Re: Can I send full diffs when publishing the review?

the size of the email and truncate after that but I realize that may be additional work. It does seem like having templates or the ability to customize each email would make this easy to customize. Thanks! On May 14, 1:11 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Jon, Including the full diff

Re: Can I send full diffs when publishing the review?

Thanks Christian! Keep up with good work with 1.5 it's working really well. On May 17, 5:24 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Jon. I agree that it could be nice on some setups. We might be able to do something down the road for this but not immediately. As for customization

starting review #

commit messages. I see that reviews_review.id is auto_increment. I know that I can do: ALTER TABLE reviews_review AUTO_INCREMENT = 100;, but I also see a 'review_request_id' column. What is that used for? Do you see any other issues with this approach? thanks, jon -- Want to help the Review Board

getting search to work with 1.5 and pylucene

I have RB 1.5 final. I have tried pylucene 3.0.2-1 (which is suggested by the rb docs as being the 'latest' version) I also tried 2.9.3-1 None of these worked. Nothing in the logs. Just a 500 error. I finally got 2.4.1-1 installed and it works. In the configuration, give it the path to the

problem submitting a diff when directories have been renamed using svn mv

thoughts? jon svn info diff --version repository info: Path: http://svn.mycompany.com/marin, Base path: /branches/iteration-0004, Supports changesets: False svn propget reviewboard:url /Users/jon/checkout/branches/iteration-0004 svn diff --diff-cmd=diff svn info billing/bin/daily.sh svn

Installation of a review board site(wsgi) not in root.

Hi, I have an ubuntu machine with an apache server running on it. I have two virtual hosts(bugzilla v4.0 and review board v1.6) they are currently separated by the Server name. Short description of the problem: I want to change the review board conf file(in the sites-available folder) so it would

Re: reviewboard 1.6.1 with wsgi

Yes, I am encountering similar problems. I opened a thread but no one replied. I would love to get a working configuration that will allow me to set up review board as a non root site. On Oct 11, 11:59 am, Rohini Kumar Tharigonda rok...@gmail.com wrote: I am still having the same problem. Any

Using post-review.exe

Hi, I finished setting up reviewboard and I wrote a script to use the post- review.exe I encountered problems so I executed the exe manually with the following command in the related branch directory: Post-Review.exe --server=http://ip-address/reviews/ -- username=super-user

Post-Review fails from within script

I have one installation of reviewboard in my laptop(testing) and another in my workplace. When running the script in my laptop it runs without any problems. When running the script in my workplace the script produce the following error: RBTools 0.3.4 Home = C:\Users\my-username\AppData\Roaming

Re: starting review #

the ideal route. cheers, jon On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Jon, Your plan to use ALTER TABLE should work. review_request_id just holds the current ID. That's what should be auto_increment. I think so long as you do that, you'll see the review

Re: starting review #

I'm inheriting this installation so I'm not entirely sure of it's history. I believe that it was essentially a checkout of the source code at some point at least a couple years ago and has never been upgraded. jon On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote

Re: starting review #

Lol. That confirms my suspicions. No worries, we are fine just mothballing the old release and I'll set the review number to be n+1. Thanks for the help! Jon On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: In that case, an upgrade could potentially be tricky... Yeah

Re: starting review #

a couple things to get the right autoincrement, but it has been working great. jon On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:42 PM, mxbraun matthew.br...@intel.com wrote: Jon, Did this really do what you wanted? I find myself in much the same situation, of having an ancient RB implementation in use, setting up

Re: starting review #

://www.vmware.com On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:42 PM, mxbraun matthew.br...@intel.com wrote: Jon, Did this really do what you wanted? I find myself in much the same situation, of having an ancient RB implementation in use, setting up a more modern one, and the prospect of either keeping the old one

Re: problem submitting a diff when directories have been renamed using svn mv

Sure, as soon as google code is fixed. ;-) It's down for me... they've been having a lot of stability issues recently. =( jon On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: I think there's likely a problem due to the diff indicating a change to an existing

Re: Review Board Ticket #4194: Include real line numbers for diff comments in API, webhook payloads

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4194/ -- New update by pawolf For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4194

Review Board Ticket #4923: webhooks send duplicate Content-Length headers under python3

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4923/ -- New ticket #4923 by nuxi For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New Tags: