. -David On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:11 AM GC varuag.chha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Today i tried posting a query for the first time. This was done around three hours back but i'm yet to see it on the board. Subject line was Command Line tool for Review Board administration. Can anyone please let me know as to how long it generally takes for a post to get approved? Regards, Gaurav On Friday, June 12, 2009 at 3:58:23 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone. As I'm sure you all have seen, we've been getting some spam lately. There was a discussion in an earlier thread about enabling comment moderation, and after thinking it over, I've decided to go ahead and enable this for new users. Existing users who have been approved shouldn't have any trouble posting, but new users may see delays before their first e-mail is sent. I'm going to try recruiting a couple regulars from this mailing list to act as moderators. If you're up for the task, please let me know. Bonus points for people in non-PST timezones. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/mS591c3RLoI/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Command Line tool for Review Board administration
Hi, Does Review Board provides a CLI for administrators? We use Git as our version control system and we receive following requests from time-to-time: Add repository Add user Add reviewers (Not very frequent) Although these operations don’t consume much time, I would like to automate them, if possible. Thanks -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: New comment moderation in effect
Hi, Today i tried posting a query for the first time. This was done around three hours back but i'm yet to see it on the board. Subject line was Command Line tool for Review Board administration. Can anyone please let me know as to how long it generally takes for a post to get approved? Regards, Gaurav On Friday, June 12, 2009 at 3:58:23 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone. As I'm sure you all have seen, we've been getting some spam lately. There was a discussion in an earlier thread about enabling comment moderation, and after thinking it over, I've decided to go ahead and enable this for new users. Existing users who have been approved shouldn't have any trouble posting, but new users may see delays before their first e-mail is sent. I'm going to try recruiting a couple regulars from this mailing list to act as moderators. If you're up for the task, please let me know. Bonus points for people in non-PST timezones. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: New comment moderation in effect
How long depends on whether the moderators are asleep. -David On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:11 AM GC varuag.chha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Today i tried posting a query for the first time. This was done around three hours back but i'm yet to see it on the board. Subject line was Command Line tool for Review Board administration. Can anyone please let me know as to how long it generally takes for a post to get approved? Regards, Gaurav On Friday, June 12, 2009 at 3:58:23 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone. As I'm sure you all have seen, we've been getting some spam lately. There was a discussion in an earlier thread about enabling comment moderation, and after thinking it over, I've decided to go ahead and enable this for new users. Existing users who have been approved shouldn't have any trouble posting, but new users may see delays before their first e-mail is sent. I'm going to try recruiting a couple regulars from this mailing list to act as moderators. If you're up for the task, please let me know. Bonus points for people in non-PST timezones. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request
Actually, maybe I should be testing out 2.5 anyway. I think I'll give that a try first. --steve On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 2:53:10 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: Will do. Thanks! On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:22:32 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: Would you mind filing a bug on our issue tracker? Thanks, -David On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM Steve seide...@gmail.com wrote: Oops, sorry for forgetting that. Review Board 2.0.15 RBTools 0.7.2 --steve On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:22:17 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: What version of Review Board and RBTools are you running? -David On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:11 PM Steve seide...@gmail.com wrote: Looking further into this, it appears that when I run rbt post -r 3 CL commit_id for RR 3 gets updated with the new cl number, but changenum does not. The docs say that changenum is being deprecated in favor of commit_id, but from what I can see, it's the value in changenum that is being displayed in the review web page. Is it just me, or are others seeing the same behavior? --Steve On Monday, April 20, 2015 at 2:40:42 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: I've noticed that when I post diffs from a new change list to an existing review request using the -r option that the change list number is not updated in the review. I think the review request should update the change list since that's the CL that reflects the current set of diffs, but there may be good reasons to not update it. So I guess my question is, is this a bug or a feature? Since we use perforce, one of the consequences of not updating it is that when the change list is submitted, it won't get automatically updated in the review request with the actual submitted change list number, because the number in the review is not the one that was submitted. I hope that wasn't as confusing as it sounds. Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: What is the correct approach when attempting to add multiple pre-commit diff files? (Multiple Parent Diffs)
