Re: Error when SVN server is unreachable.
I have py25-pysvn-svn161-1.7.0-1177 On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Leonel, What version of pysvn do you have installed? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: Issue 2191 for this one. On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When trying to access a diff of an existing review request, while the SVN server is for some reason unavailable (and the diff is not cached), I get the error below. It seems to me there's a bug in the error handling. 1.6.1 RC1 global name 'ClientError' is not defined Traceback (most recent call last): File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\views.py, line 151, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 1071, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.8-py2.5.egg\djblets\util\misc.py, line 166, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 1070, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting)), File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 551, in get_chunks old = get_original_file(filediff) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 364, in get_original_file large_data=True)[0] File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.8-py2.5.egg\djblets\util\misc.py, line 166, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 363, in lambda data = cache_memoize(key, lambda: [fetch_file(file, revision)], File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 342, in fetch_file data = tool.get_file(file, revision) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\scmtools\svn.py, line 135, in get_file except ClientError, e: NameError: global name 'ClientError' is not defined -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Added Files not being added to reviews
Hi, After upgrading to 1.6 RC1 and RBTools 0.3, I noticed that added files are not included in review requests by post-review. If I call post-review specifying the added-file filename, I get There don't seem to be any diffs!. Is this intentional? While I'm at it, a feature request: the ability to configure an ignore list for post-review. Right now I have some files that get changed locally automatically but are not commited. Right now I have to manually revert them before calling post-review, or post-review a specific file/folder without them. -- Leonel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Added Files not being added to reviews
Issue 2188 logged for the feature request. Sorry, meant to include the info but forgot. It's on SVN. The file shows as added the TortoiseSVN's check for modifications dialog. post-review -d didn't seem to show anything interesting. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Leonel, What sort of repository are you using this with? We generally call out to svn diff, git diff, etc., so it's dependent on how the particular SCM works. Can you file the feature request on the bug tracker? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, After upgrading to 1.6 RC1 and RBTools 0.3, I noticed that added files are not included in review requests by post-review. If I call post-review specifying the added-file filename, I get There don't seem to be any diffs!. Is this intentional? While I'm at it, a feature request: the ability to configure an ignore list for post-review. Right now I have some files that get changed locally automatically but are not commited. Right now I have to manually revert them before calling post-review, or post-review a specific file/folder without them. -- Leonel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Internal Server Error: /admin/feed/news/
I ended up logging Issue 2189 for the unhandled error and Issue 2190
for the feature request.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. Should I log a request for proxy support or a bug for the error I get?
I don't care that much for getting the news loaded, but I'd prefer if
it would handle a problem fetching them more gracefully.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com
wrote:
Hi Leonel,
This is a known issue. While it won't make 1.6.0, I'd like to get
proxy support in for 1.6.x. I'm not sure we have a bug filed for it,
though. Would you mind filing one?
Christian
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi !
I'm in the process of upgrading my 1.5.1 install to 1.6 RC1. First
thing I noticed is that when visiting the admin interface the news in
do not load and I get the error below in the mail. There's a proxy
server with authentication so ReviewBoard won't be able to get online
to retrieve news anyway.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
c:\python25\lib\site-packages\django-1.3-py2.5.egg\django\core\handlers\base.py,
line 111, in get_response
response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
File
c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.8-py2.5.egg\djblets\feedview\views.py,
line 38, in view_feed
force_overwrite=request.GET.has_key(reload)))
File
c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.8-py2.5.egg\djblets\util\misc.py,
line 173, in cache_memoize
data = lookup_callable()
File
c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.8-py2.5.egg\djblets\feedview\views.py,
line 23, in fetch_feed
data = urllib2.urlopen(url).read()
File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 124, in urlopen
return _opener.open(url, data)
File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 381, in open
response = self._open(req, data)
File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 399, in _open
'_open', req)
File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 1107, in http_open
return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPConnection, req)
File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 1080, in do_open
r = h.getresponse()
File C:\Python25\lib\httplib.py, line 928, in getresponse
response.begin()
File C:\Python25\lib\httplib.py, line 385, in begin
version, status, reason = self._read_status()
File C:\Python25\lib\httplib.py, line 349, in _read_status
raise BadStatusLine(line)
BadStatusLine
ModPythonRequest
path:/admin/feed/news/,
GET:QueryDict: {},
POST:QueryDict: {},
COOKIES:{'JSESSIONID': 'c89210830acfce364e3bd8bb55c921c2',
'rbsessionid': '808f6ddd7ecd1710a507fcfe05c29688',
'screenResolution': '1366x768'},
META:{'AUTH_TYPE': None,
'CONTENT_LENGTH': 0,
'CONTENT_TYPE': None,
'GATEWAY_INTERFACE': 'CGI/1.1',
'HTTP_ACCEPT': 'text/html, */*',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET': 'ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING': 'gzip,deflate,sdch',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE': 'en-US,en;q=0.8,pt-BR;q=0.6,pt;q=0.4',
'HTTP_CONNECTION': 'keep-alive',
'HTTP_COOKIE': 'JSESSIONID=c89210830acfce364e3bd8bb55c921c2;
screenResolution=1366x768;
rbsessionid=808f6ddd7ecd1710a507fcfe05c29688',
'HTTP_HOST': 'xxxbuild',
'HTTP_REFERER': 'http://xxxbuild/admin/',
'HTTP_USER_AGENT': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64)
AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.122
Safari/534.30',
'HTTP_X_FCCKV2': 'g2HP6vytWCGacqhIqnHAyiobwZw4nPryglP/jQ==',
'HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH': 'XMLHttpRequest',
'PATH_INFO': u'/admin/feed/news/',
'PATH_TRANSLATED': None,
'QUERY_STRING': None,
'REMOTE_ADDR': '172.16.44.61',
'REMOTE_HOST': None,
'REMOTE_IDENT': None,
'REMOTE_USER': None,
'REQUEST_METHOD': 'GET',
'SCRIPT_NAME': '',
'SERVER_NAME': 'xxx2-xxx',
'SERVER_PORT': 80,
'SERVER_PROTOCOL': 'HTTP/1.1',
'SERVER_SOFTWARE': 'mod_python'}
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
Re: Error when SVN server is unreachable.
Issue 2191 for this one. On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When trying to access a diff of an existing review request, while the SVN server is for some reason unavailable (and the diff is not cached), I get the error below. It seems to me there's a bug in the error handling. 1.6.1 RC1 global name 'ClientError' is not defined Traceback (most recent call last): File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\views.py, line 151, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 1071, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.8-py2.5.egg\djblets\util\misc.py, line 166, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 1070, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting)), File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 551, in get_chunks old = get_original_file(filediff) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 364, in get_original_file large_data=True)[0] File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.8-py2.5.egg\djblets\util\misc.py, line 166, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 363, in lambda data = cache_memoize(key, lambda: [fetch_file(file, revision)], File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py, line 342, in fetch_file data = tool.get_file(file, revision) File c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6rc1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\scmtools\svn.py, line 135, in get_file except ClientError, e: NameError: global name 'ClientError' is not defined -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Hmm, let me try to start over. There's a file called .reviewboardrc that can be created, on windows I put it on %APPDATA% folder. It's meant for post-review settings. There's some info about it here: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/#reviewboardrc It is a python file, so I created it and put the two lines below on it to set an environment variable that will cause post-review to bypass my proxy server, which requires authentication that i doesn't handle well: import os os.environ[no_proxy] = * It was the best way I found to automatically bypass proxy on each user's machine. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:58 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: How do I get parsed as a Python file? Got a link or instructions? Thanks! On Jun 22, 2:55 pm, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: It's not. It's an optional file that you can create and add settings. It's parsed as a python file so that's why my workaround works. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:36 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at my %appdata% folder... Does .reviewboardrc get automatically installed? I don't see it in my %appdata% folder. Thanks! Peter On Jun 21, 12:42 pm, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/#r... On windows, I have it on each user's %appdata% folder. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:20 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Leonel, Thanks for the reply, but where may I find .reviewboardrc? Thanks! Peter On Jun 20, 4:42 am, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ptrchen, I worked around this issue by adding two lines to .reviewboardrc import os os.environ[no_proxy] = * On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:48 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I think this page suggestions that should address my issues, correct? http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/69e33... On Jun 10, 4:54 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more digging for overriding the proxy configuration On Jun 10, 4:51 pm,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt window do the trick? On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review. The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set. This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration. If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other solutions. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me from doing that. Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote: Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tucker, Thanks for the reply. I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. Both return Name: server_name.domain Address: ip_address On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote: You appear to have a DNS problem: Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name. What does nslookup server_name say? On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a requested URL could not be retrieved error We're running: ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
It's not. It's an optional file that you can create and add settings. It's parsed as a python file so that's why my workaround works. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:36 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at my %appdata% folder... Does .reviewboardrc get automatically installed? I don't see it in my %appdata% folder. Thanks! Peter On Jun 21, 12:42 pm, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/#r... On windows, I have it on each user's %appdata% folder. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:20 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Leonel, Thanks for the reply, but where may I find .reviewboardrc? Thanks! Peter On Jun 20, 4:42 am, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ptrchen, I worked around this issue by adding two lines to .reviewboardrc import os os.environ[no_proxy] = * On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:48 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I think this page suggestions that should address my issues, correct? http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/69e33... On Jun 10, 4:54 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more digging for overriding the proxy configuration On Jun 10, 4:51 pm,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt window do the trick? On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review. The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set. This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration. If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other solutions. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me from doing that. Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote: Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tucker, Thanks for the reply. I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. Both return Name: server_name.domain Address: ip_address On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote: You appear to have a DNS problem: Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name. What does nslookup server_name say? On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a requested URL could not be retrieved error We're running: ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP Python 2.5.x Apache 2.2.x Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 Here is the output after adding the --debug option: -- post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= -- password= --revision-range=8325 --debug RBTools 0.3.2 Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data svn info diff --version repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base pa th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False HTTP GETting api/ Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transition al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd; HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/#reviewboardrc
On windows, I have it on each user's %appdata% folder.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:20 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Leonel,
Thanks for the reply, but where may I find .reviewboardrc?
