Re: Unable to see diff after uploading to review board

Any update on this issue? We are still unable to resolve the same. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You receiv

Re: auto-complete for reviewer/people field

Any idea how long it takes for the new version to show up in EPEL? This is my preferred installation mechanism. Currently, 2.0.8 is the latest version available there. On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:37:18 PM UTC-4, David Carson wrote: > > Ah, perfect timing! I was just about to file a bug.

Re: auto-complete for reviewer/people field

On 2014-10-28 10:05, David Carson wrote: > Any idea how long it takes for the new version to show up in EPEL? This is > my preferred installation mechanism. Currently, 2.0.8 is the latest > version available there. "Whenever Stephen gets around to it" :-). Usually he's pretty quick, but some t

Re: Review Board 2.0.11 is released!

On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 20:22 -0700, christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote: > Hey everyone, > > We just put out a new release of Review Board. > > 2.0.11 fixes some upgrade issues that have been encountered for some > MySQL users. It also improves the Change field for Perforce users, and > fixes a cras

Re: auto-complete for reviewer/people field

On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:09 -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 2014-10-28 10:05, David Carson wrote: > > Any idea how long it takes for the new version to show up in EPEL? This is > > my preferred installation mechanism. Currently, 2.0.8 is the latest > > version available there. > > "Whene

Re: Review Board 2.0.11 is released!

Stephen: > Review Board 2.0.11 packages for Fedora 21 and EPEL 7 are now on their > way to their respective testing repositories. Any update on Review Board 2.X packages for RHEL 6? I know that you were working on it a few months ago. Alfred -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.re

Re: Review Board 2.0.11 is released!

On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:48 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote: > Stephen: > > > Review Board 2.0.11 packages for Fedora 21 and EPEL 7 are now on their > > way to their respective testing repositories. > > Any update on Review Board 2.X packages for RHEL 6? I know that you were > working on it a f

A few bugs/wishlist items

Hi, There seem to an issue when using "mass close" capability of RB: I selected a number of review requests and applied 'close as discarded', after a 'thanks' message box, pressed F5 (reload the page). In the loaded page, a few other (previously unselected) review requests became immediately

Re: A few bugs/wishlist items

Alexey, Can you file these in the issue tracker? Thanks, -David On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote: > Hi, > > There seem to an issue when using "mass close" capability of RB: I > selected a number of review requests and applied 'close as discarded', > after a 'thanks' message

Re: How to migrate RB 2.0.10 to a new server

Any idea guys? I do not know why is looking for manage.py in that path. manage.py as far as I know is a django component. On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:15:51 PM UTC+11, MoonWalker wrote: > > Well I installed using easy_install and no complains during the > installation. Now I have another issu

Re: How to migrate RB 2.0.10 to a new server

Can you show me the entire console output for this? As it is, its not making a lot of sense to me. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: MoonWalker R

Re: Error 500 on opening a review request.

1.7.7.1 is quite old (and if you're still using post-review, rbtools is also probably old). Is it possible to upgrade to at least the latest 1.7.x version? -David On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:57 AM satish singh wrote: > RB Version: Review Board 1.7.7.1 > > User is getting error 500 on opening a rev

Re: How to migrate RB 2.0.10 to a new server

Hi Chrisitan, I attached a snapshot of my console. On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:00:00 AM UTC+11, chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: > > Can you show me the entire console output for th

Re: Review Board 2.0.11 is released!

On Oct 28, 2014, at 15:15, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > No progress has been made on that, I'm afraid. It's a bigger undertaking > than it seems and I've frankly been swamped with other work > (particularly the Fedora 21 release). I'd love to have someone help with > this… I don’t know what kind o

Re: How to migrate RB 2.0.10 to a new server

Did you use dumpdb or dumpdata to construct the dump file? Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: MoonWalker Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > Date

Re: How to migrate RB 2.0.10 to a new server

dumpdata On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:55:47 AM UTC+11, chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: > > Did you use dumpdb or dumpdata to construct the dump file? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com > Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org > Beanbag, Inc. - htt

Re: How to migrate RB 2.0.10 to a new server

Well I was able to by pass that issue :-). I generate/apply both dumpdb and dumpdata without any issues (I had to Open the dump file in a text editor and find all the entries whose "model" is "contenttypes.contenttype" or "scmtools.tool", and delete those entries.). Seems like the data is t