Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: component-RBTools
Comment #1 on issue 1488 by chipx86: Storing review request number
in .git/config
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1488
I could see this as being useful. The trick will be to not leave IDs around
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Owner: chipx86
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Support
Comment #1 on issue 1485 by chipx86: Newby issues: RB 1.1 alpha 2
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1485
This is best sent to the mailing list, but to answer your questions:
1
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High Milestone-Release1.5
Component-DiffViewer Interdiffs
Comment #1 on issue 1486 by chipx86: Diff viewer displays incorrectly diffs
for files which were removed in later revision of the change
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release1.5
Comment #13 on issue 1476 by chipx86: TypeError: character mapping must
return integer, None or unicode
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1476
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Labels: Component-Accounts Component-Reviews
Comment #1 on issue 1491 by chipx86: LDAP group support
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1491
This is pretty specific to certain setups and is certainly not something
we'd want to
make default. If we do
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 768 by chipx86: When you upload multiple diffs before
publishing a review request, discard all diffs except the last one
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=768
This hasn't been a problem for a while. It's fixed these days
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Milestone-Release1.5 Component-EMail
Comment #1 on issue 1502 by chipx86: post-review.py generated review
request notification emails have wrong sender and signature
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1502
Makes sense
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Component-DiffParser Milestone-Release1.5
Comment #3 on issue 1501 by chipx86: Download diff for changesets
containing changes to only one file are missing diff headers
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1501
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #4 on issue 1501 by chipx86: Download diff for changesets
containing changes to only one file are missing diff headers
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1501
Scratch that. We only put the headers there if it's an empty file
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Labels: Component-RBTools
Comment #2 on issue 1499 by chipx86: post-review tool can't use some forms
of CVS/Root entries
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1499
Can you submit a patch to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ ?
--
You
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 1497 by chipx86: post-review tool doesn't support
certain CVS formats
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1497
There's no info in here about what's wrong or why. Assuming this is
replaced by bug
1499. Otherwise, please
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Component-RBTools
Comment #1 on issue 1494 by chipx86: post-review on windows vista/7 uses
the wrong folder to store the authentication cookie, and it uses the diff
command
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1494
Upgrade
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1279
Comment #2 on issue 1494 by chipx86: post-review on windows vista/7 uses
the wrong folder to store the authentication cookie, and it uses the diff
command
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1494
(No comment
Comment #6 on issue 1279 by chipx86: post-review on windows assumes
pre-vista hard coded path
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1279
Issue 1494 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Component-RBTools
Comment #1 on issue 1473 by chipx86: Upload diff including binary file
failed with postreview.py
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1473
It sounds like your version of RBTools/post-review is quite old. Please
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Milestone-Release1.5
Comment #2 on issue 1468 by chipx86: rb-site install giving error make
sure you are running as administrator
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1468
The error should be changed. Basically it wants
Comment #2 on issue 1471 by chipx86: Groups page has a error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1471
Issue 1464 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1471
Comment #2 on issue 1464 by chipx86: All Groups button crashes app if no
starred entry
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1464
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Component-RBTools
Comment #2 on issue 1460 by chipx86: post-review fails when current branch
is called tracking remote branch
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1460
This should be fixed in RC1.
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Milestone-Release1.5
Component-Admin
Comment #1 on issue 1458 by chipx86: User View on site button has broken
path
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1458
(No comment was entered
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Milestone-Release1.5 Component-Reviews
Comment #1 on issue 1450 by chipx86: Attempt to mark closed review
submitted again yields Internal error: 200 OK
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1450
(No comment was entered
Updates:
Status: UserError
Comment #3 on issue 1455 by chipx86: rb-site install giving error make
sure you are running as administrator
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1455
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Milestone-Release1.5 EasyFix Component-Reviews
Comment #1 on issue 1451 by chipx86: Base field should be stripped before
using
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1451
Should be an easy fix.
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Support
Comment #1 on issue 1459 by chipx86: post-review produces error
/reviewboard/api/json/accounts/login/ not found
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1459
Sounds like that's not the right path
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: chipx86
Comment #4 on issue 1423 by chipx86: post-review expects an array
internally and a string is returned
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1423
Committed to master as 24b1e9d.
In the future, please post patches to our
Comment #3 on issue 1494 by gfbett: post-review on windows vista/7 uses the
wrong folder to store the authentication cookie, and it uses the diff
command
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1494
Thanks, I will upgrade
--
You received this message because you are listed
Comment #3 on issue 1358 by justin.d.teems: New review request fails
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1358
thanks. will do.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 1500 by trowbrds: xx lines hidden [Expand] link
stopped working
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1500
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 583 by chipx86: ReviewBoard does not verify patch when
uploading
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=583
This appears to be fixed these days. I don't know when, but certainly in
1.5 it's no
longer a problem.
--
You
Comment #8 on issue 821 by chipx86: Updating a diff with a diff + parent
diff does not work.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=821
The error display part of this bug is fixed on master (ab7ae7d)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 1451 by chipx86: Base field should be stripped before
using
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1451
Fixed on master (3ca1e5a)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #15 on issue 1476 by chipx86: TypeError: character mapping must
return integer, None or unicode
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1476
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed
://reviewserver.com/api/json/accounts/login/
curl --cookie cookies.txt --cookie-jar cookies.txt -X GET
http://reviewserver.com/api/json/repositories/
}}}
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/ReviewBoardAPI
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
=yyy
http://reviewserver.com/api/json/accounts/login/
curl --cookie cookies.txt --cookie-jar cookies.txt -X GET
http://reviewserver.com/api/json/repositories/
}}}
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/ReviewBoardAPI
--
You received this message because you
password=yyy
http://reviewserver.com/api/json/accounts/login/
curl --cookie cookies.txt --cookie-jar cookies.txt -X GET
http://reviewserver.com/api/json/repositories/
}}}
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/ReviewBoardAPI
--
You received this message because you
Comment #4 on issue 1494 by gfbett: post-review on windows vista/7 uses the
wrong folder to store the authentication cookie, and it uses the diff
command
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1494
RC1 fixed the application data issue, but not the external diff command
Comment #3 on issue 1281 by kyle.getz: Adding comments in diff viewer can
delete or overwrite existing comments.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1281
I don't think the line numbers need to go into the thousands for this to be
triggered. On the contrary, I perceive
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1509 by kcgade: Throws an exception upon a click on review request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1509
'm seeing this error for reviewboard.twitter.com when I click on a review
request
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 1509 by trowbrds: Throws an exception upon a click on
review request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1509
Do you have the full traceback?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields
Comment #2 on issue 1491 by psarmstr: LDAP group support
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1491
To me at least, it feels like not wanting this is specific to certain
setups (or
small shops that don't have LDAP setup properly yet). Managing everything
through a
single
Comment #3 on issue 1491 by chipx86: LDAP group support
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1491
You may want groups for permission purposes, or for review groups, or
neither. Some
places map review groups to mailman lists, and not anything in LDAP.
--
You received
Comment #2 on issue 1506 by locomocogogo: Get Unable to read
settings_local.py. error while running rb-site upgrade
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1506
Thanks for your help. Let me give you the info you need first before I try
anything...
Yes, on our installed copy
Comment #3 on issue 1506 by chipx86: Get Unable to read
settings_local.py. error while running rb-site upgrade
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1506
That should be new enough to migrate properly. Anything prior to evolutions
(which is
a few years old now) would
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Comment #5 on issue 1506 by trowbrds: Get Unable to read
settings_local.py. error while running rb-site upgrade
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1506
The auth information is now stored in the siteconfig_siteconfiguration,
which
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Component-Search
Comment #1 on issue 1508 by chipx86: Search does not search by changelist
number
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1508
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical Milestone-RBTools-Release1.0
Component-RBTools
Comment #1 on issue 1510 by chipx86: Exception thrown during post-review
-- 'rsp' is used before being defined
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues
Updates:
Summary: TortoiseAct.exe should be used as a cvs.exe replacement
Labels: Component-SCMTools
Comment #1 on issue 1391 by chipx86: TortoiseAct.exe should be used as a
cvs.exe replacement
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1391
(No comment was entered
Comment #6 on issue 1419 by chipx86: Error uploading diff: The file was not
found in the repository (207)
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1419
Yeah, you must point to the base of the repository, *not* a path inside of
it. We
will be enforcing this behavior for 1.5
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 1381 by chipx86: diff update doesn't work in web GUI
and in post-review utility
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1381
I know this is old.. Is it still a problem? If so, we need more
information. What
type
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #10 on issue 885 by chipx86: IE 6 is hanging while clicking any
button save -delete- the comment window
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=885
Is this still reproduceable? Those scripts, I believe, have since changed.
--
You
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Milestone-Release1.5
Comment #1 on issue 1164 by chipx86: Need to set permissions on database
properly
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1164
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Comment #11 on issue 885 by lonico: IE 6 is hanging while clicking any
button save -delete- the comment window
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=885
I just tried using http://demo.review-board.org/r/2643/diff/
and I still see the issue with IE. Looks like an infinite
Comment #12 on issue 885 by lonico: IE 6 is hanging while clicking any
button save -delete- the comment window
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=885
I think the issue is around:
var bgSrc = currentStyle.backgroundImage || style.backgroundImage;
if ((bgSrc + this.src
Comment #2 on issue 643 by arunbalaji1985: Getting Unable to find RCS
line error while using svn
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=643
Hello,
I am facing this issue while trying to use reviewboard with svn.
You'll need to fix the repository's configuration to use SVN
Comment #3 on issue 643 by arunbalaji1985: Getting Unable to find RCS
line error while using svn
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=643
Please read
In the admin page I have set the repository type to be CVS only.
as
In the admin page I have set the repository type
Comment #2 on issue 1359 by fiddur: Diff fails for text file with non-ascii
characters
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1359
There is error-handling to be set for unicode and encode-functions. See
http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/unicode
I had this problem in post-review
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1511 by AaronJSherman: Diff is not visible, but downloadable
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1511
What version are you running?
1.0.5.1
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Not public
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 1381 by trowbrds: diff update doesn't work in web GUI
and in post-review utility
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1381
Going to assume fixed, then.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Comment #4 on issue 1427 by trowbrds: Problems with post-review while
uploading diffs
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1427
The error really looks like it's trying to use the bzr SCMTool. It's
possible that it's
maybe confused indexing the tool into the database
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1512 by Dmitry.Litvintsev: after upgrade to 1.5 beta1 expand in
the diff body has no effect
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1512
after upgrade to 1.5 beta1 expand in the diff body has no effect
If I
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1500
Comment #1 on issue 1512 by chipx86: after upgrade to 1.5 beta1 expand in
the diff body has no effect
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1512
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Comment #5 on issue 1500 by chipx86: xx lines hidden [Expand] link
stopped working
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1500
Issue 1512 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
viewer to look empty
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1511
Okay, I've investigated this a little and it can basically be reproduced
with a diff
such as:
--- filename.foo (...)
+++ filename.foo (...)
@@ ... @@
Some text
Some text
- Foo
+ Foo
Blah blah
- /Foo
+ /Foo
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1513 by sylvain.desodt: Update diff : Error: Saving the form
failed due to a server error: 0 n/a
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1513
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 1514 by stodge: post-review.py doesn't allow parameters for http
username/password
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1514
*NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.review
Comment #1 on issue 1514 by stodge: post-review.py doesn't allow parameters
for http username/password
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1514
Sorry - attached the wrong patch. Here's the correct one.
Attachments:
post-review.patch 1.1 KB
--
You received
Comment #3 on issue 1359 by fiddur: Diff fails for text file with non-ascii
characters
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1359
Actually, that wasn't such a good idea after all; the diff was accepted but
could not
be applied :P
Adding this to sitecustomize.py was better
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems
to confuse svn diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version
Comment #1 on issue 1516 by locomocogogo: post-review clearcase setup
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1516
Ok, I can install RBTools with -Z option. So, should I edit the python code
in the
egg directory to set up clearcase and reviewboard server configuration?
--
You
Comment #4 on issue 1359 by lonico: Diff fails for text file with non-ascii
characters
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1359
I have a similar issue, but with post-review:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /u/laurentn/p4/code-review-feb22/rbtools/postreview.py
Comment #1 on issue 1515 by chipx86: SVN hook can include empty arguments
which seems to confuse svn diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515
Can you post the patch at http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ ? We don't review
patches
on the bug tracker.
--
You received
Comment #2 on issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments
which seems to confuse svn diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515
I tried already but the site crashed with an exception that the patch was
empty. I
guess I need to diff against the git
Comment #3 on issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments
which seems to confuse svn diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515
Environment:
Request Method: POST
Request URL: http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/new/
Django Version: 1.1.1
Python Version
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 1518 by stodge: new json api - get list of review requests
created between date range
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1518
*NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.review
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Component-API Milestone-Release1.5
Comment #1 on issue 1518 by chipx86: new json api - get list of review
requests created between date range
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1518
I really want date ranges on all
with git diffs
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1517
This is due to git diff using short SHA1s by default. You need to either
pass
--full-index to git diff or, preferably, use post-review.
