Re: Is Review Board mostly useful in offline code review?
This is how we started using reviewboard: we would use it more as meeting notes during a conference room code review. We progressed through that by everyone reviewing the code and leaving notes, then meeting in the conference room to go over them, but dropped the face to face part shortly afterwards. Reviewboard just makes it unneccessary. but to answer your question, it works pretty well for face to face reviews. --Jeff On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Nelson Jones huawen@gmail.com wrote: Is it overkill if used for meeting type code review (face to face code review)? Any comments? Thanks -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Installing ReviewBoard in Ubuntu 10.04
You've tried following the steps here? http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/ http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/I don't know that there's anything different enough in Ubuntu 10.4 that would make these instructions not work. --Jeff On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Rajat Khandelwal rajatgupt...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all I wanted to install review board in my ubuntu 10.04 and as there are no good tutorials about that, I am unable to do that. Please help me in this. Thanks. -- Rajat Khandelwal SD 39 Satpura Hostel B.Tech. Comp. Sc. Engg. 2nd year IIT Delhi -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Multiple diffs in the same review request
How is this different from the update diff option that's currently there? On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Andrew aschwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys. I've been playing with the multiple revisions support in ReviewBoard. I was wondering what people think about these two suggestions: 1. It would be nice to be able to compose changesets. For instance, if I have one changeset under review, it then gets reviewed, then I post a second changeset that is based on the first changeset, it would be neat to be able to see the diff from pre-first diff to post-second diff. I understand that currently, it is possible to see the diff from post-first diff to post-second diff. 2. Given that #1 is not currently a feature, I am instructing all of my users to update review requests with changesets that are based on the same initial revision. This way, the reviewer can see what's new in the second revision, as well as the full second revision. I'm wondering whether it would be worth optionally enforcing this as a feature, or warning the user if the different revisions have different parents. My question #2 may be related to my other question at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/aefd7a770dca771a Thanks. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: What does ship it and starred review request mean?
We use Ship it is a marker from the reviewers that they believe the code is ready to be committed (shipping the changed code, as in to customers) Some times the reviewer will want the original author to make the changes, and re-post the code (if the changes are sufficiently minor, we normally skip this step, and list changes but mark the review ship it) The stars I don't use too much, but I believe they're like the stars in Gmail, In this case they mark a review you may want to check back on for some reason. --Jeff 2010/1/21 qhlonline qhlonl...@163.com Hi, all. I am not quite catch what does the reviews label ship it and star mean. What does these used to do and how to use them in practice? can any one give me some suggestion? And In my understanding, I think ship it can lable a review as critical or urgent to other reviewers. Is that true? if not, how to label ureng review request or reviews ? Best Regards! -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Love Dont Cost a Thing clip
I thought these were moderated now? On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Press Centre sybleheb...@gmail.com wrote: Love Don't Cost a Thing clip special edition with Naked Jennifer Lopez! Just look! http://duuit.com/-jenifer -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error 500 Logging on New Review Request
I don't remember exactly how to set I up, but there's an additional logging switch in reviewboard, I don't know if it'll help, but I know christian has mentioned it a few times. You can check the list archive for how to set this, or christian normally responds about 1pm PDT. Hth, --Original Message-- From: David Kent Sender: reviewboard@googlegroups.com To: reviewboard ReplyTo: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Error 500 Logging on New Review Request Sent: Aug 3, 2009 11:03 AM I've just installed ReviewBoard and after i set up a repository (subversion) and attempt to create a New Review Request it gives me the Error 500 page. I can't find *any* logging of what happened. Does anyone have ideas for how I can at least get logging information? I'm totally blind as to what the problem is without some sort of log. -David --Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Error 500 Logging on New Review Request
