Ask for working example of apache-wsgi.conf for Apache 2.4

When installing Review Board using command rb-site install reviews.example.com, The generated apache-wsgi.conf is for Apache 2.2, not for Apache 2.4, Does anyone tried to make Review board working for Apache 2.4, and could kindly provide an example config? Thanks! -- Want to help the Review Bo

Re: Failed to get repository information svn+ssh

All servers are running on PST, I had already configured the timezone (or reviewboard has done it for me) to US/Pacific. I tried reviewboard on UTC same errors in the logs, ive checked and they are all in sync. Does apache keep a default location/timezone as well that I might need to change? On

Re: Failed to get repository information svn+ssh

I don't think Apache really factors into this. One more thing to try is to edit your site's conf/settings_local.py file and add: TIME_ZONE = 'US/Pacific' And then restart Apache and try again. If it works, it's a bandaid. I have thoughts on a better fix, but I want to check that first. Chris

Re: Failed to get repository information svn+ssh

that didn't seem to change anything. If i do this: >>> client = pysvn.Client() >>> client.set_default_username('') >>> client.info2('svn+ssh:///') Password: should I see some content? or does python just exit? On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 10:44:20 UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: > > I don't th

Re: Failed to get repository information svn+ssh

Running that likely wont give you an accurate repro case. There's a lot that goes on to configure what's used for SSH and how the key is loaded. Are you just running that in Python, or using 'rb-site manage /path/to/site shell'? Christian On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:55, Alex Edwards wrote: > tha

Django Evolution Error when upgrading database from 1.6.13 to 1.7.2

Hello First I have to say that the new reviewboard installer (rb-site install) assistant is GREAT. No config file to edit, each setting is explained, I like this very much ! Now here's my problem : I installed version 1.7.2 of reviewboard (ReviewBoard.noarch 0:1.7.2-1.fc18) on fedora 18. I w

Re: Can’t Enable Search

Same problem on Fedora 18 / reviewboard 1.7.2 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Web API : date format change since 1.7

Hi, I am the current maintainer of the Reviewboard integration for Eclipse [1] . I was notified by several users that the plugin broke with 1.7, due to date formatting differences [2] . Apparently for 1.6 a formatted date is '2010-08-28 02:26:18.474' while for 1.7 it is '2010-08-28T02:26:18.474

Re: Web API : date format change since 1.7

Oops, the issue URL should be https://github.com/rombert/ereviewboard/issues/116 On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:15:14 PM UTC+2, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi, > > I am the current maintainer of the Reviewboard integration for Eclipse [1] > . I was notified by several users that the plugin broke

Re: Django Evolution Error when upgrading database from 1.6.13 to 1.7.2

After some investigation, the reported error above was easily fixed. As it is clearly explained here, on Windows the default configuration of MySql doesn't allow default value for BLOB type. Settin

Re: Django Evolution Error when upgrading database from 1.6.13 to 1.7.2

Hi, Sorry to hear you got bit by some failed upgrade problem. All upgrades *should* be done in one transaction. It's *possible* that this is really a problem of some upgrade metadata that is screwed up. Something to try is: $ rb-site manage /path/to/site shell >>> from django_evolution

Re: Web API : date format change since 1.7

Hi Robert, Unfortunately, this is just the reality of the 1.7 release. We moved to a newer version of Django that changes how timestamps are stored. From here on out, they'll never change again, but they will require clients to be flexible in how they handle formatted timestamps if they want to

Re: Problems with reviewboard

Hi, I encountered the same problem in trunk version. I suggest to configure arbitrary revision strings for localized SVN environment. Does anyone review it? http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3749/ thanks, Tetsuya On Monday, November 19, 2007 3:01:35 AM UTC+9, rikl...@gmail.com wrote: > > We ha

Re: Problems with reviewboard

Wow, the original post is ancient. If you use post-review from RBTools, it will ensure the diff is in an English locale, so it'll parse properly. I'm not opposed to a change that makes the parsing more flexible for those generating diffs manually, but I haven't had time to look at the change. H

Re: Problems with reviewboard

Thank you for your comment! I can understand what you concern. Of course, post-review is good, but it depends on the operation or workflow. Some developers want to use uploading diff operation. I'm not sure my suggestion (patch) is useful or not. So, any comments are welcome and try to think of mu

Re: Prompt console window many times for cleartool when post-review and viewing diff on Windows 7

I found out that the cause, the problem is the code to call cleartool.exe in reviewboard\scmtools\clearcase.py, if add 'shell=True' paramter to all the subprocess.Popen(...), there will no annoying console window pop up. patch code as below: diff --git a/reviewb