Review Board will require a level of knowledge of Apache configuration and
general system administration, and like David said, it's not something we
can give specific instructions on.
If you don't want to maintain it, and your code repositories are hosted on
a service like GitHub or BitBucket, we
I opened another topic:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/kS23n4m5aNw
These above issues seem to be caused by the Apache configuration i used
(MPM worker instead of MPM fork).
Le mardi 10 décembre 2013 17:18:46 UTC+1, Vincent G. a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Before to explain the prob
Hi Christian,
Thank you to answer so fast.
I would like to notify that the behavior of the Reviewboard, specially when
extensions are used is very 'strange' when Apache server is in MPM worker
mode instead of MPM Prefork.
When in MPM Worker, i noticed that the HTTP request are setup as:
wsgi.m
Thanks Raja it worked for me.
when we select review tab we get a another template having ship it entry on
it i want to add another entry along with ship it can it be possible with
extensions.
also if i want to edit some strings in existing files how can i do it with
extensions.
Thanks.
On Th
Is there a place for the format of the ~/.reviewboardrc file. It appears
that the REPOSITORY field might want to be the name of my git branch? (I'm
unsure what it is asking.)
While looking playing with some of the REST apis I found that performing a
GET of /api/repositories gave me a list of our
Hi everyone,
We had a regression in Djblets, one of Review Board's dependencies, in the
RB 1.7.20 release. Essentially, sending auth headers in an API request
would cause an HTTP 500 if the user was already logged in.
If you're on 1.7.20, you should upgrade Djblets from 0.7.26 to 0.7.27. You
can
It's basically structured like a Python file.
We have docs for this at
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/rbtools/dev/rbt/configuration/#repository
(Note that we seem to have a docs bug where that's nested in the wrong
section -- it's not Subversion-specific.)
If you go into the admin UI for Review
If you want to add a button alongside Ship It, you want
ReviewRequestActionHook.
You can't edit strings with extensions. The upcoming 2.0 release has
support for localization, so theoretically you could write and maintain
your own localization file that replaces some strings, but I can't say we
su
On 12/10/2013 04:19 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We have a small bug fix release out. 1.7.20 fixes issues with JSON
> fields in the admin UI, compatibility issues with the Mercurial backend,
> API issues with file attachments, and more.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013
Thanks Stephen!
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Stephen Gallagher <
step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 04:19 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
I'm using RB 1.7.18.
I'd like to make one of the fields that is currently not required to be a
required field (with the asterisk). Specifically, I'd like to make the
"Bugs" field required.
How do I do this?
Thanks,
Blair
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/power
Hi Blair,
There's no way to do this without modifying the code. In most cases, it
doesn't make sense for every change to have a bug number, so we don't
optimize for that.
It's possible that an extension could do this in 2.0 beta by flipping the
'required' attribute for a field but there's no offi
Hi All,
I managed to do something similar to #2 in the original request, which is
allow Reviewboard to be able to run certain commands on a build/test node
after a patch is uploaded. This is done as a reviewboard extension along
with a ReviewBot plugin that does the actual command execution after t
13 matches
Mail list logo