Hmmm, sounds like it's probably something in your web server install... We might be getting beyond me, but can you describe you environment? Send a copy of your (sanitized) config file? --Jeff -Original Message- From: David Kent dgk...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:28:26 To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Error 500 Logging on New Review Request Thanks Jeff, but I believe I've already done that. To provide a bit more context, here is where I've looked and what I've tried: 1 - Looked in error.log and access.log of Apache. I've seen nothing in error.log and only the following in access.log: 10.52.53.39 - - [03/Aug/2009:12:56:13 -0500] GET /r/new/ HTTP/1.1 500 526 2 - Enabled application logging in ReviewBoard using the option in the admin section under Settings - Logging and pointed it to log in C:\ReviewBoard\logs. After doing this I only see the following in the logfile: 2009-08-03 12:01:32,937 - INFO - Logging to C:\ReviewBoard\logs\reviewboard.log with a minimum level of DEBUG 2009-08-03 12:01:32,937 - INFO - Log file for Review Board v1.0 3. I've tried logging with and without code profiling. Neither seems to do anything. -David On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Jeff Andros j...@bigredtj.com wrote: I don't remember exactly how to set I up, but there's an additional logging switch in reviewboard, I don't know if it'll help, but I know christian has mentioned it a few times. You can check the list archive for how to set this, or christian normally responds about 1pm PDT. Hth, --Original Message-- From: David Kent Sender: reviewboard@googlegroups.com To: reviewboard ReplyTo: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Error 500 Logging on New Review Request Sent: Aug 3, 2009 11:03 AM I've just installed ReviewBoard and after i set up a repository (subversion) and attempt to create a New Review Request it gives me the Error 500 page. I can't find *any* logging of what happened. Does anyone have ideas for how I can at least get logging information? I'm totally blind as to what the problem is without some sort of log. -David --Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: backup and restore SQLite DB
not to be a pain, but does the web user also have write access to the directory that the SQLite file resides in? it needs to create a couple of temp files in that directory for indices and such. --Jeff 2009/7/16 Pravin Nadarajoo ramp...@gmail.com Hi there, I've just installed the new stable release of ReviewBoard (ver 1.0) on a new machine and i'm trying to move my Sqlite DB (.db) from an old one with ReviewBoard (rc2) to the new machine. From your site, I learnt that all I need to do is point ReviewBoard to the location of the old DB file and it should work. But i'm getting thrown with an Internal Server Error, even after changing the ownership of it to the web user. Is there a proper way in which i can backup my SQLite DB from the old ReviewBoard (old machine) and then properly restore it to my new machine's ReviewBoard? Please point me in the right direction. Thanks Truly Pravin -- Jeff O|||O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: backup and restore SQLite DB
It's not just the file, the folder it resides in as well. That should be a 7 for the user that the web server runs under --Jeff -Original Message- From: Pravin Nadarajoo ramp...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:04:30 To: reviewboardreviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: backup and restore SQLite DB Thanks for your reply Jeff. I left the permissions of the DB file as 644. Will just try 777 for now and see what happens. Will write here again. Thanks Pravin On Jul 17, 2:21 am, Jeff Andros j...@bigredtj.com wrote: not to be a pain, but does the web user also have write access to the directory that the SQLite file resides in? it needs to create a couple of temp files in that directory for indices and such. --Jeff 2009/7/16 Pravin Nadarajoo ramp...@gmail.com Hi there, I've just installed the new stable release of ReviewBoard (ver 1.0) on a new machine and i'm trying to move my Sqlite DB (.db) from an old one with ReviewBoard (rc2) to the new machine. From your site, I learnt that all I need to do is point ReviewBoard to the location of the old DB file and it should work. But i'm getting thrown with an Internal Server Error, even after changing the ownership of it to the web user. Is there a proper way in which i can backup my SQLite DB from the old ReviewBoard (old machine) and then properly restore it to my new machine's ReviewBoard? Please point me in the right direction. Thanks Truly Pravin -- Jeff O|||O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: stuck with install/config
You sound pretty new to debian style apache management, so here goes. Yeah, you'll either need to shut off the default site, or configure reviewboard as a vhost. Shutting off default is probably the easiest. You shouldn't have to remove it, there's a management script that will do that for you, a2dissite or something like that (sorry, not set up to check the actual name from my blackberry). There's that command's twin, a2ensite, that will turn on reviewboard if you drop the config file in the /etc/apache2/sites-available directory (again, double check that path as I'm working from memory). This is debian's apache management system, it's pretty sweet if you dig into it. There should be documentation all over the web if you get really interested in learning more. --Jeff -Original Message- From: grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:07:59 To: reviewboardreviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: stuck with install/config Not sure about the apache setup on Ubuntu 8.10. But on Ubuntu 9.10 I had to remove the default site file /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000- default before the site would load. Not sure if that will help you but thought I would throw it out there. On Jul 1, 7:40 am, Jim Priest thecr...@gmail.com wrote: I'm going back through everything this AM - the only thing I can't find is this reference in my reviewboard.conf Location / ... SetEvn DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings ... /Location I've seen that settings file mentioned on other posts - where does that file live?? I guess at this point I'm going to just start over and try again from scratch and see what happens. Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: What functionality does the Subversion repo connection provide in RB?