Thanks!
Peter
On Jun 20, 4:42 am, Leonel Togniolli tognio...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ptrchen,
I worked around this issue by adding two lines to .reviewboardrc
import os
os.environ[no_proxy] = *
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:48 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
I think this page suggestions that should address my issues, correct?
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/69e33...
On Jun 10, 4:54 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more
digging for overriding the proxy configuration
On Jun 10, 4:51 pm,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers.
Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on
post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server,
meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find
the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's
Linux, then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting
in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple
other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits
me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem
(throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP
server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running
into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username=
--
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path:
svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD
HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type
CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be
retrieved/TITLE
STYLE
type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Hi ptrchen,
I worked around this issue by adding two lines to .reviewboardrc
import os
os.environ[no_proxy] = *
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:48 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
I think this page suggestions that should address my issues, correct?
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/69e334db357f183e/955e8ebd634d0a94?lnk=gstq=proxy+post-review#955e8ebd634d0a94
On Jun 10, 4:54 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more
digging for overriding the proxy configuration
On Jun 10, 4:51 pm,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers.
Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server,
meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux,
then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing
out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server)
and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into
a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName,
Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML
4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the
URL.
Check if the address is correct.
Re: Feature Request for Reviewboard
In the mean time, you can just log in the mysql db and query for the info. The schema is fairly straightforward.That's what I did when I needed similar info recently. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Ashith asithraj.she...@gmail.com wrote: We are planning to track the review requests and the reviewers statistics in reviewboard. Right now the statistics is only for the reviews and review requests. It would be helpful if the statistics provided the following data, 1. No of review requests logged by each user till date (can be broken down as lst 7 days, last month, all days) 2. No of review requests each user is linked to. 3. No of reviews done by each user. It would also be helpful to add a cool graphing tool to show the statistics in a neat little graph. I know I am asking for the moon, but I am so excited with the concept of introducing reviewboard in our organization I guess I can be pardoned for asking for the moon. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: AttributeError: 'DashboardDataGrid' object has no attribute 'id_list'
No, I haven't upgrade my server yet. It's a clean 1.5.1 install. On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote: Leonel, I forgot to ask, are you seeing this after an upgrade? Chris Clark wrote: Leonel Togniolli wrote: Every week or so I get one of these below in the mail from my RB server. I wasn't able to determine what triggers it, unfortunately. Me too. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1526 I suggest you log a comment on the issue/bug so that there is a record on how many people are seeing this. I'm now seeing this every day, I think with different users. I know one user has seen this a couple of times (some of the VPN users makes it tricky to know for sure who hits it). I didn't see it with: Django-1.1.1, Djblets-0.5.5, Reviewboard 1.0.5.1 Your seeing it with: Django-1.2.3, Djblets-0.6.6, Reviewboard-1.5.1 I'm seeing it with: Django-1.3, Djblets-0.6.7, Reviewboard-1.5.5 Chris -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
AttributeError: 'DashboardDataGrid' object has no attribute 'id_list'
Every week or so I get one of these below in the mail from my RB
server. I wasn't able to determine what triggers it, unfortunately.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\django-1.2.3-py2.5.egg\django\core\handlers\base.py,
line 100, in get_response
response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.6.6-py2.5.egg\djblets\auth\util.py,
line 46, in _checklogin
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\accounts\decorators.py,
line 46, in _check_valid_prefs
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\reviews\views.py,
line 330, in dashboard
return grid.render_to_response(template_name)
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.6.6-py2.5.egg\djblets\datagrid\grids.py,
line 700, in render_to_response
self.load_state()
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.6.6-py2.5.egg\djblets\datagrid\grids.py,
