Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5827#issuecomment-98046237
[Test build #31518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31518/consoleFull)
for PR 5827 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5827#issuecomment-98046206
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5807#issuecomment-98048723
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5807#issuecomment-98048706
[Test build #31508 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31508/consoleFull)
for PR 5807 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-98048853
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5807#issuecomment-98048724
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29490616
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3913#issuecomment-98039213
Hey @sryza and @srowen, sorry to vacillate here, but after looking at this
more I really do think it would be better to just make this a static method on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040339
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040337
[Test build #31514 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31514/consoleFull)
for PR 5825 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040340
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98040705
[Test build #742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/742/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040694
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040703
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98040673
[Test build #739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/739/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5680#issuecomment-98040664
[Test build #738 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/738/consoleFull)
for PR 5680 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98040685
[Test build #740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/740/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98043065
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98043027
[Test build #31515 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31515/consoleFull)
for PR 5825 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98043060
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5826#issuecomment-98045575
[Test build #31517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31517/consoleFull)
for PR 5826 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#discussion_r29489695
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -135,6 +158,24 @@ def sparkPartitionId():
return Column(sc._jvm.functions.sparkPartitionId())
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5826#issuecomment-98045399
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5826#issuecomment-98045404
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98046158
[Test build #742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/742/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98046130
[Test build #741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/741/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5827#issuecomment-98046201
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#issuecomment-98046892
[Test build #31506 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31506/consoleFull)
for PR 5430 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#issuecomment-98046897
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29489965
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29489970
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#issuecomment-98046896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-98049143
[Test build #31519 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31519/consoleFull)
for PR 5802 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5732#discussion_r29490309
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -40,21 +40,30 @@ private[streaming]
class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-98048860
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5685#issuecomment-98049642
@andrewor14 if you can update this I think this one is good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29490512
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1311,6 +1329,28 @@ def fill(self, value, subset=None):
fill.__doc__ = DataFrame.fillna.__doc__
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5680#discussion_r29490484
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/InputInfoTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29490595
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -868,6 +875,17 @@ def fillna(self, value, subset=None):
return
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-9805
Can you also update __init__.py in sql to add them to the python doc?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29490587
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1311,6 +1329,28 @@ def fill(self, value, subset=None):
fill.__doc__ = DataFrame.fillna.__doc__
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-98051031
[Test build #31511 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31511/consoleFull)
for PR 5802 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-98051037
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5729#issuecomment-98039899
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5729#issuecomment-98039864
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5729#issuecomment-98040016
[Test build #31513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31513/consoleFull)
for PR 5729 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#discussion_r29488956
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,7 +475,52 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5812#issuecomment-98040916
Alright. Merging this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98045371
[Test build #735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/735/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5819
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5729#issuecomment-98047185
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5729#issuecomment-98047184
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5729#issuecomment-98047173
[Test build #31513 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31513/consoleFull)
for PR 5729 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5823#issuecomment-98048164
[Test build #31507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31507/consoleFull)
for PR 5823 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5823#issuecomment-98048198
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5823#issuecomment-98048196
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5823#issuecomment-98049198
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5823#issuecomment-98049199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5823#issuecomment-98049185
[Test build #31510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31510/consoleFull)
for PR 5823 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29490543
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040217
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98040243
[Test build #736 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/736/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040255
[Test build #31514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31514/consoleFull)
for PR 5825 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98040269
[Test build #737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/737/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98040208
[Test build #735 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/735/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040229
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#discussion_r29489052
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,7 +475,52 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
assert(results
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#discussion_r29489165
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,7 +475,52 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824#issuecomment-98040695
[Test build #741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/741/consoleFull)
for PR 5824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98040726
[Test build #31515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31515/consoleFull)
for PR 5825 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5812
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#issuecomment-98045210
[Test build #31516 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31516/consoleFull)
for PR 5825 at commit
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5826
[SPARK-7287] enabled fixed test
@andrewor14 @pwendell I reenabled the test. Let's see if it's fixed. I did
also notice that `--jars` started to fail after this was ignored though in the
JIRA. like
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5827
[SPARK-5213] [SQL] Pluggable SQL Parser Support
based on #4015, added sqlParser in sqlcontext to pass mima tests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5825#discussion_r29489932
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1311,6 +1329,28 @@ def fill(self, value, subset=None):
fill.__doc__ = DataFrame.fillna.__doc__
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5680#discussion_r29490701
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/InputInfoTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-98051036
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5533#issuecomment-97974076
[Test build #31445 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31445/consoleFull)
for PR 5533 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5601#issuecomment-97974234
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5533#issuecomment-97974104
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5811#issuecomment-97974334
though I wonder if instead it should fail (with a good error) if you give a
bad value, rather than just logging a message and ignoring the request.
thought @marmbrus?
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5809#discussion_r29472362
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -350,7 +345,6 @@ private class LeastSquaresAggregator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5533#issuecomment-97974105
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5432#discussion_r29473085
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -96,33 +99,39 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5819#issuecomment-97975956
[Test build #31458 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31458/consoleFull)
for PR 5819 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5798#issuecomment-97975817
Definitely do not change the equality function for `AttributeReference`. I
did this in an early version of catalyst and the result can be quite confusing.
`equals()`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5819#issuecomment-97975884
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5819#issuecomment-97975897
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5432#discussion_r29473444
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerBackend.scala ---
@@ -41,4 +41,11 @@ private[spark] trait SchedulerBackend {
*/
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#discussion_r29473972
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,7 +475,58 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
assert(results
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#discussion_r29474028
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -475,7 +475,58 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
assert(results
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-97982237
[Test build #31459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31459/consoleFull)
for PR 5636 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-97982240
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-97982241
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-97983530
@kayousterhout -- I think there is just really minor stuff left, do you
want to a take quick look? I will check it out and try it on some failure
generating cases I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-97984827
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-97984826
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-97989606
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5802#issuecomment-97989605
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
601 - 700 of 1263 matches
Mail list logo