Reviewboard displays the files in a two column view. It pulls the base file from the repo, displays that on the left column, applies the diff, then displays the results on the right column. This way you've got the entire file to look over as you're reviewing it, not just the parts that have changed. 2009/7/1 Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com Ok, this probably sounds like a stupid question, but I'm curious what functionality the connection to the repository brings to RB (Subversion in my example). When I create a diff for a review (on the command line via 'svn diff'), and then upload the diff, RB appears to make a check against the repo for some kind of validation. But beyond that I don't see what the repo connection provides in terms of actual functionality; the diff already provides all the info necessary for the review (minus the base path which we manually enter anyway). I bet if I was a more seasoned user I wouldn't be asking this. Thanks for reading, Eric P. -- Jeff O|||O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: rb-site install - Review Board is taking a nap
I've yet to do an install like that, and someone else may correct me, but normally that message means that the apache user does not have write access to bothr the sqlite file and the folder that contains it. Try tracking that down and changing the permissions/owner. --Jeff 2009/6/25 Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com Hi (me again), I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first Review Board site per the documentation. When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' dialog box. In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\ndefault=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ --site-root=/ \ --media-url=/media \ --db-type=sqlite3 \ --cache-type=memcached \ --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ --web-server-type=apache \ --python-loader=modpython I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a couple issues. Anyway, thanks for reading. Eric P -- Jeff O|||O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ReviewBoard General Inquiries
I'm not really sure why this is an issue, but all uploads to reviewboard are via diff. If you use the post-review tool, you never have to see/touch/smell the diff at all, you just deal with the review, and your VCS's revision specs. Even though you're uploading a diff, reviewboard goes out to your VCS, pulls out the whole file, and hilights the areas which have changed. I think that answers your question as I understand it; if you're asking whether you can review existing files(like reviewing your whole codebase), check the archives of this list... Christian has covered that a few times, and it's very possible to do with post-review. -- Jeff O|||O 2009/5/25 Carlo Camerino cmcamer...@gmail.com Hi, i am evaluating several code review software for our company. We have this question regarding review board, one of the barriers of entry for our programmers to use reviewboard is that we are not using diffs for code reviews but rather we are using files. We don't want to be able to upload diffs but rather upload files for consumption purposes. Does review-board support this kind of model? if not, will it support it in the future. Hopefully ReviewBoard will be able to support it in the future as it is such a nice tool. Also do you support writing a review by email , or adding comments via email? Thanks Carlo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using the demo
diff headers for reviewboard are a bit different... the server needs to know not only the path to the file, but also the revision it was generated from... that's how it looks up the base code. as I understand it, svn diff might give you the right headers, but I'm not sure... we use p4. 2009/2/17 Anthony Foglia afog...@princeton.com: This might be a stupid question. I'd like to play around with the demo, and follow a patch through the review process, but I'm having trouble uploading a patch. My plan was just to add a file, maybe add additional patches to it, etc. My first question: Which repository do I use for demo purposes? Navi or Review Board SVN? Second: What should my patch contain? I tried making a patch with a new file, setting the base diff path to /, but I get an Unable to parse diff revision header when uploading the diff. I think this is because my diff was made outside any version control, and the revision header is a timestamp. Do I need to check out the demo's repository first? If so, where is it? -- Anthony Foglia Princeton Consultants -- Jeff O|||O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Newbie question: setup problems
