Ideally we'd like to use the security profile for the NIST 800-171. Yes,
this is for a security *need *and not some whimsical desire for security.
For all new installs, that's what we're going with. That includes a certain
required level of encryption. Reviewboard as is uses hashlibs.md5, and
>
> Alfred
>
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 17:31, Zachary Gallagher <zachary.gallag...@remcom.com>
> wrote:
>
> Rather than update the entire OS, I'd like to install python 2.7 on
> CentOS6. Now, so far as I am aware, there's no method for installing python
> over the sy
t;
> Alfred
>
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 17:31, Zachary Gallagher <zachary@remcom.com
> > wrote:
>
> Rather than update the entire OS, I'd like to install python 2.7 on
> CentOS6. Now, so far as I am aware, there's no method for installing python
> over the system version
the 500 error?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.comjavascript:
wrote:
*[root@mercury html]# rb-site
are you
seeing in the log files (reviewboard.log or apache's error_log) when you
see the 500 error?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Zachary
wrote:
Looks like something was stuck. Bad session data in the database or in a
cookie, I'm guessing, judging by the load error. Glad it's working now!
Christian
On Monday, April 7, 2014, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.comjavascript:
wrote:
Huh... Nevermind.
I mean, if you're
*[root@mercury html]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/html/reviewboard*
*Rebuilding directory structure*
*Updating database. This may take a while.*
*The log output below, including warnings and errors,*
*can be ignored unless upgrade fails.*
*-- begin log output --*
I've made it farther now than I have ever before. But I'm still running
into one last issue. (Maybe two.)
First, background information. Hopefully this makes more sense. I'm
learning Subversion as I do all this. C'est la vie.
The .reviewboardrc file reads as
REVIEWBOARD_URL =
There is obviously some sort of credential mismatch. But there is no
indication as to what credentials it's using on what. I don't know what is
being mismatched. And I don't know how to find out.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review
a problem with the credentials on the reviewboard
side, not rbtools. Can you check that those are correct, and if they are,
check the reviewboard log file for any more interesting errors?
-David
On Jan 15, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.comjavascript:
wrote:
I
I can log in with
gallagher
password
But I can't run *rbt post* with it.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
in the repository configuration in the reviewboard admin.
-David
On Jan 15, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.comjavascript:
wrote:
I can log in with
gallagher
password
But I can't run *rbt post* with it.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http
-.-
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:57:25 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.com javascript: wrote:
Also, if I navigate to http://*ReviewBoardServer*/api/repositories, I
get this. Yet there are 5 repositories listed
repository,
and not a directory inside it.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.comjavascript:
wrote
And there is confusion at all because I haven't been the sysadmin for a
software company for long, the programmers use the term for both, and when
I once asked which was which I was met with a shrug and iunno.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:23:30 PM UTC-5, Zachary Gallagher wrote
And the confusion in the first place exists because I haven't been the
sysadmin for a software company for long, the programmers use the term for
both, and when I once asked which it was I was met with a shrug and iunno.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
, since they'll still be in the
database, but RBTools won't look at them anymore.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Zachary Gallagher
. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.com javascript: wrote:
I navigate to a subversion checkout. I run rbt setup-repo --debug. This
is what I get.
There are four repositories linked on our reviewboard server, but they're
That being said, http://ReviewBoardServer/api/repositories *is* empty. And
I am given the impression that it shouldn't be. Was this something that was
dropped. I'm using RB 1.7.16.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting
.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.com javascript: wrote:
I navigate to a subversion checkout. I run rbt setup-repo --debug. This
is what I get
. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Zachary Gallagher
zachary@remcom.com javascript: wrote:
Also, and I feel I may be abusing this opportunity to ask a third
question:
Is there still a problem I should expect if a single server is hosting
multiple svn
21 matches
Mail list logo