Repurposing the bug. We really should make it clear what the problem
actually
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #4 on issue 1515 by chipx86: SVN hook can include empty arguments
which seems to confuse svn diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515
Are you using post-review?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Updates:
Labels: Browser
Comment #1 on issue 1513 by chipx86: Update diff : Error: Saving the form
failed due to a server error: 0 n/a
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1513
Most likely this is a bug with this version of Opera and Review Board.
--
You received
to .reviewboardrc
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1516
Right now, yeah, that's what you need to do. By 0.2 final, I'd like this to
move to
.reviewboardrc.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred
Comment #5 on issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments
which seems to confuse svn diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515
Not for the crash in comment 3. I think you explained this my other bug
report. I'll
try to get back to this next week
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 1510 by chipx86: Exception thrown during post-review
-- 'rsp' is used before being defined
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1510
This has been committed. The nightlies should have the fix.
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Milestone-Release1.5
Component-EMail
Comment #1 on issue 1519 by chipx86: Ignore emails for a review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1519
Seems reasonable. I don't know that this is going
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1520 by asitjaiswal: User Permission UI block is too small , user
permissions are not readable since they are hide behind the selection box
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1520
*NOTE: Do not post
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1235
Comment #1 on issue 1089 by trowbrds: git differ doesn't support moves and
renames
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1089
Issue 1235 says it better.
--
You received this message because you are listed
Comment #1 on issue 1235 by trowbrds: More intelligent handling of rename
operations.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1235
Issue 1089 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue
Updates:
Summary: ClearCase scm does not support main\0 and main\1 diff
Comment #2 on issue 1375 by trowbrds: ClearCase scm does not support main\0
and main\1 diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1375
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received
Comment #6 on issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments
which seems to confuse svn diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515
Created review request http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1440/.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Comment #2 on issue 1514 by stodge: post-review.py doesn't allow parameters
for http username/password
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1514
Created review request http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1441/.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 1521 by emil.sit: git format-patch/send-email equivalent workflow
for post-review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1521
What version are you running?
1.5b1
Describe the enhancement
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1523
Comment #1 on issue 1522 by trowbrds: SCMTool for Subversion fail to
collapse 'keyword' correctly
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1522
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Comment #1 on issue 1523 by trowbrds: SCMTool for Subversion fail to
collapse 'keyword' correctly
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1523
Issue 1522 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1524 by emil.sit: postreview.py should ignore user configuration
when generating diffs.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1524
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What
Comment #4 on issue 1191 by jamesdlin: post-review with no arguments
generated an empty review request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1191
BTW, similar stuff happens if I make a typo in the Perforce change number
and no such
changeset exists.
--
You received
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1525 by jamesmcdougall: Function to expand hidden lines in a diff
does not work for 1.5 Beta 1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1525
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report
Comment #6 on issue 769 by rponton: post-review should warn if there's
no diff in the user's path
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=769
This needs to be made a configuration option. The default diff util in my
default
path is a crappy old version that is not fully
Comment #6 on issue 1500 by trowbrds: xx lines hidden [Expand] link
stopped working
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1500
Issue 1525 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1500
Comment #1 on issue 1525 by trowbrds: Function to expand hidden lines in a
diff does not work for 1.5 Beta 1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1525
This is fixed in the nightlies.
--
You received this message
Comment #20 on issue 1060 by trowbrds: easy_install P4PythonInstaller
*Error*
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1060
The error you just posted looks like gcc isn't fully installed. Maybe
you're missing
C++ compilers?
--
You received this message because you are listed
Comment #21 on issue 1060 by hbetts3: easy_install P4PythonInstaller *Error*
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1060
Trowbrds,
the gcc was installed but not the g++. I installed that and now everythign
works.
--
You received this message because you are listed
Comment #7 on issue 769 by chipx86: post-review should warn if there's
no diff in the user's path
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=769
The plan after the RBTools 0.2 release is to bundle a custom diff tool that
we can
use instead of GNU diff for this.
--
You received
1 - 100 of 8899 matches
Mail list logo