I had this problem too... make sure your web user has permissions not only on the sqlite file, but on the directory it resides in as well. Jeff O|||O 2009/1/8 Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com Phil wrote: .Sqlite3 is complaining that it cannot open the database file. (sqlite3.OperationalError: unable to open database file) Has anyone else had this problem? My understanding is that Python 2.5 includes sqlite thus I wouldn't have to install it again -- is this incorrect? Have I missed installing something? If you are getting the sqlite error, this proves (py) sqlite is installed :-) You _probably_ have a file/path permission problem as sqlite databases are files. I suspect when you ran manage you did it as a different user than the one who runs the web server. Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: diff view - looking to do full file reviews not a diff between two version
It just hit me too, that you can just click the expand changes link in the diff viewer header, there's nothing stopping you from reviewing parts that didn't change, we do it all the time... just make sure to hit that link, otherwise the comments that are in old sections won't be displayed --Christian or Dave-- as an enhancement, how hard would it be to set auto expand as either a user or global setting? Jeff O|||O Help me and the Leukemia and Lymphoma society fight blood cancers: http://pages.teamintraining.org/dm/tucson08/jandros On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Jeff Andros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are two ways to do this: 1. if you manually diff your current file against a file that doesn't exist (there may be a flag you need to set on your diff program), it will generate a diff against a new file, then you just need to adjust the diff header to make it right... we've got a simple script that does this for our perforce repo 2. I haven't tried it, but there's a revision range argument on post-review. Last I knew, this doesn't work for all SCM's, but it should eventually. just supply a revision number like 0. (this has been suggested before I think) HTH Jeff O|||O Help me and the Leukemia and Lymphoma society fight blood cancers: http://pages.teamintraining.org/dm/tucson08/jandros On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:59 AM, fts1050 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: In the diff viewer, for new files, only one version of the file is show (because only 1 exists). I would like our code reviews to be more about reviewing a file in a given state, not simply a diff. Is there anyway to create your diff so that the diff viewer will only show a single version of the file, as specified by the diff file? This would avoid the side by side of the same file, which I am sure is extremely useful, but for how we work, is something we'd like to be able to bypass if we could. By the way, this is ideal for reviewers who are looking at the code for the first time, who need to review the entire file, not just the diff from version X to Y. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: diff view - looking to do full file reviews not a diff between two version
There are two ways to do this: 1. if you manually diff your current file against a file that doesn't exist (there may be a flag you need to set on your diff program), it will generate a diff against a new file, then you just need to adjust the diff header to make it right... we've got a simple script that does this for our perforce repo 2. I haven't tried it, but there's a revision range argument on post-review. Last I knew, this doesn't work for all SCM's, but it should eventually. just supply a revision number like 0. (this has been suggested before I think) HTH Jeff O|||O Help me and the Leukemia and Lymphoma society fight blood cancers: http://pages.teamintraining.org/dm/tucson08/jandros On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:59 AM, fts1050 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the diff viewer, for new files, only one version of the file is show (because only 1 exists). I would like our code reviews to be more about reviewing a file in a given state, not simply a diff. Is there anyway to create your diff so that the diff viewer will only show a single version of the file, as specified by the diff file? This would avoid the side by side of the same file, which I am sure is extremely useful, but for how we work, is something we'd like to be able to bypass if we could. By the way, this is ideal for reviewers who are looking at the code for the first time, who need to review the entire file, not just the diff from version X to Y. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