So I wasn't using RBTools but I figured I'd try it first to see a working solution with rbt rather than using the web interface. After installing and invoking `rbt`, the first commit of ten (10) created my first review for me. As soon as I try performing an `rbt posh full_commit_index` on the second or greater commits they fail. The specific error for my case was: $ rbt post 2c6346ea50d25a974f4819a372f252d34d35d0da ERROR: Error validating diff my_file: The file was not found in the repository. I assume this is a valid error message since the file is created in the first commit and ReviewBoard cannot interpret the parent state of the newer commit(s). After looking at the documentation, I don't see a way to provide a list of local parent commits which ReviewBoard can interpret the chain of changes. I assume the only work around I can do is actually push up the changes on the remote on a branch (something I wanted to avoid) and reference the branch in rbt's `--parent` parameter when generating a review for each pending commit. On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 2:37:30 PM UTC-4, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 09:07 -0700, James Knight wrote: I have the following scenario, I have a remote Git repository (powered by GitLab) configured and working as expected with ReviewBoard (2.0.15). In my local repository (cloned), I have a series of ten (10) commits I'm about to push to the origin. Before I do this, I generate a (full indexed; unified) patch for the respective commits and I want to put them into ReviewBoard. Uploading the patches, I proceed as follows: 1. Make a new review. Select the first patch and upload to ReviewBoard. The review is created. 2. Make a second review. Select the second patch and attempt to upload to ReviewBoard. ReviewBoard complains the parent hash doesn't exist. I then upload my second patch with my first patch as a parent diff. The review is created. 3. Attempt to make a third review. Select the third patch to upload but find no way to upload since I cannot complete the parent chain of diffs. Full stop. The exact error message is as follows: The file file (revision hash) was not found in the repository Is there a way I can append multiple parent diff's for a review? My attempts were to merge append patch 1 and 2 together, with no luck. Or, am I attempting to use ReviewBoard in an incorrect way? The only work around I see is waiting until I commit the new patches into the remote repository before adding the other patches, for example: 1. Add patches 1 and 2 to respective reviews. 2. Reviews approved and patches committed. 3. Add patches 3 and 4 to respective reviews. 4. Reviews approved and patches committed. 5. ~keep repeating until final patch is committed~ Any help would be appreciated. Try doing this: rbt post commit_id One at a time, from the oldest to the newest. Use *exactly* the commit ID as shown by 'git log'. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request
Will do. Thanks! On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:22:32 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: Would you mind filing a bug on our issue tracker? Thanks, -David On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM Steve seide...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Oops, sorry for forgetting that. Review Board 2.0.15 RBTools 0.7.2 --steve On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:22:17 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: What version of Review Board and RBTools are you running? -David On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:11 PM Steve seide...@gmail.com wrote: Looking further into this, it appears that when I run rbt post -r 3 CL commit_id for RR 3 gets updated with the new cl number, but changenum does not. The docs say that changenum is being deprecated in favor of commit_id, but from what I can see, it's the value in changenum that is being displayed in the review web page. Is it just me, or are others seeing the same behavior? --Steve On Monday, April 20, 2015 at 2:40:42 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: I've noticed that when I post diffs from a new change list to an existing review request using the -r option that the change list number is not updated in the review. I think the review request should update the change list since that's the CL that reflects the current set of diffs, but there may be good reasons to not update it. So I guess my question is, is this a bug or a feature? Since we use perforce, one of the consequences of not updating it is that when the change list is submitted, it won't get automatically updated in the review request with the actual submitted change list number, because the number in the review is not the one that was submitted. I hope that wasn't as confusing as it sounds. Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: What is the correct approach when attempting to add multiple pre-commit diff files? (Multiple Parent Diffs)
How have you configured the repository on Review Board? -David On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:50 PM James Knight james.d.kni...@live.com wrote: So I wasn't using RBTools but I figured I'd try it first to see a working solution with rbt rather than using the web interface. After installing and invoking `rbt`, the first commit of ten (10) created my first review for me. As soon as I try performing an `rbt posh full_commit_index` on the second or greater commits they fail. The specific error for my case was: $ rbt post 2c6346ea50d25a974f4819a372f252d34d35d0da ERROR: Error validating diff my_file: The file was not found in the repository. I assume this is a valid error message since the file is created in the first commit and ReviewBoard cannot interpret the parent state of the newer commit(s). After looking at the documentation, I don't see a way to provide a list of local parent commits which ReviewBoard can interpret the chain of changes. I assume the only work around I can do is actually push up the changes on the remote on a branch (something I wanted to avoid) and reference the branch in rbt's `--parent` parameter when generating a review for each pending commit. On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 2:37:30 PM UTC-4, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 09:07 -0700, James Knight wrote: I have the following scenario, I have a remote Git repository (powered by GitLab) configured and working as expected with ReviewBoard (2.0.15). In my local repository (cloned), I have a series of ten (10) commits I'm about to push to the origin. Before I do this, I generate a (full indexed; unified) patch for the respective commits and I want to put them into ReviewBoard. Uploading the patches, I proceed as follows: 1. Make a new review. Select the first patch and upload to ReviewBoard. The review is created. 2. Make a second review. Select the second patch and attempt to upload to ReviewBoard. ReviewBoard complains the parent hash doesn't exist. I then upload my second patch with my first patch as a parent diff. The review is created. 3. Attempt to make a third review. Select the third patch to upload but find no way to upload since I cannot complete the parent chain of diffs. Full stop. The exact error message is as follows: The file file (revision hash) was not found in the repository Is there a way I can append multiple parent diff's for a review? My attempts were to merge append patch 1 and 2 together, with no luck. Or, am I attempting to use ReviewBoard in an incorrect way? The only work around I see is waiting until I commit the new patches into the remote repository before adding the other patches, for example: 1. Add patches 1 and 2 to respective reviews. 2. Reviews approved and patches committed. 3. Add patches 3 and 4 to respective reviews. 4. Reviews approved and patches committed. 5. ~keep repeating until final patch is committed~ Any help would be appreciated. Try doing this: rbt post commit_id One at a time, from the oldest to the newest. Use *exactly* the commit ID as shown by 'git log'. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Command Line tool for Review Board administration
Hi, We don't provide a tool for adding those (though that'd be a handy project for someone to work on). We do have an API, though, for adding/manipulating repositories, default reviewers, review requests, and just about anything else. It does not support adding users, though. Most people use an LDAP or Active Directory server when they need that kind of ability. That said, I'm not opposed to adding that functionality, but it'd be low on our todo list, so the best way to get that into the product is by writing a patch and contributing it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:04 AM, GC varuag.chha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does Review Board provides a CLI for administrators? We use Git as our version control system and we receive following requests from time-to-time: Add repository Add user Add reviewers (Not very frequent) Although these operations don’t consume much time, I would like to automate them, if possible. Thanks -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Not able to find a function
Hi there, Hello; Definitions for these functions don’t actually exist. The Resource class (defined in rbtools.api.resource) generates these functions at run time from the JSON returned by the Review Board web API. Each returned JSON response has a “links” field, which contains a a JSON object mapping names to URLs and metadata. Each resource name in the links field (e.g. diffs) has a get_resource_name (e.g., get_diffs) method created. If you look at resource.py:150, you can see the logic where it iterates through the links and generates lambdas. The create function is similar, but we have a special function _create (resource.py:31) that handles adding keyword args to the http request and sends it. I hope this answers your questions. Barret Rennie On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:19 PM, XYZ karthikut...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to understand the integration of perforce repository with review board. I am stuck at one point, i am not able to find the implementation of a particular function. Can someone please explain how this function call works: In rbtools\command\post.py file, within post_request function : review_request = api_root.get_review_requests().create(**request_data) Where are these functions? get_review_requests() create() Similarly, further down : review_request.get_diffs().upload_diff(diff_content,**diff_kwargs) where is get_diffs() method ? Tnx -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[question] python-dateutil version
Hi, I'm working on porting ReviewBoard 2.x on FreeBSD system. Today I've faced problem with versioning of python-dateutil. According to setup.py, RB requires dateutil ver.1.5 (exact), but actual version (with Py2 support) is 2.4.2. My question is: is there any (hidden) reason to have exact version 1.5? AFAIK dateutil support Python 2.7 with versions 1.5 2.2+ Thank you in advance, Michael. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