line 535, in load_state
self.precompute_objects()
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.6.6-py2.5.egg\djblets\datagrid\grids.py,
line 611, in precompute_objects
pk__in=self.id_list).order_by())
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\reviews\datagrids.py,
line 438, in post_process_queryset
queryset.with_counts(self.request.user))
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.6.6-py2.5.egg\djblets\datagrid\grids.py,
line 654, in post_process_queryset
queryset = column.augment_queryset(queryset)
File
C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.5.egg\reviewboard\reviews\datagrids.py,
line 83, in augment_queryset
pk__in=self.datagrid.id_list).values_list('pk', flat=True)
AttributeError: 'DashboardDataGrid' object has no attribute 'id_list'
ModPythonRequest
path:/dashboard/,
GET:QueryDict: {u'view': [u'outgoing']},
POST:QueryDict: {},
COOKIES:{'rbsessionid': 'c307d37908b2901bbd2e42e4b714ce9b'},
META:{'AUTH_TYPE': None,
'CONTENT_LENGTH': 0,
'CONTENT_TYPE': None,
'GATEWAY_INTERFACE': 'CGI/1.1',
'HTTP_ACCEPT':
'text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET': 'ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING': 'gzip,deflate',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE': 'pt-br,pt;q=0.8,en-us;q=0.5,en;q=0.3',
'HTTP_CACHE_CONTROL': 'max-age=0',
'HTTP_CONNECTION': 'keep-alive',
'HTTP_COOKIE': 'rbsessionid=c307d37908b2901bbd2e42e4b714ce9b',
'HTTP_HOST': 'myserver2:8080',
'HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE': '115',
'HTTP_REFERER': 'http://myserver2:8080/dashboard/?view=outgoing',
'HTTP_USER_AGENT': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR;
rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8',
'PATH_INFO': u'/dashboard/',
'PATH_TRANSLATED': None,
'QUERY_STRING': 'view=outgoing',
'REMOTE_ADDR': '172.16.44.45',
'REMOTE_HOST': None,
'REMOTE_IDENT': None,
'REMOTE_USER': None,
'REQUEST_METHOD': 'GET',
'SCRIPT_NAME': '',
'SERVER_NAME': 'myserver2',
'SERVER_PORT': 8080,
'SERVER_PROTOCOL': 'HTTP/1.1',
'SERVER_SOFTWARE': 'mod_python'}.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: TortoiseHg Review Board Dialog
Hi. Looks really nice. I'm not familiar with the history of TortoiseHG. Is it a fork of TortoiseSVN or does it only have the turtle in common? I'm wondering how much effort would be to adapt this for SVN. On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Michael De Wildt michael.dewi...@gmail.com wrote: Gday All, I thought id let you know that TortoiseHg 2.0 is now bundled with a dialog that I wrote that allows users to post reviews to reviewboard directly from the TortoiseHg workbench. It is a GUI for the mercurial-reviewboard extension and, hopefully, it will be a valuable tool for people who use Mercurial and Reviewboard. You can read all about it in my blog - http://www.mikeyd.com.au/projects/tortoisehg-reviewboard/ Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated. Cheers, Mikey -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
post-review and proxies
This week authentication was changed to be required for our proxy server and post-review stopped working. This seems to be caused by two factors: 1. It doesn't handle proxy authentication. 2. Proxy exceptions aren't honored so the proxy isn't skipped as it should. I did find an older message about this topic where the poster worked around the issue with a script that wrapped post-review and disabled/enabled the IE proxy, but I didn't quite like that solution. After reading some post-review and urllib source I found a new workaround. Add the lines below to .reviewboardrc (which I found to be executable to my surprise): import os os.environ[no_proxy] = * Hope that helps someone. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Permissions and Offline Mode
Hi Christian, Yes. Admin UI - Settings - Authentication - Allow anonymous access (or something like that). Thanks, this works. Missed it the first time around. This is a requirement. Review Board grabs the files from the SCM and patches them in order to get the complete original and new files, and then performs a side-by-side diff. I see. So when you display diffs you're not showing the data the client sent you, but applying a patch e recomparing files. I could live without access to the extra context, but I understand the design and will work with it. Thanks. I'll have more questions as we work with it on the next few weeks. -- Leonel -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Permissions and Offline Mode
Hi, I recently started looking into Review Board and I'm about to give it a try with my team. A couple questions before I start: It appears to be possible as an unauthenticated user to see all review quests and the diffs. I need to prevent that and only let logged in users to do so. A setting I missed somewhere? Second, it appears client and server need a live connection to the SCM server. I'm using SVN in case that makes a difference. This is inadequate to me because we are in a different physical network than our server and reach it through on-demand VPN. It seems to me that I have all the need, in the client, to create the review request. SVN stores the original files, which are used to generate the diffs of uncommitted changes, which are uploaded to the server and displayed. This is for pre-commit reviews, of course. Otherwise either the client or the server would need to reach it and fetch the requested revisions (I'd prefer the client but can't be picky about that). Am I missing something? Otherwise, ReviewBoard looks great. Installation was a little bumpy (on windows with apache, mysql) but I figured things out without too much trouble. Looking forward to use it for real. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
